Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Connacht Team Talk Thread VI - Some like it TOH

1601602604606607633

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭CowboyTed


    To put in Context…

    Lions have lost one game in Ellis park in the URC this season. The Bulls who are the distance of Galway to Ennis away from them.

    Just to show how hard it is in the Highveld. The Bulls haven't lost to a Northern Hemisphere side in the URC in just over two years.

    I think one of the main problems is it impossible to acclimatise to the altitude in the timeframe of a week between games. Especially since you play one game at sea level and the other at 1730m (Carrantohill is 1038m, Ben Nevis is 1385m). Try just haven't a real clue how there bodies will react to the thin air, it feels normal when walking around but totally different when running, Pertoria is at 1340m and used to goto the gym and it was quite weird…

    Could hit the golf ball well over 300 yards which was great…

    Personally I think it might be easier on our teams if we play the Highveld games together on the one tour. Might be tough but you have far better chance to aclimatise. Sharks are the only team to win away on the Highveld this year in the URC.

    Connacht had the joint lowest loosing margin this year against the Lion (at Home) this season in the URC outside their derby game with the Bulls. They both beat each other away.

    Contrast that to Bulls away form:

    They lost 5 games and won 5. Looks better but the game against us they red card was given to the wrong player and we lost by 2 and they won away to Lions.

    The Lions record is

    Lost 4, won 2 and one draw…. (the two wins were the Sharks and Bulls (again on the Highveld). So Lions have not won a game in Europe this season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Yeah, I remember a few years ago Leinster played there, and a couple of players (John McKee was definitely one of them) had to come off in the first 15 mins just feeling so physically unwell. The provinces have probably gotten a bit better the last couple of years at developing a plan to cope with it to some extent, but as you said, it's probably next to impossible in the space of a week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭RonnieL


    I'm all for home advantage, but I actually think having a team based at altitude is unfair, given the lead times opposition have. It doesn't do the league any favors either, with a lot of blowout score lines. Anyway, it's done, and a 5 point haul from the trip to South Africa is excellent, and as it turned out, really needed.

    I really wanted us to progress in the challenge cup, but having a week off now is crucial. With travel from South Africa, a game this coming weekend would have been a killer. Looking forward to the Munster game already.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭CowboyTed


    I say as a minimum is you have to empty the tank at that altitude using strength and movement. You have to get to know your body and its limits or you can go red like the Leinster lads did there. Over do it and be wiped in 10 min.

    Then you are trying to set up a defence without know which ones are suffering more than others. It is clear now that Cian can go all day at altitude while Hurley Langton and Jansen can't be as effective. They could be with more prep time..

    Some of the younger players looked like they thought they were in a car crash..

    I think you are probably better to play both Highveld teams together… That way you could send out some players a week before giveing them two weeks to adjust for the first game there… These teams are no world beaters at sea level, players aclimatise…

    AI :

    Acclimatization and Performance Guidelines (1700m):

    • Initial Days (Days 1–5): Athletes will likely feel lethargic, experience increased breathing rates, and faster fluid loss. The first 24–48 hours are generally considered better for competition than 3–5 days later, as the immediate adrenaline response helps, whereas 4 days later the body is heavily fatigued by the adaptation process

    Optimal Acclimatization (7–14 days):

     Research on football (soccer) players suggests that at least 2 weeks is necessary to restore near sea-level competitive performance and avoid significant drops in high-intensity running.

    Key Adaptation Processes:

     During the first 7–10 days, the body increases EPO production, leading to higher red blood cell counts, which enables better oxygen transport to muscles.

    Alternative Strategy:

     If a 10–14 day stay is not possible, some athletes choose to arrive less than 24 hours before competing to avoid the initial, most intense phase of fatigue, relying on sea-level fitness.

    So what is our strategy?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭CowboyTed


    Some teams used to complain the Sportsground was a big advantage for Connacht with the conditions and the wind.

    We are nothing compared to the Highveld.

    My purposed solution is…

    Teams play both Highveld games together.

    We try and give a week off (where possible) to teams to acclimatise before the highveld tour… This is more possible than it looks… 8 teams play away, they play in pairs, one wek Lions , next Bulls. So you need to find generally week not playing before. The first week of Competition is one, Nov Internationals cant be used(runs into Champions Cup, but could get a compromise by one of the International teams) so could be two, Week after 6 nations is three, Semi Finals in Champions Cup (Perect for Dragoins and Zebra)…

    This gives northern Hemisphere a fighting chance..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,997 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I think it's clear that the reason a lot didn't start was they'd reactions in training to the conditions.

    The performances of Prendergast could see him starting for Ireland in November. He's been incredible, best I've ever seen him and that's saying



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    He's having a superb season. His ball carrying looks to have visibly improved significantly; his tackling and rucking have been of the very highest quality. His leadership has been really good too. He was already a very good international quality player at the start of the season, but he's one of many who have notably improved under Lancaster this season.

    Given he was already highly thought of enough to feature in the big two games of the 6N (France & England), I'd say he's 100% in the mix to feature prominently for Ireland this summer. Ryan Baird has been injured consistently, and Prendergast for me this season has pushed ahead of two guys in Tom Ahern and Cormac Izuchukwu with his performances.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭lavrenti


    Spot on on Prendergast. Having a wonderful season and should now be Ireland's starting No 6. Real pity but I can't see us making top 8 now, even with two wins and 8 or 9 pts. Munster are the worst team in the current top 8 but because of Ulster having to throw the game last week they now probably have enough points. We've been very unlucky that Cardiff have snuck low scoring wins against Scarlets and Ospreys and Ulster will surely win one of their remaining two games against either off-form Glasgow or Stormers who are poor away. Bulls and Lions have enough points. It is tough, but there's been great progress this season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 Rafabio DaSilva


    All the talk about unfair advantage the South African teams have with altitude is valid but tbf these teams do also have a lot more travelling to do.

    My biggest gripe with the league is the fixture format. It is still completely unfair that Connacht have to play Munster Ulster and Leinster twice.

    I know the reason why financially but at the same time it does make a farce of a league table where all teams should be judged by virtue of playing the same schedule.

    There must be some better way of managing it.

    Off the top of my head you pool two of the conferences (rotate each year). For example Ireland and Scotland/Italy year 1. Play each team in your conference home and away. Table then ranked 1-8 all teams have a knock out game against teams in the other conference 1 vs 8 etc.

    8 winners go to quarters and 8 losers go to a secondary bowl type competition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,997 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    We are well capable of taking ten points from our last two games and if we do that we'll make it.

    It's all about the Munster game.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,437 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Cup:
    1st Conf1 v 4th Conf2 etc

    Bowl:
    5th Conf1 v 8th Conf2 etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭ElisaAtWar


    It's been such an amazing season no matter what happens. We have seen the likes of Harry West just being incredible at outside centre and on the wing, we have seen Billy Bohan and Sam Illo become our first choice locks. we have seen Darragh Murray really develop, we have seen Shane Jennings take balls out of the sky that he had no right to, we have seen Cian Prendergast, SHL and Sean Jansen become a back row to be feared, we have seen Sean Naughton take a grip of the Nr10 starting spot as many wanted at the start of the season.

    The only negative from this season is to lose who is now our confirmed first choice scrum half. It's such a pity that he couldn't wait a bit to see how the season would pan out. It's such a shame to see him go.

    Just to add to this we have seen our defense, which was absent last year, suddenly being one of the best in the URC. And our attack is really clicking these days. And Bundee is feeling the joy as he is playing great rugby. What is not to like being a Connacht supporter these days. And that is only on Year 1 of Stuart Lancaster.

    I did use advice given and ask median ages for Leinster and Munster for last weekend which was 28 and 29. So 24 for Connacht is promising for our future

    Post edited by ElisaAtWar on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,997 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    And our academy is producing more and more. I'm hearing great things about Max Flynn from friends in Galway. Fiachna Barrett has been on the bench recently as has Matthew Victory.

    We've got Diarmaid O'Connell, Eanna McCarthy and Bobby Power to name a few talents in the academy. We are stacked with front and back row players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 150 ✭✭Purist98


    Duinn Maguire, Irish 20s and UCD hooker, is Connacht bound according to Gerry Thornley. Any word on who else is in line to join the academy?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 349 ✭✭kita99


    Barrett'carry and scrum-working was excellent at v Lions match. He may go to 'Ireland' someday with Bohan and Illo. And I think Gavin should simply play at this time and care for ball-putting after being tackled. Please don't give any penalties. His tackling is always strong and attractive enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    This data isn't quite accurate. Like a lot of things from AI, you need to double check it to make sure it's getting it right.

    For Connacht, on the weekend, the median age of the starting XV was 26.6, the median age for the full 23 was 26.0, and the median age for the finishing XV was 25.3.

    For Leinster, the median age of the starting XV was 28.4, the full 23 was 27.0 and the finishing 23 was 25.7.

    For Munster, the median age of the starting XV was 29.3, the full 23 was 27.7 and the finishing 23 was 26.2.

    For Ulster, the median age of the starting XV was 24.6, the full 23 was 24.6 and the finishing 23 was 24.6.

    It was a young Connacht side finishing the game, undoubtedly, but older than the Ulster side that started and finished, and broadly of similar age to the Leinster side that finished the game too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,997 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Why are you using the median to decide who has the younger squad?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    The post I was responding to was proposing to use the median age (though it was incorrect). Generally speaking, the median is more accurate for things like this than using the average, as it removes some of the outliers.

    Using averages, instead of medians doesn't massively change the picture:

    • Connacht - average age of starting XV: 27.1, average age of full 23: 25.9, average age of finishing XV: 25.1
    • Leinster: average age of starting XV: 29.2, average age of full 23: 27.6, average age of finishing XV: 25.9
    • Munster: average age of starting XV: 29.6, average age of full 23: 28.2, average age of finishing XV: 26.9
    • Ulster: average age of starting XV: 25.0, average age of full 23: 25.5, average age of finishing XV: 25.6

    Another way of looking at it, would be the quantity of younger players in the respective squads.

    Connacht:

    • 3 players under 25yo in the starting XV, 5 in the full 23.
    • 12 players under 30yo in the starting XV, 20 in the full 23

    Leinster:

    • 2 players under 25yo in the starting XV, 6 in the full 23
    • 10 players under 30yo in the starting XV, 18 in the full 23

    Munster:

    • 0 players under 25yo in the starting XV, 4 in the full 23
    • 9 players under 30yo in the starting XV, 16 in the full 23

    Ulster:

    • 9 players under 25yo in the starting XV, 13 in the full 23
    • 14 players under 30yo in the starting XV, 20 in the full 23


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,054 ✭✭✭Zeugnis


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/124427516#Comment_124427516

    Thanks for this.

    Do I recall correctly that you produced an analysis of minutes played by Academy players in the respective provinces? Can you point me towards the relevant posts, I've tried searching to no avail…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I just recently refreshed this data actually:

    Connacht leading the way this year. Data split as follows:

    Connacht:

    • 2,025 total mins to Academy players, 49 games, 16 starts
    • 7 different players utilised
    • Concentration: Sean Naughton (45%), Billy Bohan (26%), Fiachna Barrett (13%), Matthew Victory (10%), Daniel Ryan (3%), Sean Walsh (2%), Albert Lindner (1%)

    Munster:

    • 796 total mins to Academy players, 17 games, 9 starts
    • 5 different players utilised
    • Concentration: Ben O'Connor (54%), Sean Edogbo (32%), Ronan Foxe (8%), Tom Wood (4%), Jake O'Riordan (2%)

    Ulster:

    • 1,170 total mins to Academy players, 24 games, 13 starts
    • 6 different players utilised
    • Concentration: Bryn Ward (66%), Tom McAlliser (12%), Jonny Scott (7%), Aitzol King (7%), James McKillop (5%), Tom Brigg (4%)

    Leinster:

    • 1,559 total mins to Academy players, 37 games, 20 starts
    • 9 different players utilised
    • Concentration: Joshua Kenny (54%), Ruben Moloney (11%), Conor O'Tighearnaigh (10%), Andrew Sparrow (9%), Hugo McLaughlin (8%), Ciaran Mangan (5%), Alan Spicer (2%), Caspar Gabriel (0.5%), Josh Ericson (0.5%)

    Concentration above represents the % of minutes that player represents. In all of the teams, a handful of players are representing the lion's share of the minutes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,997 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I'm of the opinion that taking off the two youngest and two oldest and doing the average of the rest gives the clearest picture. Kind of like the median but a fuller picture.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,878 ✭✭✭realhorrorshow


    Sean Naughton could end up playing over 1,000 mins this year, thought that might be a first but Scott Penny played 1,005 back in 20/21.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,997 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Is this in all rugby played? If Naughton plays two full games he'll have 1075 minutes including challenge cup games. Obviously if we make the playoffs he'll have more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Doing that doesn't materially change the picture either:

    Connacht:

    • First XV (removing Jack Carty, Joe Joyce, John Devine, Hugh Gavin): 26.9
    • Full 23 (removing Jack Carty, Joe Joyce, Billy Bohan, Sean Naughton): 25.7

    Leinster:

    • First XV (removing Jamison Gibson Park, Jack Conan, Conor O'Tighearnaigh, Jamie Osborne): 28.8
    • Full 23: (removing Jamison Gibson Park, Jack Conan, Gus McCarthy, Fintan Gunne): 27.4

    Munster:

    • First XV: (removing Tadhg Beirne, JJ Hanrahan, Andrew Smith, Tom Ahern): 29.5
    • Full 23: (removing Tadhg Beirne, Michael Ala'alatoa, Ben O'Donovan, Brian Gleeson): 28.2

    Ulster:

    • First XV: (removing Eric O'Sullivan, Michael Lowry, Tom Brigg, James McKillop): 24.9
    • Full 23: (removing John Andrew, Dave Shanahan, Jonny Scott, Tom McAllister): 25.2


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Outside chance, though unlikely, that Josh Kenny could get there too. He's 165 mins short, so needs to feature in 2.5 games effectively. I can see him getting close but probably not quite getting there assuming no injuries (and given James Lowe is healthy again now too).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭CowboyTed


    It has been a great season , no matter what… There is a lot of ifs and buts. i.e. If we had a kicker at the start of the season…

    Saying that, we need at least one 120kg+ (19st+) lock OR someone that can push like one to play No. 4.

    We have done wonders this season against bigger packs but Montpellier shows us where the next level is… Joe Joyce is our heaviest lock at 119kg, that makes Darragh Murray next biggest at 115Kg.

    That makes him the same weight as Leinster's lightest Lock, James Ryan (Baird is backrow).

    Munster have two locks 120kg+ but Ahern is 177kg as well.

    Ulster much like Leinster have there lightest at 115kg.. One over 120kg.

    Just having one can help against the South African teams who normally have 3 players, 120kg+.

    Joe Joyce was our No. 4 when we knew it was coming, get one to replace Joyce and we could be good. Two to be comfortable.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,403 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Darragh Murray next biggest at 115Kg

    Only shortly heavier than some south African centers 😊



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,878 ✭✭✭realhorrorshow


    David Walsh seems to have the frame to carry decent size, I hope we see some of him next season.

    Mahon Ronan is apparently getting cut by Leinster, he might be worth a look. Similar sort of frame to Joe Joyce. I thought Conor O'Tighernaigh would be a very logical signing a few months ago, but circumstances have evolved in his favour at Leinster..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Yeah, saw the rumours around Mahon Ronan getting cut. Not hugely surprising given there are some good players like coming in in that position in Dylan McNeice and probably Artur Smykovskiy.

    Donnacha McGuire (Rory McGuire's younger brother) would probably be a good pick up for someone. He's been good for UCD and the Irish U20s this year and has a lot of size.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 864 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    We can't be finished at prop either. 6 won't cut it for next year. I would expect to see at least one of Lasisi, Buckley or dooley to resign and hopefully add a few to the academy.



Advertisement
Advertisement