Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Irish politics discussion thread

1294295297299300309

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I'm sure if he was a current TD the FF party leadership would certainly sanction him for it

    I wouldn’t be at all sure of that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,089 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Sold.

    And if that doesn't convince people, look at the Healy-Rae gombeenism of recent weeks.

    A large part of the sclerosis in Irish politics and public service delivery is expecting glorified county councillors to rise above the parish pump and act in the national interest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Maybe don’t reward them with government roles and ministries. Only gonna end in tears.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,942 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Oh I'm a fan though I'd go to the mixed system. Half direct and half list. Double the number of votes needed for a constituency TD which makes parish pump stuff harder and have half of them as purely national TDs.

    But I can't see anyone proposing that constitutional amendment anytime soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,089 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Its not a constitutional amendment we need. Its a complete overhaul of the whole Constitution as we approach its centenary, to enable a Second Republic, and reintegrate the six counties into an enlarged state and make it fit to serve probably 10 million people by the end of the 21st century.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,955 ✭✭✭rock22


    A list system would be dreadful. A total undermining of the idea of "representation" where the elected TD is decided by a party office in a remote,( Dublin probably) location.

    Why do courts accept these character references in the first place?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    They don't necessarily accept them. Its an abused privelege and should be above politics imo, but I'd accept that some individuals might due to circumstances commit offences that are totally out of character and previous character references might inform a judge of this.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 56,277 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    image.png

    my wife had a different experience to the one claimed by MLMcD there. walked down o'connell street and said the atmosphere was oppressive with an air that **** could kick off at any time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    Explain to me which law Glennon broke. You can't just decide to punish people for doing things that are legal but that you personally don't like.

    Glennon was a private citizen who wrote a character reference. Incredibly stupid, incredibly naive, morally repugnant, but perfectly legal.

    Do you believe in administering justice outside the law?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    AGAIN you put words in people’s mouths and then have a rant. Pretty pathetic tbh.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    Which ministry did Jim Glennon hold?

    I know there is huge disappointment out there that the TD wasn't someone prominent and closely linked to the current administration, but inventing a whole deal of nonsense to somehow rescue something to attack the government on doesn't look good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    You were seeking punishment for Glennon doing what he did. As he broke no law, you must be seeking extra-judicial action, or you didn't understand the legal situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Stop digging.
    If he did nothing ‘wrong’ in your eyes, carry on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Read the post I was answering, which was not referring to Jim Glennon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    Now you are inventing things that never happened.

    Let me remind you of what you said:

    "Perhaps, proper penalties for them when they 'fix things' they shouldn't be fixing would be a start?"

    This was in the context of Jim Glennon, a private citizen, providing a character reference for a horrible person. Explain exactly what he did that was illegal requiring a punishment.

    And in response to your little dig about me carrying on as if he did nothing wrong, let me remind you of what I said:

    "Glennon was a private citizen who wrote a character reference. Incredibly stupid, incredibly naive, morally repugnant, but perfectly legal."

    I have no idea who you are, yet you appear to have adopted a very aggressive approach when you are challenged for some very strange posts that you make. Again, explain to the rest of us in very simple words, what penalties you envisage for TDs and private citizens who make lawful representations on behalf of others?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I NEVER said boo about him doing something illegal.
    Now stop trying to infer I did please.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,785 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    I know several people who say O'Connell street was nicer without the traffic. There was also the incident with the Muslim Sisters of Eire

    "As we were finishing our service, we were approached by a group of five or six individuals carrying Irish flags. They began shouting xenophobic rhetoric, telling us this country is 'only for the Irish,' that we don't belong here, and that we should 'go home,'" said the statement.

    "In a beautiful show of solidarity, those around the GPO immediately spoke up, asserting that we are Irish. However, the situation turned hostile."

    https://www.dublinlive.ie/news/dublin-news/muslim-sisters-eire-intimidated-oconnell-33753381



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 56,277 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    my wife's reaction was ''would it have been anything to do with the massive garda presence, Mary Lou?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    So what penalties should he face?

    What penalties should others who have done nothing illegal face?

    You have called for penalties for lawful actions by people, on what basis do you call for that?

    Some kind of vigilante justice?

    You have said that what Glennon did was wrong, and that representations made by TDs on behalf of constituents are wrong, and they they should face penalties. What exactly are you calling for and can you clarify? Do you believe in mob justice, to people being put in stocks and shamed for doing something you believe is wrong but is not illegal?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Again, I said : ‘fixing things they should not be fixing’ is wrong.
    I made no comment on ‘making representations’

    Read posts properly

    I think political parties have penalties for people who do the ‘wrong’ thing. Nothing unusual about that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    What does "fixing things they should not be fixing" mean? Are they electricians trying to fix a plumbing problem?

    I am baffled by your posts. You seem to say a whole heap of nothing to have a dig at some politician/political party for the sake of having a dig.

    Other than what Glennon did being incredibly stupid, incredibly naive, morally repugnant but perfectly legal, what penalty should he face?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,218 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Mod: you also made reference to sanctions, and stated that the 'it's not illegal' stuff is just a way to excuse it"
    Possibly dancing on the head of a pin there.
    Let's just leave it at that everyone and move on.

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    Mary-Lou was clearly talking to the wrong women.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,942 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    What an utterly, utterly bizarre angle to take.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    If his wife was anything other than a Caucasian woman from rural Ireland, her experience was typical of what happened during the blockade.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 56,277 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i assumed Podge's reaction was to MLMcD's claims rather than my wife's reaction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    Apologies to him then.

    It seems I have been blinded by the tribal defence of MLMD that seems to be so prevalent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,318 ✭✭✭Good loser


    Just heard Eoin O Broin there on the Tonight Show saying he/they were opposed to the Carbon Tax because 'there was no alternative for those that it was levied on' This objection to that tax is nonsensical for numerous reasons; SF defend their opposition to it on this basis on many radio/TV shows and interviews. He instanced people in Adamstown for example who apparently have a train service but they can't got on the carriages because They're Full. That's first class raimeis imo. Nobody on the panel challenged him on the basis of his opposition - even that self styled climate 'expert' John Gibbons.

    O BRoin and Sinn Fein should have learned by now that an essential feature of a fair tax is that it CANNOT be avoided. A carbon tax encourages energy conservation e.g. those with cars choose electric models, or smaller fuel efficient models or drive less or drive more carefully.

    On another point I notice SF objection to water charges in the North currently is because 'taxes are already high enough' None of the 'double taxation' or 'we've already paid for it' which they used down here (dishonestly) at the time.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,218 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I dont think SF have had any concern about environmental matters so hardly suprosed to see their opposition to carbon tax.

    It shoukd also be noted that they are quite opposed to property tax. That is, except in Northern Ireland where they increased the annual property taxes which were already much higher than in the RoI!

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,058 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    He made a point nobody could challenge him on because there was no rational challenge. If you claim a tax s designed to change behaviour and not revenue gathering make sure the people you are trying to change have adequate alternatives, It's not rocket science and you will hear the same problem all over rural Ireland, not just Adamstown.



Advertisement
Advertisement