Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Has urban Ireland finally a voice?

124678

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33 Tornaedo


    If they are talking about foreign tourists to Ireland then it's very unbelievable. Also they don't define what's considered a local and what's a tourist. Is someone living outside the city that visits it considered a tourist or a visitor, e.g Bray, Celbridge maybe even Swords?

    Also, Dublinlive.ie is provided as a source link, which is notoriously sensationalist, in fact you'd get totally excoriated for using that source on the r/Dublin or r/Ireland subs on Reddit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,360 ✭✭✭Everlong1


    There's a bigger issue here about politicians having the balls to tell people the inconvenient truths that they don't want to hear, and it's a probably the single biggest problem in any democratic political system in any country. I warmed to Leo Varadkar the minute he started to come to national prominence and it was because he was one of the rarest examples I've ever seen in Ireland of a politican who didn't subscribe to the whole "tell everybody what they want to hear and promise them everything" style of politics as mastered and practiced for at least 40 odd years now by Fianna Fail. I'm not naive, I know politicans have to court voters in some fashion but I would instantly have more respect and trust for a politician who told me the hard unvarnished truth about something instead of telling me what I want to hear. I'd like to believe that there's a large cohort of other voters out there who feel similarly and who have never been served well by the endless procession of pothole fixers who have dominated Irish political life since independence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,854 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I remember a pre election leaders debate where I was impressed by and despaired for Brendan Howlin. Was the only guy telling the truth about taxes and not promising to lower them.

    Farming will become the mining of Ireland. It was mining areas were the big drivers of Farage and La Pen. Some weird quest to return to a past that never was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,337 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    A strange turn of events. In the UK the mining areas were those that really hated Thatcher and the right wing. Now you are saying they are right wing themselves.

    Happened here already. It was a lot of the real lefties who wanted free everything for everyone who are now the ones flying tricolurs off lampposts, and telling "foreigners" to go back where they came from, even though they are often from here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,854 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Yes. It's the north east of both Englind and France that are consistently the most UKIP and FN.

    That tricolour crowd are too thick to be left or right and regardless of what the parties telling them what to do say they are populist parties not left or right.

    What we are seeing now in rural Ireland is similar to other countries which is an anti green party that the racists will attempt to hijack. Independent Ireland are basically becoming Barnaby Joyce.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 56,288 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    to shoehorn a related point in here - i think this is the nub of the dislike many (most?) people have for the green party.

    most political parties operate on a 'whatever you want, and moar of it' approach to winning votes. but the GP operated on a 'whoah, this moar of everything is not a good idea, actually' and the response from many was 'who the hell are you to tell me i can't have more of what i want?'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,003 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    And look at who was least put out by the recent fuel price increases and protests - EV drivers and cyclists.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,692 ✭✭✭✭cj maxx




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76,155 ✭✭✭✭L1011




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 56,288 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    I'm not sure what the point you're trying to make is?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 4,710 Mod ✭✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    I think rural Ireland often feels talked down to by the Greens and sometimes Labour especially on issues like sustainability. I personally think the EU reforms e.g. the Nitrates Directive, are necessary. But I think we also need a Just Transition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,584 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    County Dun Laoghaire -Rathdown. It's part of a decades long plan to try and undo some of the British Empire Era planning to make the area better run. Dún Laohaire -Rathdown was a Dáil constituency created by the Electoral Amendment Act 1947 coterminous with the former Rathdown No. 1 rural district.It's a county made up of the Kingdom of Dun Laoghaire and part of the barony of Rathdown. It's a successor county (one of three) to county Dublin. County Fingal was also the same. County Dublin, was disestablished in 1994. It became Dublin City (Dublin City Council), County South Dublin, County Fingal and County Dun Laoghaire -Rathdown. Fingal, South dublin, County Dun Laoghaire - Rathdown now have their own councils and electorate districts. Basically if you live in these areas you should know your burrough etc from who your councillors are etc. The name "Dún Laoghaire–Rathdown" was given to the electoral county which was created in 1985. And it was made an administrative county in 1994 as mentioned. As an administrative county it is run by Dún Laoghaire–Rathdown County Council (DLRCC). It now has six electoral areas and returns 40 councillors. For Dáil Eireann it is divided into 2 constituencies returning 4 and 3 TDs.

    Why was this done you might ask? Dublin Council became too large and unwieldy. To cope with population growth. To simplify and localise administration rather than have it centralised and potentially badly managed.

    It was never really meant to be one large county anyway.

    Its all very interesting historically. And I am making a very complex story short. But when the British power of the pale was established the Gaels ran to the Dublin Wicklow mountains. And the only reason a lot of this area was made part of Dublin was simply to control it. Thus a lot of the infrastructure was not there to make life easier but to make it hostile to the local people. This includes things like roads etc. Military Road (now the R115) for example was only built to allow the British Army to clear the area and mountains of rebels. It wasn't built to make travel easier in the way more normal infrastructure is. I mention it because its one of many ways the country stands on a pre-existing framework that wasn't created for it's own well-being and there are consequences. Military Road was only built in 1809. It was built to conquer and operate a series of checkpoints and turnpike roads to harass locals. Four barracks were built along the road at Glencree, Laragh,Glenmalure, and Aghavannagh. Interestingly its an area that inspired many rebels from Robert Emmet to Padraig Pearse, Micheal Dwyer etc. The area was synonamous with the Mountainee Men and also the ascendency rebels. Thus a lot of the oldest infrastructure is hostile and partic a lot of the infrastructure that connected it to the city. The R115 itself is a bit of a rollercoaster its meant to be. It is why its quite deserted a lot.

    British and Irish towns are planned rather differently. British towns tend to follow a square. Whereas Irish towns are on a crossroads or a ribbon pattern. You can tell when the true pale ends when you start seeing villages and towns on crossroads rather than squares. It's very noticeable. Basically when you see towns on the crossroads instead of on a square you are leaving a territory that is completely under British control.

    DLR is quite different from a just suburb or Dublin City. The physical landscape ranges form an extensive coastline (17km) through extensive suburbs to agricultural lands and uplands of outstanding natural beauty. Approximately 53% of land is given over to urban developed/developing areas whilst 47% may be described as rural. The goal was to be able to administrate better to the area because it's needs were different from Dublin City as its landscape was different. This was planned even before the 1940s as the old ira used the dublin mountains a lot and were familiar with it. Well that could be myth.

    Old Dublin was a lot smaller before. Sorry for the mammoth post I just thought the whole thing was interesting and Im doing research how colonial infrastructure was made to be hostile to local people! 🙂Sorry to bore everyone with my special interests.

    IMO it needs a less English Sounding name tho. lol



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,434 ✭✭✭MacDanger


    Does this not belong in the wtf thread?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 56,288 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Why was this done you might ask? Dublin Council became too large and unwieldy. To cope with population growth. To simplify and localise administration rather than have it centralised and potentially badly managed.

    dublin is not an exceptionally large city and county. why does it need four different local authorities?

    or a wider question - why do we need so many local authorities? (this is your periodic reminder that the entire population of leitrim, and the entire population of longford, could be accommodated together in croke park, to watch the unlikely event of a leitrim vs longford all ireland final - yet each has their own council)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,584 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    I cannot answer for every county. But the population of the 'Greater Dublin Area' or the 3 counties you mean and Dublin city is 40 % of the country. Its 2.5 million in a state of about 5 million.

    Yes it needed to be divided badly it helped alleviate some of the stress on the ambulance service for one. You had some of the wealthiest parts of the city using up the services of the inner city for certain administrative purposes.

    Firstly we are not talking about leitrim. And this attitude is part of the issue. People comparing two entirely diff parts of the country with very little in common thinking they can compare them.

    People feel better about paying taxes when they see them spent in their own local areas. Also these areas of Dublin need completely different planning as DLR has much mountainous regions and coastal regions. The cost of upkeeping roads in the mountains is HUGE in comparison to the inner city. And it was hard to justify why people needed them to people paying local taxes in the inner city. Also it was a drain on poorer parts of the inner city when DLR could fund it better itself. Surely you can agree on that? You must understand much of DLR is mountains and coastline. Infrastructure needs diff investment and gets worndown quicker. But its one of the wealthiest parts of the country and the inner city has some of the poorest. Asking people in the inner city council estates to fund roads in the dublin mountains that need constant upkeep that they never use probably wouldnt go down well. If you get me?

    This area can fund itself.

    I used to be sceptical but then I saw it WORKS.

    Look both Tallaght and Killiney are south Dublin by your definition .. should people of Tallaght be funding the roads of killiney ? You will say no tax the wealthy but killiney as a coastline is going to need more repair because of that every year. It just is. It would end up being a drain.

    I don't know if its an identity thing people have of being Dubliners or what Dublin is. But administratively it does make sense in my opinion. But Im open to other opinions.

    Basically it was only through british rule that the counties were created at all. And wicklow was the last.. which if you know the geography of DLR makes total sense. It was through the counties that british centralized rule was created. We constantly talk about how we need to decentralize partic to relieve stress on Dublin and the city and to help keep rural ireland alive.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 56,288 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    But the population of the 'Greater Dublin Area' or the 3 counties you mean and Dublin city is 40 % of the country. Its 2.5 million in a state of about 5 million.

    Two things, the total population of Dublin county, which is essentially the area you refer to above, was just shy of 1.5m at the last census, not 2.5m

    Also, the greater Dublin area is Dublin and its hinterland, not just the four Dublin local authorities. Generally assumed to take in the commuter belt in Kildare, Meath etc.

    And if you combine Dublin, Meath, Wicklow and Kildare, which is the GDA by one definition, you're still not at 2.5m.

    Yes it needed to be divided badly it helped alleviate some of the stress on the ambulance service for one

    I thought DFB ran the ambulance service for the whole of Dublin? They didn't split that up between the four local authorities?

    Firstly we are not talking about leitrim. And this attitude is part of the issue. People comparing two entirely diff parts of the country with very little in common thinking they can compare them.

    But I am talking about Leitrim. If there was a necessity to split Dublin into four, as you've stated, why could they not merge others to gain eggs l efficiencies? Does an area of barely over 40,000 in population need its own local authority?

    Though the answer is clearly a political one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,718 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Interesting article in the Indo on the subject.

    Revenue figures compiled by Davy for this newspaper show that there is a clear urban v rural divide in where tax revenue is generated. The five counties with cities – Dublin, Cork, Galway, Limerick and Waterford – collected €143bn in tax in 2024. This was 80pc of the total, while they account for just over half of the population.

    "Professor emeritus of European agricultural policy, Alan Matthews of Trinity College Dublin, stresses that the net transfer from urban regions and residents to their rural counterparts is because of the general welfare state, and not a deliberate policy.

    “It’s just a fact that incomes are higher in urban areas, and more income and corporation tax is paid there. Rural areas differ in that they have an older population and are more reliant on social welfare. So through the tax and welfare system you have significant transfers from urban to rural residents,”

    It seems Leo Varadkar was 100% correct and among others including Declan Jordan, was insulted with the talk during the recent blockades about the “real people of Ireland” who work every day and keep the economy going, as if those employed by multinationals are not doing the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,043 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    GDA was over 2.2 million last year. Dublin, Meath, Kildare and Wicklow.

    The 4 Dublin councils or county dublin were just shy of 1.6 million, although the 1.6 million mark will now have been reached and GDA is about 2.25 million.

    GDA is growing by around 100k people every 3 years so it wont be long before we get to 2.5 million.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,987 ✭✭✭yagan


    I think most reps in the Dail are urbane, but the Independent Ireland seem like a coagulation of what were Irish norms half a century ago, mostly rural and agricultural.

    The 1926 had 51% of the national population working in agri, but by the time it came to joining the EEC that figure had only reduced to about 40%, but today only 4% of the workforce are in agri.

    So the massive change in rural to urban has really only happened in the lifetime of the average Independent Ireland rep. The marriage ban for job was lifted allowing a lot more rural women to have an independent income outside of the argicultural household.

    The urban setting just got more urban, but the rural economic societal pretty much collapsed, even if agri production massively increased via modernisation.

    Many people found themselves agreeing with Micheal Lowry, that godfather of country cute hoorism, when he criticised the fuel protests of going too far. Agri is still a business, whereas a lot of the protesters seemed to have got caught up in some kind of retrogressive hooliganism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,043 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I think Dublin would benefit from more councils, not less.

    London is a mega city but still has a local council for every 300k people, on average.

    County Dublin has 1.6 million population so 6 councils would seem a manageable number.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 758 ✭✭✭Sonic the Shaghog


    So disappointing to see both urban and rural people here with chips on their shoulders about each other. Playing right into the governments hands.

    Both compliment each other and work hard.

    Leo was trying nothing more than trying to stir up division after the protests as they got a fright about how well urban and rural types came together against them.

    I saw a lot of urban dwellers that supported it and came out to meet the "farmers" which might I add was only one of the many groups in it. Now for a lot of people I realize it was more of a snap against the government and general cost of living but still.

    I'd be very suspicious in fact he was asked to do so by FG seeing as he isn't currently in government so any blowback wouldn't have been another howler of a own goal that we saw from various ministers during the protests.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,718 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Yeah, a lot of naïve people, both urban and rural, did go out to support those blockading private business owners. But there were also plenty who were against it and stayed quiet, largely because of the type of people involved.

    What’s starting to come out now is a different picture altogether. This wasn’t about representing the country, it was a small group effectively holding the country to ransom while pushing for exclusive deals that suited them and them alone.

    There’s growing frustration at the idea that they somehow speak for Ireland. They don’t. They represent themselves and their own financial interests.

    And that line about being the “real workers” who keep Ireland afloat hasn’t landed well either. It’s not true, and people are beginning to say it more openly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 758 ✭✭✭Sonic the Shaghog


    Sit in the bath and have magnum horse, might relax you



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,718 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    I’m perfectly relaxed. I’m just pointing out that you went out of your way to support a group of private business owners with questionable backgrounds, who effectively held the country to ransom in pursuit of an exclusive tax deal that the rest of us will end up paying for. Sit in the bath and think about that now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,987 ✭✭✭yagan


    What was quoted was uttered 15 years ago. It's suspicious it's only being picked up now.

    Would there be a racial motivation for bringing getting upset 15 years after the fact?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭GNWoodd


    Why did you start this thread and why do you continue to stir the divide ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,360 ✭✭✭Everlong1


    I'm hugely confused Ted. "What was quoted"??? What, indeed, was quoted 15 years ago?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,718 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Why do people like Leo Varadkar tell the truth?

    The divide was fully stirred up when they blockaded us with their tractors and machinery.

    I started the thread because I’m sick of a certain group claiming they represent me or Ireland when they absolutely don’t. I’m even more sick of them calling themselves the “real workers” who keep the country afloat. They don’t.

    That’s pure arrogance dressed up as patriotism. My family and I work hard. So do my friends. We pay significant tax, and now we’re expected to fund their private businesses while they lecture the rest of us about what matters.

    Not a chance.

    Just to add, I notice it’s only called “division” when urban Ireland speaks up. When rural Ireland does it, it’s framed as tradition, community, or protecting a way of life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,932 ✭✭✭The J Stands for Jay


    There is no unspoiled part of rural ireland. The whole thing is covered in one off houses, farm buildings, roads, poles and pylons.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,584 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Then explain why around me there are miles with no phone signal. Do you even know rural Ireland?



Advertisement
Advertisement