Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Clerical officer in the civil service 2026 campaign

1181921232431

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34 Whimsicalcat


    I'm in Dublin. My scenario score increased by 1 point and my OOM improved by 9 places. I put the exact same answers for the temp clerical position back in November and scored well so expected that I wouldn't get a lower OOM with the changes. But I still am about less than 100 places behind my temp application OOM which I suppose is to be expected because I presume more people go for the permanent position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56 ✭✭dos08


    Does anyone know if you get a new OOM after interview or is that your final OOM provided you pass the interview?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11 Harry_Plopper


    @Whimsicalcat what was your scenario score

    mine 536



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 192 ✭✭Tipp1991


    Gone from mid 160's to high 40's in Tipperary



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72 ✭✭weekend2014


    Deleted

    Post edited by weekend2014 on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15 lurkerturnedposter


    Skills section seems to be subjective based on whoever is marking it. Some markers are more generous than others



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,001 ✭✭✭✭Supercell


    I dropped about 400 places and while disappointed I don't understand why people feel its unfair? This is our real score, we need to face up to that and accept it.

    Yes mistakes are made but once discovered should they have left it? That would be totally unfair to people who actually scored higher. Some people here have risen over 1000 places to where they should have been.

    It sucks but people make mistakes and the right results are out now and that is the only fair way to deal with this once the scoring mistake was discovered.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭Quitelife


    This whole error ridden process is reflective of many parts of the public sector so this debacle will help prepare anyone that gets a CO job in the public sector for their new workplace as you will see buckets of mistakes , waste of money, zero accountability & lazy colleagues in the years ahead . You will see some capable & hard working colleagues but these will be very much in the minority.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 philipper


    I haveI have a question but I don't know if anybody can answer it. But if people start appealing this and the executive results appear to be delayed. And they will probably also be appealed, could all these delays force them to go to the tco panels?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34 Whimsicalcat


    @Harry_Plopper my scenario score is 621 and my OOM is in the 210s



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17 TuesdayClub


    It'll cost the tax payer, i.e everyone. It could delay everything. Best to move on, what good is it. Ireland is small, depending how you type such an email subjectively it could negatively impact you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59 ✭✭libravibes76


    @TuesdayClub

    Systems never change if you just accept and move on. We have the current system due to that acceptance.

    While it can be accepted that it was most likely human error, the impact it has had on people is huge. A lot of people are hoping to get a job in the civil service because right now, job security is important.

    All everyone wants is fairness and for someone to do the right thing and abide by policy , procedures and procotols in place. After all that is prevelent in the ethos of the civil service values.

    Everyone applied for this competition in good faith and it's up to the department to ensure honesty, integrity, equality, impartiality is abided by everyone.

    I've no solution for what's happened but hopefully lessons has been learned and empathy can be shown to everyone who applied for this competition and has been let down by events



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭Barnaboy


    Desperately disappointed for my wife, she dropped from just over 2000 to 2400. Chances of interview were slim, but now it's over.

    Just makes no sense to me at all. She has tonnes of highly relevant work experience and put huge effort into this application. I honestly expected a large swing in other direction.

    This whole thing has been a sh!tshow.

    I'm sure "lessons will be learnt ", yeah right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 698 ✭✭✭brianomc


    if your new score is exactly 775 in Dublin the public jobs have another problem to deal with. My email says I am OOM 775 in Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,008 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    That situational judgement test is a damned nuisance. Many of the people who saw big drops probably scored well for skills, but did much poorer in the hypothetical scenarios. Literally none of the scenarios I've seen in these things is anything I've ever had to deal with in a real office (every office scenario they describe seems to be totally dysfunctional with bad employees slacking off or not up to the job etc).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 183 ✭✭Glitteringstar


    If some people here and on Reddit seen the recent COs that were employed in my office through this competition they’d be even more angry. Complete morons!
    I’ve just accepted that nothing will happen and as much as it pisses people off today’s OOMs are the correct ones. Yeah it’s **** but nobody should’ve been expecting or thinking Im guaranteed a job so early in the process.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4 HydratedPotato1


    2 people can have the same OOM, have seen it before



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6 Lubomilka


    i wonder how many of you did this before? just curious. i learned about the competition too late so had very little time to submit it on time. i think i will be a lot better next time. i did ok on the scenarios and the skill score is a pass but i was judging myself too honest and didn't select more excellent answers considering my experience and being overqualified. really disappointed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34 Whimsicalcat


    @GippyGup I'm really glad the timed online tests that they do for other civil service positions are not used in this competition. Those tests are really stressful/unfair and they are marked by an outside English recruitment company who probably uses AI software. Well the one I took before for the grad entry position was and it was ridiculous. I think this is a much fairer competition. Some people really struggle with those timed online tests but still have the qualifications/experience/education needed. Those tests are not a good reflection of whether someone is fit for the job. I feel like they probably hire a lot of people who are great at scoring high in IQ type tests but are not great in real life scenarios and probably explains why they are so slow and make mess ups like this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 58,684 ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Actually the irony in all of this is that it's actually likely not a PAS error (bar their poor communication I will say that's on them). It's one made by the private contractors or company they outsourced the testing to.

    PAS used to run everything in house and honestly, the process was much smoother and fairer than it is now. Not sure why they decided a few years back to outsource. It's been downhill ever since.

    I'm a CO since 2017, been doing tests since 2014 give or take and trust me when I say every single year they're getting more automated since they switched to outsourcing the testing. It's 100% an AI or software glitch that caused this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 58,684 ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Possibly but not in the way you think. It would still only be a temporary contract if they offered you one from that panel. Even if there was a massive shortage of people in a particular part of the CS (highly unlikely), they're not going to offer a permanent contract to someone on a TCO panel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13 DDAAGEL


    for what its worth..someone commented on my post earlier. Basically dont loose faith just yet. There was someone with oom 2400 in 2024 competition and they got a job. Sounds like with that high number your wife applied for Dublin so all may not be lost. Best of luck to her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 183 ✭✭Glitteringstar


    Agree. Those online tests are very stressful, well I find them stressful anyway. People complaining and there skills and scenario scores saying they are subjective etc well yeah they are but there is also a right and wrong answer. If you haven’t followed the capability framework for skills you’ll drop points and if you answer the scenarios wrong you drop points, people are struggling with the fact they were giving a false score and now they can’t accept they haven’t reached a high enough score which has affected there OOM. Whether we like it or not yesterdays OOM are the correct ones I’ve took time to think it over and what’s complaining to PAS going to achieve they’ve corrected it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 158 ✭✭GippyGup


    I think there's a real divide in experience here between Dublin and the rest of the country.

    People can be moved back hundreds of places and still get interviewed in Dublin. If you are moved back 10 in most counties that's you out for 2 years.

    And to say there's a right and wrong answer when we're talking about six questions of "strong response" versus "mostly strong response" is nonsense. It's an arbitrary filter because they don't want to run full assessments. Those tests are far more fair, yes they are more stressful but so is the work of a CO. The inclusion of the numeracy tests for scoring purposes should also be done. The bar for these competitions needs to be raised to reflect skills not chance.

    I also find it odd that after what must be PublicJobs most widespread ever screw up the response here is a shrug



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72 ✭✭weekend2014


    Agree @GippyGup



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,008 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I feel the OOMs are weighed too heavily in favour of the situational judgement tests. A person could become accomplished at answering them 'correctly' (especially after doing a few of them) and still be a poor CO in real life. Being good at SJ tests tells you nothing about the person's communication skills, ability to act under pressure, being a team player, ability to do a front facing role etc.

    In my experience of the public service, most of these hypothetical 'scenarios' rarely even occur in the real world and if they did, they would be a very small part of the actual job, not something that would be arising all the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34 Whimsicalcat


    @GippyGup It's not a shrug. Obviously it's devastating for people who have been interviewed or were just about to get an offer or were in with a chance but now they aren't.

    I just really don't think those stupid timed online tests are the solution. I really don't think a stressful online test is a reflection of a real life stressful situation at work where you can take action and find practical solutions to solve the problem. The questions I was asked foe the grad competition were maths I haven't done since secondary school and I would have been able for it if there wasn't this clock counting down in the corner and you're trying to answer as fast as humanly possible and if they actually gave you supports that helped you prepare for the kind of questions that would come up. There's no real life scenarios where you have to work out the mean, the mode and the median in 30 seconds or you die, which is what those tests feel like.

    I do think they shouldn't put such weight on those scenario questions and focus more on the skills side. I think this competition, although not ideal, gives people a better opportunity to highlight their skills, experience and educational background. Rather than show they can do really well in a test but have the communication/real life skills of a potato. I know someone who works in the CS and they hired 2 new EOs in his division, one of which was shockingly bad, and they had to let him go. But again the scenario questions do hold more weight than they should.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭Newbie12345The


    we had that for an internal promotion to EO in the AGS as an assessement - its the most ludicrous thing strongly/slightly or just agree



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 183 ✭✭Glitteringstar


    When it comes to the SJT there is a right and wrong answer not sure why you can’t accept that bit, if you’ve worked in the CS the applications are easier.. maybe you should review your application and see where you can improve in the future.

    A live numerical exam is not needed for a CO role, as someone stated none of those questions we did in an EO assessment would rarely be needed in the CS, yeah sure maybe a live timed SJT assessment, but ultimately it’s a fair application process and it’s the same for everyone.

    We are all frustrated I’m not based in Dublin I’m in Offaly and I’m now outside the Top 10 after the new results. My original point stands you weren’t giving the correct OOM to began with your new OOM is correct you need to accept it and move on. You should not have been expecting a job just based on your OOM you’ve got your own hopes up, I’ve been in Top 3 for an internal panel since January and there’s been no movement, you’re not guaranteed anything in the CS believe me I’ve been in those positions where panels end and you’re next up.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56 ✭✭dos08


    Hey all, I got a very high OOM for my county and I feel like I could be in the first batch (as I’m in the 10’s). The only problem is I’m on holidays for a week at the end of May into the start of June and I’m afraid I could be offered one around then. Are they ok with rescheduling? The booklet seems pretty strict so I presume I’d have to do it abroad if it’s via teams. Any help would be appreciated



Advertisement
Advertisement