Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

RTE 1: 'Today' with David McCullagh

1175176177179181

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,249 ✭✭✭hamburgham




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,249 ✭✭✭hamburgham


    I just listen to Claire after midnight before I go to sleep. I used to listen to Pat in the mornings. I find she masks the fact that she hasn’t anything to add to the discussion by just summarising and repeating back what the guest has just said.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,249 ✭✭✭hamburgham


    It must be awful for her that Pat is still on at the weekends, reminding everyone of what we’re missing during the week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Well that's what she signed up for so it can't be much of a surprise to her.

    I think she's very professional and competent but I suppose time will tell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I'm not sure that the weekend audience is the same as during the week for the most part.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,145 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    She is both of those things but that doesn't mean it flows over to the audience, I think either Claire Brooke or Ciara Doherty could do just as good a job.

    If I had been newstalk I'd have looked the two shows that aren't gaining audiences Lunchtime Live and Moncreiff.

    ______

    In the end they were just greedy, they all knew one another and knew what to expect more money for no return, it was a secure cash flow, but in fairness they looked for what they wanted and fair dues to them for that, and wouldn't you be doing the same!

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 358 ✭✭Pat734


    David had some interesting chats with people who found that their business model, to their surprise, wasn't really paying. Most blamed no govt support, etc, etc, etc. David surprisingly never asked them why they thought their business would be a success, why they opened, was the business model really a paying proposition, etc, etc.

    Lots of people in fairly good jobs see what they think is an opening in cafes, coffee shops, child minding, clothes shops and the likes. They seem to believe it can't be that difficult to earn an easy few bob and work on their own with not a lot of know how required. Most of the so called business's were never an option really, but because it wasn't a huge amount to open up that there had to be profits made.

    Blaming agencies and govt for their own failings is becoming a popular argument, but in fairness, a fair amount of business models are just people thinking how simple and easy it is to run a business, pay rent, pay insurance, pay staff, deal with revenue, management, hiring staff and keeping customers happy.

    There's 4 coffee type shops/cafes in my own town and I'd bet big money that none of them are a viable business. Very easy to blame different business support agencies for it not working, but personally I see lots of them were never going to work anyway. Anyone going to open a small business needs to ask themselves, what am I earning now before I open this place, how big a turnover would I need after EVERYTHING is paid before I earn that amount out of this business? They might be in for a rude awakening but obviously a lot of them don't do this due diligence.

    Post edited by Pat734 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,424 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 358 ✭✭Pat734


    Maybe a question mark instead of an exclamation mark dude…..please?

    In any case, I've done what you requested and hope it helps in making it easier for you to read.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,424 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Fantastic….much better ….much, much better, as The Donald might say.

    My sincere thanks.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,443 ✭✭✭rino87


    These "search for a country music star" sections each morning this week are like nails on a chalkboard.... horror show.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,395 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Yeah, pure crap.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,898 Mod ✭✭✭✭squonk


    I thought he was better than I expected for these. Only heard the segment this morning and I’m fairly sure David literally couldn’t give a flying fúck about the country music rubbish but he never let on



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,556 ✭✭✭GSF




  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,898 Mod ✭✭✭✭squonk


    He can be quite sarcastic and snarky dealing with politicians. I was hoping for a bit of that but I ships it’s not really fair in these eejits really and he knows this I’m sure



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,746 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    David does give the snotty impression that he knows what's best for people.

    I'm not sure he's that good of a broadcaster to adopt that attitude.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,145 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    will have to watch on News Now, but as he seems to be perennially unimpressed I find that to be suprising.

    His new signature tune should have been "That don't impress me much"

    ______

    In the end they were just greedy, they all knew one another and knew what to expect more money for no return, it was a secure cash flow, but in fairness they looked for what they wanted and fair dues to them for that, and wouldn't you be doing the same!

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 302 ✭✭AJB39


    Totally agree. This segment should be on Oliver Callan’s show. It has no place on the Today programme. The fact that it is on the Today programme is just further evidence of the dumbing down of Radio 1.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,424 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Nah…McCullagh unsuited for that kind of programme, permanently forcing it and just going thru the motions .

    Feigned enthusiasm I fear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,841 ✭✭✭lucalux


    Very emotional conversation on there with David talking about the TV show DIY SOS choosing to adapt a family's home after their daughter was in an awful accident in Sicily

    https://m.independent.ie/regionals/wicklow/bray-news/diy-sos-to-help-hannah-leonards-family-finally-bring-her-home-after-devastating-accident-abroad/a1713651929.html

    Her father was on, spoke about the neighbours and friends all emailing to help get them the refit. The emotion in his voice, it was so vulnerable and human.

    With everything going on these day it'd really ground you back into how much good is in the world, and how lovely it is when we show up for one another

    I'm in tears lads 🫣😅



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 883 ✭✭✭iffandonlyif


    I’ve been noticing this exact same thing - most recently from McCullagh, but across all of Irish radio. I find it absolutely maddening. It’s like they’re talking to a child.

    Someone will say something like, ‘The government needs to be held accountable for the actions it takes’, and they’ll reply, ‘Yeah, so you’re saying we need to hold them to account.’ And they might follow it up with a banal question like, ‘And do you think that’s fair?’ It couldn’t be clearer that they aren’t fully engaged or have nothing to say on the topic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 722 ✭✭✭QueensGael


    David now having the exact same conversation about remote learning with the same guest that Claire had on an hour ago…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 883 ✭✭✭iffandonlyif


    Reminds me of when Daniel Lambert, the fanatically pro-Palestinian CEO of Bohemians, appeared on the Hard Shoulder, Morning Ireland and Claire Byrne in succession. How about that for diversity?

    A criticism I’ve always had of Irish media is that there’s rarely any development across the day. One programme won’t take the ball from an earlier programme and run with it, digging deeper or coming at it from a different angle. They all just return to square one.

    We have far too many ‘magazine format’ programmes. Radio 1 should diversify and leave that to Newstalk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 327 ✭✭tradfan1


    When Jessie Buckley was nominated for the Oscars, it was hard to avoid interviews with literally every cousin and neighbour of hers on every radio programme. Delighted she won but the whole thing was so parochial and cringy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    That was your cue to switch back to Newstalk.

    It was an interesting item and not surprising that two producers decided to give it airtime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Radio 1 should diversify and leave that to Newstalk.

    They are direct competitors in the slot so unlikely RTE will allow Newstalk to eat their lunch on advertising revenue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 527 ✭✭✭tarvis


    All our radio now seems to be of the shallow red top variety with anything goes. Repeated over and over each day and ‘ sorry the clock has defeated us’ is used far too often to avoid any meaningful content creeping in.

    Except of course in sport… sport gets in depth analysis and seemingly endless comment with not only its own designated programmes but also with more slots in main programming, making time available for anything else even less.

    I remember Radio Éireann - current output is not even close in content and quality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 883 ✭✭✭iffandonlyif


    It’s funny that you mention ‘the clock defeating us’, because I was going to mention something I associate with Miriam O’Callaghan, which is saying with an apologetic grin, ‘I’m sorry everyone, but we’re going to have to leave it there. I’m sure we’ll be returning to this in future programmes’ . . . and then never returning to it.

    What I had in mind in my previous comment is that if a discussion does have to be curtailed, they would return to it soon afterwards, but this time using the previous discussion as a launch pad. They might open with short highlights from it, and any guest who repeats the same arguments is interrupted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    That would make for a very interesting follow up.

    You'd have to plan it before the initial programme and build on the story to achieve depth.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 883 ✭✭✭iffandonlyif


    I’m not sure why you think they’d have to plan it in advance. If a discussion were particularly contentious or fruitful, they could spend the next few weeks preparing a follow-up. It wouldn’t even need to be the same programme. I’d love for the Late Debate, say, to make a habit of picking up where Prime Time left off.



Advertisement
Advertisement