Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Kerry Babies Case

16465676970

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,537 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    but, like your suggestion, they will all be pure fantasy because it's obvious already that the media (like so many posters here) don't want to know the real story of Baby John.

    My query was if baby John could have been born in a M&B home and relinquished for adoption. Apparently it was very common in the 80’s so not impossible. Curious why you think most don’t want to know the real story of baby John? Do you know something? It’s a very strange case for sure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,991 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    It was very common in the early 1980s for single women have babies adopted. By the end of the decade it had gone completely the other way and was rare for children to be given up for adoption. In that way it was a, decade of change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,594 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    It would seem to me that @Caquas believes that J Hayes's and/or family also could have murdered her baby at coincidentally around the same time as baby John, and that people are going to rush to defend the parents of John as they did they Hayes once a reasonable sob story comes out in the press. Not trying to put words in mouth, just my understanding, apologies if mistaken.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    I believe the media do not want to know because they haven’t run any investigative stories into this case recently - a case which transfixed the nation, a most shocking murder which the media had covered assiduously until the Hayes family got their compo.

    Then came the sensational breakthrough with DNA identifying the parents of Baby John. The media dropped the story as quickly as decently possible and now refuse even to ask any questions of the parents’ loudmouth solicitor when he gets a platform to whine about their arrest. Posters here seem eager to mitigate or even explain away this brutal murder. And look at the nonsense posted here attacking the Tribunal Report - a plethora of deflections, fabrications, abuse and dismissals. I hope you see that the “informal adoption” story is baseless and wouldn’t absolve the parents.

    I say there will be no justice for Baby John and no closure of the national wound if the DPP won’t bring charges. And that is unlikely unless some witness from 40 years ago comes forward (a chance in a million as no one came forward in all that time).

    Worse, there is a media campaign to invent stories which exonerate the parents who have said nothing to explain themselves. And younger people will be told that it was the way things were in Ireland in the 1980s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,537 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    Posters here seem eager to mitigate or even explain away this brutal murder.

    TBH, I haven’t seen any post trying to explain away the murder of baby John. Even friends and colleagues I’ve spoken to about this are as perplexed as I am as to what could have happened. Maybe the media haven’t reported because nobody will talk about it even after forty years but that could change.

    There was lots of stuff online when the couple were arrested after the dna evidence, but does anyone even know for sure who the parents are? It’s been kept very quiet and I read somewhere that locals kept quiet because the mother had family in AGS. I don’t think that would make any difference nowadays, shur members of AGS are charged with all sorts and it’s widely reported. Attitudes to gardai and religious figures are different now to forty years ago, those figures had authority in the community then and people were indoctrinated to be subservient and obedient.

    It’s really awful to think that someone has information about that baby but they haven’t spoken up for forty years.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭phormium


    Definitely I would say locals know exactly who the people in question are, the only person we can be sure knew was the mother, there is the outside possibility that the father did not know at the time, who knows!

    Even further afield than their direct locality research with the bits of info given both here and in the media can lead to exactly who but sure what's the point of knowing! The gardai know and that's all that really matters for now.

    I think most people other than maybe those directly involved would like to know the answers, I don't think it's true that nobody cares or wants to know what happened him. If the people who are still alive who do know don't talk I don't know what the solution is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,062 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    It's an official government document, but it is set aside. It is not publicly available in the National Archive.

    Normally documents are archived after 30 years, so would have been archived in 2015.

    To post a link to the document on a public forum is irresponsible, to say the least.

    Post edited by chooseusername on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    This was a bigger story with a bigger impact on society than the West Cork murder. Yet it doesnt get a fraction of the media coverage.

    Notwithstanding that Gardai are more likely to be prosecuted today than the 80s, the cosy relationship between crime reporters and the Gardai means that they get a lot less critical media coverage than they should.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,062 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    Yes they need each other, on a local level anyway. But I can't see any such Faustian pact between the review team and the press. There is nothing for the press to investigate at this stage. They probably know all the details but since no charges have been brought their hands are tied. The last update on April 4/5th was that a file had been sent to the DPP, but that could have been sent anytime in the previous 2 months

    "The file on the murder of the infant, known as Baby John, in 1984 was submitted to the DPP within the last two months and it’s understood that it recommended a range of possible charges."

    For all we know the DPP may have already passed it back to the Gardaí as not enough to bring charges.

    In the West Cork murder the media got plenty fodder from the Gardaí, Ian Bailey and multiple dodgy witnesses who kept coming up with stuff for years, but not so much once the review team moved in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,364 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    The document is freely available from a government website (oireachtas.ie) Is there anything to show that access to it is restricted in any way?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,062 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    I don’t know, that’s why I asked the question; can it be downloaded by just anyone?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,364 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    Yes, anyone can download it. Any document laid before the Oireachtas is a matter of public record and can be freely accessed, viewed and downloaded by anybody. It's part of the democratic process.

    The Oireachtas library can be searched online at https://opac.oireachtas.ie/knowvation/app/consolidatedSearch/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,062 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    So a pointless exercise then setting it aside!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,057 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I hope to god this baby gets justice and the parents are charged! 3 days old when murdered. They damn well know what happened. One, or both of them!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,364 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    Not at all. The High Court ruling would also be a matter of public record.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,537 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    You’re right, the parents are very likely known locally and the wider public could also unravel it from various bits of information available online. It doesn’t explain the murder - just raises all kinds of very unsettling questions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,062 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    The Hayes family, not a million miles away, do they know I wonder.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,227 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The Hayes family would be too far away (~80km) to know (and more than likely want to hear nothing about it)

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,062 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    "(and more than likely want to hear nothing about it)"

    30/40 years under a cloud, and no interest in seeing justice in a case they are inextricably linked to?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,227 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Try put yourself in their position and think do you want it gone from your consciousness or have some crap lingering on and on and on and on...

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 390 ✭✭I told ya




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    Of course the Tribunal Report rubbished this idea and gave the Gardai a judicial tongue-lashing. That's why Gerry spent the rest of his life trying to salvage his reputation by repeating this nonsense to any reporter who'd listen. But then, 35years later, for no particular reason, the State disowned the Report and lavished millions on the Hayes family and their lawyers.

    Then DNA identified the parents of the Caherciveen baby. Their solicitor is outraged, not about the massacre of his client's little baby, but because they were asked questions. The media spew his nonsense at us without apology.

    So the State has no explanation for why the Hayes family confessed to the dreadful murder unless you think Kerry people will confess to anything if a Garda looks sideways at them. (Please don't say Garda brutality - the State has never claimed that there was any brutality toward the Hayes family. Because there wasn't - the family withdrew those claims 35 years ago even if the media pretend otherwise)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,973 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Caquas, seriously? Your posts are the most incredible amount of nonsense

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    you tried and failed to show a single error in any of my posts so now you’re reduced to these abusive comments

    Post edited by Caquas on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,594 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    Why did they confess in your opinion, is it because they were unsure if baby John was Johanna Hayes’s? But the circumstances of death were extremely different.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,062 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    The Hayes were playing the long game, don’t you know!
    They all confessed straight away and lied about the police brutality, so that when eventually the truth came out they would be quids in.

    Ching Ching!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    The Tribunal Report explained it all. The Government accepted it. No politician seriously challenged it.

    Lots of handwringing back then about intrusive questioning of Joanne Hayes by the Gardaí but the Judge told the politicians “You demanded a public inquiry and serious allegations were made against the Gardaì. I had to let them push their stupid theory in order to discredit it”.

    The High Court Declaration re-writing this history without hearing any evidence was a low point for our judiciary but if the Government wants to hand out money, the Courts won’t stand in the way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,594 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    Ultimately it's a situation where the Hayes family were not put under a fair trial, and there is a level of guilt administered by an extra-judicial proceeding, then it becomes somewhat of a fruit of the poisoned tree. Unless they go through a formal legal due process with all the protections (which they wouldn't), then I think they should be entitled to compensation.

    We can't just go dragging people through these things, unless perhaps they have taken an oath to the state, no matter how well intentioned (which I can't say it even was tbh). If you think of the payment more as a punitive action against the state to protect the public institutions in the country, rather than a specific compensation to the Hayes family, then it becomes far more reasonable imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,991 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    The Chairman of the Tribunal had choices. He was not acting as a judge in this role and simply should have told the barristers the limits of what he would allow. Since it wasn't a trial, then if those barristers felt they're rights to protect their clients, the guards, was being denied, they could have sought an opinion from the courts. The tribunals function was to find the truth as far as possible, not to impune or defend anyone.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    Again, this thread is starting to focus on the Hayes even thougb they've no connection to Baby John.



Advertisement
Advertisement