Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

US/Israel conduct airstrikes on Iran again

1428429431433434451

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,583 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    Im sure the Iranians would be shouting it from the rooftops if true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,108 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    They would not so much be backing Iran as negotiating safe trade with a country they're not at war with. The USA doesn't dictate with whom the EU trades.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,969 ✭✭✭Nermal


    Nations have no permanent friends or enemies, only permanent interests.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,689 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The Iranians have stated today that they believe the incident was a failed US ground operation / incursion 100 miles from where the F15 went down and that no actual rescue of a pilot took place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    A lot of fake news around. Logically it was part of the rescue mission. They blew up their own planes when they got stuck in the remote airstrip. Expensive loss. People forget how big Iran is and that was the nearest point for a coordinated rescue. The US didn't try and "invade" in the middle of nowhere.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,583 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,689 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    But experts have been able to geo-locate the precise location where the US transport planes and helicopters were destroyed - it is 100 miles from where the F15 crashed and where the first pilot was (allegedly) rescued. Even the Sky News military analyst fella mentioned this yesterday and said he couldn't understand the discrepancy.

    Something about the account from Saturday night doesn't add up at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,770 ✭✭✭yagan


    That's the part Trump doesn't understand as he's in it entirely for himself. He has probably done more damage to the petrodollar than anyone else possibly could.

    If it transpires that the hormuz toll becomes a defacto feature it will not be paid in USD.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,689 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The wreckage of an American aircraft and a helicopter rotor is seen in Isfahan, Iran, April 5, 2026. (Reuters Photo)

    A recent U.S. mission to rescue a downed airman may have been a cover operation to steal Iran's enriched uranium, the country's Foreign Ministry alleged Monday.

    Earlier Sunday, President Donald Trump said the U.S. recovered a second crew member of an F-15E that went down over Iran Friday in what he called a "daring" search and rescue operation.

    Iran's military has called it "a deception and escape mission," insisting it was "completely foiled."

    On Monday, Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said there were "many questions and uncertainties" about the operation.

    "The area where the American pilot was claimed to be present in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province is a long way from the area where they attempted to land or wanted to land their forces in central Iran," Baghaei said.

    "The possibility that this was a deception operation to steal enriched uranium should not be ignored at all."

    He added that the operation was "a disaster" for the United States.

    Iran's military said several U.S. aircraft had to "make emergency landings" in southern Isfahan province after being hit during the mission, with the U.S. "forced to heavily bombard the downed aircraft" as a result.

    *(As referenced further up, analysts who have geolocated the site where the US planes were destroyed confirm it is indeed a long way from where the second pilot was supposed to have been shot down, at least 100 miles away).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,235 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    The US and Israel didn’t ‘side’ with Europe when they attacked Iran. We may be left to negotiate our own way out of the problem they created.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,583 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    Id have no doubt believing the US administration have/would alter any aspect that didnt suit their narrative but this theory would be odd.

    What was the aim of this attempted ground incursion?

    Are we to believe both pilots were already rescued before this event?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,962 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    What's the source for this info? Am not on twitter



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,583 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    I mean was there enriched uranium where the planes did land? Presumably this qould be something the Iranian foreign ministry would know. Why they ambiguity in their statement?

    Sounds far fetched to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    I queried the why Isfahan part of this yesterday.
    In the context of where the WSO apparently was, and access from Iraq & Kuwait, setting up an FOB/FARP in Isfahan makes zero sense.
    It's 100s of Km from the rescue area.

    I also spitballed the possibility of a raid on Isfahan a week ago and outlined why while I believed it was a mental idea.
    It's exactly the type of audaciousness that appeals to the MAGA mindset.

    I think the Isfahan FOB is one of 2 things.
    Sensible officers within the chain of command decided to use that agricultural strip that was clearly pre-scouted.
    As their FOB precisely to burn it, and prevent it's use as a basing point for the absolutely ridiculous HEU seizure/recovery raid.
    If it was used as such?
    It has certainly saved US lives from a reckless effort.

    Or.
    The missing WSO was used as cover for the HEU raid attempt.
    It went poorly and they extracted ASAP when discovered and brought under fire.

    So much of the timeline, the deployed force and the story of the WSO, who reportedly had a broken ankle, climbing a mountain to be rescued via MH6 operating at the limit of the range from Isfahan area air strip…
    Granted, still very much a tangle of sources but the story of the evac from the airstrip?
    Makes zero sense.
    2 mechanical failures?
    2-4 MH6 destroyed, but the airfield perimeter held for a minimum 90minutes whilst other aircraft, reportedly either Dash 8s or C295s flew in from outside Iran, landed and egressed without damage or loss?

    Far more likely IMO that a larger force was landed via C130s, that when they came under fire that force egressed via the undamaged airframes and scorched the rest.
    I think it's far more likely this was an attempted raid on Isfahan, with the WSO recovery as a cover than it was a direct rescue attempt.

    Post edited by banie01 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 565 ✭✭✭thamus doku


    In all fairness, a coalition like that already exists. Israel have played this very well. They will go full steam now to clean house as much as they can.
    there will never be another American president that will let them do whatever they like while also backing them with all of America’s military might.

    they know the jig will soon be up and are going to make hay while the sun shines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,610 ✭✭✭csirl


    One of the experts on Sky News gave a plausible answer. Said the 2 planes couldnt lift off the makeshift runway. One plane contained small rescue helicopters, the other was a medical plane as the crewman was injured and needed immediate treatment.

    They sent replacements to another airstrip to carry out the mission and get the stranded people from the original location home.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,468 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Does not sound great, the guy in charge of the missile department is suggesting that an escalation of attacks on energy sites has started. Last time a couple of weeks ago Israel bombed that petrochemical site at Pars, Qatar's LNG was taken offline for 3 years.

    Any small chance of a ceasefire or any deal looks dead in the water now

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Thats not all that plausible as the 2 destroyed planes are MC130s, they operate as petrol stations when on the ground.
    They fly in carrying 1/2 MH6 each, as well as palletised fuel tanks.
    The MH6s get unloaded and are ready for flight within minutes.
    The MC130s are parked, with their engines running to operate their fuel pumps for refueling.

    The US have updated the MH6 destroyed total to 4, so with fuel and 2 choppers on each of the MC130s?
    Neither were medical planes.
    So the 4 choppers and 2 planes were likely a complete set, if there was a medical plane?
    It wasn't destroyed, and it took off.

    If, the yanks sent replacement planes to an alternative airstrip?
    How did the troops and pilots at the 1st airstrip get there for evac?
    Did the US manage to setup a 2nd FOB, send out additional choppers and shuttle the personnel from strip 1 to to strip 2?
    Via multiple flights back and forth all whilst keeping both strip perimeters secure?
    Before then flying everyone out from strip 2 and torching strip 1 completely?
    Does that pass a sniff test?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    There was no landing strip close to where the pilot was hiding. That's the closest they could get the troops and helicopters to do the actual rescue hop. It certainly wasn't an invasion attempt. They screwed up because the big troop carriers couldn't take off after sinking into the sand. So they brought in more and blew up the existing planes.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,770 ✭✭✭yagan


    It seems more likely that the F15 downing and the destruction of the two large C130 troop carriers were two separate unrelated incidents. I've seen a few clips of locals firing at US choppers like a blackhawk flying low on a rescue mission that would make sense, but nothing to do with the two burnt out C130s makes sense.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,610 ✭✭✭csirl


    No, the 2 planes were multi purpose heavy lift planes.

    Sky News guy said it was normal for them to leave behind and destroy aircraft if plans change on the hoof. Said they did so with the Bin Laden raid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,825 ✭✭✭combat14


    there will be no cease fire till iran quit their nuclear missile program, stop targeting their neighbours and open the straits of Hormuz we are in for a long road by the looks of it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    The US have confirmed the 2 planes they destroyed were C130s.
    The models used for CSAR are MC130 and HC130, only the MC130 carries the MH6s,and it can only carry 2.
    There were 4 MH6s destroyed.

    The notion that it's "normal" to destroy them is an interesting take.
    The USAF certainly plan redundancy into their mission profile but these aren't disposable assets.
    Ideally they will get all assets in and out unscathed.

    The Bin Laden example, the helicopter that was abandoned and subsequently destroyed.
    Crashed due to ingestion issues caused by hovering over the walled compound.
    It was a stealth modified UH-60, one of very, very few and one that has yet to even be clearly photographed all these years later.
    So as a result of the crash, additional standby units were used for the evac and the chopper was torched.

    One of the most technically sensitive helicopters ever used in service.
    They hadn't planned to lose one, and certainly not in the manner they did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,468 ✭✭✭brickster69


    3 F15's mistakenly shot down in a morning by a Kuwaiti pilot, an aircraft carrier being taken out of action for a year due to a laundry room fire and only 13 US troops being killed also does not sound plausible, but plenty of people keep falling for it.

    Best off taking anything from someone constantly lies with a giant pinch of salt until proven true. He has claimed they have won 10 times already and now he is demanding a ceasefire.

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭redshift-rider


    If it was a bungled attempt to steal uranium from Isfahan, is that why Trump fired all those military guys on Thursday? He fired everyone who said it was a retarded plan



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,770 ✭✭✭yagan


    A couple of things are looming for Israel. Firstly the perception of their Iron Dome being impregnable has been truly shattered, which will only encourage more resources towards increasing production of swarm munitions.

    Secondly and most importantly for keeping the gains made is their call up for an expanded Israel is simply not sustainable, especially when it falls entirely on non orthodox secular Israeli's who are most likely to leave Israel.

    And as you say this US presidency has been the best conditions for the genocidal Zionist agenda, but continued pain at the US gas pumps will wear down the most beligerant Trumper.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,235 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    They seem to be sticking with the story of ‘at least one’ of the C130s getting stuck in soft ground. From the NYT.

    The plan was to immediately load the airman and the rescue force onto two C-130 aircraft that were supposed to carry them out of danger to an airfield in Kuwait. But, in a final twist, the nose gear of at least one, and possibly both, of those planes got stuck in the sandy dirt at the airstrip, military officials said.

    Hours passed. Efforts to free the stuck wheels failed, so the commandos called in three replacement aircraft.

    Officials in the Pentagon and at Central Command waited anxiously. The success of a dangerous mission, which had seemed nearly complete, was suddenly once again uncertain.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,178 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Causality figures for the US armed forces don't come from the President. He can be as full of **** as he wants, pretending there is a rake of undeclared casualties is still conspiracy brained nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,689 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The guys with military knowledge on social media say they cannot be entirely sure of what the reason for such a ground operation would be or even exactly how events unfolded on the night - but they strongly suspect the administration is lying and that Saturday night was a US ground incursion that went disastrously wrong and was a total failure (and there's not even much evidence that any pilot was rescued on the night).



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,178 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    What "guys with military knowledge" on social media? They sound like utter loons from how you are portraying it to be honest.



Advertisement
Advertisement