Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

US/Israel conduct airstrikes on Iran again

1406407409411412427

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 266 ✭✭rayman10


    Have they been firing them at desalination plants?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 195 ✭✭StarryPlough01


    Middle power Australia’s PM Antony Albanese just might have received a lot of complaints about remaining silent. Who knows... This needs to get more traction...

    UNILAD
    “Founded in 2012, LADbible Group has redefined entertainment and news for a social generation. With a global presence, and offices in the UK, Ireland and Australia, LADbible Group has grown to become one of the biggest social publishers in the world with a global audience approaching a billion.”

    ‘Australia’s Prime Minister issues blunt warning to Donald Trump as he expresses concern over Iran war’
    ‘Anthony Albanese has been vocal about his support of regime change in Iran since the US and Israel attacked the nation’

    By Britt Jones
    Updated 15:24 31 Mar 2026 GMT+1Published 08:43 30 Mar 2026 GMT+1
    https://www.unilad.com/news/politics/australia-anthony-albanese-warning-iran-donald-trump-change-difficult-987538-20260330

    ....
    "I want to see more certainty in what the objectives of the war are, and I want to see a de-escalation," he said. "A de-escalation is in the global economy's interest. I have nothing but contempt for the Iranian regime."

    Calling the task of changing its regime ‘very difficult’, he added: "At the beginning of the conflict the objectives were outlined as one: stopping Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, which has been clearly achieved."

    He went on to say in his address: "Secondly, degrading the opportunity that Iran has for engaging in military action, either overt or through its proxies in Hezbollah, Hamas and the Houthis. Clearly there has been a substantial degrading of Iran's position.

    "The third was regime change and I think that, very clearly, history tells us that regime change imposed from outside is very difficult."

    However, Albanese noted that ‘whether that is going to occur or not is something that I think needs to be outlined’. ....

    ‘Distancing himself from Trump and a badly waged war in Iran might be the smartest move Albanese can make’

    ‘The US president thumbs his nose at concerns about the most serious energy crisis in global history. But Australia, like other countries, is paying a high price’
    Analysis Tom McIlroy Mon 30 Mar 2026
    https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/mar/30/albanese-trump-iran-energy-crisis-analysis

    Australian PM Albanese
    
“Louder this time, he said it was time for the US and Israel to move on from heavy bombings. Failing that, he suggested Trump should explain exactly what he planned to do to achieve victory.

    ….

    “Announcing new measures to shore up fuel supplies and cut the excise paid on petrol, Albanese told reporters that Iran’s mission to build nuclear weapons had been degraded, along with the country’s conventional missile firepower.
    ....
    "But, pointing to the difficulty of achieving regime change without a protracted campaign by military forces on the ground, Albanese called on the US president to “clearly” outline his next steps.

    Times of Israel published a paragraph or two about PM Albanese on their liveblog:
    https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/australian-pm-says-he-wants-trump-to-clarify-objectives-of-iran-war/

    By Reuters
    “SYDNEY, Australia — Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says he wants more certainty from US President Donald Trump on the objectives of the ongoing war in Iran.

    “I want to see more certainty in what the objectives of the war are, and I want to see a de-escalation,” Albanese says, responding to a question about his view on how Trump was prosecuting the war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,408 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    I don't understand. How can a useful idiot be intelligent? She's a contrary Russian stooge at best and thankfully the population has seen through her worst. Constantly bigging up Russia whilst undermining the European organisations that she was an elected official for. To what benefit? Why is it OK for Russia to invade somewhere? Where was her condemnation then? Why make excuses for them, especially if she is so confident and intelligent? Hopefully we have seen the last of her as any kind of public official.

    Save boards.ie by subscribing: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,584 ✭✭✭Marty Bird


    https://news.antiwar.com/2026/03/31/us-deploying-another-aircraft-carrier-to-the-middle-east-for-iran-war/

    Another strike group headed to the Middle East. No chance this will de-escalate anytime soon.

    🌞6.02kWp⚡️3.01kWp South/East⚡️3.01kWp West



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭purplepanda


    Don't worry I'll give likewise abuse to her fellow traitor, that Tramp Mick Wallace. I actually could call him worse regarding his treatment of women according to locals in Wellington Bridge, Wexford. also considering the fraud he committed against his former employees & the revenue in the past.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,441 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Iranian missiles struck Batelco data centre in Hamala, Bahrain. Batelco is the largest telecommunications company in Bahrain and just opened a few months ago. It hosts Amazon Web Services infrastructure.

    Also an oil depot operated by British firm Casrol attacked in Iraq.

    Australian PM's speech reassuring the public they will assist with the fuel problems in the country for the next few months.

    No surprise to see Trump launch his attack shortly, as doubtful he will back away and never would of sent those troops for the region just for show.

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,584 ✭✭✭Marty Bird


    Just listening back to Rubio in Aljazeera saying..

    “If only Iran didn’t spend the money on chasing a nuclear weapon they wouldn’t have economic problems for their people”

    No Marco, it’s your buddies in Washington that have destroyed Iran economically for years and Mossad and CIA fcuking up their country.

    🌞6.02kWp⚡️3.01kWp South/East⚡️3.01kWp West



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭bored65


    Ah so by your {bending over backwards to defend end Iran from committing war crimes by deliberately targeting civilians} logic all Trump and Israelis have to do is give warning (like he done) that they will bomb civilian power plants and water infrastructure

    Yeh perhaps think before posting in an accusatory and rude manner



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,584 ✭✭✭Marty Bird


    🌞6.02kWp⚡️3.01kWp South/East⚡️3.01kWp West



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,788 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    When markets close this weekend over Easter, Trump will commit more war crimes in Iran.

    Every power plant, reservoir, desalination plant will be bombed. And in the chaos they will try to invade. Boots on the ground.

    It will not go well for the US, but the toll on Iranian society will be catastrophic from the infrastructure damage.

    And dont be surprised to see "tactical" nuclear weapons used either. Trump knows not how to deescalate, and Israel know they will never be held accountable, so together they can wage the most brutal war imaginable because who is there to stop em?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,525 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    @sock.rocker*

    ”striking all of the oil fields and infrastructure with conventional weapons” They have tried attacking oil fields and infrastructure for the last couple of weeks, look at the Yenbo refinery attack. But I’m looking at the number of missiles fired and the number intercepted. With Ukranian drone interception technology I’m also expecting the success rate of drone attacks to dimish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,525 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,832 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    together they can wage the most brutal war imaginable because who is there to stop em?

    'Joint chiefs' quitting in protest?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,360 ✭✭✭Tazz T


    Classic him. Deescalate overnight to bring down oil then a hawkish speech tonight just before market close for Easter. Has to be. This is what he does every time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,555 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    Everytime Irans infrastructure has been hit theyve responded. Literally an eye for an eye.

    The only thing so far they havent hit is desalination plants as none of theirs have been hit yet.

    Theres been a continuous and controlled retaliatory response from the Iranians.

    They are in control of their actions still and their responses are penetrative.

    You're smoking Donalds crackpipe if you believe anything else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,525 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    @PokeHerKing War started 28th Feb, Iran attacked Ras AlTanura on the 2nd and Yenbo on the 19th March. Kindly list what Iranian oil infrastructure was hit prior to these attacks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,891 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    hitting civilian power plants and water infrastructure is different, come on now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,695 ✭✭✭yagan


    Untitled Image

    Trump seems to have shot his load in Epstein Fury.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,788 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Most of these positions are stacked with those favourable to "the cause"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭bored65


    Both sides have now threatened to target civilians and civilian infrastructure

    Instead of condemning both we have some bending over backwards to excuse Iran doing it, which is ridiculous as that makes complete mockery then when the other deplorable side does the same or worse

    bad enough we had pages and pages of justification that it’s all good for Iran to attack all its neutral neighbours and hold the world to terrorist style ransom



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,889 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    They haven't targeted the gulf desalination or oil infrastructure yet, because that would be a massive escalation because if Iran attacks the gulf oil infrastructure in a big way, then they will reciprocate and destroy the Iranian infrastructure, it's MAD

    Except Israel don't think they are subject to consequences, so they're the ones who have been escalating across all fronts. they think they will be protected and they have been correct up to now. We need to stop that protection so that they stop constantly escalating the situation and making everything worse for the rest of the world.

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,628 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    You seem to be admitting that if even 50 per cent of Iranian missiles were hitting their targets this war wouldn't likely be taking place.

    I wonder If North Korea were attacked,how many of their missiles would get through in the first day alone due to overwhelming the air defenses? Is that why North Korea will never be attacked because they are actually a serious threat this is before we even consider the nuclear option. So is that the great lie of this war- that if you are in fact a serious and imminent threat you will be left alone. The political cost of war with North Korea would be unsustainable, whereby war with Iran is deemed costly but ultimately sustainable- at least in the short term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,832 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Except of course it won't be the United States itself that will be 'mutually destroyed'. Of course a tit for tat destruction of infrastructure across the ME would plunge the world into economic crisis but Trump might think "Meh how bad can it get, wom't come anywhere near Mar-A-Lago"…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,889 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    It definitely will sting and hurt the IRGC, but it won't destroy them. Since Trump re-imposed the sanctions after he ripped up the JCPOA, Iran have lost about that much in income from lost oil revenue and probably much more than that in overall economic harm. 500bn is a lot of money to take in one go, also a lot of money to take on a drip of sanctions over 10 years

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,555 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    This is not a related question to the post i responded to but i suspect its your attempt to deflect from the fact that iran have not tried to attack any desalination plants and that is why theres been no successful hit on one.

    If/when Irans are hit, based on what has gone before i fully expect that Iran can and will hit GCC Desalination plants.

    To answer your new tangent. On Feb 28th Irans nuclear, infrastructure, air and naval bases, leadership and schools where attacked by the US/Israel.

    They responded by attacking similar across Israel/US bases and infrastructure in GCC aligned with US/Israel

    Since then its been eye for an eye.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,623 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    Iran's only chance of its own infrastructure not being attacked is to threaten retaliation. Every escalation has been from Israel and America. Iran's threat last week was what stopped Trump attacking its power network.

    And the states are not neutral but I sort of admire your determination in believing otherwise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    One has to be rude reacting to someone constantly posting lies.

    Your post was twisted to the point it was outright lie.

    I am sure it is not comprehension problem. You just engage in the same thing over and over because you are Israeli apologist. No matter what they do reply is but but Iran plus your favourite nonbeligerent neutrals spiel.

    So yes, attacking Iran without declaration of war and targeting civilian infrastructure right from the start was a war crime. Everything what happened afterwards was a direct result of operation Epsteins fury when both sides go after everything they can.

    Blowing up bridges, occupying land and demolishing homes of a sovereign country is another one. Iran is without a doubt bad actor and bad country but the two attacking it right now are much worse. One led by egocentric self-absorbed individual who could not stomach not getting Nobel peace prize and other led by utterly corrupt genocidal maniac.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,181 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    The markets don’t close for any Easter holidays, it is just a regular weekend.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,555 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    Theyre either a troll/botor have a serious cognitive defect.

    Claiming the UAE and SA are neutral is like saying the houthis and hezbollah are neutral.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,219 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



Advertisement
Advertisement