Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

US/Israel conduct airstrikes on Iran again

1387388390392393427

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,525 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    What “genuine, organic regime change”, for the people of Iran this is their last chance to change the last 47 years, if this fails they are done.

    There are videos showing a silent uprising in the country and people are attacking the IGRC and Basiji, unfortunately some are also calling for their families to also be killed in reprisal for their actions, so internally this has the ability to turn into a nasty civil war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,089 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    You don't know that, just an opinion. As I said, legality so far is opinion too. The narrative on rights and wrongs solves nothing. Just adds to propaganda and counter propaganda. The weight of declaration of legality isn't remotely going to change one iota of what is happening, other than perhaps the US might be more amenable towards not targeting anything other than military targets. Though that is arguable too. The die has been cast and all that matters now is how to reach a settlement while causing the least damage. No side is going to admit defeat and will want to be able to claim a victory of sorts. So negotiations are going to be very difficult I think.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,531 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    What “genuine, organic regime change”, for the people of Iran this is their last chance to change the last 47 years, if this fails they are done.

    Regimes can last a lot longer than that.

    Genuine change usually comes from within a given country and, frankly, every time the likes of the US has gotten involved in the affairs of another country in the last 70+ years they've made an absolute balls of it and ended up making things worse because it's not so much "regime change" that they are interested in for the good of the people concerned, it's a regime change that's agreeable with US goals.

    You won't bomb a people into changing it's government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,175 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    The GCC is hosting the majority of US forces involved in this action.
    The vast majority of strikes into the GCC states have been against US bases and facilities used by the US.
    Dual use and other associated targets have also been hit.
    A quick breakout of facilities and use of same attacked to date.

    Screenshot_2026-03-28-11-46-08-289_com.microsoft.office.excel-edit.jpg


    Bemoaning those as strikes on GCC states and Civilians?
    Flies in the face of the fact the GCC aren't raising similar outcry regarding strikes on Iranian dual use and civilian facilities being launched from their territory.

    The 1st strike against water desalination of this war, a US strike via PrSM against Qeshm.
    Was launched from Bahrain, the GCC can't claim to be neutral when actively supporting and allowing attacks on Iran from within their territories and with their logistical support.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,695 ✭✭✭yagan


    Same could be said for a lot of the GCC, especially Bahrain and Saudi Arabia.

    9/11 is actually closer in time to the great siege of Mecca than 9/11 is to us now.

    The oil curse dictates that those in charge become more entrenched against those they rule. Norway learned from the middle east and instigated state driven exploration and ownership, even if tax payers had to shoulder initial exploration costs rather than let outside profiteers in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,175 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    You were asked what the reason was if not supporting US operations across the Middle East.
    It wasn't a trick question, lay it out.
    In case you missed what was asked of you.

    Why do you think they are there?

    What's the purpose of an inflight refuelling tanker?

    Or indeed an AWACs?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 276 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    Oh ok, the IDF said they didn't do it - that clears that up so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 276 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    I've said it before but I literally had conversations about this with Iranians 20 years ago when I was in Iran, at that time it was looking possible that the Americans were going to try to invade them. They hated the government but they hated even more that outsiders thought they knew what was best for them. They have a civilization that goes back millennia and they are fully aware of this. Despite what people here and elsewhere think, they aren't a bunch of benighted savages in need of saving by Western people. Their recent history alone shows that nobody in the West (or Russia) give a flying fúck about them either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,219 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    It's not their last chance. Not at all.

    A regime change instigated by Israel and US would have no chance of legitimacy. It would be viewed as a foreign puppet government and would not last. Israel is already hated for the genocide and Israel killed Iran's religious leader on Day 1. And he was anti nuclear...

    I think the uprising would have succeeded if given time. An uprising instigated by people power would have much stronger chances of success. The previous protests around Mahsa Amini were a turning point in many ways.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 276 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    The last "regime change" instigated by the US in Iran didn't work out too well either.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,219 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    No. Israel's Mossad trained the Iranian secret police in surveillance and torture in order to keep the Shah's regime in place.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,360 ✭✭✭Tazz T


    Jesus. A website dedicated to trying to downplay and negate the truth of Israeli war crimes (with a banner at the top 'Israel at War - Donate Now'). Ploughing the depths of Israeli propaganda - straight from the nazi playbook.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,531 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I know several Iranians, one of which I've had an in-depth conversation with on this topic. He wants the Iranian leadership gone. But what he, and as he put it "the Iranians", absolutely do not want is somebody else put in place by either America or Israel, who'll only end up being another puppet of theirs. And many Iranians remember what happened the last time that was tried.

    If the Americans (and the Brits) had kept their noses out of Iran's affairs in the first place we wouldn't be in the mess we're in now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,285 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Honest Reporting??

    'HonestReporting or Honest Reporting is an Israeli media advocacy group'

    All they have stated is the IDF say they shot warning shots and the fragments of those warning shots caused the injuries to the child!!

    Honest Reporting indeed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 276 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    I've been to a lot of different countries but my stay in Iran still resonates with me. Given that you know Iranians this isn't going to be news to you but they are probably the most kind and caring people I've ever met. When I travelled to the country, I went overland and crossed the border from south eastern Turkey. I ended up at an army outpost after I went through the crossing, it was basically in the middle of nowhere where I crossed and it was the middle of the night too. I wasn't afraid but it was all a bit weird and I was very tired too (I'd been travelling for almost 24 hours without sleep at that stage) so I probably looked like a nervous wreck. One of the soldiers spoke English and after welcoming me he started telling me that I shouldn't be scared because I'm in Iran now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,525 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    I have to totally agree with this, i guess that i would like to see Pahlavi take over with a mandate to hold elections within a fixed time. The Americans should have learned from Iraq, they can take over but they can’t run a foreign country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,695 ✭✭✭yagan


    Reports of lethal hits in Dubai on US military that were in hiding off base. If true and confirmed it will demonstrate that there's significant local intel in GCC not sympathetic to the US propped up regimes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,525 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    IMG_0168.jpeg

    This is google earth, but the latest free dates are from 2023. KC-10’s were based there for years. The quality of those chinese satellite photos are rather crap so you can’t assess aircraft type nor ownership.

    None of the other free satellite maps that i have seen offer good clarity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 693 ✭✭✭Lawlesz


    I see you’re back to posting the same “Iran is heading for total collapse” take like it’s a certainty, when it’s really just your own speculation. It’s bordering on fantasy now, confidently repeatedly predicting one particular outcome with no evidence behind it. Are you hoping that if you say it often enough it will make it true?

    There is no evidence that any of this will come to pass, and more and more reads like the posting of someone fantasying about it than any critical analysis of the situation.

    Any time someone explains the reasoning behind Iran’s actions, you jump straight to accusing them of “cheering for Iran.” That’s been explained to you multiple times. Understanding something isn’t the same as supporting it, but you keep ignoring that and repeating the same line.

    You did it to me last week as well, saying I was “OK with Ireland being attacked,” and couldn’t back it up when asked. Then it was “you’re cheering for Iran,”. When asked to show where I said anything like that, you just didn’t reply. Then turn up later repeating the same rubbish to other posters

    You’ve also been misrepresenting other posts (like the refugee comment) to suit your argument. It’s a constant stream of bad faith posting and speculation, and you try to pass it off as fact while accusing other posters of all sorts. It’s unbelievably tiring.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,525 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    Look who is visiting Saudi.

    IMG_0167.jpeg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 276 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    I'm sure the Orwellian language is completely lost on that poster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 276 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    Why Pahlavi? What mandate does he have outside of segments of the Iranian diaspora in the West?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,891 ✭✭✭✭8-10




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,525 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    His flag is the only flag that people appear to be flying inside iran.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,219 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    There is no point. When asked in the past to point out the exact word that represented "cheering", he ran away.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 276 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    I don't think this is the case. From what I've seen it seems to be the diaspora, i.e. either those who were actual monarchists and fled after the Islamic Revolution, or their descendants, actively promoting this guy as some sort of leader of the Iranian people. I honestly can't see why the average Iranian would want Shah v2.0 in power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,525 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    Are you following social media where they are showing groups attacking the IRGC and Basij? The controlling forces are weakened so no better time to rebel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,695 ✭✭✭yagan


    Even though Maduro is in US custody there's no sign of regime change or elections in Venezuela, so all Pahlavi III will be is just another Saudi monarch with an inner circle ruling a majority.

    Pahlavi's grandad was actually a middling army officer that ousted the then Shah of a dynasty that had been there a few centuries. If Pahlavi II had been supported nationalising the oil wealth then Pahlavi III would probably be on the throne now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,525 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    IMG_0165.jpeg

    This is going back 2 days, no mention of a ballistic missile hitting anywhere.

    The sad thing about this is that one place posts “something” and then other media sites take it as gospel, all trying to get their clicks with instant news, who cares if its correct or not.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,584 ✭✭✭Marty Bird


    I think it’s very clear that Iran is targeting US assets and interests in the region, you know the ones that’s started this.

    🌞6.02kWp⚡️3.01kWp South/East⚡️3.01kWp West



Advertisement
Advertisement