Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

118121813181518171818

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Sorry but it is insane picking Wallace over Van Der Flier.

    It's not even close between them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,591 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Going by that logic, Wood is clearly better than Sheehan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,762 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    It's far too early for Sheehan to be even considered for an all time team. You'd expect he will be the best ever hooker but he needs another four years before being in the conversation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,785 ✭✭✭50HX


    Its subjective

    Hard to beat the raw power of Wally but if you want work rate & tackle all day then VDF



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,049 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I enjoy these arguments and don't take them too seriously but they are inherently subjective and even across 1 decade making comparisons is difficult, never mind 30 years. Sheehan is a better rugby player than Wood was - it is not particularly close. He is simply better at most of the facets of the game - he is stronger, quicker, a better thrower, a better scrummager, a better rucker. So then we are having to extrapolate how much better Wood would be under today's S&C, training environment etc and we are largely doing it by comparing him to his own cohort. But it is all supposition (maybe his own cohort was unusually bad, maybe better S&C doesn't help him cause he was already taking it super seriously when others weren't, etc).

    For what it is worth, this would be mine but I am only locked in on about half of them.

    15. Keenan 14. Bowe 13. O'Driscoll 12. D'Arcy 11. Hickie

    10. Sexton 9. Murray

    1. Healy 2. Sheehan 3. Furlong

    4. Beirne 5. O'Connell

    6. O'Mahoney 7. O'Brien 8. Heaslip

    16. Wood 17. Porter 18. Ross 19. Ryan 20. Doris 21. Gibson-Park 22. O'Gara 23. Earls



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Wood has more caps over a longer period than Sheehan, as well as winning world player of the year. So yes there is absolutely an argument to be made for Wood being 2. I think when all is said and done, Sheehan will surpass him.

    Van Der Flier has more Ireland caps and more tries than Wallace and O'Brien. Wallace had a longer career, but never reached the heights Van Der Flier reached as a rugby player, as good as he was.

    This isn't just about him winning world player of the year, but it absolutely holds more weight then being picked for a few games where the only thing gained from it is money for the unions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,591 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    One thing I was thinking about when comparing Wallace or SOB with VDF is the quality of their international rivals in the same position. The former two had careers that overlapped with the likes of McCaw,, Pocock, Back, Hill, Britz, Smith, Kaino, TDT, Faletau, Warburton. The opponents of that calibre that VDF has had to contend with are Savea and PSdT. Maybe Matera. It's harder to be best in the world when your direct rivals are the quality of the first group.

    I admit I've had a couple of beers so I've probably missed some great players in both groups.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,224 ✭✭✭TRC10


    It depends how much weight you put on longevity, as opposed to how good a player was at their absolute peak. For example, Stockdale at his very best in 2018 is the best we’ve seen from and Irish winger in the pro era. But he’s done very little outside that year, so it’s hard to justify selecting him, even though at his absolute peak he’s the best we’ve had. Bowe for example, never scored 7 tries in one 6N, but was consistently excellent for an extended period.

    I personally don’t think it’s too early for Sheehan to be considered. He’s got 39 caps, he’s our 8th highest try scorer of all time, the best try scoring forward in 6N history, and has won a grand slam.



  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 9,462 ✭✭✭fitz


    I was at that game, and the group I was with (all Munster folk, I married into it), all reckoned we'd do a number on them, but I remember saying before the team was announced that if we started ROG it was a sign we'd do nothing but have one out runners and the Welsh would be well able for it. It was gut wrenching in the stadium watching us blow it, especially after having been at the Australia game and experiencing the incredible celebrations after it. Yeah, still a deep wound, that one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,766 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    A very salient point. Wallace and SOB were both better players than VdF, in an era of better 7s.

    I find it hard to pick between Wally and SOB to be honest, Wally shading it for athleticism maybe, they were both absolute monsters on the pitch. VdF's workrate is what enables him to succeed



  • Advertisement
  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 9,462 ✭✭✭fitz


    Wally was one of my favourite players. Was so pissed off that the RWC warm up game against England robbed us of seeing him at the RWC in NZ. England were filthy that day...I've had an intense dislike for Tuilagi ever since that tackle.

    Wally deserved a better end to his career.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,920 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives




  • Administrators Posts: 56,306 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    You are confusing two different things, who was the better talent versus who contributed more to Ireland. Caps and tries don't come into it.

    Like BOD is obviously Ireland's best ever 13 but in terms of achievements he's under-represented because he played in a weaker Ireland team than Garry Ringrose.

    VDF winning player of the year just means he was better relative to everyone else at that point in time.

    This is not a good barometer as to how VDF stacks up against SOB or Wallace or Ferris. Would VDF win player of the year if he was around at the same time as peak SOB or peak Wallace? We'll never know for sure, but I would argue it's much less likely as the quality of the field was much stronger.

    VDF absolutely benefits from playing in a much better Ireland team than those lads did.

    If I had to choose between SOB at his peak and VDF at his peak I'd pick SOB.

    Post edited by awec on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,064 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I despise the WC warm up games. Always an exercise of waiting to see who is going to cop serious injury



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,394 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Gordon Banks in goal...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,588 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I hear you but the tackle was fairly innocuous and I doubt Wally holds it against Tuilagi. Just incredibly unfortunate. Wallace was one of our greatest ever players in my book.



  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 9,462 ✭✭✭fitz


    For me it was a cheapshot tackle, there was a swinging arm in it...he could have just shoved Wally into touch, but he was just looking to put in a big hit. My abiding memory of that day was the amount of slightly late hits England were putting in...they were definitely trying to rough us up, if I remember right. In that context, it was just more of the same dirty play, imo.

    But yeah, you wouldn't have expected that tackle to result in the injury that it did, it was a bit of a freakish outcome. I had been looking forward to watching Wally at the RWC (we went for 4 weeks of it), and to have it be a career ender...well, it wouldn't enamour you to Manu.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,796 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Complete cheap shot. Tuilagi revelled in those.

    Wallace wasn't prepared for it. He was jogging out over the touchline hence the awkward fall and subsequent injury.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭realhorrorshow


    What?! He was a metre infield and bracing for contact. He just got smashed and landed awkwardly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,591 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Why was he jogging over the touchline? Did he have the ball?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42 shinana abu


    Agree Tuilagi was a cheap shot merchant



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,667 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    He might have been, but there wasn’t anything obviously foul about that hit. Wallace was a ball carrier still well in the field of play, and angled back in (not towards the touch line). Tuilagi was well within his rights to go for the big hit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,064 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    That was just his foot catching on the turf. Nothing you can blame Tuilagi for there. Shite luck for Wallace



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,796 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Ok maybe Im remembering through tinted glasses so!

    And the fact it was a RWC warm-up match



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,796 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Definitely. Think he also put a few late hits in on Earls and Sexton over the years

    His specialty was trying to obliterate the defenseless player as they came down with ball from a Garryowen.

    Post edited by ionadnapóca on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,588 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Ah yeah, he was a nutter who actually assaulted opponents on a couple of occasions, famously. A reason I think people exaggerate the Wallace tackle. It was just bad luck though, if it was French player no-one would comment on the tackle and rather remember that it was a great player and a very unfortunate end to his carreer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,591 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Thats what a chaser is supposed to do. Player jumps, catches the ball, lands, and the chaser wants to time their run just right so as one foot hits the ground they can smash the ball carrier.

    It's a beautiful thing when done right. When it's mistimed the consequences can be horrible.



  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 9,462 ✭✭✭fitz


    I don't know about that, he was always going into touch, his run took him from close to the 5m, to about a couple of feet from touch. Tuilagi hit him driving up, swinging his left arm wildly.

    Screenshot_20260327_203402_Brave.jpg

    I get players wanting to put down a marker, but I also think Tuilagi isn't in control of the hit there. While not a foul as such, I think it was reckless. The injury was a freak outcome, for sure, but that doesn't mean I think it wasn't Tuilagi going out to just put in a dirty hit...getting Wally in touch was secondary. That was about putting some hurt on him.



  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 9,462 ✭✭✭fitz


    Aye, I'd have more issue with the scummy habit a few of the England players had of hitting kickers slightly late on clearance kicks who were at the end of their swing with their standing leg planted. Courtney Lawes was terrible for it. Absolutely intended to injure.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,790 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    Yeah, it's a bit like saying Paul O'Connell cheap spotted Chabal!

    (Not a Garryowen technically but similar concept)



Advertisement
Advertisement