Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Capitalism is Unsustainable

  • 23-03-2026 09:17PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,649 ✭✭✭✭


    Very good and thought-provoking article by an environmental economist (linked below) on how and why capitalism is ultimately unsustainable as it relies on endless growth and consumes natural resources much faster than our only planet can sustain, despite efficiency and resource extraction advances over the past 50 years.

    Many thinkers believe the current system will not survive the 21st century and that a day of reckoning is approaching; others are of the view that AI (Artificial Intelligence) will only serve to create massive social upheaval and unrest due to unprecedented job losses in pursuit of profit maximisation and a collapse in living standards that will hasten the end of capitalism.

    The relentless financialisation and commodification of housing, for example, over the past 30 years has led to a collapse in home ownership in all the Anglo-American countries and the emergence of a younger generation that will never realistically be able to attain housing security and wealth, unless it is inherited. Effectively, the longstanding trend of rising wealth and living standards in the West from one generation to the next is not just grinding to a halt, but is going into reverse.

    Some are also of the opinion that the chaos we are seeing now in the world with respect to America under Trump and its destabilising actions is a symptom of the ultimate breakdown of the boom-bust cycle of capitalistic growth. All are of the view that, on its current trajectory, humanity is very much on borrowed time that is fast running out.

    But what type of economic model will eventually replace capitalism?

    Food for thought indeed. Looking to hear your own views on this.



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,155 ✭✭✭c montgomery


    Elon will get us to mars, chinese are looking at colonising the moon, plenty of growth available to those who think big.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,218 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    Ahhhh as opposed to marxist communism? The problem is socialist always run out of other peoples money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,056 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Capitalism has not caused a lack of housing.

    Excessive regulations introduced by Govts based on people's preferences is one reason.

    Example: Japan builds more houses than most countries, as they don't have planning permission.

    Why don't we try to see what would happen if we abolishing planning permission?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,056 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Economic growth has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty.

    We need more of it!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,482 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    I've lost count of the number of times we've socialised the cost of corporate failure in this country. ICI, Quinn, Setanta, AIB, PTSB, EBS, Anglo, Irish Nationwide, pyrite, mica.

    Capitalism only exists by occasionally going EXTREMELY socialist to cover its failures.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,655 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Elon has a tendency to promise pretty huge things and failed to deliver. He claimed he'd have a colony on Mars by 2025.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,645 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Both systems are sh1t. But presently out of all the forms of government and economics, capitalism, with all its faults, seems to be the least sh1t system out there.

    Gotta be a better solution somewhere.

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,301 ✭✭✭Mike Murdock


    Pure naked Capitalism would have let all the banks fail and bankers be put in jail ala Iceland. We have the worst of both worlds, Corporatised Socialism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    But pure naked capitalism would have also taken our deposits with them. I wouldn’t think we’d get much, if anything, back in a bank liquidation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 304 ✭✭Mother Shaboobu


    Well I don't think that's being suggested either.

    Greed is the issue more than capitalism. I dunno, seems like a free market with state supports and a degree of nationalisation makes the most sense.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,968 ✭✭✭✭briany


    If we abolished planning permission, you'd end up with people taking the absolute pss, especially in this country. The Japanese probably have more of a civic and environmental awareness built into their culture, when it comes to where they place structures, anyway.

    As ever, the solution to over regulation isn't no regulation. It's just common sense reform. And as well as removing some of the more ridiculous zoning laws, not allowing investment firms to buy up Irish housing would be another good move because while capitalism may not be the sole culprit of the crisis, its worst excesses certainly are not helping.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,422 ✭✭✭Kaybaykwah


    They keep building millions of houses while millions of others are left abandoned. Not a winning recipe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,895 ✭✭✭aero2k


    And in that bastion of capitalism across the Atlantic you could add Goldman Sachs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,482 ✭✭✭✭L1011




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭bored65


    That’s a wishy washy article which judging by its tone and punctuation seems to been completely generated by ChatGPT

    Edit; 80% ai according to pangram



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,218 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    Well then like the fat man falling 15 stories, we dont run in to save him and let nature take its course. It will teach other reckless traders there are consequences for playing hard and fast and going beyond safety threshold. We also should have not have bailed out the Anglo Irish Bank or the non garunteed bond holders. That is capitalism. Smaller government is the answer and let the market and consumer decide success/failure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,164 ✭✭✭Dogsdodogsstuff


    Had this argument with a friend over 20 years ago. Capitalism with humanity is like leaving a raging alcoholic running a pub. All the wrong kinds of people , similar to politics, seem to end up in the strongest positions who have absolutely no interest in anything other than themselves.

    Individuals just can’t be trusted so whatever system you come up with you will always have rogue individuals corrupting or manipulating it to their goals. But capitalism is just the absolute worst sort of system you could come up with that literally lets rich people get richer even when they’ve made a balls of everything.

    It’s just a modern feudal system at this stage , that’s technically not because “anybody can be rich”. Yes, anybody can win the lottery or get lucky and rise above it. Also love how people imply it drives on humanity which is dogs*t. Some of the greatest achievements or inventions come with wars (technology and moon) or crisis (covid immunisation)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,218 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    Japanese houses have that light construction due to its position on tektonic plates. Japan on the Pacific rim is terribly prone to earthquakes like Turkey and Syria. Knock it down and build it up again fast is a suitable ideology. Much like simple construction in the Carribean.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,482 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    So comparing planning systems, and housing output, is completely pointless.

    Post edited by L1011 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭littlefeet


    Late capitalism as a concept has been around for a long while, the end of capitalism is always around the corner.

    Says the brainy professor or economist who has benefited in everyway from capitalism.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,825 ✭✭✭plodder


    I note the article says nothing about liberal democracies. But, I think you can make a stronger case that (ever expanding) cradle to grave welfare systems and entitlement spending are much more responsible for these problems because they are a product of our one man, one vote, democracy.

    Capitalism is just private ownership of goods and property, combined with free markets. Capitalism can exist in a low or no-growth environment, as it did for centuries. But the welfare state can't. We have to have economic growth to allow the national debt to keep on expanding and entitlement spending to keep increasing.

    “The opposite of 'good' is 'good intentions'”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭csirl


    Most of us older posters grew up in a world where Europe was literally divided between capitalism and socialism.

    On the capitalism side of the iron curtain, society thrived, most poverty was eliminated, human rights were a thing and society was diverse.

    On the socialist side.........



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,877 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Capitalism is, no doubt better than any alternative system we've devised. Unfettered capitalism where corporate losses are socialised and capital gains are taxed at much lower levels than the wages of labour, however, lead to a concentration of wealth among a robber barron class which has disasterous consequences for the world (see Trump, Putin, Thiel, Bezos, etc.)

    As with all things, the answer lies in balance: let market forces decide what gets built/grown/created and how much is charged for it, have taxation policy that taxes away the excessive wealth of current billionaires and prevents the creation of new ones and sensible planning laws that ensure we're not destroying our planet in the name of "progress".

    Abolishing planning permission would be outright madness. If anything we need to tighten restrictions on what's allowed to be built. Have you seen the monstrosities the likes of Cairn Homes and Glenveagh are getting away with throwing up lately? It beggars belief that someone with the title "Architect" actually put their name on the drawings. Hideous, over-sized, boring blocks that are in no way in keeping with the environment they're built in. I'm hearing more and more anecdotes from the occcupants of these new blocks that they're having issues with the cheap construction materials used and dampness from the lack of ventilation achieved in pursuit of an A rating.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    It's been a topic I've thought quite a bit about over the last few years.

    The simple concept of market growth demands newer markets and newer markets at this point are harder and harder to find and what constitutes a new market for a company is often because they outfought or cannibalised the company or industry that had been serving that market. Finding newer markets because of population growth seems to have already reached its peak as housing/healthcare/education costs have become such in much of the west that people are simply no longer repopulating as they did over millenia.

    Manufacturing companies in particular saw this coming about 30 years ago so they flipped from building products that they could market as being long lasting and robust and instead they flipped to offering products that were "features lead" but have horrendous lifespans and are virtually impossible to repair. As we've seen (or anyone willing to look has seen) this has had significantly negatively impactful outcomes for localities/regions in terms of the use of natural resources, and for the world itself in terms of the climate.

    You can have forever growth without forever market growth and to have that, you need a forever supply of resources and the simple facts of physics and maths means that the finite resources the planet has cannot sustain this model.

    There's lots of ways to be pessimistic about this. Corporate greed being what it is will mean that capitalism will extract every last morsel it can out of the planet before it shrugs its shoulders and says "maybe we shouldn't have done that" and by the time that happens we will have likely seen more and more damage done along with conflicts between nations (corporations) for the final resources, chief among them being natural fresh water.

    I have as close to zero as it is practically possible to calculate confidence that the likes of Elon Musk and the tech-bros™ will come up with a positive solution for this. Musk is a charlatan who has been enabled by the worst excesses of modern society and he would watch the world burn if it gave him the energy to get to Mars and live out his life in an inverted fishbowl with enough people around him to pander to his ego for his final years.

    As to what will happen? I'm not sure, but human nature being what it is, it is very likely to involve a lot of conflict and suffering as we transition to a new society rather than any sort of awakening. The "elites" whoever they are may have calculated that this will happen as a natural cycle as the world population falls (largely through loss of available resources) from about 2100 onwards as I've seen projected.

    It's hard to think positively about all of this, one of the negatives of this sort of topic is to see people struggling massively in the midst of this capitalist world and yet they continue to think corporations are the solutions. One bizarre positive I'd rather I didn't have to experience is that my not having children does not make me petrified as to what their and their children's future is likely to be.

    Post edited by Tell me how on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,386 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    People building anything anywhere. No thanks.

    Planning isn't a hold up anyway. There's no end of planning permissions already granted and waiting for someone to build them.

    Japan does have strict zoning laws.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭csirl


    Is Animal Farm still on the school curriculum?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,671 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Why don't we try to see what would happen if we abolishing planning permission?

    We already tried that during the Celtic Tiger.

    During Ireland’s Celtic Tiger boom (roughly 1995–2008), 

    rapid development led to widespread building on flood plains, driven by weak regulation, developer demand, and pro-growth local authorities

    . This resulted in thousands of homes being built in vulnerable areas, increasing flood risks for residents and creating a lasting legacy of damaged property and expensive insurance issues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,013 ✭✭✭✭Mr. CooL ICE


    Let's have a mix of capitalism and socialism and not take anything to the extreme. Crazy idea, I know...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    The death cry of capitalists, "whatabout….. communist marxism". Is that all you can say to what is a thoughtful op?

    I lived in the US for a few years and now live in a European country conservatives in the US dismiss as a communist society. It is a million miles away from that. In fact nothing about it could be described as marxist communism.

    The quicker people realize this, the better it would be for the human race. One of the most depressing things of the last 10 years has been watching the volumes of people who think Trump/Musk and their ilk have for one second acted in the interests of anyone but themselves. Being selfish is a human trait, that's fine, there's going to be people like that, but to praise and laud them as has been done has been a massive misstep.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    100%. I don't see any European countries seizing the means of production or banning ownership of private property. So many Americans were raised/brainwashed to be so extreme that they see any deviation from their extremist position as equalling the complete opposite extreme. It's as if there's no middle ground anymore.



Advertisement
Advertisement