Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1180618071809181118121818

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,224 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Leinster already have nearly their entire starting XV on CCs, so actually having to pay the wages of a couple of guys on their team isn’t that big a deal for them. Other provinces don’t have that.

    Crowley, McCloskey and Baloucoune have now proven themselves as key players for Ireland. The IRFU should be rewarding Munster and Ulster for producing them by putting them onto national contracts, just as Leinster have been rewarded by having their whole team payed for.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,306 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Every single contract is funded to some extent by the IRFU, the exact amount depends on what type of contract it is.

    All players are bucketed into categories like development player, regular league player, senior player etc. So they might say for example that regular league players get 100k a year. There are defined salary bands for each category too.

    Say for example Jack Murphy at Ulster. He is in that bucket, and Ulster want to pay him 150k a year. 100k of it comes from the IRFU, and Ulster top up the 50k.

    These numbers are entirely made up, but this is roughly how it works.

    I think that PONI and central deals (these days) work almost the same except the figures can be a bit more ad-hoc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,711 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    What was the original reason? I thought it was to keep particular players playing in Ireland. Topping up their wages so they didn't go to abroad for more money and avoiding placing that financial burden on the provinces.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,924 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    there are few reason, and player retention is one, from the point of view that if provinces cannot gazump others for player contracts then there needs to be a carrot to keep our top players in ireland.

    However in my opinion a bigger reason for central contracts to exist is the realisation that these players are essentially Ireland players before they are provincial players, in that they spend a significant amount of season time in ireland camp and having their time managed by the IRFU and thus not available to their provinces. Therefore those provinces need to have alternatives available for those positions during the season, which puts an additional salary cost onto the province. It was said above that Central Contracts are an "award" to a province for developing the players, i would argue that that is incorrect. The province still has to pay, from its balance sheet, a percentage of the CC players contract PLUS the whole salary of the alternative players that they need available when the CC player is away (again, for a significant period of the season)

    for the most extreme example, see Johnny Sexton and Ross Byrne.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,711 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Fair enough. Aki fits that bill if the plan is to bring Aki to the world cup.

    As an older player he'll probably have his minutes managed pretty strictly. So Connacht will be without him for much of next season and will need to pay for replacements.

    Plus they needed to pay to keep him in Ireland and prevent him going abroad for more money.

    As you explain it, the Aki CC makes more sense than I originally thought



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    They're not going to flip them onto central contracts mid contract. That's never happened for anyone.

    The likelihood is that Crowley & McCloskey, as guys who have been around the national team for years, are already on heavily subsidised PONI contracts. Harder to say with Baloucoune, given how little international rugby he's played for years (largely down to his injury issues).

    If the former two were getting renewed now, there would be an argument for CCs for each of them.

    This bullshit of Leinster being rewarded for "having their whole team payed for" - when in reality, for the best part of a decade Leinster have produced players who have substantially carried the national team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 977 ✭✭✭antfin


    The amount of central contacts at Leinster doesn't just mean that they have to "pay the wages of a couple of guys". They have to pay 40% of those salaries on the central contracts for players who aren't available for vast amounts of the season either on player management breaks, training camps or during international game windows and also pay salaries for guys who of a significant level to remain competitive when those players on central contracts are unavailable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,758 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    We are not worried about Bundee missing time unless we have a bunch of injuries at centre. Cathal Forde is at least as good as Bundee at 12. Gavin can play 12 to a high level.

    There are others who can play the position to a decent level.

    I love Bundee and I hope he gets back to his best. He impressed me when he can on against Scotland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24 oso92


    The near absence of key Ireland players moving abroad suggests the IRFU’s model has ways and means of keeping top players happy whether it's a central contract or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,771 ✭✭✭All_in_Flynn


    I'm not sure to be honest because he can clearly pass off his left hand. Case in point was the 3rd try off the back of the scrum where he passed it out the back before McCloskey threw it wide.

    He started all 5 games so obviously deemed vital to the team. Jones been getting plaudits left and right but once again Ringrose shut him down completely. Give me Ringrose any day.

    Post edited by All_in_Flynn on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,224 ✭✭✭TRC10


    This bullshit of Leinster being rewarded for "having their whole team payed for" - when in reality, for the best part of a decade Leinster have produced players who have substantially carried the national team.

    That’s the point of the system. They supplied players to the national team, and got reward for it by having said players paid for. It’s not a criticism. Crowley, McCloskey and Baloucoune have established themselves as important players for Ireland. If it weren’t for them, we’d be in the midst of a post mortem of a 6N that included our first loss to Italy in 13 years and an embarrassing home loss to Wales. Their provinces should be rewarded accordingly, as Leinster have been. Hardly controversial.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Yeah, sure, and while we're at it - Edwin Edogbo had a big 11 mins off the bench in the Italy game, and Nathan Doak had a great cameo against Wales, should we stick them on central contracts too?

    Grow up for God's sake.

    As I said before, if Crowley & McCloskey had expiring contracts, I'd have no issue with him getting bumped to centrals. Baloucoune has more to prove.

    Ulster & Munster haven't had many central contracts for the past 5-6 years because they haven't been producing enough players. That could change over the next 5-6 years and early signs are promising, but as I said, if you want to go through the list of players who didn't get CCs over the past 6 years or so who should have had them, then you've likely got two Leinster players (Conan & Lowe) at the top of that list.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 977 ✭✭✭antfin


    There's probably many players that you could add to the list that show how silly of a suggestion is it is that Balacoune has earned one. I could be wrong but I don't think Simon Zebo ever got a CC, which, along with Lowe, shows that it's not something handed out for one good Six Nations. There are also many other players that had to put in years of work, eg Josh Van Der Flier won World Player of the Year in 2022 while not a CC, before he got a central contract the following year having played for Ireland since 2016.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,224 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Yeah, sure, and while we're at it - Edwin Edogbo had a big 11 mins off the bench in the Italy game, and Nathan Doak had a great cameo against Wales, should we stick them on central contracts too?

    Obviously not. Stop being disingenuous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,588 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Obviously Ringrose sometimes does pass the ball playing 13 in a test side! The point is he dies with the ball very often. And yes, he is a top class defender and has many other great facets to his game. But he is not dangerous in attack these days. A lot of this team seem to have benefited from the higher level of competition for places and being dropped for a game or two as a result. We just don't have the depth at 13 yet to give Ringrose than break/kick up the arse. I think he could do with it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,771 ✭✭✭All_in_Flynn


    I wasn't being disingenuous when I mentioned the pass off the left hand vs Scotland. I just meant that I know he can do it but doesn't do it often.

    Hmm, I take your point that he's not the one making the breaks. I'm just not sure that a large part of that is not by design. We seen in the Lions that he can do it if needs be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,776 ✭✭✭A-Train


    wrong thread



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,413 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    McCloskey was on a BBC podcast yesterday and he was stressing how important Ringrose is to the team, not just on the pitch but off it. He's integral to this team in the minds of those that make the decisions or play with him.

    On the depth issue at 13, I'd argue James Hume should be looked at. The summer centre selections will be interesting. Presumably McCloskey, Aki and Ringrose travel and Osborne will be in the squad. Is there room for a younger centre rather than Farrell or Henshaw?

    Edit - I'd be happy to see Postlethwaite or Gavin in the squad, but back up at 13 seems more of an issue which is why I'd be looking at Hume. I'm not dismissing Farrell, but having 5 centres well over 30 is a concern.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61 ✭✭shimmieandshake


    Yep, I'm a big Ringrose fan, but agree his attacking ability has waned, and would like to see some of the younger generation snapping at his heels.

    Apparently Gavin will be back for Connacht's SA Tour in April. Hope he gets back up to speed quickly and becomes the player we'd hoped. He's 22 now. Needs an injury-free run to start fulfilling the huge potential he showed at u20s.

    But for now, Hume should be ahead of Gavin - I know Hume has a concussion issue right now, but hope he has a big end of season push when fit again. He's 27. Should be coming close to his peak.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,489 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts


    Still can't help but think Osborne at 13 running off SMc has absolutely tons of potential



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 579 ✭✭✭exiledawaynothere


    post 6N - who is the best 23 to play New Zealand assuming everyone is fit?

    Does Keegan walk back in at 15?

    Lowe and Hansen on the wings?

    Porter at loosehead ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Keenan absolutely walks back in at 15.

    Why does this come up every now and again? Yes, Osborne played well at 15 in this 6N, but Keenan is one of the very best 15s, if not players, in the world when he's fit.

    Osborne, as good as he is, doesn't lay a glove on him.

    Absolutely nonsense to suggest that he doesn't get back in the team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 585 ✭✭✭Tommybojangles


    Interesting question, everyone magically fit tomorrow my 23 would be:

    McCarthy

    Sheehan

    Furlong

    McCarthy

    Beirne

    Baird

    VDF

    Doris

    JGP

    Crowley

    Hansen (can switch to the left fairly easily with his skillset imo)

    Mcloskey

    Ringrose

    Baloucoune

    Keenan

    Porter

    Kelleher

    Bealham

    Ryan

    Conan

    Doak

    Frawley

    Osborne

    Harsh on Osborne to be dropped and on TOB to miss out but we have excellent options in the backs now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,413 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    I'd love to see it as well, we did see it a bit with Osborne running centre lines off him during the 6Ns, but most on here seem to be of the opinion that he is a 12 rather than 13 for pace issues?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,489 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts


    Personally I think criticism of his pace is over blown, if he was as slow as some allude to theres no way he wouldn't have been completely found out at 15.

    I accept he's not a speedster but we saw him run some beautiful lines in the centre and finish well, I'd take that over top end pace at 13 tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,064 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    That's a great team. I think I'd go for Clarkson or O'Toole ahead of Bealham at this stage. Really hope Baird can come back playing at the level he was before his injury. He will add so much to the team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,711 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,064 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Not the worst injury though. Shite for Ulster



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 inbloom427


    Fit and in form needs to be the criteria, and the likes of Mac (to a greater extent) or Keenan (to a lesser extent) need to demonstrate that in order to displace the likes of TOB and Osborne. If Keenan does come back in, perhaps might be time to drop Ringrose.

    Same with Baird. Should be settled on McCarthy (if his form doesn't dip again), Ryan, and Beirne at 6. Lineout is going well and Ryan doesn't come out of the XV easily.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,785 ✭✭✭50HX


    I think it could be horses for courses going forward.

    We've now seen a bigger body of work from Osbourne & what Hansen brought v Aus.

    For me he absolutely deserves to go back in provided his club form backs it up on his return from injury.

    Its not inconceivable to see Osbourne at 15 with 2 v pacey wingers against certain opposition, we've seen the physical attributes that Osbourne has brought when running lines off Stu Mc this past few weeks..Keenan doesnt have that level of physicality imo.

    We are in a far better position option wise at 15 now than we have been since Rob K retired.

    He has enough credit in the bank at the minute but I wouldnt be throwing the toys out if he didnt start specific games either



Advertisement
Advertisement