Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

US/Israel conduct airstrikes on Iran again

1301302304306307424

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,890 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I wonder if Trump tacos against Iran will Israel stop attacking them too and solely focus on Lebanon. Amazing Bibi will have conducted so many wars over such as short space of time and still survive in charge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,181 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    You replied to me in your post. From what i can gather you are drawing comparisons between (1) historic claims by the Irish state, of jurisdiction over the entire island of Ireland with (2) the idea to create a state of Israel by an atheist Hungarian at a meeting in Switzerland.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    That's some runaway. It must take incredible blinkers and character to still support Israel's actions in Gaza. Astounding really. The "dislike" is very strong.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 862 ✭✭✭Fuascailteoir


    The only defense of rape that I have seen is the Israeli state basically sanctioning its use against Palestinian prisoners by not taking prosecutions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 597 ✭✭✭myfreespirit


    You posted:

    "In the not so distant past, plenty of people were being blown up to achieve those aims."

    Those aims, for clarity, are to extend the territory of a country, as espoused by political parties.

    In Ireland, those responsible for "blowing up plenty of people", were hunted down, andcwhen caught, brought before courts of law, and sentenced to long terms of imprisonment when found guilty.

    Presumably you will agree that the same must apply to the Israeli government who have "blown up plenty of people"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭goldsparkle


    Where did I write that I am against granting asylum and how did you come to that conclusion? I am not against people seeking asylum or Ireland granting it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,202 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Distinguishing between the regime and the people would a challenging task for any administration, let alone these maniacs. At some point they may just say to hell with it and try to damage Iran as much as possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    In Ireland they were given amnesty when there was peace, I assume you would apply the same principle to Israel?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 597 ✭✭✭myfreespirit


    Just as long as the b@$tards do plenty of jail time beforehand...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    33,000 of them tried to overthrow the regime in January, that didn't go well for them.

    When you are up against a regime like Iran's, you are in a horrible situation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    How can you have the cheek to ask questions when you refuse to answer any questions relating to your "stuff"? I am still waiting for answers from yesterday btw.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    A lot of Irish bombers never did jail time, some of them got heroes' burials during Covid as well.

    One law for the Irish, another law for everyone else.

    It is ok to want someone else's land because it was yours historically if you are Irish, but not if you are Jewish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 306 ✭✭Hodger


    Seeing the news and I honestly can't wrap my head around the logic here. We've got reports of a French military unit getting hit by a drone attack in Iraq, and a Thai cargo ship getting struck by a projectile in the Strait of Hormuz.

    It is completely baffling to me for a couple of reasons:

    Point 1: France didn’t even join or partake in the current military actions/war against Iran. They've stayed out of it.

    Point 2: If you look back at recent history, France was actually one of the most staunchly and vocally anti-war western nations when it came to the invasion of Iraq in the early 2000s. They took a massive political hit back then for refusing to join that coalition.

    And then you have Thailand. Thailand has absolutely nothing to do with this conflict. They haven't taken part in any of this, yet their civilian crew members are getting their cargo ship set ablaze by Iran in the Strait of Hormuz.

    It just goes to show that you can try to stay out of it, or even have a history of opposing military intervention in the region, facts, history, and neutrality just don't matter to religious fanatics. They'll just lash out at anyone.

    https://www.france24.com/en/middle-east/20260311-thai-navy-says-cargo-ship-attacked-in-strait-of-hormuz

    https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2026/03/13/french-soldier-killed-in-attack-in-iraq-s-kurdistan-region-confirms-macron_6751397_4.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,890 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    The Israel government has and is taking Palestinian land, the irish government is not and has not. Defend land grabbing all you want, but the accusations against the Irish parties are unfounded.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭.Donegal.


    Wanted war criminal Netanyahu has killed over 100 children in Lebanon recently.

    More than 100 children killed by Israeli strikes in Lebanon, health ministry says

    More than 100 children have been killed by Israeli strikes in Lebanon, according to the country's health ministry.

    The total number of people killed since the first strikes on the country on 2 March now stands at 773, while a further 1,933 people have been wounded, it said in its daily report.

    It said 103 children had now been killed in the strikes, up from 98 as of yesterday. A further 326 children have also been wounded, the ministry added.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,278 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    That is one of the reasons I put someone in the grey area



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,278 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Where was the French military unit when it was hit?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,486 ✭✭✭halkar


    Collateral damage. US and Israel are the masters of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,168 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    The transfer of a Marine Expeditionary Unit to the Gulf is both interesting at this point in time aswell as being an indictment of the absolute incompetence being demonstrated in the planning underpinning the attack on Iran.

    Much like Hitler believing he was a great General and ignoring the advice of his Generals particularly after the failure before Moscow.

    20260313_180901.jpg

    It genuinely appears that all military advice and basic best practices were ignored in the rush to support Israel's decision to attack Iran.

    What the US believes the MEU can achieve?
    Is an interesting thing to game out.
    A well trained force, equipped to attack via amphibious assault, but a small force that cannot be rapidly reinforced by follow on landings.
    What targets for such a force?
    Is it merely posturing, to keep Iran off balance and divert their resources?

    Or.

    Is there a US plan to land troops at a point within the Strait of Hormuz?
    Perhaps to control a section of coastline with the aim of interdicting drone and SSM attacks via Marine Corps artillery attacks.

    Or.

    The absolutely mental notion of a direct assault on Kharg Island?
    The US have warned Israel against bombing the island, they know it's immediate strategic value in both terms of oil output and importance to Iran's economy.
    I think it's both too obvious & far too risky a play.

    But who knows what Don thinks?

    I do think if the US were to land a force at Kharg?That Iran would torch the lot rather than allow the US to claim control of it.
    The Iranians don't need to defeat a US force to win this war.
    They really just need to endure and it rapidly becomes an economic Armageddon.
    The impact on oil prices, the reduction in Fertiliser and Helium supplies and the cash the US, Israel and the GCC states are burning through in their own actions.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    Only way anything can be done at this stage is to DMZ the whole south coast of Iran... creating a buffer zone too wide for rockets and artillery... have continuous fighters in the air for drones... that's all depending on ballistic missiles being depleted.

    I reckon that's why the marines are inbound.

    Air arm of the marine corps is moving eastward also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 978 ✭✭✭batman75


    Rumours are that Bibi has been killed or is in a coma. No sight of Ben Ghvir for days either. Smodrich would want to watch his back. Given they killed Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei they are in line to meet the same fate. If true it will really shake the Israeli psyche. Another reinforcement that their security is no longer guaranteed by the state.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    That makes no sense. The coastline is 1500 miles long btw. This war will be over in a week. 22-March is my guess.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭.Donegal.


    Not a good look from Zelensky. Although he left Iran when he was young, he’s the figurehead of the previous murderous puppet installed regime which lead to the Islamic uprising that has given way to what rules Iran today. The Iranian people should decide their own destiny, not installed puppets of America/israel as it won’t work in the long run.

    Ukraine’s Zelenskyy meets with son of former Iranian monarch Pahlavi

    Ukrainian President Zelenskyy has met Iranian opposition figure Reza Pahlavi in Paris, where they discussed the situation in Iran and the US operations against the “terrorist regime”.

    In a post on X, Zelenskyy said the Israel-allied Pahlavi, who is the son of Iran’s last monarch who was toppled in the 1979 Islamic revolution, and his team briefed him on the “signals they are receiving from inside the country”.

    “The regime’s hierarchy has indeed already suffered significant losses, and it is crucial that the Iranian regime gains nothing from this and that the people of Iran have greater protection for their lives and more opportunities to determine their own fate,” Zelenskyy wrote.

    Zelenskyy had said earlier that the war in the region brings “nothing good” to Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    It's the only plausible option to secure the straights. ... practicalities is another matter.

    Trump is getting richer off this war, he not stopping any time soon. Movement of military kit also suggests this isn't stopping soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,784 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Can't see Israel having the manpower, ordnance or cash to keep bombing Iran on their own. US depleted of ordnance may also not be too quick to resupply Israel either.

    I think they'll concentrate on Lebanon when the US pull the plug. If Iran continues to send missiles/drones into Israel, that would be an interesting scenario.

    And there's still Gaza, East Jerusalem, Syria and the West Bank for them to deal with.

    It would be enlightening if anyone has an in-depth analysis for the various credible scenarios.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,666 ✭✭✭amacca


    That picture reminds me of a quote I probably misheard

    Something along the lines of ...Donald Trumps promising military career was sadly interrupted by the outbreak of the war in Vietnam..........



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,784 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I'd be an utter dunce when it comes to military strategy but even I know sending 2,200 soldiers to Iran is bonkers.

    Perhaps they're going somewhere else in the ME? Or per your first point, it's just posturing?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    No it's not plausible. The manpower and equipment needed to enforce a DMZ along the entire coast of Iran would be immense. It would be pointless lunacy. And why? For how long? The war will end soon enough and things will go back to normal until the next "obliteration" is required. And it is called a "strait".

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



Advertisement
Advertisement