Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

US/Israel conduct airstrikes on Iran again

1284285287289290423

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,053 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Everything that is happening shows why we need to adopt renewable energy faster. Otherwise we are dependent on mostly unstable, undemocratic and chaotic regions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭csirl


    But Governments will. If this drags on for another while, I can see various Governments indemnifying tankers they flag or those en route to their countries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 924 ✭✭✭bored65


    But yet again your are lumping everyone into the same “west” basket (aside are you not in the west yourself?) with no nuance

    Take Azerbaijan, whom one can’t say are in “west” with a straight face

    Iran bombed Azerbaijan repeatedly in the last week, a country that;

    • has no US bases or permits them access, if anything Trump made a deal with their enemy in Armenia 
    • Is Muslim Shia majority like Iran 
    • Has a large Azeri population like Iran (which has more for Soviet reasons)
    • President gave condolences and his hometown got attacked
    • Spent decades laundering money for IRGC
    • Helped mediate conflicts involving Iran to avoid regional disruptions
    • Wanted no part in this war yet got attacked like dozen+ other countries 

    It’s quite obvious that neutrality means nothing anymore and the very same people on the far left whom harp on about Irish neutrality and how we {and our neighbours} shouldn’t spend anything on defence

    are now busy clapping the likes of Iran pooping all over concepts like rule of law and neutrality (and before you go but whataboutery US, they are in wrong too for starting this illegal war, two wrongs don’t make a right)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,282 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I don't conosider us neutral at all. Just look at how very one sided we were in constantly bashing Israel post October 7. That's not neutal. And plenty here now not neutral as regards this Iran issue. Just listen to some the nonsense from some people wanting our Taoiseach to go to the White House and stick it to Trump and America by lecturing tthem on all they're doing bad/wrong…

    And here is the hypocrisy with this neutrality nonsense: Our official government response to this has been neutral, in calling for peace; but you can bet your bottom dollar if the U.S. weren't involved in this Iran attack, and it was JUST Israel, we'd be nowhere near neutral!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,671 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Maybe, but the cost will be astronomically which will have to be factored in to the wholesale price.

    Also people who are working on this ships, are not military personal. They have not signed up to be blown out of the water.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 924 ✭✭✭bored65


    So if Ireland or Irish people/troops get attacked here and or in the Middle East, you will say what then? We deserve it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,282 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    No. I won't be saying that at all.

    If Irish troops are in the middle east, then they are at risk, and in the firing zone from whatever country wants to get involved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,551 ✭✭✭csirl


    Not sure it would. In the scheme of things, the cost of replacing or repairing a ship is immaterial to most large countries. And only needs to be paid if the ship is damaged.

    If loads of ships are being attacked/damaged nobody will be making the journey on pure safety grounds. But if they are confident that they can protect them, then it will be done.

    There are many precedents of governments stepping in to cover uninsurable risks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 924 ✭✭✭bored65


    An Irish plane flying over Azerbaijan in the narrow corridor between Russia and Iran gets shot down, just like MH17 was, with loads of Irish people on way to far east

    Our fault too?

    Like I pointed out this self hating anti neutrality position is a slippery slope



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,530 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    That Smedley D. Butler quote was never more accurate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,282 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    You're bringing in all kinds of examples here. If Irish people/troops want to be in the middle east during this conflict, and the conflict widens and escalates, then that is their choice; there are risks associated with this.

    No use crying and blaming the 'bad' Iranians (who are under attack) for deaths here. It's not you or me or Ireland having our country attacked and bombed daily by foreign countries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,085 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    What's this new trend of people making up hypothetical situations in order to make their arguments?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 924 ✭✭✭bored65


    Earlier in thread you had posters blaming and giving out about those fellow citizens who when this war broke out were in Middle Eastern countries {that are neutral but ended up being attacked anyways} and called all sorts of fairly nasty names and the government criticised for repatriation flights



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,671 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    There are many precedents of governments stepping in to cover uninsurable risks.

    For shipping war insurance?

    Have you examples please?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,530 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Well Chris Murphy, we all knew how incoherent and incomplete these…ahem…"war plans" were already. We didn't need to attend any meetings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,331 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    How slow do you have to be that any support in Ireland for Iran is because they are being attacked by Israel and the US who are continuing their joint efforts to destroy the Middle East?

    Disagreeing with international authoritarianism and state terrorism does not automatically mean that you agree with everything carried out by the people or countries who these acts are aimed at.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    My guess is that this war ends in around 10 days time. Hostilities cease around Sunday 22nd March. The usual "objectives have been met" and "obliteration" rhetoric. Big lift for markets on the Monday.

    Post edited by Cluedo Monopoly on

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,530 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,890 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    That would be pity then MM would be in the WH on paddies day before the conflict ends. Can see Trumps mood sour in advance of his climb down.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,549 ✭✭✭✭leahyl


    Stryker cyber attack by iranian linked hackers. All their systems are down and multiple systems wiped.

    Stryker Hit by Handala - Intune Managed Devices Wiped : r/cybersecurity



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,482 ✭✭✭trashcan


    War, what is it good for ? It's good for business.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 253 ✭✭Tacitus Kilgore DCLXVI


    In my case, i was staying in a hostel in Tehran and the stay got extended to a couple of weeks due to an accident. An Iranian guy who was friends with staff hung out in the place most days and once he found out I was Irish he would greet me by saying "Roy Keane!".



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 54,659 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    You mean Azerbaijan with Israeli links and more than likely letting them use their airports?

    Also nobody is celebrating the killing like you are disgustingly alleging to suit your agenda. More pointing out you can't cry foul or neutrality when you are assisting an aggressor and are hosting viable military targets. If you make a deal with the devil you might have to pay them back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Yep all those missile defence systems need to be restocked amongst gulf states. Big money for Big Arms Industry.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭yagan


    This sea mining angle feels like a complete off ramp build up. Destroy a few Iranian navy ships, call them all mine layers when in reality mines can launched from shore and hauled into position by an average tug boat or fishing trawler.

    Plus mines are not required to close the straight, it's just that they build an image in the mind of US voters of an object that their Navy can destroy. So essentially an imaginary spectre that they can claim to have neutralised so they can say a line has been drawn.

    However it entirely depends on Iran playing along. Bombing Hanoi to the talks table didn't stop Saigon falling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭Large bottle small glass


    There's layers of innocence to that post.

    Humans will always compete for resources; look at the paradise that is the Congo/Rwanda thanks to it's cobalt resources which AI is the new driver for but also mobiles/EVs etc.

    Look who's there; USA with it's tech oligarchs, Wagner group and China. Locals get fcuked of course.

    Saudia Arabia's primary vulnerability for example is to Iranian/Houthis is the oldest resource of all; water. Close to 40 million people in a deserte require a lot of large desalination plants which are very vulnerable to drone/missile attacks. Access to both seas is mirrored by adversaries in Iran and Houthis close by to both coasts.

    Increasing renewables energy so we don't need any fossil fuels without building huge nuclear plants isn't currently possible.

    When Europe gets a week long cold spell with close to no wind and very low sun where does the renewable energy come from?

    What's the cost of standby in such a system? What's the cost of the storage?

    Where do the resources for that storage come from?

    Energy usage will only go up. That's all has every happened in human history.

    Post edited by Large bottle small glass on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,438 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Problem is after twice negotiating with this administration and twice being attacked during them, who could trust both of the zionist regimes to act in good faith. Especially with the constant lies being spewed.

    Same thing will just happen again.

    Add to that the JCPOA treaty which some buffoon tore up and walked away from.

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,774 ✭✭✭storker


    And trebles all round at Mar-a-Lago because, by amazing coincidence, the Trumps will have done very well out of the market movements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,774 ✭✭✭storker


    I was working in France the year of the Heysel Stadium riot, and although I let people know that I was Irish and not English, some didn't quite get it. One colleague in particular, who after the riot would greet me amiably as " 'ooligans!". I didn't take offence because I knew it was slagging, French-style.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭yagan


    You do realize that Europe has many different weather zones?

    It's like saying just because it's cloudy in Ireland it's also cloudy across the whole of the EU.



Advertisement
Advertisement