Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Cork Area Commuter Rail (CACR)

15678911»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,652 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Plan for Cork is to order 21 train sets identical to the DART+ fleet except they will be 25kV AC overhead

    Cork is making rapid progress as there is 20+ years of preparation, planning, zoning in place to make it happen



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,429 ✭✭✭pigtown


    It's actually more like 50 years, dating back to the Land Use Transportation Strategy of 1978 which recognised the potential of the railway lines and attempted to divert growth and investment to the towns along the lines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,603 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    I hate to tell you, but people are left behind at stations going into Dublin on all lines already during the morning peak. The same for the luas.

    Also, the 29s are not great trains. Noisy, rock about the place, dirty, cold. Most will be happy to see the back of them. They are a stop gap. Better than a 2 car 2600 leaving people behind, but that is about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭jimbob955


    Ya Irish rail have done very well in Cork. Could a similar CARC plan work in Galway/Limerick try and drive growth and new developments, along the railway lines and near new stations??

    Do Irish Rail have the ability to be a flag bearer for sustainable, planned, public transport development. More than any housing government minister?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,760 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    The limited railways in Galway make an Athenry-Oranmore-Galway double tracked shuttle your best bet but Limerick has a larger rail network which could be leveraged. Unfortunately it has not been developing along the paths of those lines over the years so that would have to change.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 369 ✭✭rounders


    Was just about to comment the same. Limerick is best setup with rail lines radiating 4 directions once Foynes is open (I know just freight for now). But like you said, very little development along the line.

    I wouldn't know Limerick too well but if the line tunneled under the city and across the Shannon to link with the Ennis line I feel it would really be the crown on top. I know that's fantasy though



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,104 ✭✭✭niloc1951


    What I'm writing about is Mallow-Cobh, or vice versa. The Mallow to Midleton is talked about as a through train. Passengers wishing to travel to/from Cobh (from the Mallow end) would need a same-platform change to the Cobh train at Glaunthaune (Cobh Jct) or further up the line.

    Both the Mallow-Midleton and Cork-Cobh trains are/will be down trains which share the same line and platforms, after they leave Kent station, as far as Cobh Junction.

    Obviously, passengers travelling between Midleton-Cobh and vice versa would need a platform change at Glaunthaune or further up the line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,688 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    How does nonsense like this get published with zero critical analysis. In what world would extending a train to Youghal take 10,000 cars off the road daily?

    "It would remove an awful lot of cars from the N25, up to 8 or 10,000 cars per day I would imagine".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,296 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    I wish they’d try walking before running.

    I really can’t see how they’d divert 4~5,000 people a day from Youghal from driving to the train (10,000 cars = 2x 5,000 trips).. No matter what way you arrange it, commuters will have to drive to the station, and if they’re already driving, then driving on the open road to Killeagh or Mogeely to use a Park+Ride is a better choice than winding through Youghal’s twisty streets to get to a station. The traffic flows pretty well until Killeagh, even on bad days, so the stretch into Youghal is not where you really need to remove cars.

    Honestly, I don’t see any strong justification to extend further than Mogeely when Castlemartyr is bypassed: the only realistic path of that bypass road comes so close to the old railway that it would make for a perfect P+R site, as well as allowing development in what is quite a neglected town at the edge of Cork city’s natural hinterland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,596 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Yes, the 25kv overhead makes total sense for Cork. One additional point: anything with 25kv should be dual-voltage (i.e also able to run on 1500v DC). Dual voltage is simple and routine, and it means sets can access the Dublin area if necessary.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56 ✭✭eoin91


    54,763 cars a day on the N25 just before the Dunkettle interchange (1), and 15,474 cars a day on the N25 east of Midelton (2).

    The Clr is saying cars, not journeys, so 1 car on a daily commute counts for two journeys in the above numbers (inbound/outbound). So cut those numbers in half 27,381.5 and 7,737.

    And of course, not everyone can switch away from their car (trucks, vans, those who only a car is viable etc) but luckily we have at least a lower bound for this number from the TFI links, 22.7% at (1) and 15.19% at (2) of vehicles are non passenger cars, so unable to switch to the train (in reality percentages would be higher as not all car drivers can/would switch). That brings the numbers down to 21,311 and 6,561.

    But please do tell me how the train would take 8 or 10,000 cars off the road, how a newspaper could put this in the subheading and how an elected representative could state this as fact at a council meeting, all without spending less then 5 minutes like I have looking this up.

    1. https://trafficdata.tii.ie/sitedashboard.asp?sgid=XZOA8M4LR27P0HAO3_SRSB&spid=DFA198C74264
    2. https://trafficdata.tii.ie/sitedashboard.asp?sgid=XZOA8M4LR27P0HAO3_SRSB&spid=5229D264490

    Note1: I could probably drop those numbers another 10% if I manually counted up all the cars on the road between 11pm and 6am from the TFI chart, but I think I've made the point pretty clear.

    Note2: I'm not against any rail line or voicing any opinion on this line, just calling out nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,296 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    They do mean journeys, not cars, but that really doesn’t damage your argument, and I agree the claim is crazy.

    You are entirely correct that AADT figures are trips, not individual vehicles, but their wording is correct too, in its way: if you take a car off the road in the morning and evening, that’s “two cars” of traffic space that is freed up. But even at this more generous reading of the data, it still makes no sense, as it would involve diversion of 60% of all traffic east of midleton onto commuter rail. As you say, that’s a nonsensical position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,652 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Plain 25kv is the plan

    Train is 1500VDC by design so dual voltage could be done, likely put the transformers and rectifiers on the end cars where the battery packs are.

    Cork fleet will be captive, have its own depot so little it any justification to go this path



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,513 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    It's probably not beyond the realm of possibility that within the lifetimes of the Dart+ fleet and the CACR fleet the Cork commuter, Dart + and Cork to Dublin electrification projects would be complete. Would it not make sense, perhaps at the midlife refurb, to fit the 25kv AC/1.5kv DC respectively so that the otherwise effectively identical fleets could be used more flexibly across the network?

    Assuming this is a relatively:

    a) triviaI job for these modern 'flexible install' trains

    b) cost effective option

    I think the battery trains might be too useful long term for 'quick electrification' of areas of the network ahead of eventual full electrification to be swapped out, although if they want to use them intensively outside of Dublin then they'd probably want them to be 25kv AC

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here (use your boards.ie email!)

    👇️ 👇️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 96 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    Surely it would be more useful in the long term to replace the 1.5 kV DC wires with 25 kV AC than to fit the AC stock with DC equipment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,596 ✭✭✭Economics101


    The practice in europe is to have dual (or even treble) voltage EMUs and Locos, where necessary. As far as I am aware, having dual voltage capability specified for new rolling stock is fairly routine and should not be prohibitively expensive. Replacing DC OHLE with AC would be extremely disruptive. and multi-voltage rolling stock is the common solution, for a very good reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,296 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    25 kV means replacing substations too - it’s not a trivial job, and it would mean closing all of the the affected railways while the conversion was done, plus buying/modifying trains and in the end it wouldn’t really provide much of an operational advantage.

    The south-east corner of England is electrified at 650 V DC (third rail, like London Underground) because there has never been any advantage in changing it that outweighed the huge cost..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭PlatformNine


    b) cost effective option

    So that is unfortunately the problem.

    Generally speaking it may not be the most expensive, but over 100s of units it will add up and the added flexibility may not be worth the added cost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭PlatformNine


    Is it possible to do dual voltage stock without dual pantographs?

    I ask that as a genuine question as I know very little about dual voltage stock and the few examples I have seen all appear to use dual voltage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,596 ✭✭✭Economics101


    As far as I am aware changing voltage while on the move can be done while passing over a brief neutral or dead section, and there are newer technological fixes which make things pretty automatic and simple. I don't think there is a need for separate pantographs.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 96 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    It also means less substations. It costs on average around 15% more to order dual voltage units, and considering this system will presumably be in use for a century or more, it should be looked at; Czechia has already began converting its DC lines to AC.

    I don’t really think the third rail system in England is a good comparison. It’s relatively self-contained (owing to historically being operated by a different company), and doesn’t require all intercity trains coming into the city switching to the other system, unlike ours, which will.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,596 ✭✭✭Economics101


    There is one interesting case at present whare a 1500v DC line dating from 1926 is being changed to 25 kv AC to conform to the rest of the national rail system. The line in question is Lisbon-Cascais in Portugal (familiar no doubt to many Irish tourists), and the process seems to involve a lot of rolling clusures of sections of the line. It seems to be a complex and quite disruptive affair.

    What motivated the change may well be the fact that the DC rolling stock about 50 years old.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73 ✭✭spark23


    Would a future opportunity arise with DART underground to use 25kVA in conjunction with 4North to standardize on 25kVA on the Dublin to Cork line and Dublin to Belfast line. Could have express DARTs maybe on the non stopping line into Dublin from future expansions to Kildare etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,652 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    DART+ stock has 2 pantographs but requires only a single pantograph to run. The second is identical but is used in charging only.

    Typically you use a different pantograph for AC and DC, DC is low voltage high current with heavy contact wire, where as AC is high voltage low current with a lighter contact wire so the pan head and contact strips are different. So you need two



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,384 ✭✭✭Mefistofelino


    A bit late to this..

    Nice to see that Cllr. Dineen is now embracing the concept of public transport. He previously criticised the plans for the new 25 floor Railway Yard apartment block in Cork for not having a basement car park, on the grounds that people living in the city centre could not rely on public transport, while at the same time actively mobilising opposition to the Bus Connects plan. I suspect he may be one of those people who don't actually give a sh!te about public transport but if it gives an excuse to get rid of a greenway, they're game for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭jimbob955


    That man is incredible, constantly against Public Transport and against Active travel projects around the city and county.

    My nephew is studying "Sustainability" in school, I think it is only when we see the kids coming through into roles of power and homeowners, that we might see some real action and support for PT and AT projects. I think we still have another 20 years+ off idiot politicians and NIMBY people controlling the narrative and complaining about everything before we start seeing some real change and genuine support for PT and AT projects.

    Does anyone think the Iran war and fuel crisis might see some more support from the general population for PT and AT projects and renewable projects?? Will the penny finally drop for some people that we can't always rely on imported fossil fuels all the time!?!?



Advertisement
Advertisement