Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Weekend On One With Brendan O'Connor

1206207209211212214

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,467 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    It certainly shouldn’t have been. No matter which way you want to spin it, a well known female journalist made snide remarks about another woman’s outfit / appearance and then the presenter rowed in for good measure. No woman should be judged or quizzed in that manner about their appearance or their outfit.

    Post edited by mrslancaster on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,825 ✭✭✭plodder


    My take on the handbag issue was first I was surprised nobody apparently had asked Steen what it was all about before now. Otherwise, Alison O'Connor would have known presumably. Second, it seems the media and her detractors generally created this narrative that the handbag was some kind of defiant gesture to the left when she failed to get nominated for the presidency. Alison took that a step further by asking if she had two bags in her car? A modest one to be used if she got the nod, and the Hermes then to be taken out when she didn't get nominated as a "middle finger" to her detractors. Steen denied it unsurprisingly, saying she wanted to look her best on the occasion, that the bag was a gift from her husband and cost nowhere near the sums that were being bandied about. Brendan thought the question was tongue in cheek, but it wasn't apparently.

    “The opposite of 'good' is 'good intentions'”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,237 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    You've never heard any comments about Charlie Haughy and his Charvet shirts???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,047 ✭✭✭yosser hughes


    Apart from that being 40 years ago - questions about Haughey and his extravagant lifestyle were few and far between when he should have been questioned a lot more about how he was funding his lifestyle. Our spineless media rarely bothered- Vincent Browne being one of the exceptions.

    The private dining and the charvet shirts were raised in a sheepish and sometimes admiring tone and long after the fact.

    Alison O'Connor is a dose with very little of interest to say. Her columns are an exercise in stating the obvious, usually long after someone else has written something similar. She's an example of so many long term hacks in this country that have made careers by just being around.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,467 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    Ah fair point, yes, he was pulled up on the cost of his shirts after he gave a speech telling everyone in the country to stop living beyond their means and then it turned out that he’d paid for them from the party leader’s fund. I didn’t hear that MSteen used anything but her own family private income to pay for that handbag which I’m sure you’ll agree, she is entitled to spend on whatever she likes, just like anyone else.

    Comments about a woman’s appearance, body, clothing, hair, makeup etc etc happen constantly, even CConnelly got criticism from some quarters about the fit of her inauguration suit. I don’t recall hearing MDH’s suits, shirts or hairstyle being discussed but his wife’s outfits were.

    I know being in the public eye leaves a person open to scrutiny about their views, values, lifestyle, and that’s fair enough. But, I feel women in the media like AO’Connor should avoid comments on a woman’s appearance to score petty points. Challenge them on policies, business practises or topics that could affect citizens. Just my tuppence worth.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 451 ✭✭tarvis


    Brendan is fully behind the govt line in the treatment of schools in the SNA controversy -

    -The schools who are managing children who are on very long waiting lists for a diagnosis and treatment options - when such diagnoses are time sensitive - childhood passes quickly.

    -The schools who are charged with teaching large classes while also managing those with special needs - all in one classroom

    -The schools whose support staff are mostly on minimum pay, unlike the officials who tick boxes from afar and never ever face a classroom of children.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,726 ✭✭✭jippo nolan


    Luke ONeiil must have his own parking spot out in RTÉ!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,261 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    ..

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,261 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    Mod - warned for trolling

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,508 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,574 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    How about we don't go discussing people's autism, mental health issues or anything else?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,993 ✭✭✭Hippodrome Song Owl


    Adam Harris communicates very well because he largely speaks about what he knows. His brother is a spoofer who pontificates on all manner of topics of which he has little to no expertise or experience. For me that's the main difference in how well they each come across.

    Unfortunately however Adam Harris now monopolises public discourse on autism, and to a certain extent all issues around neurodiversity and youth mental health. His particular view has come to represent the only acceptable view of how society interacts with autism. There are many autistic individuals and families who don't feel he represents their experiences or opinions, but there is very little alternative access to influence public discourse on the subject outside his charity.

    Post edited by Hippodrome Song Owl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,508 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    There are 54 registered charities with the word Autism in their name. They would be happy to continue their work without the need to have a media presence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 22,628 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    Mod - as dulpit said above, "How about we don't go discussing people's autism, mental health issues or anything else?" Please don't post unsubstantiated claims about charities either, especially if you follow it up with a post acknowledging you don't know much about it.

    Some posts deleted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,942 ✭✭✭ballsymchugh


    I really wish someone, when there's constant talk of not being enough SNAs, consultant psychiatrists or whatever else that there's not enough of, would ask where they're going to be gotten from. You can't force people to apply for a certain job in a certain part of the country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,825 ✭✭✭plodder


    That was one of the most depressing items I ever heard on the program. Nothing signals to me more that this country is headlong bound towards another fiscal crisis some time down the road, based on that piece, with the government completely unable to control entitlement spending (however just the cause). I thought Brendan made a decent enough fist of playing devil's advocate - that resources will always be limited, will always have to be allocated based on priorities, rather than lofty notions around absolute rights, particularly "constitutional" rights, as if the constitution was a magic money tree. But, the panel were having none of it.

    As a by the way, I thought this was interesting considering the discussion on autism. The diagnosis is so broad nowadays that experts are trying to introduce a new diagnosis of "Profound Autism" presumably to prioritise resource allocation towards those who need it the most.

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/feb/15/profound-autism-meaning-what-is-parents-need-to-know

    “The opposite of 'good' is 'good intentions'”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,686 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Is Brendan O'Connor reflecting the Irish media that whenever Trump does anything it's a distraction from something. This attack has been in the planning for months.

    Our media is so poor when it comes to international matters.

    Looks like RTE resident Scott Lucas isn't being addressed as from the Clinton Institute anymore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 925 ✭✭✭littlefeet


    It bears David McCullough with it's, bipolar switch from a serious discussion on housing to a discussion on cute dogs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,152 ✭✭✭ShamNNspace


    No mention at all by the host or the four panellists of the Isreal/US bombing of a girls school in Iran leaving at least 100 dead 🤔



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,484 ✭✭✭z80CPU
    Darth 8-bit




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 770 ✭✭✭iffandonlyif


    It was utterly bizarre that they floated that conspiracy theory. I couldn’t believe what I was listening to. The way they (particularly Alan Barrett) spoke with such breathless confidence on issues they had only swatted up on the night before was embarrassing to listen to. Reminded me of a student debate.

    Scott Lucas was also on Newstalk’s newspaper discussion programme. I know that, as professor of international politics, this is his area of expertise, but surely we deserved a diversity of views, especially when he is so obviously partisan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 244 ✭✭tradfan1


    Could someone tell Pat Leahy, Political Editor of The Irish Times that Fine Gael is not pronounced Feena Gale!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,574 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Plenty of coverage online pointing out that the timing has meant that, yet again, Epstein is out of the papers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 770 ✭✭✭iffandonlyif


    Yes, that irritates me too, but not unique to him. I was more surprised to hear him pronounce the dead Iranian leader’s name as ‘Hchhmenei’, like he was coughing up phlegm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,686 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Is this from Irish newspapers?

    This offensive has been planned for months and months so the distraction theory is just stupid. Trump haters unable to form a view on the matter because they can't be seen to be supporting Iran, a murderous regime. So they've decided upon the distraction angle to seem clever and maintain their anti Trump faith.

    If Trump has questions to answer over Epstien, that will happen as he has a few years left in office.

    It's also ironic that Irish media is talking about distraction when they have used Trump as a distraction from Irish matters the past 10 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,686 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Embarrassing and shameless about how out of depth they are.

    Not sure I ever heard a presenter push back against this Scott Lucas. Only time was when he started to discuss our neutrality being a problem and I think Brendan shut him up. Lucas just there to say bad things about Trump. We can't let the public know the Democrats love war as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,329 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Actually that is how it's pronounced.

    How do you say it ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,329 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    It's also ironic that Irish media is talking about distraction when they have used Trump as a distraction from Irish matters the past 10 years.

    In and out of office Trump has been putting himself in the frame.

    What do you expect the media to do except report on his misdeeds ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,686 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    The amount of coverage on ICE on RTE was a joke. American immigration isn't a matter for us in the same way that Australian immigration, which is far stricter than the US, isn't on our news.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,329 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Now you're deflecting to another country even further away because you don't want Trump covered in Irish media.



Advertisement
Advertisement