Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General British politics discussion thread

1628629631633634637

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,345 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Remember, the justification for Israel's genocide of Gaza was their right to defend themselves after they were attacked.

    Here's the leader of the party who led the government of the UK for 14 out of the last 16 years, supporting israel attacking another country, unprovoked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,279 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,345 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Horrendous.

    Hamas attack Israel = Israel annihilates Gaza - leads to "Israel has right to defend itself" statement.

    US and Israel attacks Iran = Iran responds - leads to "I condemn Iran's attacks" statements.

    And mentioning Iran not being allowed to develop a nuclear weapon today is just antagonistic. Why wouldn't the whole of the Middle East here that and feel the UK has no right, authority or power to tell another country what to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,147 ✭✭✭Randycove


    the rest of the Middle East agrees with Starmer though, no one wants Iran developing nukes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,345 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Trump shouldn't have withdrawn from the Iran nuclear deal then shouldn't he?

    Do you think the rest of the Middle East want Israel to have them?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,147 ✭✭✭Randycove


    I doubt if they care too much. Israel isn’t going to give nukes to some mad jihadi



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,345 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Israel has attacked 7 countries in the last year or so. 1 in the last 24 hrs.

    I dont think anyone, me or you, think the issue with Israel and nukes is them giving them to anyone for them to use.

    But well done in avoiding the question while appearing to answer it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,546 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    He's quite right and everyone apart from centrists with their heads up their own arses about Starmer and his advisors could see it.

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,345 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    It's a problem in the States also with respect to how the Democrat Party has acted over the last several years.

    They talk progressively (to some extent) but they act very much centrist, at best. See how reluctant they all were to have anything to do with Mamdani before, at the election or since it.

    Except there, it is a 2 party system so they can focus on the "we're not as bad as them" strategy, knowing if the Republicans are bad enough, the Dems will get their turn next time out again most likely.

    In the UK, there's a lot more hands (or asses) trying to grab the seat so it's going to continue to be more volatile going forward with a lot of rainbow governments I expect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,920 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    I’d say trump & benny’s actions in the ME are a blessing in disguise to take the British media’s investigation into the fallout of the Manchester bi election on Starmer.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,016 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa



    Meanwhile Iran which has attacked dozens of countries over the years, and spent 40 years declaring death to Israel, has attacked 7 countries in 24 hours.


    Iranians in Iran and around the world, including in Ireland, seem to be celebrating the attacks of the regime that murdered tens of thousands of unarmed Iranian civilians only weeks ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,345 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I'm not a supporter/defender of Iran.

    People cheered in Afghanistan and Iraq too when they were "liberated".

    Do you think Trump has the best interests of the Iranian people in mind? Is that your take?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,016 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Absolutely not - my worry now is that Trump doesn't care in the slightest about regime change and would be perfectly happy to see the regime survive as long as it is no longer a risk internationally. Because I don't think that air strikes alone will be enough to overthrow the regime, and I wonder how much of an organised opposition lis left in Iran after the regime's recent exactions without help from outside. Help that I don't think Trump will provide.

    But I also think that people in the west who were relatively uninterested in the tens of thousands of unarmed Iranian civilians murdered by the regime only weeks ago are in no position now to claim that their opposition to the assassination of Khamenei etc comes from any real concerns about Iranians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,345 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    But I also think that people in the west who were relatively uninterested in the tens of thousands of unarmed Iranian civilians murdered by the regime only weeks ago are in no position now to claim that their opposition to the assassination of Khamenei etc comes from any real concerns about Iranians.

    How do you know they were uninterested? How do we know that you were interested in a way you think others should have been?

    Were you doing the things that you expected from others to demonstrate their care? What were those things? If you yourself weren't, but saw people be concerned about Palestine but not Iranians then I've two things to say about that. A - That doesn't seem like you care at all, you're just using the same suffering Iranians to undermine/take from care people are expressing about Palestinians. B - There are several reasons why people care specifically about Palestine including the intensity of what we've seen, the duration of it, the enablement by western societies in what has gone on there, the connection that we as Irish people feel because of both the colonial over reach and the British involvement. I've seen a lot of people complain about Palestinian activists not immediately acting in the same way with respect to the Iranian situation and that annoys me, but it repulses me when the people complain aren't activating for anyone in the way they demand others do for everyone.

    What annoys me about what is happening in Iran is mostly because it emboldens authoritarian action, it emboldens both Trump and to a greater degree, Netanyahu who has been a disturbing influence on the region for decades, it undermines international solidarity with respect to non-military intervention which wasn't perfect, but the opposite, military intervention is a bad bad slippery slope option. And of course the Iranians and now all the others in the region who are suffering and will suffer at least partly because Trump wants to avoid being disclosed as a paedophile/rapist and Netanyahu who wants to avoid being tried for corruption.

    I'm interested in your response to the questions at the start of the second paragraph but also I know it's not fair to drag this thread too far off topic so I'm not going to back and forth on this any more than what I've done.

    To bring it back to a British Politics discussion, Emily Thornberry called the attacks on Iran both ill-advised and illegal. I was pleased to see her use the second term definitively. At least someone in Labour was finally able look in that direction and speak with moral conviction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,016 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭rock22


    DO you remember the Iranians celebrating when the Ayatollah flew from Paris to take power after the removal of the Shah?

    Being cynical, I suspect the timing of this attack, in the middle of peace negotiations, has more to do with diverting attention away from Trumps Epstein links.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,691 ✭✭✭yagan


    I think photo ID is only trialed at the moment. I think my last vote there was 2019 and no one was checking IDs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    Israel is the maddest jihadi of them all in the middle east, they just dress a bit differently and have slightly different religious practices.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,279 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Labour are gaslighting us and are being facilitated by the media



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    he spoke about traditional politics been broken

    My take on this is multiple, but here are a couple of my thoughts.

    To begin with, we live in a society of plenty, so we all have enough food, clothing and shelter to survive comfortably. There are those who fall through the cracks of course, but even our homeless have a roof over their heads, with the exception of the few who sleep rough. I'm not excusing any of the exceptions, and I think we could do more, but the very large majority of people in our western society is physically comfortable.

    In second place, following from the above, the conditions that led to the rise of socialist and communist parties have disappeared: very large numbers of people carrying out manual work in very dangerous conditions - mostly mines and factories without proper safety measures - have also mostly dissappeared from our societies. Some of this has been outsourced to what used to be known as the 3rd world, some has been automated etc. Either way, it doesn't impinge on the lives of most of our working population.

    A third factor is the huge working class now washing around the (post-)industrialised world. People moving from country, staying a while and moving on or going home after several years. Many of these work in menial jobs - hospitals, cleaning, hotels, restaurants and the like. The nature of their stay means that they are not full members of our society, and despite the large number of them, they cannot or do not vote in any numbers, meaning that they are unrepresented in our parliaments; and these people would generally be natural socialist/labour party voters.

    Doubtless there are other factors involved, but traditional Labour politics no longer do the job. "Identity" politics was one of the responses in search of a constituency by many in Europe's left parties, and was a logical outgrowth from feminism (including women in the movement), anti-racism (including people of different origins in the movement) - but the numbers are small in comparison to the huge number of foreigners working and living in our society who are effectively disenfranchised.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,617 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    War and violence is their default setting. Ori Goldberg (Jewish Israeli academic who lives in Tel Aviv) predicts they will still be bombing their neighbours in 20 or 30 years' time and will always just be 'one war away' from peace and stability.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,016 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Getting back to UK politics, as per the thread title, Hannah Spencer seems to be yet another Green whose policies for being green are only for the plebs, as well as a "local" MP who doesn't think much of the locality:

    image.png

    (I think the number plate isn't actually illegal, just not correctly spaced out, but the rest is accurate)

    Shades of Al Gore's empty house being left lit up and fully heated, consuming a small town's worth of electricity while he was off speechifying around the world about saving energy. How everybody else should save energy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,617 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Would be extremely difficult to rig UK elections anyway via voter fraud given their FPTP system and the fact that their large constituencies rarely come down to a small number of votes in the end (most British constituencies have around 70,000 voters on the register). It's mainly gaslighting by the right wing brigade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,691 ✭✭✭yagan


    @volchitsa

    I had the misfortune of living near there once and believe me when I say not even the locals think much of where they live. Although that house they used in the 90s TV Pride and Prejudice is up that way and has a nice park.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,546 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    How about people use sources better than no name fúcking Twitter accounts with an obvious bias to back up their horseshít, and if there's going to be a news article, link to the fúcking article so we can all see the source.

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,993 ✭✭✭PommieBast




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,016 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    You sound angry. I linked to a video in which you can see with your own eyes what I've described, as well as a screenshot from a local newspaper.

    I'm sorry if reality is painful for you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,279 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Starmer now allowing the US to use UK bases - that essentially means the Cypriot base is now a target for Iran



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,617 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Watching that robot address the nation with the news is quite the repulsive sight - serious Tony Blair vibes there.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,147 ✭✭✭Randycove




Advertisement
Advertisement