Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General British politics discussion thread

1624625627629630637

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,483 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Suspended pending the new regs, but the outcome is much the same - there are five vacancies out of the 92 and its exceptionally unlikely there'll ever be any by-elections.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    This could be interesting.

    Is It appropriate or indeed required that Hoyle would have acted in this way given his role?

    Seems all too coincidental that he was the one to hear this rumor given the position he holds.

    One major question that will be asked is did he tell Starmer before he told the police.

    Curious also that this seems to have broken immediately after PMQ's



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,468 ✭✭✭hoodie6029


    The Met doing a bang up job as usual.

    ‘Why did you arrest him?

    ‘That guy told us he was about to leg it.’

    It must give Londoners a great sense of comfort when they report a crime or suspicion, the confidence with which it will be held and the tact it will be handled with

    This is water. Inspiring speech by David Foster Wallace https://youtu.be/DCbGM4mqEVw?si=GS5uDvegp6Er1EOG



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,546 ✭✭✭✭Tom Mann Centuria


    I'd love to see Mandelson put away (though it's probably very unlikely) I hated him before the cool kids did but Hoyle really is a terrible, self serving, self promoting speaker. Just dreadful and more concerned about himself above all else.

    Oh well, give me an easy life and a peaceful death.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,147 ✭✭✭Randycove


    Mandellson was under investigation and Hoyle had information that made him believe he was about to do a runner. I’m not sure he had much choice. I presume now he has been arrested he will have to surrender his passport until the investigation is complete.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I just find it very coincidental, the whole thing.

    That Hoyle just so happened to be in a place at the exact time where this was a pertinent conversation. Some people might say that is all a ruse so that Mandelson can say at some point that there was never any justification for his arrest and that he was only taken in because of fears he might abscond.

    I'm not saying that, the only person who could have planned something like this without much risk of that being disclosed is Mandelson if he knew someone who could whisper in Hoyles ear while he was away, but the timing of all that is weird.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,147 ✭✭✭Randycove


    maybe the zionists put him up to it, or something like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,147 ✭✭✭Randycove


    I thought they were the root of everything evil. Are you saying there is no conspiracy here?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Ah, I see where you went wrong.

    Sometimes there is a strong likelihood particular people are involved in something because of what they have said/done etc and their association with a story. Sometimes there isn't.

    I haven't seen anything to suggests Zionists are involved with Mandelson being arrested. I presumed you must have given you're talking about it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,993 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Can't even think about how many rules were bent to let him in given previous US immigration bans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,213 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Gorton and Denton by-election today. Genuine 3 way battle.

    Urban Manchester constituency so very much solid Labour territory - whilst it wasn't a seat in 2019 (The Johnson v Corbyn massacre) it's estimated they would have won with close on 70% of the vote.
    Greens are 4/6 favourite which would be a bad but not terrible result for Labour.
    Reform UK 5/2 - a win here would put them on target to be the biggest party in the next parliament.
    Labour 4/1 - some polling indicates they could retain it, failing that I guess it's important to avoid a voting meltdown.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,483 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    I can see a hideous Green/Labour vote split letting Reform in here, particularly as the growing Reform/Restore vote split can't happen here as there's no Restore candidate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,213 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    There is an Advance UK candidate (Ben Habib's 'Reform UK is too woke for us' Party) but they will probably max out at a few hundred votes. And the Conservative candidate could affect Reform as well. But agree a vote split scenario is more likely between Green/Labour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭rock22


    Did Hoyle not say he was in the British Virgin Islands speaking at an parliamentary function and was told this by senior BVI official? I imagine if he hadn't passed on the information and Mandelson did 'leg it' he would be accused of some cover up. I doubt he was going to take any risks for someone like Mandelson.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,626 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I've seen polling which suggests that the Greens have a decent-ish lead. Polanski seems to be making an impact as leader (despite being hated by the right wing press for opposing all their talking points) - they surely wouldn't be favourites to win without him there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    The Labour line 'a vote for the Greens is a vote for Reform' could come back to bite if the Greens win the Manchester bye-election.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    James O'Brien had a bit of a go at him this week on LBC.

    Said he doesn't know that he has the charisma that some people say he has.

    Polanski is Green (metaphorically with respect to party leadership experience, not just political ideology) but he has done very well to this point in a variety of media environments which James was talking about. And it seems to have helped them to a significant increase in membership late last year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    McSweeney is gne, Mandelson is gone.

    How long can Starmer last now, particylarly if they lose today's election?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,483 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Losing to the Greens would likely cause a quicker exit than losing to Reform. Can [try] blame the Greens for a Reform win, can't do so for a Green win!



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 8,116 Mod ✭✭✭✭circadian


    Labour would definitely prefer a loss to Reform, they can try and solidify their base nationally in under the guise of keeping them out of government.

    If you look at how Labour are attacking the Greens then you can see they're clearly rattled. Recently they posted polling of this by-election showing Labour ahead of Reform but omitted the Greens, who in that poll where tied with Labour. Their attacks on Polanskis decriminalisation of drugs is straight out of the Tory playbook.

    Labour voters aren't happy and it looks like the Greens and Reform are gaining momentum. How long Starmer holds on for is anyone's guess, but he clearly represents the corporate wing of Labour and I feel like his position on Gaza has been hugely damaging. It's not a good look and shows that the anti-Semitism claims against Corbyn were little more than a smear campaign to stop his momentum.

    An interesting election but we're still quite a bit away from a full shift to Greens and/or Reform with Reform ahead of the curve currently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,626 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    One thing working in Polanski's favour is that he sounds genuinely left wing. Could virtually anything Starmer says sound like a comment from a left wing politician? It would seem Reform, the Tories and Labour (the Labour leadership anyway) are three different shades of right wing party, just at different points on the spectrum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,916 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    I do hope the Greens take it. Beating Farage and getting Labour to cop on, in one go.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,712 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    How could Epstein keep all those files? There are millions of them.

    More important - why? How do you keep control of very powerful people unless you have the kompromat on them?

    How do you get komprimat on someone? Perhaps invite them to your private island and some dodgy parties.

    What do you use the komprimat for? How do you get so rich? Oh, really!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,483 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Have you ever cleaned out your email account and SMS/imessage/Whatsapp history? Most people don't.

    That's what the bulk of these are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,062 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Labour sources saying too close to call in the Gorton byelection. Predictit.org thinks its the Greens. Green leader Zach Polanski was ask could Reform have won it, and he said yes. Too close to call. Labour sources saying Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham has played a big role in the campaign.

    Controversially, the Greens were producing leaflets showing Starmer with Narendra Modi and Benjamin Netanyahu in this 30% Muslim constituency. Reform UK accusing them of "sectarianism". The leader of the UK Greens is Jewish but fiercely critical of Israel and Zionism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,288 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Controversially, the Greens were producing leaflets showing Starmer with Narendra Modi and Benjamin Netanyahu in this 30% Muslim constituency.

    Did they photoshop the images?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,062 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    The photos are real except where they superimposed an image of Steve Bannon making a fascist salute. In ads they show photos and then juxtapose them with images of destruction in Gaza.

    Reform are also criticising them for ads using Urdu.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    What I can't fathom is how some of the most powerful and clued in people on the planet communicated by email so much.

    I mean, even from a user interface experience, it isn't a comfortable environment on a phone.

    Not to mention the literal paper trail it left. Well not literal, but literally figuratively if you know what I mean. Like line after line listing the "from" and "to" and the date and time it was sent.

    They must thing phone messaging at the time must have been compromised or they were mostly older people not realizing how open this made them. Which might be the case for some, but surely couldn't have been for Gates/Musk etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,483 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Mobile messaging did not take off in the US until a good bit later than here - they have always been a decade behind in mobile tech - and then when it did, it was iMessage and iMessage only. So europeans that don't use iPhones as much versus Epstein - who's latter email address told us he did - would result in them sticking with email.

    That has to be part of it.



Advertisement
Advertisement