Orange is the new Burke

What do you think of the panel set-up to hear his unfair dismissal claim? You haven't mentioned it or the allegations of bias he keeps making against the members of the, by now, various panels set up with volunteer members to give him a fair hearing.

How does he think he will ever be able to get his claim heard there with his appeals against members of the panels plural because he alleges any of them holding an opinion on topical social matters which is contrary to any opinions held by him AND HIS FAMILY automatically disbars them from being able to examine his unfair dismissal claim in a fair and unbiased manner as required by law?

The two members of the panel who resigned are from the latest panel and not from the original panel. The question now is; will he ever be prepared to allow a panel to meet to hear the unfair dismissal claim he brought before the actual body under which the panel hearing route is laid down for appellants alleging false or unfair dismissal.

I'm just trying to explain how the system works, or as the case may be does not and why.

All the wishful thinking is pointless and don't shoot the messager.

Why has it taken so long to fully fire him - off the books, and who is responsible?

No, Enoch made the perjury allegation, and the news reports etc. suggest to me he is likely correct, as previously outlined.

Yep, Enoch is responsible for firing himself and to stop paying himself.

Yep, makes perfect sense...if thats what you want to believe.

No, Enoch made the perjury allegation, and the news reports etc. suggest to me he is likely correct, as previously outlined.

His allegation is baseless.

He wants the High Court to pass on a discussion he thinks the DAP had to the DPP so they will initiative a criminal prosecution. i.e. have the Panel arrested.

Anyone who suggests he is correct is as delusional as the Burkes.

I don't understand how appeals happen. After EB was dismissed from his work, would it have been him that sought an appeal and not the school? So that was a process that he himself wanted. Why has he blocked it for years preventing it from going ahead? I know he developed issues against the members on the panel but they can't all have problems. It was him that sought an appeal and then he goes against it.

Is he not better off letter the appeal happen and if it's not to his likely take it higher maybe to the workplace commissions or whatever it is.

This whole entire appeals is so long. Is there any way a court can decide on the matter?

I don't get it. If you are called for jury duty and you don't engage with the letter, there are penalties involved.

I really think the government should pass emergency legislation for people who waste the courts time and resources for petty nonsense like the Burkes are rattling about.

The sequence goes something like
Disciplinary Action (fired from school) - > This DAP Appeal (fired by Dept) - > WRC - > Labour Court - > High Court - >…

Think of appeals like bullets so you don't want to waste them, and also they tend to get harder for him as they move on.
Also, he's still paid before this appeal.

So yes he would have requested the DAP appeal but it is up to them for it to happen.
He injuncted it because it was unfairly staffed and he appears to have won that, as they resigned.
It's not in his interest to allow it unless he thinks its at least neutral.

The Courts are not on his side (even though they are supposedly impartial) so there is no way they will allow him to delay without very legitimate cause.

Enoch is NOT a master court magician who can somehow delay the Courts.
He has NO super powers.

His families antics just garner enough attention to ensure the Judge dots his i's and gives him the fair trial he should have by right. This is unfortunatly true and is to the shame of the courts, though I don't expect many to understand this at present.

If the court were to decide right now they would have to decide in Enoch's favour - as it is not his fault about the panels. He just pointed it out.

As it stands the Court appears to be allowing the school/legal team a third chance to create a panel - but the court could equally say - tough - you've had 2 chances so are blocking Enoch's rights so he wins by default. Unlikely but possible.

Again, the school's legal team have royally fcuked up and all delays are on them, unless you believe in "Super Enoch" who can "paralyze and mesmerize Judges of the High Court with his steely stare", even over a video link from jail.

If the court were to decide right now they would have to decide in Enoch's favour

The court have decided. The injunction has been struck out.

There is a matter of costs for last weeks debacle. Which I understand will take place today, as well as dealing with his Mother and Sister, who hopefully will be on their way to Limerick prison by the close of business.

He injuncted it because it was unfairly staffed and he appears to have won that

Again. His injunction was struck out, he won nothing.

As for being unfairly staffed, his claim is every member of the ASTI is an "activist for transgenderism".

But again that injunction was struck out.

the school's legal team have royally fcuked upand all delays are on them

Absolute nonsense.

The "schools legal team" don't pick the composition of the appeals panel.

The repeated claim that the school are the ones delaying the process is extremely dishonest.

As it stands the Court appears to be allowing the school/legal team a third chance to create a panel - but the court could equally say - tough - you've had 2 chances so are blocking Enoch's rights so he wins by default. Unlikely but possible.

Fabricated nonsense.

I'm puzzled at your [the courts are not on his side - even though they are supposedly impartial] bit. You do understand that being impartial means not taking sides?

So they turned up in court today where the judge asked them to explain why do they think she should not be jailed for contempt of court where mother and sister Burke banged the same old drum degraded the judge and the courts once more. And the judge will decide on the matter next week. Why could he not decide on the matter today?

I don't know. Surely he knew what way it was going to go. Then walk away and decide on the matter next week.

Or the judiciary are being extra prudent to avoid any chance of an appeal being successful...

Of course he is.
And the school already tried that in their favour and failed twice and they had to resign (and delayed the process).

It's an adverserial system - that's what sides do. But the Judge in the middle shall decide.