Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Liverpool FC Premier League Champions 25/26 - Talk /Gossip/Rumours

1122012211223122512261343

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    Rooney even, Wilshere, and countless other players who were the next big thing but then crashed out relatively young and then you never hear about them again.

    Too many cautionary tales vs the rare success story. This season is somewhat throwaway, so playing Rio too much is a risk with minimal reward. Perhaps in the CL he might be a higher return.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,916 ✭✭✭mormank


    Ok Ronaldo started playing regularly at 17 I'm pretty sure and is still playing at 40 also, just to give another example besides Milner. And actually one thing those two have in common is their professionalism and dedication to their bodies and their careers so there might be something in that.

    Despite a few other examples tho I'd be inclined to agree with you that younger players need to be protected. I mean, even without any stats or any previous examples doesn't it just kind of make say intuitively? At 17 you're basically still a child with a child's body and to put that up against a fully developed elite athlete's body is definitely risky.

    I'm curious if the clamour for him to play more would still be there if we still had Diaz or a fully fit and firing Isak meaning Ekitike could rotate with Gakpo on the left cos I know for me I just want to see him play more mostly because he looks exciting and watching us play this season has been so boring for the most part. We have become a boring team to watch, which is wild considering what came before, and at least Rio brings some excitement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,443 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    Should Rio reign back the stepovers a bit?

    Kinda looks like a nervous tic they way they’ve so frequent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,440 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    The goal we scored yesterday came after Rio beat a defender using stepovers!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,128 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    i am not advocate of over playing a 17 year old, and i think to pin the rest of the season on Rio is a bit short sighted however citing rooney as a cautionary tale is probably going a bit far, he had 16 years at PL level, maybe 12 of those at the very top, most players would take that!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,887 ✭✭✭Ottoman_1000


    We’re such a strange side that it’s hard to know where to start with the analysis. And I don’t want to get negative after a win like that. But it’s all very frustrating when you look at the bigger picture.

    Firstly, I’m not buying the idea that we were completely rubbish throughout and deserved nothing. There was nothing wrong with our second-half performance. It’s exactly the type of display I’d expect from a top side like Liverpool, going to a tough away ground against a team hoping to capitalise on a new-manager bounce.

    My big issue, like most people’s, is the first half. It’s not as if the difference between the two halves was down to a simple tweak because something wasn’t working quite right. The gap between the first and second half performances, and not for the first time this season, is so massive that it looks like there’s a completely different eleven on the pitch.

    I never thought I’d say this about a Liverpool team in recent years, but to me, having also watched us three times in the flesh this season, there’s a huge laziness problem. We want to dictate and get on the ball like we did in the second half, but you have to earn the right to do that. And when “lesser” teams come out and get in your face, you have to put them back in their box quickly. But to do that, you have to show you’re willing to do the dirty work and sprint the hard yards just as much as they are. We simply don’t want to sprint those hard yards or put in that dirty shift.

    Instead, our lads seem to hope the opposition will eventually tire from these efforts. So we sit back and pray we don’t concede during that phase, then pray even harder that this passive approach has worked and we can get on the ball against a tired team in the second half.

    It’s such a bad mentality.

    I’m not Slot’s No.1 fan by any means, but having been there and watched it a few times, it doesn’t come across as bizarre tactics like some would have you believe. I’ve seen him visibly frustrated at the lack of energy, movement and urgency from the players. So the question is: why are the attitudes so off?

    We currently have one of the highest-paid squads in world football, yet too often they only seem willing to show up for 45 minutes here and there against tired opposition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,130 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    That's it though, early starters seem to retire earlier, their careers at the top aren't shorter, they are when they are younger.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭Appletart Upsetter


    I think some of it just comes down to the lack of athleticism/physicality in the team, especially in the first half of games when the intensity is highest.

    Mac Allister, Jones and Gravenberch really struggle when the opposition put physical pressure on us. Salah literally cannot run anymore. Ekitike is far too easily brushed off the ball.

    Some of it is definitely lack of application but we are a bit of a soft touch too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,453 ✭✭✭jones


    Theres a distinction between overplaying him and him getting the odd 5/10 minute run around. Careers are funny some young footballers start brightly and fade massively in their early twenties nothing to do with injuries - when they should be at the peak of their powers. I think if he's good enough he plays we're not exactly running him into the ground there has to be a happy medium.

    He made a huge difference when he came on yesterday and he's played 89 minutes in the league this season in 9 appearances.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,404 ✭✭✭ebbsy




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,924 ✭✭✭Damien360


    we are going to be screwed then when Isak comes back. He looks like a gust of wind could knock him over.

    Football appears to be changing to a power player game, like a return to the Drogba type player or outright pace in CL teams. I’m not sure what we are aiming for.

    It’s nice to get a win but it was a very hard watch yesterday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    The thing is Rooney was not like most players, he was a phenomenon, and he was washed up by the time he was 30. He probably lost out on 10s of millions in wages due to his decline. Milner and Ronaldo are both the same age, and are both still playing. All three started young, and had played a lot of minutes by the time they were 18.

    The thing is you don't know ahead of time whether playing young will have such a negative impact. Millie and Ronaldo are both effectively freaks of nature, but perhaps if Rooney's minutes were held back in those first 2 or 3 seasons he might have had another 6 or 7 years at the top level. Alternatively, maybe his body just was never going to last.

    The point I'm making is that it is known that playing a lot when you are young can have a detrimental affect on your longevity, and I feel that a player like Rio, who is fairly light and weak looking, a fair amount of caution should be taken, because there's not much on the line.

    Bringing him on in a game where we need a late inspiration and goal is exactly what we should be doing with him. In addition starting him in the Champions league, and getting him high visibility minutes on the world stage, and where he might have a big impact, is far better use of his minutes than a rainy Sunday in Nottingham.

    Having said all this, I do think he could play a little bit more, and I understand people's frustration, but I'm not going to lose sleep over it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    I think you've nailed it here, the players for whatever reason have not been turning up in the first halves of games, and one of the biggest issues we had earlier in the season was that we were not the team chasing the goals early in the game, and allowing other teams to come at us gave them confidence.

    Laziness and complacency have dogged this team all season. I don't know how much of that is down to the individual players, but I've said all along that they have escaped a lot of criticism, and it has almost all been directed at Slot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78 ✭✭Dublin_Anthony_2025


    Look at Sterling

    such a prospect with us and now washed up



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,130 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Poor man, probably worth over 100 million and retired in his early thirties.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,770 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,136 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    ah in fairness there’s a context to the conversation. Obviously he’s done very well for himself - every top flight pro footballer’s career compares very well to us normies - but in the context of this conversation it is fairly stark just how much he physically declined after turning 27.

    It’s not even just senior Prem minutes that seem to cause problems though, it’s the whole pro infrastructure it seems - sure we’d a really promising bunch who are all now between 19 and 22 and almost all of them are crocked. Bajcetic, Ramsay, Beck, Danns, Doak, and plenty more of that group have spent years sidelined, with most of them still sidelined even now. It’s too high a percentage, so something really has to be looked at there.

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,880 ✭✭✭✭8-10



    You have to remember though that Wirtz was a warm up injury so Jones was a last minute change

    The entire team would have trained all week (no midweek game) with the understanding Szoboszlai would be at RB and so Dom would have been completely prepped to play at RB and likely had the full briefing on Hudson-Odoi.

    Joe Gomez would have been prepared to be the player off the bench at RB, not Jones

    Overall, I get your point that Jones is another option at RB and was able to play there later in the game, but I don't think it's surprising that it wasn't from the start because that meant essentially 2 unplanned changes at the last minute rather than just 1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,646 ✭✭✭robwen


    The appearance-related trigger inserted into Harvey Elliott’s loan move to Aston Villa only applies to Premier League matches.

    He has been free to play in European matches and domestic cup games all season.

    Elliott has appeared four times in the Premier League, twice in the Europa League and once in the Carabao Cup.

    He is currently sidelined with a minor injury but is expected to be available for Villa’s last-16 tie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,539 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    I loved how Szobo had the patience to get the ball onto his right foot to cross into the box for the goal. Didn't just rush and hit a hopeful ball in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 339 ✭✭redoctober


    The thoughts of watching us play like this again next season gives me Sideshow-Bob shudders!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,916 ✭✭✭mormank


    This is another symptom if his terrible squad management if you ask me. As a player if you know you are gonna be starting every game regardless of how you actually play there is less incentive to try harder. Players need to know that if they play poorly or don't try hard or whatever that they can and will be dropped. Our players know they will start the next game anyway so it comes down to personal motivation to give your all in every match. Some players have that motivation, like Szob, and some don't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,170 ✭✭✭giveitholly


    What players do you think do not have an incentive to try harder? And who would you replace them with?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,611 ✭✭✭Girly Gal


    There's a bit of a trade off, in that players like Sterling and Rooney who start off as first team regulars at the very top level generally finish up early too. Both still had phenomenal careers, won way more than the average footballer does and had a decade or more continuously at the very top level, very few players get that. I would also think that when they start to decline and are no longer at the top clubs, the hunger and drive goes, an element of nothing to prove anymore, millions in the bank and not bothered to put the effort required to "only" play for a mid table or lower half team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,916 ✭✭✭mormank


    Well any player whose starting spot is guaranteed regardless of performance. So basically all of them. Players generally need to know there is someone ready to replace them if their performances drop or else their levels might drop. In fact I think it's a pretty basic theory in sports in general really. Having a rival pushing you to your limits propels you and that rival onto achieving things and reaching levels you might never have thought possible otherwise.

    It's the same idea as having a team as a rival like we had in city which pushed us onto reaching a level where we could win 26 games out of 27 whilst drawing the other. We never would have reached that level without city pushing us so fiercely. The same idea exists with players in a squad pushing eachother to reach higher and higher performance levels.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,170 ✭✭✭giveitholly


    Have you looked at the state of our squad this season? Imo its a very light squad compounded by some long term injuries. Its easy say a player should be dropped if not performing but what if there is no replacement for them on the bench?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    The trade is multiple years shorter career of a top level player, reducing their wages by potentially 10s of millions, reducing the value to the owning club by potential 10s of millions too if they are washed by 30. Or maybe they get a serious injury at a young age and miss out on a season of physiological development which has a permanent negative effect on their quality and huge reduction in their value and potential.

    And what do you get for this trade exactly? Perhaps a couple dozen starts a season for a couple of seasons, and maybe +10 team goals/assists a season max, something like that.

    Seems like a bogie trade to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    The other concern is that the players who do come on have tended to be even worse than the players they replace, with the exception of one or two….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,916 ✭✭✭mormank


    But there was all season but Arne refused to use them which only further compounded the problem. Macca was terrible for periods of the season and also Gravenberch has been poor for periods. Arne may not think Endo for example is good enough to start most games but he is good enough to come in for a game or two when others are septic to watch. He is better than Macca performing at a 3 out of 10 for example.

    But no, instead these players learned that they will play regardless of how they perform. And that goes both ways, the guys not in that 11 or 12 know that no matter how well they perform in their cameos they will not start. This approach is bad for both sets of players, the ones both in the starting 11 or 12 and for the ones outside of it. It can lead to complacency for the starting 11 whilst causing disillusionment in the rest, not to mention those players having no rhythm or match sharpness when finally called upon once or twice a month for 10 minutes. This is squad management 101. It's such a basic concept and yet a premier league winning manager can't seem to grasp it. It beggars belief imo.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,170 ✭✭✭giveitholly


    There is no way Endo could play the role that Mac plays in the team,he can only play as a no 6 in midfield.



Advertisement
Advertisement