Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland vs Israel - To play or not to play, that is the question Read OP for Mod Warning

145791032

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,230 ✭✭✭Enduro


    Russia were banned for invading Ukraine, a sovereign European state (And a member of FIFA and UEFA). They were not banned for committing genocide and war crimes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Would you agree the latter is more serious than the former?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    No the former is far far more serious for countries in Europe. Some countries have a genuine fear that Russia would/will invade them and that independence would be/is at risk. The USSR and the Eastern block is still well within living memory. This is why there was such a sudden and united approach to Russia. Had Russia invaded former Soviet Republics in the Caucuses or Asia no one would have cared enough to talk about less enact a boycott. . See Georgia or the Azerbaijan Armenia conflict, or Chezhnia.

    The Israel Palestine conflict/slaughter/genocide/annexation/plantation (take your pick) doesn't raise any sovereignty issues for any European countries. It's why for all the death, there has been no serious co ordinated talk of isolating Israel akin to Russia. In a European context they are apple and oranges politically. Israel Palestine is in Middle East and all the geo politics that goes with that. It's not very nice, arguably very selfish and hypocritical. But welcome to the world of real politik.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    No the former is far far more serious for countries in Europe.

    I understand your point, but I disagree.

    The Israel Palestine conflict/slaughter/genocide/annexation/plantation (take your pick) doesn't raise any sovereignty issues for any European countries. It's why for all the death, there has been no serious co ordinated talk of isolating Israel akin to Russia.

    I agree. But there should have been.

    We grew up hearing the phrase "Never again" and then we learned exactly where that came from and what it was to mean for the human race. But we've seen many countries and people who should no this history all too well ignore that reality and not just permit Israel to do what they have done, but have supported them in doing so in various ways. That allows a very dangerous precedent to be set and undermines the institutions which ordinarily should be used to set good examples worldwide, not just on their doorstep.

    The UN has almost been entirely undermined, and this is in no small way because of the actions of Israel and it's main supporter the US towards it as a ruling institute. That same UN should be the primary mechanism to enforce peace and justice between countries around the world, but it can no longer be relied to do that. And look at what America has descended to do in the short space of time of the last 12 months without fear of being held to account in any way.

    All of this will ultimately mean at some point that Europe is more at risk than it was in the recent past or than it should be going forward, all the remains to be seen is exactly who is the aggressor towards it. Hell, we've already seen an example of this starting to occur with the Greenland fiasco.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭csirl


    Why is sport, and specifically soccer being used as the battleground? What about politics, trade, travel etc? Why not the UN?

    Two other points:

    We live in a democracy. Our govemment claims to be neutral. When was their a Dail vote saying we should side with the Palestinians in this conflict? Surely Irelands stance in this conflict should be that we want peaceful secular democracies who respect human rights in the middle east rather than advocating for one theocracy or another

    Secondly, most sports organisations have rules against political interference and stances/,statements by national sports bodies. Surely the FAI would be breaking FIFA rules by bringing politics into things?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,798 ✭✭✭Quitelife


    I go to most Irish matchs in the aviva but will be outside protesting if Istael are playing in the Aviva and most of the people that sit near me with season tickets will be the same from talking to them . The nation of Israel is a killing machine and ireland should not play their football team full stop .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,804 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    But again the FAI refusing to play Israel doesn't prevent the Greenland fiasco. It only harms Ireland. Strawmen arguments about Russia and South Africa and World War II have no relevance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,785 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    No

    In September 2023, Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin said that “Uefa's continuing suspension against Russian adult teams reflects its commitment to take a stand against violence and aggression

    as I said, hypocrisy at its finest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,726 ✭✭✭Benedict XVI


    No

    In September 2023, Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin said that “Uefa's continuing suspension against Russian adult teams reflects its commitment to take a stand against violence and aggression”

    But if you want to take that approach then the Asian Confederation and/or FIFA should be banning Palestine also.

    Irish people need to stop taking sides in this, because there are no goodies and badies here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,785 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    first off, it's not "my" approach - that's a quote from UEFA.

    As for not taking sides, I don't think anyone has the right to tell anyone what side they should or should not take.

    If people want to take the side of a state that carries out a Genocide and war crimes, fine. Nail your colours to the mast. If people don't, that's fine too.. if people want to take no side, fine again.

    But if people believe there are no "baddies" in this, perhaps review your moral compass. If you think the executions of 50,000 women and children is something to be ignored, I suspect the majority of normal thinking people would disagree.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Amateur groups again doing what national governments and international institutions should be doing.

    https://www.thenational.scot/news/25874080.fifa-uefa-presidents-accused-aiding-war-crimes-gaza/

    THE presidents of Fifa and Uefa have been accused of “aiding war crimes” in the occupied Palestinian territory amid Israel’s genocide in Gaza in a complaint filed to the International Criminal Court (ICC).

    Both the president of Fifa, Gianni Infantino, and his Uefa counterpart, Aleksander Ceferin, have been accused of crimes against humanity, specifically apartheid, for the inclusion of Israeli football clubs “based in illegal settlements on occupied Palestinian territory that were built on land stolen from Palestinian people”.

    Still it is something that is long overdue and is interesting in that the claim against these organisations is because of them permitting Israeli clubs to play in their competitions when the clubs are located on stolen land. Something that is directly against UEFA and FIFA rules.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Irish people need to stop taking sides in this, because there are no goodies and badies here.

    70K people have been killed in Gaza since Oct7th, 1000 in the West Bank. This is on top of decades of the Palestinians suffering persecution, murder and having their lands systematically stolen. All without them being able to have an airport, to control and use their sea border, to have dependable, sufficient supplies of food and medical supplies.

    If you can't look at this and see the actions of one side categorically justifies the taking of sides to call a halt to all this, you should really stop and have a think about why that is the case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,726 ✭✭✭Benedict XVI


    I know it's UEFA approach.

    And it's the correct approach when it comes to Israel.

    Because they are victims of violence and aggression.

    And most of the right thinking people of the world are aware of that, with the exception of some delusional Irish.

    The whole "River to the Sea" thing you hear from Palestinians and their supporters is all about the destruction of Israel and the Jewish people.

    Don't be fooled that it's not.

    And in years or decades to come the geopolitical shoe may be on the other foot and the Palestinians and their allies may have the upper hand.

    But what is more certain in the shorter term is that another Oct 7th type massacre will happen and the whole thing will happen again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,629 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Imagine if someone post world war 2 said something similiar during the nuremburg trials. Sometimes you have to take a side against what's wrong. Being against genocide and ethinc cleansing is a side I am happy to be on, Bren. Also i suppose the same argument could have been used against Mrs Parks or the Dunnes Stores workers. If Virtue Signalling was in the lexicon back then it no doubt would have been used by those who were critical of what they did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,785 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Israel are breaking FIFA and EUFA rules. That they both refuse to act upon this is the key issue. According to those rules, Israel should be banned.

    Discussions about "from the river to the sea" belong in a different thread - but that's precisely what the Israeli Govt also state is their aim. But they are the only ones executing it.

    There are certainly some delusional Irish - but they are not who you think they are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    And it's the correct approach when it comes to Israel.

    Because they are victims of violence and aggression.

    Are you for real? You're talking about Hamas right? Israel has killed 1000 Palestinians in the West Bank since Oct 7th. Guess what doesn't exist in the West Bank. Hamas. Israel has killed 70000 people because of the 1200 killed on Oct 7th with the argument "Israel has the right to defend itself". Does Palestine have the right to defend itself? Who should act in their defence? How should they do so?

    And most of the right thinking people of the world are aware of that, with the exception of some delusional Irish.

    You think?

    image.png

    These are protests in Melbourne, Auckland, Singapore, Paris, Madrid, Johannesburg, Rio de Janeiro, Toronto and Dallas.

    The whole "River to the Sea" thing you hear from Palestinians and their supporters is all about the destruction of Israel and the Jewish people.

    What about when Likud used in their charter? And when Nethanyahu went to the UN with a map of Israel covering all Palestinian land? Or when Mick Huckabee this week spoke about the God given right for Israel to assume control of all the land in the Middle East.

    And in years or decades to come the geopolitical shoe may be on the other foot and the Palestinians and their allies may have the upper hand.

    In the decades to come, everyone will claim to have been against what Israel has done. It is one of the greatest tragedies of failure from most countries in the Western World that they have facilitated and permitted them to do so.

    If Ireland do decide to not play Israel, they will likely experience some short to medium term vitriol and consequences for doing so. They will absolutely lauded for having done so at some point in future. I am quite sure of that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,626 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The thing is that UEFA almost certainly know that Israel is a pariah state carrying out war crimes. But they also have backing from a lot of bad actors and bad elements. There was talk last year when a UEFA ban was being mooted that the Trump regime were issuing threats to UEFA through back channels of severe repercussions if they dared institute a ban on them i.e. pulling of major sponsors etc.

    The same thing is playing out with Eurovision - the EBU are terrified of the clout that the Israelis have and are covering this up with "we mustn't allow politics to interfere with the Contest" statements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    This is all true. Lindsey Graham, the US senator came out and named Ireland directly when the FAI called for Israel to be banned from competitions last year.

    But it's partly because this is true, that Ireland (and others) should act. One thing we have seen irrefutably over the last few years is just because you appease a bully, it doesn't mean that they improve their behaviour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,626 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    It's a very tricky situation unfortunately. UEFA would much sooner ban Ireland than Israel from all their competitions. The other crowd have clout and lots of bad elements pulling strings for them and calling in favours (it's an incredible situation given that they are not even located in Europe, but it's just the way it is).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,286 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    We are back to 'Israel has the right to defend itself' when it comes to justifcation of genocide



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    Ireland plays Germany regularly, a country that carried out a genocide. Are you ok with that?

    You could argue that the genocide has stopped in Germany, but that would also apply to Gaza, as the bombing has stopped.

    We also play Afghanistan regularly, a country that doesn't let women out in public alone. Are you ok with that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,671 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    You could argue that the genocide has stopped in Germany

    What sort of lunatic would be counter arguing that?

    but that would also apply to Gaza, as the bombing has stopped.

    So the 11 killed in that strike should be booked for simulation?

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8r15eyvk2do



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,286 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Ireland plays Germany regularly, a country that carried out a genocide. Are you ok with that?

    Ffs. What a ludicrous post. If you dont know the difference between carried out 80 years ago and carrying out now, there's no talking to you.

    And I note you qualify yiur statement with respect to Gaza by saying the Bombing has stopped rather than the "killing" has stopped.

    A - Israel is persecuting Palestinians in many ways, not just killing them, which they obviously are still doing.

    B - The bombings haven't stopped.

    C - Talking about Afghanistan is just an attempt at deflection which was responded to



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,548 ✭✭✭Unearthly


    Off topic

    Come back to the soccer forum. It’s been decades!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭csirl


    Why is Afghanistan a deflection? Or DPRK? Or Iran?If people want to stop sporting events due to the human rights status of various countries, then they need to be consistent. If not you have to ask if human rights is really their motivation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Demanding that they need to be consistent is the deflection.

    In all areas of life, we give focus to some events or people for a particular reason whereas we dont give focus to other events or people that ostensibly are pretty much the same.

    Focusing on one topic gives a better chance of effecting action, rather than diluting the message by focusing on multiple situations, each with different nuances and participants.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭csirl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,555 ✭✭✭csirl


    The DPRK situation has been around for decades and has had millions killed over the years.........but its a left wing dictatorship, so gets a free pass.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement