Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1175617571759176117621845

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,565 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Disappointed in that team to be honest. Heaven help the scrum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,710 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Prendergast dropped in a 5/3 bench is bizarre.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,852 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Absolutely nonsensical. If you are going to have a 5/3 there are at least 2 better 10s than Frawley to have on the bench. Do not remotely understand this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,063 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    IRELAND (v England): Jamie Osborne; Robert Baloucoune, Garry Ringrose, Stuart McCloskey, James Lowe; Jack Crowley, Jamison Gibson-Park; Jeremy Loughman, Dan Sheehan, Tadhg Furlong; Joe McCarthy, James Ryan; Tadhg Beirne, Josh van der Flier, Caelan Doris (capt).

    Replacements: Rónan Kelleher, Tom O’Toole, Finlay Bealham, Nick Timoney, Jack Conan, Craig Casey, Ciaran Frawley, Tommy O’Brien.

    Glad to see the 5-3 split and TOB is a good option to cover a number of positions, but the choice of Frawley for 22 is a bit odd, unless they're worried about Ringrose's injury and want extra cover in the centre.

    Izuchukwu possibly hard done by to lose out to Timoney.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭longjohn200


    Cant see what Tommy o brien adds. Not at this level.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 726 ✭✭✭Pablo Escobar


    Let’s hope none of the backs need to come off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,090 ✭✭✭✭Pudsy33


    That's an absolute bizarre team selection. The bench should have been our strength but it's underpowered. No idea why you'd pick Frawley and then got 5-3. Neither Izzy or Edogbo on the bench is nuts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 360 ✭✭big-al


    What has Tommy O’Brien ever done in a green jersey to warrant all these opportunities?


    he was like a rabbit in the headlights France.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,476 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Glad we went 5/3, I assume Frawley is there to cover 15 as they'll not want to move Jack in case Osborne gets a knock or has to move to centre.

    Very tough on Izuchukwu to miss out completely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 888 ✭✭✭darkened_scrum


    This, imo is one of the worst overall selections of the Farrell era (in hindsight France was pretty terrible as well):

    Dropping Conan

    Dropping Edogbo

    Dropping Izuchukwu

    Retaining Loughman

    Picking Frawley out of absolutely nowhere in a 5/3

    Dropping Sam as a bench option in a 5/3 when we have multiple examples of him being really strong off the bench and changing things up



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,982 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Beirne essentially providing the 2nd row cover, but I'm not sure I love having 2 back-rows on the bench. (Hope Edogbo is back in for the Wales game).

    Not sure I love that starting back-row either, I think all 3 of them need a big performance and big improvement from recent games. (Jack Conan unlucky not to start and Izzy unlucky to miss out).

    Ringrose, Sheehan and Joe McCarthy as well in need of big games here (think Lawrence back for England is a huge plus for them, Ringrose can't afford to be shooting and missing tackles).

    You'd imagine Crowley will do the majority of the 80 mins at 10 here, and I think he deserves it. Hopefully will carry on a lot of the good we saw from him last week, and cut out the bad.

    Sexton's comments the other day about 4 10's in retrospect look like the big indication around Frawley here. I don't love it, but I get it with a view towards a RWC panel, and I think a little time out of the spotlight will do Prendergast some good.

    Baloucoune deserving of his start as well, quality performance and brilliant finish that I don't think many other wingers in the squad could have pulled off. (Maybe turning the corner after his supposed "career or mediocrity" as previously suggested on here...).

    We can only hope scrum - and Loughman - go much better this time round.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,710 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Prendergast has been involved in 15 of our last 16 matches and only missed Portugal. How does Farrell believe in him that much and see that much of him to now suddenly think he isn't good enough.

    Unless the lad has had a total breakdown it makes no sense. And if it to keep him out of the spotlight I would say they just made it worse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,463 ✭✭✭crisco10


    very disappointed in the bench. I had hoped our experiment with no 2nd rows are the bench would have finished with the SA game in November.

    Then 5-3 is almost a retro look in rugby, would have much preferred to seen Edogbo in for TOB.

    TOB looks to me to be the next Fergus McFadden, very good at club level because of his commitment and general footballing ability but lacking the last 10% to be a 50 cap international. Hopefully he proves me wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭bingobango12


    I don't understand that selection at all.

    No second row cover, Frawley covering 10 instead of Byrne, Stockdale would have covered more backfield than TOB who just covers wing, even though I think TOB is the better player, he isn't the better choice at 23. Strange.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,982 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Prendergast isn't as rubbish as is being made out by some.

    But he also has been dropped for a reason, which includes some of the completely valid criticisms of others.

    As always, the truth lies somewhere in the middle.

    But conflating the two - which has been happening a lot on here of late - is a mistake.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    • Frawley got himself injured for the emerging Frawley tour in South Africa. He was always Andy's choice to replace Sexton, that injury and only that injury opened the door for Crowley as number two to Sexton. Andy was always trying to get Frawley into the replacement ten spot, and that was the plan up until he had a very bad performance and was dropped.
    • Sam gets rocketed straight into the team and Jack pushed to the side to become Frawley 2.0.
    • The media, and fans (here especially) have been treating Sam like the proud dad of the ugly child, non stop lauding every move he made. Entire performances have been reported as great, when they were anything but.
    • Reality has come crashing down on Sam. The reality is, he's not as good in offense as the glazing has suggested and regularly (always?) tops the missed tackle stats.
    • So Sam has gotten everything he's ever dreamed of before analysis has rendered him completely ineffective.
    • The people who doubted his ability have been proven correct, surprising absolutely no one.

    Now lets contrast Frawley and Crowley.

    • We were ahead against NZ when Crowley was subbed off.
    • Frawley - who was shaping up to take the starting 10 spot, had a bad day at the office and was completely forgotten about.
    • Crowley took Frawley's spot and Frawley got to hold tackle bags.
    • Crowley was sent out to do media before the next game, only to find out that his place was taken by some unproven kid with "The Ceiling". Very embarrassing, and fans were rightly disgruntled with the absolute glazing done in the media.
    • Media were very unkind to both Frawley and Crowley. Contrast that to "it's the fans' fault that young Sam has lost his confidence" but for his own sake, he needs some time away, or it was Casey's muck performance that set him up to fail.
    • Crowley has been subject to the exact same abuse as Sam, maybe even more abuse, but because he's 3 years older, he should have learned to deal with it.

    So who's at fault?

    Well primarily, Andy is at fault. You'd think after his own son was put through the grinder, he'd have some experience of what was always coming. It's funny that it was on Andy's advice that England played Sam Burgess, who also looked like a fish out of water for England, maybe Andy just likes the name Sam.

    So where do we find ourselves, Crowley starting and Frawley on the bench? The circle is complete and Andy has learned nothing AND he's all out of ideas.

    In summation, fans are going to fan, the press is going to press and Andy, once you peel back a few layers, is a bad selector and a bad man manager. I expect him to feature strongly in a few sports books when the current crop hang up their boots.

    And Sam, he's pretty much the same story as Stockdale, both very bad defenders and both found out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭longjohn200


    After Frawleys terrible performance with the A's, it would be a disaster if Crowley goes off early. This is a missed opportunity for H.Bryne who is currently no.1 at Leinster. I can't make sense of this selection to be honest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,631 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I don't mind Frawley as the 23 in a 5-3 bench, but having him as out half cover is mental. How many times do we have to see that idea fall on its face? Beirne doesn't warrant his starting spot, much rather one of Izuchukwu or Prendergast be given the start. Conan continues to be rewarded for his excellent play with a bench spot, honestly think he probably should be starting ahead of Doris currently.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,852 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Ferg got 34 caps all the same! I'd say TOB would be thrilled to hit that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭bingobango12


    I don't understand not having Edogbo at all. Makes no sense to me. Have a 6/2 if you want Timoney and Conan but Edogbos power would have been such an advantage coming off the bench.

    I disagree with your comment around Crowley deserving the full 80. I don't think any of them deserve it at the moment to be honest. As it stands he is best placed to start this game, but he needs a big performance as much as many of them. And I hope he has one because we are goosed without him playing well in this.

    Agree with you re Ringrose, Sheehan and Joe Mc. All potentially lucky to be starting this, along with JDVF and Loughman. Casey lucky to be involved at all.

    Frawley makes absolutely no sense to me at all. He hasn't started a single game at 10 this season for Leinster, who have finally recognised he isn't a 10. And the start he gets for the A team he was dreadful in.

    I don't like this selection. But let's see and hope.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,063 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    if we dropped everyone who played badly against France, we'd have to forfeit this weekend due to inability to field a team.

    TOB had a decent Autumn series, didn't set the world on fire but didn't look out of place either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,982 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Always remember this from Ferg after Drico's last home game for Ireland:

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,119 ✭✭✭crusd


    I think people seeing to conflate critisism of performance with abuse. Crowley never received any of the vitriol Prendergast gets from some.

    Prendergast is rightfully dropped form the 23 as his confidence is shot and his weaknesses have not been addressed, however what some have subjected him to online is nothing short of shameful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,767 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Agree, Andy is the one at fault here, he trains and picks the team and he's supposed to do that to the best of his abilities because that's what he is paid to do. If the team is in trouble due to lack of confidence or not being ready for international duties then he hasn't fulfilled his role as head coach of the team

    As an aside I think pinning the performance against Italy on one or 2 players is also unfair and I'd have been happier to see Farrell pick 20- 23 different players based on last weeks performance



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,995 ✭✭✭Utah_Saint


    Quite a few odd decisions.

    Izzy dropped out of the squad. He could cover back-row and 2nd row. Now Beirne and Ryan have to play a full 80.

    Sheehan & Joe Mc's poor form rewarded.

    Casey and TOB selected?!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,063 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    34 caps and 10 tries. If he hadn't been made of glass in his later years, he absolutely would have hit 50 caps.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,852 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The only sense for Frawley is that they want Crowley to get the full 80 at 10. Even then they could have put Stockdale on the bench instead of TOB to cover 15. So I dont really get it.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,542 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    It's a bit of an odd selection.

    I would have gone with:

    Loughman, Sheehan, Furlong, Ryan, Beirne, Conan, VDF, Doris, JGP, Crowley, Lowe, McCloskey, Ringrose, Baloucoune, Osborne

    With Kelleher, OToole, Bealham, McCarthy, Izuchukwu, Casey, Byrne, Frawley

    Reasoning:

    VDF is likely to play the full 80 if he can or nearly the full 80, so I don't see huge value in having Timoney on the bench for this one. If he has to go off injured, we can move Doris and Conan across and bring on Izuchuwku. Or drop Beirne back and bring on McCarthy.

    I think Izuchukwu more likely to bring the sort of impact we'll need off the bench, it's likely we'll be chasing the game and need some athleticism.

    Similarly, McCarthy hasn't been great but he could be great coming off the bench. I don't like Beirne at 6.

    I don't really see the value in TOB, Frawley is an odd choice for 10 cover but I'd be fine with him being number 23.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭bingobango12


    I get that but Crowley could pull his hammy after the 1st minute and we genuinely have not got a chance of winning the game with Frawley at 10. Byrne at least gives us a fighting chance.

    As you said, Stockdale at 23 covers fullback so I really can't understand choosing Frawley/TOB instead of Byrne/Stockdale, unless there is some injury.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 inbloom427


    Awful selection but at least it might be the "kick up the arse" Farrell needs. England will batter us



Advertisement
Advertisement