Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1175217531755175717581838

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,638 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    Prendergast got his start because the other two options form was poor

    Which is what people claim they want

    Now it seems you don't want the form player to start, just keep the incumbant in place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,541 ✭✭✭✭phog




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,863 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    revisionism at it again, crowley was in decent form at the time and had come off a very good performance against argentina. the idea that he was in terrible form at the time is rubbish. he wasnt shooting the lights out or anything but he was fine



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,285 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    • Jack Crowley - attack, kicking, composure
    • Paddy McCarthy - scrummaging
    • Gus McCarthy - scrummaging, throwing
    • Ronan Kelleher - throwing
    • Dan Sheehan - scrummaging
    • Hugh Gavin - defence
    • Joe McCarthy - discipline
    • Jack Boyle - scrummaging
    • Edwin Edogbo - conditioning, carrying
    • Craig Casey - defence, composure
    • Ryan Baird - focus

    etc etc.

    Almost all of them have relatively fundamental flaws to their games - i.e. props who have unproven track records as scrummagers, hookers with issues with their line out throwing or scrummaging or both, scrum half with poor composure etc.

    The difference in Prendergast's weakness versus some of the others is it's significantly easier for the layman sitting at home to notice him missing a tackle than it is to spot when, for example, Craig Casey or Jack Crowley make a bad decision in attack, or the line out or scrum falters.

    That, and the fact that the primary alternative to Prendergast right now is from Munster is what leads to a huge amount of the noise around Prendergast's shirt. If the most viable alternatives for Prendergast's jersey were Harry Byrne and Ciaran Frawley, then Prendergast wouldn't come in for anywhere near the level of vitriol and targeted abuse he receives.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,285 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    It's comparable in the sense that Crowley was plucked out of the blue, ahead of available and more experienced alternatives like Ross Byrne, Harry Byrne, Ben Healy, Jack Carty etc.

    Farrell saw something he liked in Crowley (who was 3rd choice for Munster at the time) and elevated him, just like he saw something he liked in Prendergast and elevated him too.

    The reason Crowley went back to the rotation after that was because Johnny Sexton was healthy again. If we had a player anywhere close to that calibre available now then Prendergast wouldn't have gotten all the gametime he has gotten, but we absolutely don't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    No its not revisionism.

    Crowley was not in "decent form". He was mixed at best. His performance against Argentina was not a good performanace.

    Crowley form after the November games wasn't much better and was mixed

    Prendergast came into the game against Fiji, mostly to replace Frawley who was supposed to start that game by all discussions before the Nov AI's started. Played well and was kept to play the Australia game, and again played well.

    But none of this matters does it. You have invented a reality when prendergast is terrible and the player you want is exceptional.

    In reality, neither are terrible. Prendergast has played well and has had some poor games as well. To be expected for a young player. But the nonsense we see online is just embarrassing.

    Well done to Farrell for calling it out, I hoped it would stop but people are so delulded we still have them going on and on today

    FYI I never said "rubbish"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,638 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Maybe Farrell was right about keyboard warriors. Imagine winning a 6 Nations including a 6/7 in a battering of France in France being told you need to be dropped for a rookie because you are sht.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,944 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Also, I think you will find the same people who are claiming Sam defence is an issue, have spent the years leading up to Sexton retirement with all sort of gymnastics to say why he shouldn't be playing at 10 for ireland. All just a load of nonsense. Embarrassing nonsense

    "claiming sam's defence is an issue"? Do you not think his defence is an issue?

    In any case, I'm certainly someone who has claimed Sam's defence is an issue. You won't find a single post from me saying Sexton shouldn't have been playing 10.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,863 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    i havent invented anything, you and others have invented this idea that crowley was playing terribly at the start of last season when he just simply wasnt. you also say his performance against argentina 'was not a good performance' which is absolute rubbish to be honest

    i also at no point have said prendergast is terrible and a number of times have come to defend him, especially the hyperbole about his defence. i, and i would imagine many others, simply feel he was cemented as a starter last season much too early and it has had a detrimental effect on both 10s

    not really though, crowley was in the A squad originally due to harry byrne being injured and for experience, he ended up getting gametime for the senior team due to an unprecedented run of injuries - he wouldnt have played for either the A or senior team if it were not for injuries. prendergast was brought into the senior squad/team for the 2024 AIs because Farrell wanted to pick him - whether that was the correct call or not is up for debate but they arent comparable circumstances



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,285 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Crowley was there too because Farrell wanted to pick him. As I said, he was the third choice Munster 10. Farrell could have picked guys like Ross Byrne, Billy Burns, Ben Healy or Jack Carty as four clear alternatives, all of which were more experienced than Crowley and available in November 2022.

    He could have restored Carbery to the squad ahead of him in the following 6 Nations if he wanted to, but didn’t.

    The injury issues that saw Crowley originally capped were temporary, the issue we faced around long term direction at 10 when Prendergast was first capped was much more material.

    The circumstances by how they get selected isn’t the factor anyway - it can’t be the case that Prendergast wasn’t experienced enough to justify inclusion but Crowley was when they have almost identical levels of experience at the time of winning their first caps.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,471 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Well...we might start to get a few leaked teams from the journos in the next hour or so



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,621 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,863 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    ive already explained multiple times why this isnt the case, if you want to continue refusing to believe this then thats your perogative



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    Yes you have invented it. Prendergast wouldn't have been near the first team that Nov only for both players in front of him didn't play well.

    Its embarrassing that the Head Coach has to come out and say it in the media to try and shut down this nonsense

    Does it stop it? no

    Not sure what you are actually trying to say

    If you talking about the last 6 nations Ireland won, the France game was great win and was won by the forwards. Same as the France game the season after was won by the forwards, just the French ones this time

    Last 6 nations Ireland lost 1 game. The 6 nations they won they lost 1 game. Both started well with a good victory, then it went slowly downhill with a loss and a poor last match.

    Nobody was told they are sht by the way, thats the sort of nonsense we are seeing from keyboard warriors and should be shut down.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭50HX


    I wonder is Harry in the 23 on Sat, maybe Wales would be a better bet to see him in.

    I wouldnt be surprised to see both current 10's in matchday 23.

    Some commentators suggesting SP should be given a break from matchday to sort his head out & get a bit of confidence back.

    Based on Farrells own experience of playing from 17 yrs on at a high level he could v well double down on the 10 selection



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,285 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    You’re just choosing to frame it the way that suits you.

    It’s a verifiable fact that there were alternatives, all of whom were more experienced (4 of which had international experience) when Farrell chose to elevate Crowley.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    The same "commentators" have done gymnastics for months now on why XYZ should be dropped. As I siad above you will find those same people said he should drop Sexton etc

    If he picks Prendergast so be it and real rugby fans will support him. Same if he picks Crowley or whoever at 10

    The rest Im sure will be continuing with the same embarrassing carry on they have done for months now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,863 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    its a fact that crowley came into the squad down to injuries to other options and he was only part of the squad originally to gain experience

    i havent invented anything, you have invented the idea that crowley was playing poorly and he somehow had played badly against argentina, when the overall consensus is that he had done quite well that day



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,944 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    As I said, he was the third choice Munster 10

    …under a different coaching ticket.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    For someone who claimed I was "revisionism". You really need to look in the mirror

    Crowley starting in Nov was down to a similar situation as Prendergast starting in Nov. A combination of mixed form for the alternatives gave Prendergast his chance, it was injury which was for Crowley but he was put in front of other players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,285 ✭✭✭FtD v2




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    I didn't say he played badly. I said he was mixed. You are jumping around trying to claim I said rubbish and now badly. Cop on as Andy would say

    As I already outlined it was Frawley spot that Prendergast actually took. He was the one due to start that game. This is lost on you and other. Crowley would have never started that game and it was always going to be Frawley

    If you think Crowley was not playing mixed last season then I don't know. It's not really a secret and was the big topic before the 6 nations and I remember people been relieved he had a decent game in a loss to Northampton. This of course is all forgotten once Prendergast started in the 6 nations

    Of course in that 6 nations Crowley played in the Italy game, what did you think his performance was like in that? mixed?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,863 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    if you dont understand how thats a different situation then i cant help you

    'his performance against argentina was not a good performance' - that is implying it was a bad performance. and i never claimed you said 'rubbish' - i said what you were saying was rubbish



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,638 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I don't think anyone has or had a problem with Prendergast starting in November. That's exactly when an understudy should start.

    Getting picked for the biggest 6 Nations games was the problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,285 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Murray Kinsella saying Crowley & JGP to start on Saturday.

    Rest of backline apparently unchanged, sounds like Beirne for Izuchukwu the only likely change in the starting pack too, apart from Furlong for Clarkson.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,832 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Cian Tracey is suggesting Frawley on the bench in a 6-2 which I can not possibly get on board with. Awful decision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,897 ✭✭✭JanuarySnowstor


    Stumbling towards the team that should have been picked against France. Better late than never. Let's hope Jack can show his true worth and cement down the 10 position for rest of 6N



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,285 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    That would be a complete shitshow.

    Frawley just isn’t a 10.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭50HX




Advertisement
Advertisement