Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1174717481750175217531834

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭Jelly Welly


    frawley at 10 is a nonsense proposition and he knows it. Utter gibberish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    It’s basically what Italy did with Lamaro/Zuliani and France did with essentially their entire back 5.


    Now, is this a tactical decision to exploit an Irish weakness…or is this a panic selection after last weeks loss where they’ve said “let’s copy what other teams are doing”, we’ll know soon enough.


    Intereestingly they’ve done away with the cringey named “pom squad”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,594 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    We have to work Steward into 1 on 1 situations, he's a massive liability with his tackling



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,343 ✭✭✭bingobango12


    Would be leaning towards the second option and reacting to last week for them. I personally don’t think Borthwick is astute enough to fully cop tactical weaknesses in opposition. We will see smash smash kick kick kick from England as we do most games. If Ireland can deal with that, I think we come out on top. Big ask though with how this Irish squad are currently playing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,863 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    no no, some posters on here are saying he was terrible so it must be true. they must be the special ones who have access to more info, tv angles or something because i certainly didnt see things like that but they probably just have a much superior knowledge of the game

    none of that is 'established fact', its just absolute hyperbole from some people on here

    as said before, sexton is working off what he learned from Wilkinson's kicking coach Dave Alred, who is generally accepted to be the best kicking coach out there. they both definitely have some more improvement and refining to do but i think they both are likely to come good soon enough. i also think SP's misses on saturday were more of a mental thing than anything.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,281 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Why do you think Farrell & Co haven't persisted with Crowley at 10 up to now?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,863 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    continuity with JGP, trying out an alternative, feeling SP fits 'the system' better?

    that wasn't the point i was making though, i was pointing out that some posters are repeatedly claiming that crowley was 'playing like a drain'/ rubbish/ in 'terrible' form/ had played badly against NZ last year etc, when it is simply untrue. i dont think anyone can dispute that he was average at best against NZ in 2024 and he was up and down for munster at times but there is also massive overexaggeration as to how poorly he was playing (SP and some of the other options get this treatment too) and the fact that he had went quite well against argentina is conveniently left out, as is how the attack against aus improved when he came off

    a bit of reality when talking about all the options is required - none have quite hit the level they are certainly capable of getting to but none are/were as bad as they are being made out to be by some posters either



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,939 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    He didn't have a good first half against NZ. He was a non-entity. He passed the ball 8 times in that entire match. 8 times! He ran with it another 4 and kicked something like 4 or 5 times (including at least one straight into touch as I recall). Those are astoundingly low numbers for a flyhalf.

    To be fair, Podge, a lot of the context for his performance from that game is missing in this synopsis. We had a huge amount of handling errors, stupid penalties, and very poor scrum and lineout platform that all contributed to that, and very little of which can be attributed to Crowley.

    I even remember him getting some flak on here for his contestables and re-starts which were actually really good that day.

    I'm not arguing he was good that day; but I thought he played ok, and certainly better than the more recent performance vs NZ. But there was an awful lot more going terribly that day that meant he barely got any platform to operate from.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,594 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    That game should've been the canary in the coalmine for Farrell. An incredibly poor NZ, that we'd have beaten by 2 scores at least in our 22-23 era, managed to scrape a win against us. It's been consistently downhill from there.

    Our structure and basic skills have collapsed. We're not tailoring our gameplay to our players strengths, and seem to be lacking any creativity in unstructured play.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,025 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    no no, some posters on here are saying he was terrible so it must be true. they must be the special ones who have access to more info, tv angles or something because i certainly didnt see things like that but they probably just have a much superior knowledge of the game

    Like, you can be salty about something that happened a year and a half ago, and we can argue whether he was good, bad or terrible all we want, but what we know is;

    1. his performances were such that he lost his spot AND
    2. his performances were such that he lost his spot to an extremely raw and unproven newcomer AND
    3. his performances were such that he lost his spot to an extremely raw and unproven newcomer under a coach who has been absolutely lambasted on here for years for ignoring form and being excessively loyal, conservative and afraid to try new players.

    So noting all of the above, it is not at all possible that maybe he didn't do himself justice?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    What I will say is looking at their team it really doesn’t take a genius to see what England will try and do. Kick, chase, Ireland win the ball, gets smashed, one of the English BR’s/Itoje gets over the ball, wins turn over, kicks to the corner, set up maul, score a try/penalty…it’s a play book as old as time, they did the same thing to us in 2020 an 2022, would be very disappointed if we fall into the trap again…would be nice if, just for once, we outsmarted England…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,281 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    So none of your reasons for why Farrell hasn't settled on Crowley are anything to do with deficiencies in Crowley's game?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭Krazy gang


    Pollock, curry and Lawrence starting for England. Interesting how farrell will counter that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,863 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    so none of your responses are going to deal with the actual point of what i was trying to say?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,539 ✭✭✭✭phog


    What we also know is that Farrell has learnt from previous failings and decided he couldn't go into the next RWC with just one outhalf.

    So he wanted to give time to another player.

    It's been previously discussed here that Crowley hasn't been frozen out but has in fact shared similar game time with Sam.

    I suppose it really depends on what narrative you want to make this week rather what you previously made.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    Well if he believes that then Crowley needs to start this weekend.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,863 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    you have also missed the point of what i was saying. i dont necessarily agree with how you have framed the 2024 AIs to be honest, but thats not the point of what i said either - my point was the hyperbolic rubbish about crowley 'playing like a drain' etc, is completely untrue and people need to be realistic in their criticism. again, i have said he wasnt shooting the lights out at the time or anything like that but he was in no way playing as badly as some people are making out either

    i said the same in response to the poster's who were speaking in a similar way about SP after the France game - players generally arent ever as bad as they are made out to be by some



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,966 ✭✭✭almostover


    Why do we keep insist on picking McCarthy when he's had next to no impact in the first 2 games and was replaced early in both games? Why not start Beirne and Ryan and spring him from the bench instead? It might put a rocket up him too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,939 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I think if we were playing Wales or Scotland this weekend, that's nearly what I'd expect to happen. Unless he pulls out a big performance against England, I think that's what needs to happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭longjohn200


    Hmm Postlewaite at 13 perhaps?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,966 ✭✭✭almostover


    Personally, I'd drop him entirely from the 23 because he's been so poor.

    Start a back 5 of Ryan, Beirne, Conan, Timoney and Doris. With Izuchukwu, Edogbo and VdF on the bench.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,284 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Ryan and beirne would get absolutely minced in an already fcuked car crash of a scrum



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,939 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    1 his performances were such that he lost his spot AND

    …. that can have been a mistake by Farrell.

    Happy to help.

    So noting all of the above, it is not at all possible that maybe he didn't do himself justice?

    I think it's entirely possible he didn't do himself justice and also that he didn't deserve to be dropped.

    Now, that might get me pigeon-holed in the "lambasting the coach" bucket, but the reality is that was a perfectly reasonable opinion to have.

    And it was entirely reasonable to have that opinion AND also think Farrell was too conservative. Because - as I've previously mentioned:

    It's not difficult. It's because him being less conservative in a few cases does not mean he's not more conservative more broadly across the whole squad. There's no contradiction here.

    I think that was absolutely a fair criticism of him for last season. Things have improved on that front this season, and it has been very necessary, imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,966 ✭✭✭almostover


    We got minced there too with McCarthy on the pitch vs. Italy. Only seemed to steady up with TOT and Edogbo on the pitch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,332 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    from the photos it looks like Ringrose was as involved as anyone in training albeit with his right knee strapped



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,594 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,863 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    im all for wanting a change but being disappointed that a player on your team isnt injured is a bit ridiculous



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,332 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,245 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Just heard that clip on the radio,I would be surprised if Byrne doesn't start Saturday.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,594 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I'm disappointed at the likelihood for Ringrose playing, not that he's uninjured.



Advertisement
Advertisement