Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Dee Forbes banging the RTE TV licence drum again 60m uncollected fee *poll not working - pl ignore*

1469471473474475

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,468 ✭✭✭hoodie6029


    JC, you’re tiresome. Is your keyboard broken and you can only keep typing the same things?
    I’ve reported your tiresome antics multiple times but apparently it’s not a charter breach. Viva Boards!
    luckily there’s a mute button….

    Mod - warned for breach of forum charter

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on

    This is water. Inspiring speech by David Foster Wallace https://youtu.be/DCbGM4mqEVw?si=GS5uDvegp6Er1EOG



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,743 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    It is completely and utter arrogance.

    When everyone across the country is taking a pay cut or loosing their job, RTÉ say they have no way to cut top stars wages due to multi-year contracts.

    When you get to the point you've had to make people redundant because of your failures and still you have someone begging to be let back in and another basically saying she's off because she want's more money.

    When you consistently blame everyone else. And call it all an "existential crisis" or say "to get the best you must pay well".

    I absolutely agree D4rbes is to be blamed (this thread has been going since 2017) as are her predecessors in the role, who since the 1990s built these people up.

    You seem to think that world of RTÉ is large, look at how friendly Marty Morrissey is with the KB4, look at how KB4 went to dinners with Jimbo Jennings, I'd be very surprised if D4bres wasn't invited to many a soirée.

    Of course there is an amount of arrogance and ego.

    It was consistently stated over the years by most people that RTÉ were over paying, and the rebuke? …. your just jealous, sure wouldn't you take if you were offered it?, your just an Irish begrudger. No we knew that they were overpaid and BBC is over there in the UK if they want and the if the independents want to pay for them they are across the road.

    ______

    In the end they were just greedy, they all knew one another and knew what to expect more money for no return, it was a secure cash flow, but in fairness they looked for what they wanted and fair dues to them for that, and wouldn't you be doing the same!

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    "Of course there is an amount of arrogance and ego."

    Hard to disagree.

    The only further comment I'd make is that 'arrogance and ego' are evident in many walks of life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,138 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Tubridy went along with the lie to his financial advantage. His earnings were undeclared and could not be publicly justified. It is not the same as other types of financial negotiations where there is (a) no onus for the earnings to be disclosed and (b) public money at stake.

    He was a participant in it by not correcting the record - a lie of omission on his part.

    And remember he said he was wrong not to correct the declarations.

    Or was that another lie?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    "He was a participant in it by not correcting the record - a lie of omission on his part."

    He has acknowledged his failings in this regard, that he should have paid more attention.

    As regards a 'lie of omission' I don't accept it applies in this instance, I don’t see evidence it was a calculated omission.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,138 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I do as do many others - both on this thread and among his former colleagues in RTE as noted in the Extra article linked above.

    He was a current affairs commentator on radio. The publication of RTE top earners including his own was a major media story every year. He well knew that his declared earnings were wrong and speaking up about it could jeopardise that money as could teh backlash should it come to light.
    Which is why he should have had the sense not to agree to it.

    So we'll just have to agree to disagree on that point, I've made one cases, you've argued the opposing - otherwise we'll go round and round.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,552 ✭✭✭csirl


    The elephant in the room with all these historic presenter contracts is that none of the jobs/contracts were openly advertised or tendered for. RTE seems to forget that it is a public body.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 22,628 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    Mod - @odyssey06 and @Cyclingtourist, please move on or take it to PM



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,138 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Does any public service broadcaster do that though?
    I don't think it necessary in order to get someone who can do a good job on realistic money.

    Just drop the nonsense angle RTE were clinging to for so long that they needed to pay mega bucks or their top "stars" would be poached by others. If it is a genuine top "star" like Gerry Ryan or Gay Byrne who brings an audience with them that is one thing. But for any mere mortals, we've seen how RTE ratings for shows have survived people moving on.

    Although the whole charade with replacing Joe Duffy with trial hosts only to parachute an external candidate was nonsense!

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,790 ✭✭✭Peter Dragon


    You’re acting as if Tubridy and Kelly had zero knowledge of or input into the agreement they were party to. Mr. Kelly of course had to provide invoices for said payments (which he did) so their claims they knew nothing of what was going on ring a little hollow.

    And let’s not forget both of them gave “nothing to do with me” statements when this first broke, when they were in fact party to the agreement.

    Were I to speculate as to who dreamt up this “creative” agreement and given only Kelly or Forbes as the options, I know where my bet would be placed.


    Tubridy lied many times actually. He lied to his colleagues about taking a pay cut for one.

    When he gave his “seven untruths” opening statement to the Oireachtas Committee Fionnán Sheehan went through those one by one on Eamon Dunphy’s podcast and in his own paper Mr. Sheehan found those claims to be…..well, and I’ll be “kind” here….inaccurate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    "Were I to speculate as to who dreamt up this “creative” agreement and given only Kelly or Forbes as the options, I know where my bet would be placed."

    NK in his evidence to the Oireachtas committees said the Renault deal was RTE's idea, the barter accounts were RTE's idea (RTE had used them for other purposes) and the invoices to foreign identities were also made out at the direction of RTE. He claimed the whole process was directed by RTE management and provided emails from RTE to back up his evidence.

    AFAIK no one from RTE contradicted him and of course Dee Forbes never even turned up to give evidence so I'm not sure what you would be basing your hypothetical speculation on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,790 ✭✭✭Peter Dragon


    Why are you assuming I think it was Kelly? Sure Noel never ever met Dee Forbes or had as much as a cup of tea with her after all. It’s clear she was the mastermind and Ireland’s greatest celebrity agent had the wool pulled over his eyes and he was forced to comply. Same with the invoices - he was only following orders and doing what RTÉ told him to do.

    I see you ignored the comment about Tubridy lying though. Intriguing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    "Why are you assuming I think it was Kelly?"

    I'm not, I quoted you saying 'were I to speculate…' and wondering out loud what you'd base such speculation on.

    What would you base it on, were you to actually speculate?

    Edit: I ignored your 'lying' comment because I've already covered it just recently with a different poster. Not going over old ground.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,790 ✭✭✭Peter Dragon


    Sure. You offered no similar defence for Forbes intriguingly. Given you only offered this for one side one might suspect you had some pro-Kelly/Turbidy bias under-pinning your speculative answer, or that you had “some skin in the game” so to speak.

    On Tubridy lying, nice attempt at deflection. I’ll ask a direct question then - do you accept he lied to his colleagues about taking a pay cut in solidarity with them?

    Post edited by Peter Dragon on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,790 ✭✭✭Peter Dragon


    Mr. Kelly also said that Ryan Tubridy is “the most trusted man in Ireland” at the very same Oireachtas Committee. Similarly, no one from RTÉ contradicted this statement.


    Did you believe that statement to be a matter of fact then? Do you still consider it thus? No doubt you’ll avoiding answering these questions.


    Anyone can say anything at such a hearing. It doesn’t make it either true or a matter of fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,743 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    https://www.independent.ie/opinion/analysis/ryan-tubridy-and-rte-clash-over-request-to-see-stations-pay-scandal-files/a1372709250.html

    Sorry just to slight move away from Tubs even though I am link a story about him and KB4.

    The celebrated Donnybrook grapevine suggests Bakhurst wanted Tubridy to drop the data request.“It’s thought he was asking Ryan: ‘Can you back off on that?’,” a source said.RTÉ doesn’t say what was said, but Bakhurst admits bringing up the data request over coffee.

    This is a grapevine that for Seven years had little or nothing to say about the running of their organisation by D4rbes. Would ye ever stop with the quotes from a source at RTÉ who clearly know f-all.

    ______

    In the end they were just greedy, they all knew one another and knew what to expect more money for no return, it was a secure cash flow, but in fairness they looked for what they wanted and fair dues to them for that, and wouldn't you be doing the same!

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    RTE confirms that Bakhurst brought up the data request but won't comment on why or what was said.

    Interesting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,743 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    Why is that interesting?

    KB4 had coffee with Tubs and to mend any suggested hostile that they both might have or to avoid any future embarrassment that they might have.

    KB4 bringing up the data request, you have to remember this is also a business meeting, it away to mend any issues.

    Tubs is not looking for this data out of curiosity, he's looking to either sue RTÉ or announce a smoking gun that vindicates him from all responsibility.

    There are numerous issues at RTÉ, no one is suggesting that Tubs caused the lack of Governance in RTÉ, or put blame on him for either the Musical or the failed IT project.

    It is the issue of the top ten earners.

    Tubs, and all of the top talent at RTÉ, created an environment where it was suggested that they were worth more than what they were getting and that they could easily be getting more for working in the Independent sector or in the UK. BTW this environment still exists and it is the believe of the current governance team.

    RTÉ, over the last 15 years, ran around desperately trying to down play this, issuing the figures for 3 years, some of them late and one earlier than required, both D4bes and Noel Curran* did this, but they did this with the presenters/actors/talent earning over 100K. There were meetings with all of them Daithi O'Se does just shoot into the top earners list, he was already in and around that figure over the last decade at least. He discussed this with RTÉ. He realized last year he might as well take a pay increase and it was agreeable with him now to be in the top 10.

    *I will call him "Christmas Fruit you find in a Cake", not sure if any one get this!

    ______

    In the end they were just greedy, they all knew one another and knew what to expect more money for no return, it was a secure cash flow, but in fairness they looked for what they wanted and fair dues to them for that, and wouldn't you be doing the same!

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Why is that interesting?

    Because it shows, just like with relevant data, their is a limit to RTE's openness. One has to wonder what are they trying to hide. Was it Bakhurst who asked for the 'meeting over coffee'? I'm sure that's one question along with others he will be asked in any future press conference.

    "Tubs is not looking for this data out of curiosity, he's looking to either sue RTÉ or announce a smoking gun that vindicates him from all responsibility."

    It can be both curiosity and depending on what the data released says also be evidential if he decides to sue for damages.

    Hardly going to 'vindicate him from all responsibility' as he's already accepted some responsibility himself.

    There's also a possibility that NK might sue RTE and RT not sue. Depends on what RTE are hiding.

    "Tubs, and all of the top talent at RTÉ, created an environment where it was suggested that they were worth more than what they were getting and that they could easily be getting more for working in the Independent sector or in the UK. "

    That's a strange assertion as the former RTE DG is on record as being the most vocal proponent of this suggestion. When management subscribes to the exceptional nature of the 'talent' in RTE it's disingenuous to claim it was the employees who created the idea.

     "BTW this environment still exists and it is the believe of the current governance team."

    So is the current environment the creation of people like Miriam O'Callaghan or RTE management or both?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,743 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    @Cyclingtourist I argue that the main person to blame for the current environment and that of the environment of pay for talent at RTÉ resides with Mike Murphy way back when he told Gay Byrne to ask for more money, because he wanted a pay rise.

    It follows on, Tubs is part of that, along with all of the leadership team, sorry I did mean to include them in this. I thought I had made that clear. Though I did think that the following made that clear "RTÉ, over the last 15 years, ran around desperately trying to down play this, issuing the figures for 3 years, some of them late and one earlier than required, both D4bes and Noel Curran* did this, but they did this with the presenters/actors/talent earning over 100K."

    And then you quote me on "BTW this environment still exists and it is the believe of the current governance team".

    These people got paid too much money and continue to do so. RTÉ will now begin to have most TV production outside of news and current affairs produced by independent producers.

    So from now on many presenters will be pay for Radio via RTÉ and TV via the independent production company.

    Running around like headless chickens trying to hide renumeration packages.

    ______

    In the end they were just greedy, they all knew one another and knew what to expect more money for no return, it was a secure cash flow, but in fairness they looked for what they wanted and fair dues to them for that, and wouldn't you be doing the same!

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    So you now blame Mike Murphy, that's really going back in time.

    Personally I don't blame any employee for wanting to be paid as much as possible, especially if they're having to renegotiate every three years or so. If they get 700k or even more I say good luck to them.

    If anyone has a beef with what RTE are paying their 'talent' then blame the management and board who approve it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,790 ✭✭✭Peter Dragon




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,743 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    You wanted an attribution to the level of pay for the top ten earners in RTÉ, that is a story that Mike Murphy Reminisced on.

    It seems to be every 5 years, and it seemed to be pretty much guaranteed for most part, I wouldn't imagine it was a hard negotiation .

    How do they put it "Like taking candy from a baby"… do you blame the baby for giving the candy away?

    It is pure greed. The talent all know the board, they all know management, they are all friends. Jimbo Jennings went to Joe Duffy's going away do. And the management have show that they too are greed.

    One of the talent is married to one of the executives (who'd previously been in RTÉ as an executive and before that he'd been an indo producer for them).

    KB4 on his deputy DG … "He's not been given any extra money for his new role and extra responsibilities" …. then he publishes the fee that the Deputy DG is on… he was on too much money.

    This is the national public service broadcaster, a broadcaster that always has its hands out for more money.

    I have no problem with people wanting what they are worth, but they were over valued in the extreme.

    Why do you feel the need to defend this type of carry on? You main focus is on these talented people? What do you think about RTÉ spend on Children's Content?

    ______

    In the end they were just greedy, they all knew one another and knew what to expect more money for no return, it was a secure cash flow, but in fairness they looked for what they wanted and fair dues to them for that, and wouldn't you be doing the same!

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    "You wanted an attribution to the level of pay for the top ten earners in RTÉ, that is a story that Mike Murphy Reminisced on."

    Did I, when?

    I don't believe I've mentioned 'the top ten earners' and pretty certain not in the recent past at least. Perhaps you're mixing me up with someone else.

    "How do they put it "Like taking candy from a baby"… do you blame the baby for giving the candy away?"

    I don't blame RTE for cutting back on the rates of pay for 'talent' but it was RTE who gave them these original levels of pay and are responsible for their own largesse.

    "I have no problem with people wanting what they are worth, but they were over valued in the extreme."

    That's a reasonable opinion to argue but the fact is it was ultimately RTE in agreeing to their terms & conditions of employment who determined their 'worth'.

    "Why do you feel the need to defend this type of carry on? You main focus is on these talented people? What do you think about RTÉ spend on Children's Content?"

    I'm not defending any carry on I'm placing the main blame on RTE management. Whatever blame is attributable to Tubridy is minor in comparison and centres round his silence over RTE's misrepresentation of his remuneration. In effect he failed to step forward as a whistle blower on his employer.

    I've referred to them as the 'talent' in inverted commas as that's what RTE called them and it's a handy way of differentiating them from other senior figures in RTE who apparently (according to Tubridy) make up 70% of the current top ten earners.

    I don't know anything about RTE's spend on Children's content so you hardly expect me to have an opinion on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,743 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    "Did I, when?I don't believe I've mentioned 'the top ten earners' and pretty certain not in the recent past at least. Perhaps you're mixing me up with someone else."

    From you: -

    That's a strange assertion as the former RTE DG is on record as being the most vocal proponent of this suggestion. When management subscribes to the exceptional nature of the 'talent' in RTE it's disingenuous to claim it was the employees who created the idea.

     "BTW this environment still exists and it is the believe of the current governance team."

    So is the current environment the creation of people like Miriam O'Callaghan or RTE management or both?

    You ask who in the current environment, I had suggested it goes away back and suggested Mike Murphy. But to answer weather it is management or talent … it is both and a history of it.

    I don't blame RTE for cutting back on the rates of pay for 'talent' but it was RTE who gave them these original levels of pay and are responsible for their own largesse.

    Your now under the assumption that the level off pay is a good compromise for government/public and RTÉ, I do not.

    That's a reasonable opinion to argue but the fact is it was ultimately RTE in agreeing to their terms & conditions of employment who determined their 'worth'.

    It is also reasonable to argue that they came looking for more money. And that the agreement is between both parties, though, yes, ulitmately signed off by RTÉ.

    I've referred to them as the 'talent' in inverted commas as that's what RTE called them and it's a handy way of differentiating them from other senior figures in RTE who apparently (according to Tubridy) make up 70% of the current top ten earners.

    He'd be wrong up until the scandal they probably would only taken up 50% of the list if not less. Though as I say I believe them to also be overpaid.

    I don't know anything about RTE's spend on Children's content so you hardly expect me to have an opinion on it.

    Do you not care? Afterall D4bres often said that the top earners only took up 1% of RTÉ overall budget, surely you'd consider that the pubic service broadcast is spending much more on Children's content than on their top presenters, right? or do you feel children's content isn't important?

    This thread isn't all about the scandal or Tubs, it predates all of that, and its been pretty much on the mark.

    ______

    In the end they were just greedy, they all knew one another and knew what to expect more money for no return, it was a secure cash flow, but in fairness they looked for what they wanted and fair dues to them for that, and wouldn't you be doing the same!

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,790 ✭✭✭Peter Dragon




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    On the 'top ten', that's really a stretch from your original post. Mentioning Miriam and Bakhurst's management isn't bringing up the 'top ten' more than half of which are currently executives, CFOs etc.

    Lots of IMOs which everyone has.

    "Do you not care? Afterall D4bres often said that the top earners only took up 1% of RTÉ overall budget, surely you'd consider that the pubic service broadcast is spending much more on Children's content than on their top presenters, right? or do you feel children's content isn't important?"

    I care about facts.

    I've already told you I know nothing about 'children's content' spending in RTE.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,743 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    You have to explain why it is a stretch.

    IMO this is an opinion boards, I base my opinions on facts and on my biases. Like most people.

    So your only care is the top earners and one that you feel was mistreated, and those facts alone. You care about nothing else surrounding the mismanagement of the national public service broadcaster.

    ______

    In the end they were just greedy, they all knew one another and knew what to expect more money for no return, it was a secure cash flow, but in fairness they looked for what they wanted and fair dues to them for that, and wouldn't you be doing the same!

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    I have already explained.

    It is an opinion based forum and I post my opinions and back them up when I can by facts and links.

    No I don't just care about 'top earners but this thread is about the former RTE DG who was one.

    Edit: This back and forth is pointless at this stage IMO. You have your opinions and I have mine, I think it's time to just agree to disagree.

    Post edited by Cyclingtourist on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,743 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    ______

    In the end they were just greedy, they all knew one another and knew what to expect more money for no return, it was a secure cash flow, but in fairness they looked for what they wanted and fair dues to them for that, and wouldn't you be doing the same!

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



Advertisement
Advertisement