Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Public Pay Talks - see mod warning post 4293

1248249250251253

Comments

  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 14,476 Mod ✭✭✭✭pc7


    Have any Siptu members heard anything on local bargaining?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,727 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    Asked SIPTU several times about education sector - no response



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,000 ✭✭✭granturismo


    What I heard is before Christmas, Siptu, Unite, Connect and the Irish Universities Association asked DFHERIS for 1% to be applied across the board for local bargaining, DPER said no because it had to be bargained locally. DPER were happy with Forsa's bargaining, IUA probably want to give 1% to all groups so each institution doesnt have to negotiate a deal with admin, academic, technical, trades etc for 1%.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,727 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    Thanks! Don't see why a flat 1% isn't possible if it costs the same to DPER? There are so many grades and differences within the sector it makes sense imo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,476 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    There is a recruitment crisis for certain sectors due to poor wages and some of the intent of local bargaining is to improve those wages. Top of scale changes can attract people looking at something as a long term job for instance.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,777 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    How can you apply such a thing locally when often such things are linked to other civil service grades though. 1% across the board would have to be applied not only sectorally, but simply everywhere. I presume too late to do that since they've already used up some of that budget. Since this is done, for many, jumping points on the scale is all they can do now. There are many administrative jobs in Universitys that are linked to CS titles. Since those titled jobs have already been dealt with, a flat 1% is no longer possible for them, all they could negotiate is jumping a point on the scale. I think, Unions are bizarre in this fashion they never seem to think past this. Effectively other unions restricting bargaining for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 563 ✭✭✭chipfox


    just the civil service bulletin with what was agreed

    https://forsatradeunion.newsweaver.com/designtest/pl5jib1ob9h?lang=en&a=1&p=66396361&t=30063856



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17 auris12


    Is this deal just for Civil Service?Have Forsa reached an agreement with the HSE in respect of Clerical grades?

    Post edited by auris12 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 534 ✭✭✭Cuauhtemoc


    There are negotiations for the HSE etc. the below is a section from the local bargaining offer received in November. The original claim specifically referenced the Grades 4 to 7 in the HSE but whether it happens in the 1% backdated to September or the 2% to be negotiated from June I don't know.

    An offer in principle has been made in the civil service for executive officers, administrative officers and higher executive officers. These grades are in the same cross sectoral bargaining unit as grade 4-7 roles in the public sector, however as the pay scales are of an entirely different construct, a separate offer will be made across the other sectors in respects to grades 4-7.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 488 ✭✭donnem33


    I found this letter in relation to local bargaining for AP and PO level https://rcpsa.ie/dper-letter-of-09-02-2026-application-of-the-local-bargaining-clause-for-grades-represented-by-the-ahcps/

    Is this for union members only or for all AP and PO including non union members?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,273 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Jaysus, imagine if NSSO had to implement a different pay scale depending on whether you were in a union or not. They can barely cope as it is.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,851 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Pay agreements aren't applied depending on whether the member is in a union or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 97 ✭✭midfield dynamo


    Looks like it's only for AP/PO Higher scales.

    Damn Standards scales!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 563 ✭✭✭chipfox


    Lack of progress on local bargaining called out

    not sure how this will tie in to what is proposed, especially for those middle grades without many increments

    is a local authority 5/6 mostly equivalent to a HEO or a higher scale AO?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 106 ✭✭countyireland12345


    Why am I learning about this deal on an online forum? I am a member of AHCPS but unsurpringsly I was not asked for a view, or told about it directly. I need to assess my membership.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 4,710 Mod ✭✭✭✭dory


    I was told by my local AHCPS rep. I think whoever is in your dept had a duty to tell you. Are you on their mailing list?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 173 ✭✭fergald


    if you look. back on discussions nobody can tell who is the representative for the AHCPS, at least FORSA have regular contact and voting. I have never got anything, I even rang and was told someone would be in contact. Loads of us have discussed this in larger Departments and no one knows a proper contact, I have talked to at least 12 PO/AP and no one has a clue. No one has been asked to vote on anything. No one knows of any mailing list, I can see Forsa lists alright but nothing for AHCPS.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 173 ✭✭fergald


    just wondering did you get to vote and was it communicated to you beforehand by the union.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14 turfer239


    Where did you see it was only for AP and PO higher? I couldn't see that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 97 ✭✭midfield dynamo


    It doesn't say it! I thought it was a flat 1% across the board for all APs & POs. But then when I started to look into what the PCW was, it's described as an allowance to the higher scales. The letter from PER says something along the lines of that it's up to individual Departments to implement this. So assuming it is only onto the higher scales, as these are generally operated locally.

    Also, a few years ago, there was a PQ (below) about the allowance and how it works and good auld Paschal explained it in the response.

    Just how I'm reading it, and will be more than happy for someone who is well versed on this to tell me I'm wrong!

    https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2016-10-26/110/#:~:text=Minister%20for%20Public%20Expenditure%20and%20Reform,-Share&text=The%20framework%20in%20respect%20of,or%20Office%2C%20experience%20and%20suitability.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭Kirbi


    The AHCPS spring update clarified it (following a piece on the Feb increase):

    “The other major pay issue has been the agreement with The Official Side regarding 1% Local Bargaining due from September 2025. As you may have seen circulars issue last year and the Official Side issuing a circular earlier this week outlining the agreement is now in place. For those who don’t know, the PCW is a late 1990’s agreement giving effect to Higher Scales for our grades. The fund prior to this agreement was 1% and from September 2025 the fund increases to 2%. This amounts to a doubling of the fund and we would expect a significant increase in the number of higher scales to be awarded as a result. The agreement relates to only the fund, all other ancillary issues around HS remain the same and are subject to our agreement with individual departments. For any queries, please contact your full time official.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,055 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    I must sit down and check the data, but I feel that real wages in the PS have been falling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41 Sideview


    Has anyone at HEO Higher Scale LS2 Max scale received the September increase yet? Or are they still processing that?

    I got the Feb 1st increase recently, but no sign of the Sept. top of scale increase, which I think I'm due for.

    The Forsa website has it included in their pay scales as far as I can see.

    Thanks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 106 ✭✭countyireland12345


    Yes I am. AHCPS should just use centralised mailing for updates, don't see why they don't. I will be cancelling my membership.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 233 ✭✭Alonzo Mosley


    Yes, I got the 2 increases in last paycheck. The arrears was €435.30 if that's any help. My pay slip is also showing top of the scale increase.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14 turfer239


    Why do the Higher Scales only get the increase? What logic is there to that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,710 ✭✭✭combat14


    with a lack of tax bands/credits indexing and the war in middle east most likely going to send prices sky high again any news on next round of public sector pay talks - june is only round the corner



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41 Sideview


    #######



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41 Sideview


    It is not just the higher scales as I understand it.

    The Max of each scale gets it.

    There are also scale point skips for those who are newer to the grade and so they will reach the max sooner.

    The benefit of the max of the scales receiving it is as an incentive to keep people long term.

    For the employees it means that you have something to aim for, and you could be on the max of the scale for many years. It will also benefit your pension long term.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭gandalfio


    If the max on a particular scale is LSI1, will this increase be applied to the LSI1?



Advertisement
Advertisement