Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

US/Israel conduct airstrikes on Iran again

1130131133135136430

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    I was talking about Irish left-wing politicians supporting Russia and you managed to drag Trump into it to hide embarrassment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,537 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I'm not interested lad.

    Can smell you a mile away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭bored65


    I ain’t the one who started the “but whataboutism Trump” deflection side tangent on previous page to try to excuse Sinn Féin’s carry on

    But I am the one who pointed out how their position {which thankfully failed in EU parliament this time} is the height of bullshit and hypocrisy that somehow ended up being similar to what Trump wants but even more malign



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,537 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Nobody's "excusing" anyone.

    Sinn Fein have stated that they opposed the 90 billion bill because it wasn't going towards humanitarian purposes. I don't agree with their position, but I understand it.

    Donald Trump wants Russia to win because there's more in it for him if it does.

    These positions are not the same no matter how much you try to make them out to be. Nor does it translate into the Shinners or "tHe lEfT" supporting Russia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    There is already an Ukraine thread where Ukraine/Russia discussions take place.
    This thread is about the Israel/Iran conflict.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭bored65


    Agree

    two cheeks of same arse Iran and Russia are, and they are quite open about their alliance against democracy, my discussion with Tony was over this comment of his which as I pointed out to him is bullshit

    I’m gonna leave it there, some people are not able to admit being wrong, might be a function of age or a blind spot for a political party who are becoming indistinguishable from MAGA



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,537 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I’m gonna leave it there

    Yeah, it's probably best that you do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    Judging by the stuff moving east, the missile program will be dismantled consensually or by force, in the next month or so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    This is the kind of simple crass analysis that people like to see the world through. Good vs bad, left vs right, democracy vs communism.
    The US has toppled its fair share of democratic governments and supported socialist/communist/religious fundamentalist ones.

    Ireland is an English speaking country in the west with huge social, historical and economic ties to the US. Many Irish people have a deep interest in American politics. Our culture is massively influenced by the US. It is not in any way unusual that we are more aware of and therefore critical of, American excesses and criminality than we are of those of Russia, Iran or Saudi Arabia.

    Not everyone agrees with you. Not everyone thinks the US is interested in spreading democracy and freedom. The US is interested in US interests and of course those of Israel.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,630 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Well some are only itching for a war. Hopefully a deal can be reached because as we have seen with Iraq and Afghanistan a war would likely be another disaster for the region

    I think an agreement similiar to what i outlined would be a fair compromise. Do you agree vswr?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,630 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    For some posters an act is not bad per se, rather it depends on who is doing it and for what purpose. In others words if the West support proxies that carry out the killing of civilians they will try to reduce it to it was for the greater good/ served some higher ideal. However if an adversary carries out the same act its beyond the pale; hence, Iran killing civilians is to be condemned in the strongest terms, but Israel killing civilians is in the main ignored by some posters- we have seen that demonstrated numerous times in this thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    With the Epstein files, a protracted war in the Middle East would be an ideal distraction.

    In an ideal world what you outlined might work. In reality, you would need to undo over 50 years of policy, blood and hatred. So it's a no go.

    Even though you can delve into the back story for over a century (centuries if you fancy heading down the Ottoman route)… one of the crux arguments is, Iran has a policy to destroy the state of Israel. The west has a policy for Israel to exist. Until that gap is bridged, that, and all periphery arguments will remain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Iran does not have an official state policy to destroy the state of Israel.
    Do states have a right to have a permanent sectarian majority through the use of ethnic cleansing and genocide?

    Would posters support Northern Ireland being a “Protestant state for a Protestant people” if it meant regular ethnic cleansing and killing of catholics to retain that majority?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    Iran have a publicly stated long term goal to get rid of the state of Israel, since the late 70's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,442 ✭✭✭brickster69


    How are they going to do that, when they could not do it with a biger force against the Houthi's ?

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭Marty Bird


    Yet covert friendship existed back then between the two states, yes publicly they both hated each other. Sadly today it’s a completely different story.

    🌞6.02kWp⚡️3.01kWp South/East⚡️3.01kWp West



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,630 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    What Iran seems to object to is a zionist state built on ethno supremacists ideals rather than the physical destruction of Israel. You are correct though as long as we have leadership in Israel that is steadfastly against a two state solution the conflict will rumble on



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    A threat Israel took so seriously that they were the largest supplier of weapons and military equipment to Iran for the best part of a decade. Supplying up to 80% of Iranian military needs.

    Iran have called for the destruction of the Israeli regime just as Israel has called for the destruction of the Iranian regime.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    Welcome to the oxymoron that is the Middle East. Also a prime example of, "your enemy's enemy, is your friend". Plus a truckload of US influence.

    There is a bit of a difference in your last statement, Israel want a regime change…. Iran want Israel gone completely with restoration of Arabs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    Using a limited aerial campaign to attack camps, weapons caches, staging points and launch sites, against pretty much a clandestine group that uses gorilla war tactics is completely different to a sustained attack on manufacturing and defence locations.

    The Yemen strikes were also performed from a lot of already in theatre aircraft. Currently the US are shipping in fighters and support aircraft daily. There is pretty much a continuous airbridge between the US/Germany/Middle East at the moment.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Are you opposed to the “restoration of Arabs” to the areas they were ethnically cleansed from?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,216 ✭✭✭wildgreen


    Israel is the only country saying that they want the end of Israel. Palestinians accepted Jews when they fled Europe in the 1940s. Israel now uses any straw as a justification for their slaughter and genocide just like they facilitated October 7 so that they could eradicate Gaza and the West Bank.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    I'm not opposed to anything that leads to peace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    I mean, if you even took one look at Iranian state media, there is rarely a day goes by that they don't have some sort of propaganda on the destruction of Israel.

    British Palestine did, yes. Under the supervision of the British, and under UN mandate (there was actually Jewish and Arab insurgencies in the region at the time). Surrounding Arab nations were never happy to Jewish people coming into their lands, even before Israel becoming a state.

    There was a civil war that started the day after Israel was declared a state, and subsequently led to the Arab Israeli wars…. so to say it's been a jovial affair is not true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    So allowing displaced Palestinians to return to the areas they were ethnically cleansed from and allowing them to vote would be acceptable. We are agreed.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    I'm pretty certain that wouldn't lead to peace in the current climate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    I think internationally, many could get behind and support a non apartheid Israel. A one state solution with equal citizenship has been suggested by groups on both sides. The major barrier is that in an Israel of 7 million Jews and 7 million Arabs, Israel would no longer be a Jewish supremacist state and that is unacceptable to many Israelis.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    which is now full circle to my original statement:

    one of the crux arguments is, Iran has a policy to destroy the state of Israel. The west has a policy for Israel to exist. Until that gap is bridged, that, and all periphery arguments will remain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,442 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Israel pushing hard now, up to 200K dead according to the media. Will be up to up to a million by Easter, just last week they reported 350K were also injured during the riots.

    iran.jpg

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,216 ✭✭✭wildgreen


    Just like today, the only country never consulted about their land is Palestine. Iran has no serious intention of attacking Israel whereas Israel wants to put Iran in a position that it cannot defend itself just like Lebanon. Iran wants justice for Palestine and defence against Greater Israel's colonialism.



Advertisement
Advertisement