Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General British politics discussion thread

1616617619621622637

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,712 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Lawyers get used to defending the indefensible. It is part of their training. Everyone is entitled to a defence, even if they are obviously guilty.

    I believe Starmer has a Jewish wife, so would tend to be sympathetic to Jewish causes, but that is a personal position. The political position should be in favour of international law and crimes against humanity - which is after all his legal speciality.

    He comes across as a political glove puppet, with no substance of his own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,916 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    In fairness, the same could be said about Blair. Brown, the grumpy sod, had strong positions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    The strength of Zionism in the British Labour party & in Britain more generally is such that they can fund McSweeney to keep holding Starmer's strings from the shadows for as long as the Labour party supports him; and as virtually the whole cabinet subscribes to zionism, it is in their interest to keep the puppet master pulling Starmer's strings, because they will all be gone as soon as this government falls.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    There is so much wrong with this post that I don't know where to start.

    Labour didn't sell itself and the electorate didn't buy Labour either - it got into power off the back of a split rightwing vote. Starmer et al convinced 20% or so of the electorate to vote for them. That's their first major failure.

    Moving right to cut off Reform clearly didn't work, in fact Starmer convinced fewer people to vote for Labour in 2024 than Corbyn did in 2019 when Johnson cleverly used Brexit to split the Labour vote; whichever side of the fence Corbyn came down on he was going to lose votes on the other side. It was a master stroke by Johnson, I have to say. But Starmer's Labour party gained even fewer votes.

    Somebody posted that we don't know what Starmer stands for - well, that is not true. We know that he stands for Genocide. We know he stands for Censorship. We know he is a rabid zionist. We know he couldn't care less about the British working classes. That's quite a lot of knowledge about what he is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,923 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    He destroyed the viability of left politics in the UK for a generation and has gone on to disenfranchise the left even further with the your party debacle. It has been an achievement driven by incompetence. In the field of being a politician his only achievement has been gaining power through Ed Millibands ill conceived electoral reforms.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Wes Streeting has published the messages he shared with Peter Mandelson between August of 2024 and October 2025.

    The fact that he was communicating in a manner that indicated a personal relationship between the two is probably enough to exclude him from consideration for the next leader of Labour. But if that wasn't the case, I'd say messages such as this will motivate some to feel that he is not fit for a leadership position which could include being PM.

    (Link)

    “Morally and politically”, Streeting said, the UK needed to join France in going for recognition, writing: “Morally, because Israel is committing war crimes before our eyes …. Politically, a Commons vote will be engineered in September on recognition and we will lose it if we’re not ahead of it.”

    Even though he has held various positions that would indicate a favourable view of Israel, including; vice-chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism, a co-chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on British Jews and a supporter of Labour Friends of Israel, I don't think they will like the fact that his personal view was that they were committing war crimes.

    Be hard to play the "right to defend themselves" card as PM when being asked if he would instruct the police to arrest Netanyahu or Gallant if they visited UK territory when he expressed clearly that they were committing war crimes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,533 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    It wasn't Corbyn that "viability of left politics in the UK".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,062 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Well he says he had dinner with him once a year so I don't think it was that close other than the communications seeking Mandelsons advice. He says that his partner worked for Mandelson 25 years ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,629 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    It's a bizarre sight to see a party with very strong working class and trade union roots supporting a colonial oppressor like Israel. They really have 'jumped the shark' here and gone in a direction that would have been unthinkable a few decades ago. Having said that, Blair supporting the invasion of Iraq was probably a sign of things to come.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,062 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    I think in the UK, the Jewish vote has gone to the Tories since Disraeli, the first UK PM to be born Jewish (though he was raised as Church of England) because even after Catholic Emancipation, the parliamentary oath said "on the good faith of a Christian". That oath wasn't changed until late 19th century. Tony Blair did better with them, getting maybe 37%.

    Judaism in the UK tends to be Orthodox, unlike in the US where it's more likely to be Reform Judaism. Orthodox Judaism internationally is often correlated with votes for right-wing parties, though there are individual exceptions 75% of American Jews voted for Harris. But one third voted for Romney in 2012. The last US Republican to win the Jewish vote was Ronald Reagan. Bush Sr. only won about 7% of it in 1992.

    Theres also a denomination called Conservative Judaism. It will score liberal than Orthodox Judaism though and followers tend to vote Democrat, though not by as much.

    Israel has erected obstacles to Reform Judaism domestically. Jewish family law is controlled by the Rabbinate, which is Orthodox. Civil marriage is not recognised in Israel unless conducted outside the country. So Israelis who want civil marriages sometimes have them abroad and then return to Israel. Foreign marriages are recognised in Israel.

    Also trade unions have declined in Israel, which I think is an often overlooked factor in the rise of the Right there, as class politics is undermined, being replaced with nationalism.

    Also ex Soviet Jews are overwhelmingly Orthodox and vote overwhelmingly for nationalist parties.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,629 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    It's an odd one for certain - one would have thought that supporting Israel as it attacked Gaza would be no vote winner for the Labour Party and more likely to cost them votes and yet that is somehow where they found themselves after October 7th, 2023 (yes, they won a landslide in 2024 but only because the Tories were beyond hated at that point).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,213 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    The political theory is that the Islamic voter has nowhere to go other than Labour, but that the Jewish voter can be flipped from Tory to Labour. Even if an Islamic voter doesn't go to the polls in a rage at Labour, but Labour get a Jewish voter to flip, then Labour are up on the deal - their vote has stayed constant and the Tories are down one.

    As a theory it really only worked in the two-party system though. A different ball-game now that vastly more constituencies are likely to be 4 way contents.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 145 ✭✭Duke of Schomberg


    Johnathan Ashworth, Labour MP for Leicester South, lost his seat to the Independent Shockat Adam who stood on a pro-Palestine platform - as they grow in numbers non-indigenous, non-Judeo-Christian, immigrant populations will organise for themselves . . .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,288 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Streeting releasing private messages between him and Mandelson where he thinks Israel is committing war crimes and talks of ethic cleansing and yet the man goes on TV and defends Israels right to do all that…. slippery as they come



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,213 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Yes, that was one of the few big setbacks for Labour in the last GE.

    It doesn't disprove the overall logic of the Labour/Islamic-voter theory though - it likely gained Labour more seats than they lost. But does show there is a potential flaw going forward if a strong local single-cause independent is in the mix combined with Labours core vote falling in a now 4 party system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,375 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Sure but that can lead to disaster as well as success. Look at Your Party. Their one connection with each other is their opposition to Israel's genocide. That's it and even that is insufficient to get them to behave professionally.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,916 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Labour would be much better off doing the electoral reform and accept being the senior partner of coalition well into the future. The present option is being occasionally in Govn't and undoing the damage done by right wing Govn'ts who will be in power most of the time. Don't see them taking that brave decision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,375 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    They're too short sighted and they won't kick away the ladder they climbed up on.

    I'd love to see PR the same way I'd love to see better law enforcement, abolition of the monarchy, NHS reform, etc…. It's a fantasy.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,213 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Even Reform UK seem to have dropped a referendum on PR as being one of their policies, now that they see a path to government under the existing system. No longer a mention of it on their policies section on their website, whereas back when they launched it was number 1 policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,375 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Simple self-interest. 25% of the popular vote is what you need for big gains. Farage can get that easily so adopting PR would only hurt him.

    There was a time when he collaborated with other small party leaders including Natalie Bennett of the Greens on this.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,288 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    I cannot believe Labour are still running with the 'we did not know' defence



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,629 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Keep in mind that Starmer was a top barrister. Literally his role would be to suss out when people were lying to him or being deceptive. Imagine using the "he lied to me and I was therefore totally deceived by him" thing as an excuse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Zara Sultana left Labour (with others) because of Labour scrapping the 2 child benefit. Corbyn because he was pushed out as the conclusion to a campaign against him. Both of them have long records of speaking in the House with Left wing views on a variety of topics.

    The political statement available on their website doesn't mention Israel, Gaza or Palestine. It does mention being against colonisation so maybe that would be enough to make some people think their only connection is Israel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Nigel Farage spoke out against working from home yesterday.

    https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/nigel-farage-calls-for-an-end-to-working-from-home-5HjdS8n_2/

    Mr Farage thinks it is ‘nonsense’ that people are more productive when working from home.

    Speaking at a rally in Birmingham, the Reform UK leader said he thinks workers are “more productive being with other fellow human beings”.

    He said “you can't go on the sick because you've got mild anxiety. But it is an attitudinal change that Britain needs.

    “An attitudinal change to hard work, rather than work-life balance.

    That last sentence is particularly telling for someone seeking to become the next Prime Minister. Between this, and a recent statement from him that Reform could even look to cut the minimum wage is a curious tactic. Cutting minimum wage and telling people to prefer hard work over work-life balance is not a strategy that will be popular with anyone under 30 I would imagine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,533 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Nige should keep banging that drum. It'll keep Reform out of power forever. 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,375 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Richard Tice owns about £300 million of commercial office space. Just a coincidence from mister 1/43 fisheries meetings, I'm sure…

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I 100% know why he would think this way, what I'm curious about is why he would say it as he did. Who does it bring onboard? Corporate donors?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,288 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Farage has a brass neck considering he hardly works in his place of work. The retired who want to hark back to the good ole days will still vote for him, everyone else has moved on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,375 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I wouldn't say so. Don't underestimate the amount of older people who think that anyone below 40 is a perpetually triggered woke snowflake who has no interest in work.

    This won't win him any new votes but it will invite donations from corporates and it's a bit of red meat for the base as well.

    Exactly. There are plenty of Alan Sugars who love to moan about wfh.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,993 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    It a push whether he cares about anyone under 50, let alone 30.



Advertisement
Advertisement