Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1171417151717171917201818

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭almostover


    I would debate that we're comfortably in 5th at the moment. Only a defeat of England in 2 weeks time would change my mind on that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    I don’t disagree with us being miles behind SA and France, that much is obvious but that wasn’t the point I was arguing.

    The point is we’ve beaten England already in that period and while we lost to NZL, you would also argue how much did us not playing any rugby going into it played a role. I would say the gap between 3-5 is a lot more debatable due to there not being as much concrete evidence. From what I’ve seen of England they aren’t as good as France or SA so it’ll be a clear indication of where we rank amongst the rest of the pack.


    The clear evidence we have so far is we are well behind France & SA but we are also well ahead of Scotland & Australia etc. the question that remains is where we rank in the middle portion, we beat England but lost to NZL whereas England lost to us but beat NZL and NZL beat us but lost to England. England obviously are now on a 12 game win streak so will be a different proposition to the one we played last year but at the same time of that 12 game win streak how many “wow” games have they had? NZL probably but other than that it’s not been that impressive performance wise, even the France win while an impressive result was probably one of the flukiest wins you’ll ever see in rugby (even the most one eyed English fan would admit that). What impresses me most about England is their consistency, while not being as mind blowingly good as some of France/SA’s best games their consistency has made up for it. We’ll definitely be underdogs but I doubt it’ll be 2 score underdogs unless Ireland are dreadful this weekend and/or England are impressive. I suspect it’ll be like 7-8 points underdogs, similar to our handicap in 2020 when we went to Twickenham, which conveniently is how I see the game going unfortunately bar massive improvement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    4th or 5th for me, NZL may have beat us but over the last 12 months I think their worst performances have been so bad that it possibly drags them down despite beating us.


    I think 1 and 2 in the world is fairly locked in for the moment. England are 3rd for me but I don’t think their miles ahead at the moment, if they beat us in 2 weeks in convincing fashion then I’d confidently nail them in as 3rd in the world with the question being can they challenge the top 2, on the flip side if they lose to us I think Ireland can certainly make an argument for being ahead given they also beat England 12 months ago



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    Really rate Brex so was relieved for our sake to hear this…then I hear Capuzzo is available and my heart sank, if we are falling off tackles like we were on Tuesday and he gets the ball we are in trouble.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,049 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    If Farrell is planning to change things up in terms of playing style a bit and in personnel (and I really hope he is for both) then the most logical thing to do is pick the expected England starting team against Italy and get them bedding in the changes.

    So I don't mind if he goes very strong against Italy as long as it is not the exact same as the France team.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 307 ✭✭big-al


    you think he is going to drop Stockdale ahead of TOB (looked like a rabbit in the headlights) even thought he pulled O’Brien early vs France?


    I think we’re more likely see Baloucoune at 14, than Lowe at 11.


    my team

    1. Loughman
    2. Sheehan
    3. Clarkson
    4. McCarthy
    5. Ryan
    6. Beirne
    7. VDF
    8. Doris
    9. JGP
    10. Byrne
    11. Stockdale
    12. McCloskey
    13. Farrell
    14. Baloucoune
    15. Osbourne
    16. Stewart
    17. Milne
    18. Furlong
    19. Edogbo
    20. Conan
    21. Casey
    22. Crowley
    23. Ringrose


    Team I think Farrell will select

    1. Loughman
    2. Sheehan
    3. Furlong
    4. McCarthy
    5. Ryan
    6. Beirne
    7. VDF
    8. Doris
    9. JGP
    10. Prendergast
    11. Stockdale
    12. McCloskey
    13. Ringrose
    14. Baloucoune
    15. Osbourne
    16. Kelleher
    17. Milne
    18. Clarkson
    19. Edogbo
    20. Conan
    21. Casey
    22. Crowley
    23. Lowe/Farrell


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    The difference is the guys Ryan & Timoney are proposing to replace did not play well last Thursday; Loughman did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,064 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Italy are arguably superior across the backline. Garbisi is a quality 10, their centres are excellent, and they have some quick and dangerous wingers. They're no mugs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,315 ✭✭✭✭phog


    We have two extra days to prep for this game. I can understand some people being despondent after last week but losing to Italy is not on the horizon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    They are no mugs but realistically only 3 probably get into the Irish backline (Garbisi, Menoncello and Capuozzo…if he was available Brex possibly as well).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,413 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Replacing Stockdale with Lowe just means Lowe dodged the Paris bullet and gets rewarded with playing Italy at home for his poor form. It would be a pointless change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    Tbh, if we play like we did in the last 30 minutes we should be okay…but that first 50 was frighteningly bad that I certainly won’t be counting my chicken. That first 50 will sting for awhile I suspect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 319 ✭✭cantwbr1


    If we’re trying to be positive we can’t ignore the impact of the Lions tour on those who travelled. They have had minimal downtime since pre-season 2024 so they must be fatigued, especially mentally, which may account for some of the poor start . They will recover, but probably not until next season when they will have a proper break and pre-season



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,315 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Giles often said that the stock of an injured player in a team that is underperforming is always higher than those that play.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,064 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    All the playmakers so 😋 Love how far Italy have come, honestly wouldn't begrudge them a win



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,924 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Giles from Buffy?? 😉

    its like most sayings, there is an equal and opposite version for most sayings. ill take your above and counter it with "the best ability is availablity".

    reminds of the saying "fortune favours the brave" being countered with "fools rush in where angels fear to tread" or "better safe than sorry" or again, in a similar vein, "Look before you leap" versus "He who hesitates is lost"

    "Many hands make light work" compared to "Too many cooks spoil the broth"

    "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" …... "Out of sight, out of mind"

    i could go on…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,656 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    Brex out for the Italians (big loss) however Capuazzo and Varney back for the game.

    Post edited by SaoPaulo41 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,226 ✭✭✭bingobango12


    I've not dropped Stockdale from my own team. I have moved him to 15, where he has been excellent this season. Moved Osbourne away from fullback also, which just isn't where he is best suited. But yep, I do think Farrell drops him completely to get Lowe in and keep Osbourne at 15. Wrong call imo.

    TOB was poor last week, but he has been good this season. I don't think he is dropped after 1 poor game, especially for Baloucoune who I don't think has ever been excellent for Ireland to my mind and probably isn't busy enough for Farrell. Who knows though, I think the backlash and general sentiment around puts a few positions up in the air.

    Yep, I agree with you but with the back 3 players that are out, and unless he shocks us and names Ward/Kenny (both of whom were poor for the A team), I can see Lowe starting this.

    The other thing that I don't see happening, but would be a possible curve ball would be 11 Stockdale 14 TOB 15 Crowley. Again I don't see it happening but would be possible if he wants to keep the wingers the same as last week, and add a second playmaker. Frawley is completely out of the reckoning after that performance on Friday in my opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    We’ll definitely be underdogs but I doubt it’ll be 2 score underdogs unless Ireland are dreadful this weekend and/or England are impressive. I suspect it’ll be like 7-8 points underdogs

    Just for the sake of clarity, by "2 score underdogs", I meant in the 8-14 point region so we're not a million miles apart there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    In that case I agree but I suspect it’s a single digit handicap, unless there are some surprise results this week that might influence the handicap.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,064 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Stumping for a majority Ulster backline wouldn't be a terrible idea imo. Replace Ringrose with Osborne or Hume. Put Stockdale at 15, Baloucoune on the wing. I'd like to see Doak get a spot on the bench too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    It’s not necessarily a case of dropping TOB, it’s more about wanting to see Baloucoune get a run in the team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,899 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Yes the Schmidt era has a significant gloss from France blowing hot and cold for the entirety of it but the collapse of Wales is on a whole other level. France could still show up throughout that period and notably ran England close in 2017 away from home, while currently Wales are utterly spent as a competitive force.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    I mean yes of course Wales are practically a walk over now whereas France were a tough side but one you’d be confident of beating. The big difference in Andy Farrells favour is we have yet to lose to a side that finished bottom half of the table whereas Schmidt lost to Wales & Scotland in 2017 who finished 4th and 5th and in 2016 lost to France who finished 5th. Personally , I find this worse than losing to a quality French side that we saw in Thursday, granted both suck!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,758 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,053 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    Right wingers rarely get a pass from Ringrose who nearly a;ways cuts back in off his right foot rather than pass to a player on the outside. Baloucoune would be lonely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,073 ✭✭✭typhoony


    Was watching a clip of the Wales v England 2015 game, All the fanfare and top players they had but all was not well in the regions. We're not far from that precipice with only 1 province seemingly able to deliver players and even that could end



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    There was a period where, as bad as France were, they seemed to reserve their best performance of the 6 Nations versus us.

    I remember the last game of the 2014 6 Nations, and we were clinging on by our fingernails to close it out at the death (possibly still carrying some doubts from what had happened vs NZ the previous November).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,758 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I'm sure many will disagree but I'm going to say it anyway and it'll probably be different to what a lot think.

    The worst two backs were Stockdale and Prendergast, both horrendous. Stockdale, high balls forget about it, awful tackler. About the only thing he has is a bit of speed and strength when going forward. There's no.llsve for him in this Irish team.

    Prendergast is just too bad defensively, missed tackles at crucial moments like the one where Jalibert cruised by him. What he was at when he intercepted the pass I just don't know, the pass to O'Brien was the worst option. Kick it if you have the chance, if not go to ground so the forwards can set up a clearance.

    He's grand and looks good against weaker opposition but he's a liability in a tight game against an elite opponent.

    The best backs. Osbourne stood out out for me, looks really good and composed both with and without the ball. A very talented and smart rugby player. He was solid defensively and seen thing very well when we had the opportunity to move forward.

    There is nothing exciting about McCloskey but he's consistent and trustworthy. I think we have younger talents that will be better than him soon but he won't let you down.

    O'Brien got a lot of criticism for a couple of high balls but besides that he had a decent game I think.

    The worst forwards,

    Joe McCarthy was a challenger to Stockdale for worst player on the field. He was overpowered by the French all through, lost a couple of balls, did absolutely nothing of note.

    I never thought I'd ever say this but Dan Sheehan was very poor, seemed lost and couldn't get going with ball in hand. He has to get credit for his throwing to the lineout though.

    The best forwards,

    Caelon Doris never stopped trying and he made metres every time he went into contact.

    Tadgh Beirne, like Doris, never stopped trying, had a few good runs and he was excellent at the lineout.

    Some are saying Cian Prendergast played well. I'm a Connacht fan and maybe I'm being a bit critical because this performance wasn't up to the level he shows for us but I thought he was just about okay on the might.

    There's a few that had okay nights but we need to be giving opportunities to players who came in and played well. And we need to replace those who were awful.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,785 ✭✭✭50HX


    Someone needs to have a chat with the bookies

    France are only 11 points higher than us on the handicap away to Wales🤔

    Ire - 19

    France -30

    We are not loosing to Italy at home on Sat, we've 2 extra days prep & i fully expect to see a reaction from this team.

    Will all our issues be resolved...no

    Will we win...yes



Advertisement
Advertisement