Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

US/Israel conduct airstrikes on Iran again

1127128130132133430

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    No, and I never claimed they were.
    A poster claimed Masha was executed you jumped in and ranted at me for “defending the regime”. I asked you to show me one human rights organisation who claimed she was executed and I don’t believe you have.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Well then, I am glad we can agree that the death tolls are unverified. I believe that a high death toll was prompted to encourage US intervention. What do you believe motivated unverified reports of high death tolls?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,323 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Well, you did defend the regime, and you appear to love arguing over the semantics about this or that.

    At the end of the day, Masha was murdered by the regime for not wearing a hijab and showing her hair. The subsequent protests saw another 500 murdered.

    The latest protests have seen thousands of people murdered, possibly tens of thousands, but you seem to want to win some internet arguments on technicalities rather than look at the overall picture, that one of the most repressive right-wing regimes on this planet has no qualms about killing their own civilians to hold onto power. You seem to be interested in collecting internet points by winning on technicalities, but by doing that, you are defending this very regime.

    What do you get out of this? I am curious.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 342 ✭✭Lucien_Sarti


    Unlike previous “ “wars” “, this potential new “conflict” (ie. US/euro ruling class discretionary attack) is taking place in a situation where anyone who cares, can view real-time satellite photographs (with the ease of viewing met eireann satellite photos) & count the number of fighter/bomber mid-air re-fueling tankers parked on imperial airbases in the S.W. Eurasian region (& then compare that with MSM reportage).

    The Chinese are open sourcing this real-time military intelligence on US logistics - on the internet every day !!!
    Its almost like the serfs from any typical European peasant revolt of old are emphasising in bold print how the ‘game’ has changed.

    Unsurprising that the Battle Warlord RTE, Irish Times, BBC consuming crowd can’t even interpret whats going on!!

    James Connolly, The Irish Flag (1916)
    Common Prosperity, China (2021)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,323 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I guess in your world its all a conspiracy right? Higher death tolls will prompt US intervention.

    The higher death tolls have numerous sources, as the article explained. The Guardian is not Fox News; it's a left-wing publication. Are they also controlled by the US?

    Maybe no one was killed?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    I welcome your honesty Mark, thank you.
    Well i don’t consider it victory, but we now agree that the death toll figures were unverified and possibly deliberately inflated to political motivations and that Masha was not executed.
    It’s of no importance to me and of no consolation to the many thousands of people killed by the Iranian regime but it is the truth.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,323 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Unsurprising that the

     RTE, Irish Times, BBC consuming crowd can’t even interpret whats going on!!

    What is going on? The Chinese are winning? The West is fucked? Am I right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,323 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    So your goal here is to win internet points and downplay the atrocities carried out by the Iranian regime by hiding behind the fact that it's hard to 100% verify what it's happening.

    Say we split the difference and only 18,000 people were murdered, does that make it OK?
    Would you claim that to be a victory?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭Marty Bird


    I seen that piece in the Guardian by the fashion blogger Deepa Parent nothing in that article was verified.

    When asked about the 30k figure she replied she didn’t need to convince anyone the numbers were accurate. 🤷‍♂️

    🌞6.02kWp⚡️3.01kWp South/East⚡️3.01kWp West



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    I think you have completely missed the point Mark and are the one trying to salvage an argument.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 342 ✭✭Lucien_Sarti


    Whats going on is – the revolting class of people you admire & look up to are f*cked militarily
    (which means totally f
    *cked economically and therefore: in every possible way).

    If this disappoints you, try to be born 200 years ago, or something.

    sat1.jpeg

    James Connolly, The Irish Flag (1916)
    Common Prosperity, China (2021)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,323 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Not at all.

    Let's go back to basic facts.

    At least 3,100, as confirmed by the regime.
    Up to 36,000 deaths, according to various human rights groups.

    Regardless, this will go down as one of the most violent massacres of the 21st century, perpetuated by a regime you seem to defend, given your words.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,323 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Whats going on is – the revolting class of people you admire & look up to are f*cked militarily

    I presume you mean the Americans here, but can you elaborate on why exactly they are fucked militarily? That image tells me nothing. Is it supposed to mean something?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    The point you have missed Mark, is the faux concern about the killing of civilians in Iran by the very same people who defended the killing of civilians for 2 years in Gaza.
    The point you have missed Mark, is that the very people who questioned and downplayed the number of people killed in Gaza, calling the death toll inflated, unverified and propaganda are now the very same people who are arguing that an unverified death toll in Iran is the worst, or as you bizarrely put it, the “most violent massacre of the 21st century”.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,891 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Delete



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,891 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    You defend a regime that is nitpicking and making wild claims on who is a civilian or a fighter in Gaza. You must recognise that others poster can see the hypocrisy in your posts here?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    But it isn't the same people on that side, look at yourself first.

    Did you accept unverified reports from a terrorist group like Hamas? Why don't you accept unverified reports from human rights organisations in Iran?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,891 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I think the point is that this counter argument has run its course. The UN agencies have accepted these figues as accurate, even the IDF have now. no one likes that the Palestinian Health Ministry in Gaza is run by Hamas but it appears their numbers now are accepted by most people as being credible.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-believes-70000-gazans-killed-in-war-as-claimed-by-hamas/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Hamas have been more accurate in their reports on casualties than Israel.
    Do you remember 40 beheaded babies, babies in ovens, babies cut from wombs claimed by Israeli sources? All lies.

    Israeli sources told us that the bodies of dead Palestinian children were fake. That they were dolls.
    Israeli sources told us that claiming Israel would attack a hospital, kill doctors etc was a “blood libel”. It was all true.
    The Israeli president told us that Israel had nothing to do with the pager attacks. Lie upon lie upon lie.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    You still don't get it, do you?

    You reject unverified reports from human rights organisations in Iran, while you accepted without question unverified reports from a terrorist group in another conflict.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,630 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    I see Bibi is meeting Donnie on Wednesday. I think there will be a military attack on Iran by the end of the week



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,891 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    The poster is only accepted numbers that are also accepted by the UN and IDF. Perhaps the Iranians numbers are accepted by similar authorities, I don't know?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    No. You don’t get it. We have death toll figures in one instance and a range of death toll estimates even among NGOs on the other.
    What figure, specifically, are you claiming I am rejecting?
    The UN cites and uses the Gaza health ministry figures but has yet to confirm or accept a definitive number in the case of the Iranian protests.

    Are you really still arguing about the number of people killed in Gaza?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    Were the numbers from Hamas accepted without question before they were verified by anyone else. Yes, they were, but in the case of Iran they were not.

    Look I get it, anti-Americanism must trump the day (pardon the pun).

    I have even seen someone engaging in the semantic distinction between "executed" and "killed" and between a single hair showing and a head uncovered, in a desperate attempt to defend and support the genocidal oppression of women by the Iranian regime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,891 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    They certainly weren't accepted without question, im not sure what you are alleging against the UN. Some people even on boards are not accepting the numbers now and israel only accepted the numbers this month.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    I’m sorry JohnDoe if you don’t like your BS claims being called out.
    You made a claim that was false. It’s that simple.

    Post edited by SafeSurfer on

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    So women aren't killed in Iran for showing hair?

    Are you saying it is BS to claim women are killed in Iran for showing hair?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Masha Amini died in hospital after having been beaten by police following arrest for improperly wearing a hijab.

    Those are the facts.

    You claimed the Iranian regime executed women for showing a single hair.

    If you regarded women, children and disabled people who die following beatings at the hands of Israeli forces as having been executed by the Israeli government then perhaps you hold all governments to the same standard and are not a hypocrite.

    So, do you regard those killed following being beaten by Israeli forces as having been executed by Israel?
    Please don’t avoid the question.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    So you are engaged in semantics to downplay the actions of the Iranian regime. I understand. You avoid all criticism of Iran. You avoid all criticism of the decades long violations of human rights by that Iranian regime. You think that a woman beaten to within an inch of her life and somehow dying in hospital absolves it as not an execution. It is crueller than an execution, to leave a person in a situation that they are still alive but will not recover. Semantics, disgustingly so.

    You also claim that it wasn't for showing a single hair. Do you know that for sure? Where do you think the threshold for unlawfully killing her is? If it is not one hair, can they legitimately execute her for showing three hundred hair strands? She was killed for not covering up her hair, it doesn't matter whether it was a single hair, or a complete head of hair, it was wrong. Scoring debating points on whether is was a single hair or not, is that where you think the discussion should go? You are just using the semantics to hide the fact that you are unable to criticise the Iranian regime because something something Israel.

    What is behind your obsession with Israel?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    My goodness JohnDoe. I have criticised Iran. I have said that it is a brutal, repressive regime that has murdered civilians.
    You made a claim that is not true. No human rights organisation claims the Iranian state executed Masha Amini.
    You talk about semantics and then describe someone dying in hospital following being beaten by police as an execution.

    The thread title is about an illegal attack on Iran by Israel. Contravening international law. You won’t condemn that. I condemn the brutality and illegality perpetrated by Iran but it is you who avoid any criticism of Israel for the deaths of innocent people in Israeli custody, whether they were raped to death and the Israeli soldiers became celebrities or Down syndrome Palestinians being savaged to death by Israeli combat dogs you won’t condemn it.
    You are a hypocrite, plain and simple.
    You don’t give a damn about the people of Iran or the people of Palestine. Your only concern is that Iran is attacked removed as a threat to Israel.

    Do you condemn the Israeli execution of Mohammad Bhar?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



Advertisement
Advertisement