Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General British politics discussion thread

1613614616618619637

Comments

  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 45,538 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    ...and still Andy hasn't started having to sweat

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,993 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    The Starmer government being fiscally conservative? Nope.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,887 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Why would he?

    The King's brother would never be tried. Even though he's been civilianised. Not in a million years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,063 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Edit: Reports that "Labour Together", which was linked to Morgan McSweeney, investigated journalists including those who reported for The Guardian, Declassified UK and the Sunday Times, and to identify their sources.

    Echoes of Watergate?

    An investigation by Democracy for Sale has found that the rightwing think tank Labour Together, directed by McSweeney from 2017 and from 2022 by Josh Simons, hired APCO Worldwide to investigate journalists from outlets including the Guardian, Declassified UK and the Sunday Times, and to identify their sources.

    Richard Burgon MP, from the Left of the Labour party says that one of the main reasons Peter Mandelson was "let off the hook" for this relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and was made UK Ambassador to the US was his role in the factional politics in the Labour party trying to bring down Jeremy Corbyn when he was leader, and also because of Mandelsons relationship with the "super rich".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Definitely not at the Watergate level.

    But everything that has come out about McSweeney indicates a patron of the dark arts.

    Particularly with how he was involved in acting against Jeremy Corbyn while leading the think tank you reference above ironically called "Labour Together".

    Well, its looking now like him and Keir Starmer will become best known for destroying the biggest Labour majority at any election within 2 years of gaining power.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,629 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Seems evident there are two different versions of the Labour Party : the Starmer-McSweeney-Mandelson one appears to be by far the more the dodgy version…..right wing, pro-Israel, in bed with billionaires etc. The 'Corbynista' wing was probably the more benign one all along, despite being demonised by the Labour Right and the British media as 'radical anti-Semitic extremists' and so on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Would be interesting to know just what McSweeney's experience in Israel was given he came back, joined Labour and years later actively worked to undermine one of the strongest Pro-Palestinian voices in Parliament.

    I'm not suggesting he was a plant, or that his actions against Corbyn were what was in mind when he joined Labour or anything like that, but there are rumours that he became involved with Labour at the behest of someone, or some organisation.

    https://electronicintifada.net/content/morgan-mcsweeney-man-running-britain-and-his-ties-israel/51215

    According to The Jerusalem Post, in that kibbutz and the surrounding Jezreel Valley, McSweeney would have become “closely acquainted with the Hashomer Hatzair,” a Zionist settler organization founded in Austria-Hungary in 1913.

    ………..

    While researching this article, a former Labour volunteer, “Simon,” contacted me and spoke on condition of anonymity. Simon claimed that McSweeney was deliberately inserted into the party and later became Keir Starmer’s “handler,” presenting compromising material to keep him “in line.”

    Whether this is true or not, the fact that he undermined Corbyn and actively promoted and then tried to defend Mandelson is why Starmer is likely going to be out of a job at some point this year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,916 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Morgan McSweeney gone. Was inevitable, might buy Starmer some time, until after the by election.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    "I leave with pride with all we have achieved"

    A final F you to the Left wing of the party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,533 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    The "left wing" of the Labour Party.

    Just let that sink in for a moment.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    The Overton window has been pulled dramatically to the right these last ten years.

    That's irrefutable. Trump, Brexit, Putin, Israel (and the various supporting artists of these individuals and ideals) have all to varying degrees been responsible for this.

    And the Labour party hasn't escaped this. Many (most) went along to get along but fair play to those within the Labour party who saw what was happening and refused to go be a part of it.

    Some people have left the Conservative party to jump ahead of the curve in joining Reform, the likes of Zarah Sultana and a few more are some of the only ones who stood by their morals and refused to go along with what was happening within Labour.

    And yet some people think she is responsible for harming the Labour party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,629 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    It's becoming obvious that Corbyn was stitched up by the Labour right and the right wing press. Even if you view him as a cranky lefty crusty, he was harmless enough - yet was absolutely demonised by them as a racist and a hate filled extremist, merely for criticising Israel's activities in Palestine.

    The McSweeney wing of the party are far more shady, with their links to Israel and Zionism. Hardly seems a coincidence that McSweeney lived in Israel and with now rumoured links to Israeli settlers. Worth remembering too that Starmer was never even a member of the Labour Party until a decade ago, when he was already in his 50s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,993 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Think it more a case of if they were not already doomed they pretty much are now. Looks like a competition between Starmer and Reeves on who'se done the most damage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Wes Streeting might be competent enough to come in and blame everything that has happened since they gained power on McSweeney and now Mandelson for being the ultimate reason Starmer had to go (if he goes now).

    As has been said here, Reform have a ceiling, a lot of the country do not like them and they have no track record to hang their hat on. And what they've attracted from Conservatives are people who many would have seen as in line with the Reform ideology anyway.

    Do Labour keep Starmer until the local elections, take the hiding, and then get rid of him and bring Streeting or someone else in and basically hope it can only get better. Or do they make the change now and hope it's enough to save them somewhat in the local elections. I think they are inline for a hiding in what will mostly be a protest vote in the local elections, it remains to be seen who picks up the votes though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,993 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Never mind the local elections another incoming grenade will be publication of material related to Mandleson's vetting. Streeting would be better off biding his time and let Starmer take the hits.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,288 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Starmer and his cabinet are not shielded from the fallout of Mandelson just because his chief aide has quit…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,916 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    If there is a police inquiry into Mandelson, which is most likely, there will be nothing released in the short term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Mandelson's vetting was something McSweeney alluded to in his resignation announcement, saying the vetting process needed to be overhauled entirely.

    Think that was a pointed comment, suggesting either it didn't become clear the extent of the relationship between Mandelson and Epstein, or that it was clear but the wrong people knew about it or didn't act on the information.

    Ideally, an outcome of this should be an insistence for the disclosure between all UK politicians and those that they choose to spend time with. Nathan Gill and Russia, Farage and the rumours around him, Johnson and his visit to Italy without a security detail to meet with a KGB operative, Priti Patel meeting Israeli officials etc etc. Not mention the influence Israel has on the UK parliament through it's "Friends of " shenanigans.

    But because so many people from all sides have so much to hide, it is unlikely that full disclosure will happen. Unless the dam fully breaks such as with Epstein and they can't keep a lid on everything. Interesting times. And depressing mind, the UK and the wider world needs action, not to be swimming in the sewage infested waters that all of this is.

    (Actually sewage infested waters is an apt analogy for this time in UK politics given the action of the private water groups with respect to water quality and how successive governments have emboldened them rather than hold them to account. A sh*tshow all round, you might say.)



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,058 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    There is absolutely nothing benign about Corbyn. The misdeeds of one do not erase the misdeeds of the other.

    I would have thought the fiasco about Your Party was evidence enough of both his poor politics and his general incompetence when it comes to leading.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,288 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    It is not relevant whether Corbyn was good at leading a party or not, what is relevant is the lies and smear campaign carried out by some in the Labour Party (and the media) to sideline him. That is the politics of the gutter and it is no wonder the state of politics in Britain in if that behaviour is deemed acceptable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    The writing is on the wall for Starmer, but the Labour Friends of Israel that actually control the party will go to great lengths to keep him in place until a "suitable" replacement can be found for him. I wonder what role they played in putting Ed Milliband in as party leader?

    In June 2014, while speaking to the Labour Friends of Israel, Miliband stated that if he became Prime Minister he would seek "closer ties" with Israel and opposed the boycott of Israeli goods, saying that he would "resolutely oppose the isolation of Israel" and that nobody in the Labour Party should question Israel's right to exist.

    I wonder what will be in the next tranche of Epstein papers, and who will fall then?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,058 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I dont think they were lies and smears. His actions since leaving Labour should easily show that. Starmer being poor in no way mitigates Corbyn being terrible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,375 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Precisely. They turned the party into an unelectable racist sh*tshow and once again there's an attempt at whitewashing. They're away grifting with their new catastrophe now.

    I'm glad McSweeney is gone. He's needed to go for quite some time. The original plan was for him to do comms and Sue Gray to handle governance but that obviously never happened so he became far too powerful.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    Talk about hedging your bets -

    Streeting is a vice-chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism, a co-chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on British Jews and a supporter of Labour Friends of Israel.[46][47][48] He is also a co-chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims and a supporter of Labour Friends of Palestine and the Middle East.[49] In September 2018, he held the last in a series of London-wide consultations to create the Working Definition of Islamophobia.

    All things to all men, but most likely just a careerist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,058 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Deflection of what? I am not the one who brought up Corbyn and his apparent benignness. Starmer being weak and having poor judgement does not change the past.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    If votes are anything to go by, Corbyn was a far better leader than Starmer, and than Milliband. Even when Johnson used the Brexit issue to corral Labour in 2019 knowing that the Labour voters were divided on the issue, they got more votes than Grey man managed to get when an election was handed to him on a plate.

    2015 - Milliband 9.3 m votes


    2107 - Corbyn 12.9 m votes

    2019 - Corbyn 10.3 m votes

    2024 - Starmer 9.7 m votes



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,058 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Votes aren't anything to go by. Seats are because that is what actually gives you power and let's you impact things. Corbyn equally led to record high votes for the Tories despite their rampant incompetence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    They turned the party into an unelectable racist sh*tshow

    It's a shame to see zionist lies being posted here.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf




Advertisement
Advertisement