Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1170517061708171017111835

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭longjohn200


    We need depth and we need more energy in the pack than what was shown yesterday. I think Timoney did have a good impact but can hide in the big days too.

    I think we start Ryan ahead of Carthy.

    I think we start izzy if fit.

    I would like to bring Stewart onto the bench instead if kelleher. Nothing against kelleher, I just want exposure for stewart.

    I would think Crowley should start. Just personal preference

    We need to add depth at centre. Start Farrell at 13 or at least have on the bench. Think he can make big positive impacts. As well as mccloskey did yesterday, I would like to see osbourne or postlewaite get a run in the 12 jersey.

    I do like stockdale and what he's been putting out for Ulster but what ireland put yesterday does not suit him. Someone like Calvin Nash would be great for chasing box kicks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,020 ✭✭✭50HX


    That's a great signal to send to Timoney...you did well lad except France weren't really bothered when you came on so Josh stays where he is until such time you get another crack.

    A fire needs to be lit under this team & Farrell now has a great opportunity to shake things up...we will finish 3rd at best in this year's championship so mix it up.

    Its not change for the sake of change, a statement that this level of performance is not acceptable & there will be consequences.

    That message has to go out.

    Farrell looked really p1ssed in post match interview.

    The naming of the team to play Italy is one I look forward to with the greatest interest in years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,539 ✭✭✭✭phog


    This is true, the whole team were below par but the thing for me is some of the posters arguing how Sam gets a tough ride here are the same who complained about Crowley when we lost to NZ despite the fact that we were winning when he left the field of play.

    Are we pinning the winning and losing of games solely on the outhalf or does it depend on who the outhalf is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,553 ✭✭✭OldRio


    The amount of yards gained post tackle by the French was shocking from an Irish perspective. Time and time again Irish tacklers forced backwards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,553 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Farrell has a great opportunity now. I hope he seizes it. Some of that last night was unacceptable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 322 ✭✭cantwbr1


    I agree. There was a total system failure/over powering last night. No one player was responsible (similarly for that NZ match)



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,785 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I don't blame Crowley for NZ (though I don't think he was particularly good) though it is of note to point out that the 10 who replaced him had such a mare that it all but ended his international career.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,710 ✭✭✭ersatz


    this match was as aimless and lacking in urgency and accuracy as the Chicago match in Nov. And we know NZ were’t great. This French team look the business, but as ever when Dupont and Jalibert teams thrive, it’s often unstructured and where defences give them a yard. DuPont had a lot if time on the ball yesterday, far too much honestly. It’ll be interesting to see how they go against a defence that gives him less space. I think he was caught in possession behind a ruck only once yesterday.

    I’ve been worried about our lack of gameplan, strategy, whatever you want to call it, since the WC. It’s become glaringly obvious now that we play the most basic form of rugby imaginable, and one that can only succeed if our pack can dominate open play, which ours seemingly can’t.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,020 ✭✭✭50HX


    https://archive.ph/sfF3U

    Good piece by David Kelly today



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 360 ✭✭big-al


    he clearly isn’t past it, this is pure and utter drivel. If he was past it he wouldn’t have been leading the number 1 attack in the URC. He has been beating defenders for fun for Ulster this season and creating a lot for Ward/kok, Baloucoune.


    Ireland need Mark sexton to sort out the attack. Last nights tactics ball in hand was a complete and utter **** show. Blaming the wingers for not collecting box kicks is a complete and utter kop out. It’s a stupid tactic overused and leads to nothing more than a lottery most of the time.


    if I was Andrew Goodman I’d be worried about my future roll with the IRFU post six nations.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    We've wasted the entire post WC period. We have not evolved tactically in a way that's proven successful. We have delayed jettisoning players who are past it in key positions, like the centres and wings, and our players look bereft of ideas. How we went from one of the best teams at playing heads up rugby, to a team that chose to kick endless contestables to an opposition that was eating our lunch, is beyond me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87 ✭✭Knowall1


    It's obvious that some of our better players ,Sheehan, Doris, JVDF, Beirne are not performing to their own high standards. But is it a case of coach fatigue. Schmitt was our greatest ever coach until he suddenly ( very suddenly ) wasn't. Farrell may be heading down the same road. Conor Murray in the IT says that Farrell gets the players up at half time by asking them to remember why they do this...to think of their families. An emotional message for sure but when you have heard it 20 times before maybe it's just not enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,863 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    i think saying 'crowley doesnt get half the criticism prendergast gets' and then going on to write the last paragraph is more than a little ironic.

    there is no world where crowleys form has been 'beyond awful', even allowing for a dip in form somewhat he has been nowhere near as poor as some people make out.

    the talk around JC, SP and recently again Harry Byrne almost always ends up being hyperbolically negative/ positive, whereas the reality lies somewhere in the middle. SP wasnt amazing or anything last night but he definitely wasnt as bad as some are making out on here. Similarly, i think the poster who said it was his best game ever for ireland was overhyping things a bit in the other way. Another poster said that JC is not and never was the answer at 10, while forgetting that Ireland won the 6N and were 2 points against england off a grand slam when he was the starting 10

    players arent and shouldnt be immune to criticism or anything, but it needs to be realistic and not just 'player X = terrible because i said so'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    I'll keep it very straightforward.

    Another poster brought tackle success into this. Posted about one. Ignored the other.

    Are we going to go on this merry-go-round of you saying the same thing over and over while ignoring the fact that I was not the one who mentioned tackle success rate in the first place.

    If you want to talk about nuances or whatever shite, bring it up with the OP who was the one who posted selective data to make the case for one out half over the other.

    I've dealt with your questions on this. Clearly you're not getting the answer you want and no repetition of what you're saying is going to get you the answer you want.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,939 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    So no answer to my question then.

    You're clearly implying that their missed tackles were equally poor because they both ended up with the same tackle success %.

    It's fair to say that, no, I don't think Crowley's missed tackle in this situation is equally poor to some of Prendergast's. But crack on making that argument if you wish.

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Crowley has started 8 games since the game in Croke Park for club and country.

    How many of those can you honestly say he played well in? 1 at a push against Toulon?

    He's been in poor form and with an attitude to match it. It's not a controversial take whatsoever but yet some want to argue a toss with it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Why are you showing me a screenshot of something I already said was harsh to criticise him on?

    The reason why I get to a point where I don't engage with you is because you make it bluntly clear that you're reading what you want, and you're not reading what's actually written in front of you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,939 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I'm the one reading what I want, from someone who has claimed I have a desperate desire for Prendergast to fail?

    Irony.

    Anyways, will leave you to it, FPS…. 👍️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,863 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    hes played fairly well at times, even the castres game he was decent in open play - it was his goalkicking that was poor and even that was exaggerated apart from the last kick

    but either way, 'playing well' is still a big difference from 'beyond awful'. the fact that you said that right after saying that JC gets less criticism than SP shows a complete lack of awareness

    and now your questioning his attitude for some reason? i presume this is in relation to the leinster game at christmas, which i agree he should have kept his cool better, but he gets some grace from the fact that it was one of the worst referee performances i've seen in a long time (for both sides). and in terms of poor interactions that irish 10s have had with referees in the recent past, its not even worth thinking about really



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,785 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    To be equally fair, one of Prendergast's missed tackles (for the Jalibert try) was were he fairly hammered a French player in contact, stayed on his feet, JGP committed to a covered man and left LBB alone on the wing, SP recovered and hustled back and went for a tap tackle that missed. In no universe is that his fault but it goes down in the stats.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 112 ✭✭Benihunter


    The Prendergast v Crowley debate is easy, Prendergast is a better player and should start until someone in better form takes the 10 jersey off him.

    Of course he's young and doesn't always take the right option but the amount of criticism he gets is becoming a parody at this stage.

    It's like the 'Blame Cananda' song in the South Park movie years ago, they should do a 'Blame Prendergast' version and release it for charity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,539 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Only one big screen here tonight



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 835 ✭✭✭MangleBadger


    I wouldn’t even say he missed the tap tackle. LBB went to ground. When is a tap tackle successful? The tackler is never going to complete the tackle by bringing the player to ground.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,939 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    For that one, yep, I agree (it was the JBB try).

    But do you think them having the same tackle success % means the quality of their missed tackles was the same, overall?

    That’s what was being implied here.

    And you’ll be forgive me for being a bit prickly towards a poster who’s claimed I have “a desperate desire for Prendergast to fail”.

    Post edited by aloooof on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 835 ✭✭✭MangleBadger


    Which missed tackles by Sam do you think we’re particularly bad?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,939 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    The one for the Jalibert try was very poor.

    TOB was far more at fault for the try, he shot and caught himself in no man’s land.

    But I think part of the reason he shot like he did was because he knew Prendergast was the defender on his inside.

    I’m sure there was another too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭Jelly Welly


    Post edited by Lost Ormond on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 835 ✭✭✭MangleBadger


    So the one where everybody in the studio agreed it was TOB at fault and Sam was enroute to get the outside man?
    How is that worse than Crowley’s missed tackles?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,939 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    The try can be TOB’s fault AND it can be a really poor tackle attempt from Prendergast.

    Both things can be true.

    And with regards Crowley’s, as per the screenshot above, one was a 2 on 1 where he did really well to even lay a hand on Attisogbe.

    Neither were responsible for the resultant try. But Prendergast’s was an objectively worse effort at a tackle. That’s why I think Prendergast’s was worse.

    I think that pattern will be the same if you analyse all of the missed tackles. Because Crowley is obviously a better defender.

    Now, a question in return. Do you think it’s possible TOB shot like he did because Prendergast was the player inside him?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,281 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    There’s an actual game of rugby happening and we’re still posting about who made more effort in situations that were ultimately conceded tries for Ireland.



Advertisement
Advertisement