Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning updated in OP 12/2/26

1147514761478148014811829

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,707 ✭✭✭Fann Linn




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,036 ✭✭✭rogber


    Incredible quotes here, basically "give us Greenland or it will be war":

    US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent defends Trump's tariff plan, telling NBC News' Meet the Press on Sunday that Trump is making the "strategic" geopolitical decision to use the US's "economic might" to "avoid a hot war".

    "The national emergency is avoiding a national emergency," Bessent says.

    Bessent also says that Trump is trying to "avoid a conflict" by annexing Greenland.

    "What we know is that Greenland can only be defended if it is part of the US, and it will not need to be defended if it is part of the US," he adds.

    "I believe that the Europeans will understand that this is best for Greenland, best for Europe and best for the United States," he says



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,716 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    What a fooking idiot, the Europeans understand that Trump and Co can't and won't bully us and what is best for Greenland and best for Europe is for the American's to STFU and leave Greenland alone.

    What he believes is just that, what he believes not what Europe believes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,337 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Incredible excepting that it's coming from a top shelf member of Trump's crew and the country is turning into a living hell under Trump's guiding hands. I'll wait for a quote from the U.S's top diplomat Marco Rubio to see what he thinks about Trump's foreign policy statements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,053 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Sweden has issued a national church warning after allegations that pro-Kremlin nuns linked to Russian intelligence were fundraising inside its parishes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 501 ✭✭✭thamus doku


    I agree on the concentration-of-power problem. And while I’m not a fan of Trump’s behaviour, I do think it forces Europe to grow up fast - we can’t outsource our security forever, so we’ll have to step up properly.

    Ireland can’t afford to be a passenger. If we don’t help shape Europe’s decisions, we will end up living with decisions made for us. We and the other smaller nations need to be at the table shaping Europes military policies, we cannot afford to let the Germans, the UK and the French take full control. That would be a huge mistake.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,324 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    It's getting to the stage where I don't know is this fake news, something you just made up, or is something real.

    All three are plausible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,202 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    That was a striking thing about Cuba when I visited - nothing named after Castro during his lifetime. Even he thought that was too much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,666 ✭✭✭amacca


    True...a lot of Marti and Che etc.....nothing like a romanticised martyr



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,170 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Trump and his enablers have placed 2 battalions of the 11th Airborne Division on standby for deployment to Minnesota.
    Of note, the 11th is one of only 2 US cold weather specialist units.
    If they are on the streets of Minneapolis?
    They can't be dropped into Greenland.

    The administration is deliberately stoking outrage in blue cities and states in the hope that a violent reaction will allow them scope to invoke the insurrection act.
    Minnesota is standing up and standing strong for its people and for "real" Americans.

    The absolute dangers of the US' style of Executive power has been laid bare.
    The lack of any effective checks and balances, despite our hearing about them for years?
    Should surprise no-one.
    A system that relies upon good people, doing the right thing and ensuring the system "works"?
    Is a system that is only as good as the people.

    The notion of 3 co-equal branches of Government?
    Has hopefully been shown up for the utter fantasy it always has been.
    The US has become a "papers please, police state" it has devolved to that in less than a year.

    The lack of any effective means of Congressional censure or even opposition.
    Is leaving oversight in the hands of the courts.
    Courts that the administration is happy to demean and ignore.

    Whilst ramping up the potential for violence at home?
    Trump is also burning bridges with allies internationally.

    This is all deliberate and calibrated. It's project2025 white nationalism on steroids.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,716 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    Does the insurrection act allow Trump to cancel mid term elections?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,750 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    We will still have some posters argue the opposite.

    It was crazy to read during Brexit. Here we are, 10 years or so later, and the simple function of the single market still eludes people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,170 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Far too much attention is being paid to the possibility of elections being cancelled.
    This is a regime that doesn't care if there are elections.
    It already ignores Courts and Congress, why would it care who wins an election in November?

    If the Trump admin decides that for the sake of national security, protecting the coca cola recipe, owning the libs, or any other brain addled reason they can come with.
    That the results don't matter, that the man the Supreme Court gave a free pass, immunity whilst in office to will find a way to spin, ignoring elections as a necessary step to "protect" the country.

    None of what's legal or ethical matters.
    The apparatus and institutions of the state have in the main, been thoroughly corrupted and the ones that haven't been?
    Are just completely ignored by the administration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,337 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    And this is after Gov Walz activated and mobilized the Minnesota Nat Gd having it on standby for use to support the police, as I understand it, a step up from the readying order he issued to the Gd on the 7th Jan. The Airborne battalions are based in Alaska, according to an earlier F/B post.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,716 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    Back in the day in a previous life, i prepared import and export documentation so I do know what a trading block is and what it entails.

    I have also seen MAGA and Trump supporters are claiming German troops are retreating and leaving Greenland. The dumb fooks are making false claims again.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,703 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I think most of us on the American side of the water think it’s a stupid obsession, but there is a not uncommon (though still minority) view that it is, in the large scale of things, a non-issue. (It depends on how you factor diplomatic reputation). I don’t know anyone who thinks that military action is a realistic possibility or even “buying” the place. Meanwhile, the military is continuing to work with NATO in its actual job of working together to prepare against external threats, regardless of the political statements coming from the Administration.

    https://www.rcinet.ca/eye-on-the-arctic/2026/01/14/4000-us-soldiers-deploy-to-norway-for-arctic-exercise/

    The deadline is the end of the term, in June. The actual dates of releases of opinions are secret until the morning of the release. That doesn’t stop lots of people speculating and making guesses, even those who should know better.

    Only if they wish to send more than 7 personnel under the current laws. The government is expected to introduce legislation to repeal the Triple Lock, despite the vociferous objection of certain political parties who apparently do not believe that the Irish government can be trusted to maintain Irish interests or a policy of neutrality (at least, as defined in the wierdly Irish way)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,862 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    What happens if DJT decides to halt his per captia $Billions to the UN?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,890 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I think an American based poster saying Americans think this standoff and threats are a non issue shows how deluded Americans are. This is not reassuring at all to us on the other side of the Atlantic. Its concerning that Americans may be sleep walking into the breakup of Nato in such a relaxed manner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,053 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Live chat on future of NATO with Pyotr Kurzin, James Ker Lindsey, Michael Rossi now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,862 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Good point, currently Europe could not defend itself from a Russian attack.. If either China or Russia did decide they wanted to annex Greenland there's nothing Europe could do militarily..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,053 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Meet the Press today that the EU-US trade deal "is not finalised".

    EU discussing invoking the anti-coercion mechanism of the treaties.

    The Anti-Coercion Instrument (ACI), also called the trade bazooka, is a regulation of the European Union proposed in December 2021, adopted in November 2023, and entering into force on 27 December 2023. It aims to protect the EU and its member states from economic coercion by third countries and provides a framework for EU action, including examination, engagement, and the adoption of countermeasures.

    Combining security policy and trade policy, it is a defence and deterrence tool designed to prevent coercion by creating penalties for whichever country is performing the coercion. Analytically, one conference proceeding from 2025 introduces the term "geo-legality" to describe how the EU deploys its legal-normative authority, including the ACI, as leverage to counter external (economic) pressure.: 138, 142–143 

    Among the coercive measures against which it could be used are boycotts and trade restrictions. An earlier version of the ACI contained proposed mechanisms for compensation to affected member states; the final Instrument instead provides a framework for seeking reparation from the coercing country.

    As of November 2025, it has not been used. In 2026 EU leaders are weighing its potential first use against the United States in response to the Greenland crisis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,530 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Ukraine alone has defended itself impressively against a RuZZian attack. Europe can't defend itself against Orcs on donkeys driving to the action in Ladas?

    Horsepoo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 501 ✭✭✭thamus doku


    europe did nothing when Russia invaded Ukraine, would they do any different if Russia or china made moves on Greenland or even Iceland.
    I know posters will say Europe would do something in that case, I have my doubts they would.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,249 ✭✭✭selectamatic


    The poster said there's nothing Europe could do.

    Not what they might or would do.

    Europe could do quite a lot militarily to a number of adversaries if it wished to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,882 ✭✭✭threeball


    What if anyone does? That wasn't my point. My point was, the US does not disproportionately fund either the UN or NATO. Its a sack of shìt sold to gullible yanks who think the world is robbing them. Just like the fools who voted for Brexit, thought the Europeans were dragging Britain down. That worked out well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,337 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    As a debater here, do you trust the words from the Trump Admin team on where the Airborne battalions based in Alaska may be deployed to; rumoured to be Minnesota to support the federal personnel there or whether the battalions [specified as being winter warfare trained] might be used on a land mass like Greenland [as Trump seems to have set his heart on annexing that island]?

    It's fair to say that Trump likes issuing statements and saying things which he knows will agitate people. He might end up with stampedes here, not just in Europe but in Wall Street.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,882 ✭✭✭threeball


    This is total nonsense. The biggest military in the world behind the US is a combined EU. Outside of resorting to Nukes, Russia wouldn't last a week vs the EU. And European gear is proven, unlike Chinese.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,862 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Just that simple is it? How naive…

    Ukraine is the only thing stopping Putin from starting a conflict into Western Europe and there's little we could do to stop them from wreaking havoc..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,862 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    I would say Putin is **** himself, so whilst the EU army? Is deploying some troops up to Greenland, what happens to Ukraine?

    image.png


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,582 ✭✭✭PropJoe10


    Nonsense. Russia's military capability in Ukraine has been fairly laughable considering the size of their army. All they seem to have is unlimited personnel, which is sad in itself.



Advertisement
Advertisement