Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning updated in OP 12/2/26

1145214531455145714581836

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,221 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    I wouldn't give him an inch of Greenland personally. What boggles me is that nobody is talking about his violation of international law in Venezuela. He invaded a sovereign country for oil. A week ago and it's forgotten/forgiven. That was the first mistake.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,288 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Indeed it was and you see the appeasement from European leaders and he moves to his next target and so on



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,221 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Exactly. People here even accepted it. It's like it never happened.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    Try selling him an iceberg, the bigliest iceberg. He can have it towed down to Mar-a Lardo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,190 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    That White House post....

    The White House posted a cartoon to X on Wednesday of two Greenlandic mush teams with three huskies each, pointing towards the choice of the white pillars and the South Lawn or a tempestuous scene by the Great Wall of China and Red Square in Russia.

    Paired with the image, the official White House account posted a single question: “Which way, Greenland man?”

    At first glance, it might seem to be innocuous and referencing the ongoing demands of Donald Trump that Greenland – an official Danish territory – become part of the United States.

    But according to Heidi Beirich, a co-founder of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism who closely monitors American neo-Nazis, this was a clear cut example of a nod towards racist, far-right literature.

    “This is a key concept in neo-Nazi and white supremacist subculture,” said Beirich. “Western man is code for white man, and one of the most popular racist books in these subcultures is Which Way Western Man, which has been featured in a [Department of Homeland Security] post celebrating manifest destiny.”

    The 1978 book is essential reading among the American far right and was written by the late white nationalist William Gayley Simpson, a member of the National Alliance – a foundational neo-Nazi organization established by William Luther Pierce, whose writing inspired several acts of terrorism, including the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.

    “It’s absolutely shocking to see such images being deployed by this administration,” said Beirich. “The idea appeals to racists and white supremacists who think only white people should be in positions of power.”

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/14/trump-administration-white-supremacist-language



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,221 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Did you steal this idea from the 1980s TV show Salvage 1 where they towed an iceberg to California to help with a drought? 😁

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,569 ✭✭✭blackcard


    I agree. Nato and the EU need to step up in opposing the US acquiring Greenland. There should be no appeasement to the US as this will only encourage Trump in his bully boy tactics. No mineral rights should be conceded either

    The US can threaten additional tariffs against the EU. Specifically, they can target goods that are important to the Danes. If they do, it will further tarnish the US's reputation which is going downhill very fast.

    The US can threaten to pull out of NATO. It can also threaten to reduce assistance to Ukraine

    It is time for the EU and NATO to stand up to Trump and tell him where to shove his threats



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,341 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    My bad. I see that in an The-Express.com article on other countries support troop movements to Greenland. https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.the-express.com%2Fnews%2Fworld-news%2F196095%2Fgerman-soldiers-greenland-trump-threats%3Ffbclid%3DIwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAYnJpZBEwMVk3ZDk4TnZCTkVuaEttTXNydGMGYXBwX2lkEDIyMjAzOTE3ODgyMDA4OTIAAR7hhhfCNWppBUxUXxH1gq88jCBZblGe-nZyQyNrxNKdyb7m7MC-aqepZNsELg_aem_VhJ42O0EpOiA5mXpZvkXrw&h=AT2vilokW6ppGcqqAfv3_5AmR1UJ9dVWuS2awrlXFnkDskGX_5IVmTR4pcBj_vu9bMt-v5BMKuI9MjAKbXo3LqVNrS4cmkJk1Gnz5L5WmP7JFq0A3cNa5sLXH0ioQi2k_LPAx1_5veiSfClJc84oImA-WYXtMQ&tn=R*F&c[0]=AT3taSHi_18q4YZUWm5XbKAKctC4_yQt8Qktx6be5E7vBJdin6xJXIQdu25704rUDRTiWpaaD4qO9nneEkiQJHdbIFhSHA8LOxavVdZQXkZHiLd_jJKvUjOjR0_AmHR6BjswGpSPLEpQgFEnoQX3jY6zgn6RgouvzsXXYelUqhhijFtQBXQTgWzDy3O270_8f-7zHh4awSjMaIcrOo4atvr21q49ZMXHWGGd4aWDANRHOA



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,685 ✭✭✭valoren


    In essence, does Europe want to be the meek and insecure George McFly who allowed himself to be bullied by Biff for decades or does he want to be the George McFly who knocked Biff out and then became a self-confident, self-assured man. Biff is in the process of attempting to rape Lorraine (Greenland). What is George going to do? Will he protect Lorraine? If Europe does nothing then that original timeline in BTTF will apply. 😀



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,341 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Going slightly off-topic here, I'm looking at the U.K Govt move in providing one [1] officer to the combined-country Greenland move, thinking that it's the minimum that Govt could do while keeping it's buddy-buddy relationship with Trump intact and presume the U.K Govt will be updating it's U.S buddy, even if it's a daily slow/late update, on what its happening on the ground, if not what is talked about by the group with the Greenlanders and Danes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,210 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    ...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,894 ✭✭✭threeball


    When your court system has no interest in law and only in political decisions the game is up. Its a completely stupid system where you just appoint judges that are favorable to one side or the other. Like all the other checks and balances, its been shown up as being completely flawed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,894 ✭✭✭threeball


    I think the likes of California, Oregon, Minnesota and New York should start making some overtures about secession. That would flood the zone in the other direction and throw Trump into a tizzy. He would go mental at the thoughts the union would break up under his watch. Just to throw a spanner in the works they should announce that they are exploring a vote on the possibility as people are no longer comfortable being governed by this administration.

    At the moment, everyone is letting him dictate the terms. Whats in the news, whats the latest scheme. Time to start rattling his cage a bit. He doesn't handle pressure well. He can't even answer a simple question without flipping out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,221 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    A tangent I know but I started watching Sky News in recent weeks after a 10+ year break. There was a time when "Breaking News" actually meant something big and new. Now they seem to use it for a trivial/repetitive headline every single day. It has become meaningless. More dopamine hits I guess.

    Post edited by Cluedo Monopoly on

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,067 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I've long thought that the Democratic states should create some shared programs, like universal healthcare, education etc among themselves. Why lower themselves to the standards of the South? By pooling resources, larger social programs become more tenable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,221 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Yeah maybe so but things had become silly here and people were falling into the trap (and ignoring the blatant violation if international law in Venezuela). I don't hunt for likes either. Trump always starts with an outrageous opening position to deflect. We should all know that by now.

    What odds would you give for an invasion and takeover (i.e. US ownership)?

    I would offer much less than 1% or even 'politically impossible'. Many many reasons but mainly:

    1. An attack would turn US into the aggressor against it's own defensive alliance (NATO). NATO would collapse. That would anger Congress, the Pentagon and every other US institution that matters. NATO countries would have to expel the US from their bases. Absolute strategic disaster. Decades of progress up in smoke.
    2. The USA gain very little from an attack. They already have military access and cooperate on security and early warning systems. They can negotiate for mining rights and ports and further influence without attacking a mainly ice shelf with 57,000 brave souls.
    3. Trump would need Congress to launch a war on a NATO country. Very unlikely. I think he would face massive resignations in the military and intelligence service if he tried to do so.
    4. There is very little public support for an invasion. No casus belli. Very important to have public support. The optics would be shocking.
    5. The markets would crumble too!

    When I saw the term "working group" I knew it would be boring diplomacy rather than tanks and guns. There will be lots of posturing and negotiation tactics and there will be some kind of deal hammered out before the mid terms I'd imagine.

    What % chance would you give for an invasion now?

    Post edited by Cluedo Monopoly on

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    Not coincidental that people have been comparing Trump to Biff Tannen for years. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/oct/23/back-to-the-future-writer-bad-guy-biff-was-based-on-donald-trump

    I saw a comment recently that we are living in the timeline where Biff got the Sports Almanac.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,547 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    All of what Trump has done has been unprecedented.

    All of it.

    It's easy for you to sit here and downplay the seriousness. Ask people from that country how they feel about it. NATO members are taking action. Should we contact them and tell them to relax?

    And people haven't "forgotten" about Venezuela. There was widespread coverage of his appearance in court. I read an article yesterday about where the money was being held. So it's in the news.

    You think nothing is going to happen. Fine. You're absolutely entitled to that opinion. Just don't rubbish everyone else's for thinking in line with NATO

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,221 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    You could list your reasons why you think it will happen you know.

    The violation of international law in Venezuela needs to be more than "in the news". It was outrageous. There should be retribution.

    NATO putting a few soldiers in Greenland is just tokenism. It's a very good idea though. Reinforces the very bad optics of invasion. They don't really expect combat.

    Go on, give me a % chance of invasion. Genuinely curious.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,121 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    I just read what her former father in law said:

    "Renee was an amazing person, she was full of life and full of joy, real gentle, a good mother. [...] I just think we make bad choices, and that's the problem, there is so much chaos in the whole world today. We need to turn to God and walk in the spirit of God, and let him lead us and guide us. [...] It's a hard situation all around [...]. I don't blame ICE. I don't blame (Good's wife) Rebecca. I don't blame Renee. I just wish that, you know, if we're walking in the spirit of God, I don't think she would have been there. That's the way I look at it."

    Now look, I appreciate fully that this is just some everyday guy who a few days ago was Joe Bloggs and now suddenly finds himself commenting on the death of his former daughter in law which is now an event of period-defining national and global discourse (not to mention that we know nothing about him, his character or his mindset). So I would give him all due leeway in that regard.

    But reading the above really does leave you somewhat taken aback as to just how emotionally-detached and brainwashed the Christian conservative mindset in America really is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,121 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    I think you're right as to the chances of military action being low but I think what might add to the anxiety a bit is that Trump is an ageing man with increasingly little to lose as he grows older. It's sadly not unreasonable to assume that all he wants with Greenland is to have its grossly disproportionately large space on the Mercator projection map covered in an American flag so he can outrageously claim to have doubled the territorial size of America. That's what Trump is all about ultimately — d*ck measuring with land and property. He is also now showing us that his administration absolutely can test the limits of what we thought was possible for Presidential power and how the organs of the State will line up for him.

    What Trump wants now is legacy and we have seen in the past that when presidents sense they are in a weaker position (often towards the end of their term), they often turn to foreign policy as the place to force legacy given there is simply more leeway in that area for Presidential prerogative. It's hard to really see where Trump draws the line and ultimately I don't think he actually really cares about the massive geopolitical ramifications of threatening his allies and risking the dismemberment of the Western alliance.

    He really strikes me as the sort of guy who is petulant and self-absorbed to such an extreme that he sees no reason why, if he has to decline and die in the next few years, the world should not have to go down with him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,221 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    All good points. I am always glad that Trump has family in that if he had no possible "successors" he might do completely daft things or even launch the nukes (always a risk). He'll never convince Congress about Greenland all the same because they can do more than 2 terms so need to think about the future. And the markets would be livid with him so he and his family/friends would lose a lot of money.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,018 ✭✭✭Detritus70


    So just ignore it? Nothing to see here? Carry on as normal?
    Two things.
    You are completely fixated on Venezuela and have become obsessed with it. So you just plug your ears and go "lalala".
    No. We won't ignore Greenland, sorry to disappoint you. If it bothers you, go somewhere else instead of whining about it on a continual basis.
    And
    Just go away with your dopamine thing. Is that the best you can do? I hardly call that an argument, it's just noise. And we don't care about Sky, we know it's crap, and what does that have to do with anything?

    Do better. And maybe try to concentrate on more than one topic at a time.

    Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,221 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Oops touched a nerve I see. Thought this was a discussion forum. Grand, let see where we are in a month. You missed the point re Venezuela (actual v projected). It also successfully distracted from ICE, Epstein etc. I'll say no more on Greenland. It's a non story now. A chicken licken.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,190 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    Very much this, but also... So much of what Trump has done/ is doing is against the interests of not just the 'rules based' post war order, but against their long-standing allies, and even against US interests. Much of this would have been previously unthinkable/ laughable.

    Cui bono? Putin.

    We thought there was kompromat before, but not we know that the Epstein files have Trump compromised. Maybe that is what the Russians had against him all along - paedophile president.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,190 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    You put too much stock in Congress unfortunately. Trump is liable to do what he wants and worry about justification after the fact. He doesn't care about due process and runs roughshod over it constantly, with the flimsiest rationale, often pointing to a bizarre interpretation of some obscure legal point.

    Don't forget January 6th, and don't forget he is still talking about a 3rd term. The scumbag is actively setting the conditions for dictatorship.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,221 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,190 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    1. Trump has been spending his second term neutering, dismantling, or perverting every US institution that matters. Where they have survived, they have had MAGA puppets installed. He has stacked the courts and threatens their 'independence'. He is now targeting the federal reserve chairman, who also should be independent. Congress has shown itself to be either in thrall to this maniac, or too weak and scared to confront him. Trump has regularly attacked NATO, he doesn't care a jot about it. He wants the world divided among strongmen dictators, each with their sphere of influence wherein might is right.

    2. The US knows they have massive freedom currently with regard to 'security' or mining potential with Greenland as it stands but 'pyschologically' Trump needs to own it. It would also massively increase the US footprint, exit them from NATO obligations, allow them to encircle and isolate Canada, and gain some potential future 'mineral wealth'.

    3. Trump cares not for Congress, or due process. He needed Congress to approve Venezuela - did he seek that approval? No. He needed Congress for tarrifs - did he seek that approval? No. Many more examples.

    4. The optics are already shocking. Trump is dividing americans into 'with us or against us' and is using corrupted US institutions to further this, cracking down with his own twisted geheime staats polizei/ gestapo.

    5. The markets... The US is many trillions in debt. Beyond what should be possible. They are printing new money, and the fear is they simply loot their Hemisphere into the future if this dystopian timeline is not halted.

    With regard to the 'working group'... Have you heard the US mention it? I have just heard their Danish/ Greenlandish counterparts say this.

    Ultimately, there is very little we can be complacent about at the moment, and our seeing the EU countries and UK taking this seriously should tell you something... It's serious.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,190 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    If you're going to continue to be a smarmy twat, I won't be continuing to engage with you.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,598 ✭✭✭Economics101


    That would give Trump the perfect excuse to unleash quite incredible levels of violence against the seccessionists. Undoubtedly supported by deeply Red Southern States, whose leaders are too dim to spot the irony.



Advertisement
Advertisement