Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Avoiding Halal slaughter plants

  • 12-01-2026 04:26PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 157 ✭✭


    Hi Folks,

    Keep a few sucklers here in the south-east. I find the whole halal slaughter without stunning awful to stomach.

    Apart from avoiding live exporting to countries where this happens. Does anyone know the plants where this is being done so I can avoid sending there.

    A pal of mine has told me to not go to Ashbourne meats, anywhere else?

    Thanks



«1345

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 80 ✭✭One2Many7ups


    Not sure the extent of it but I'd like to see my cattle killed humanely too. Used to be able to follow cattle to see them stunned but no longer allowed in ABP anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭GNWoodd


    ASBA Meats in Tiermacleane Co Clare .

    This has become a huge issue in the UK with significant quantities of meat killed by Halal ending up in the conventional food chain. People unknowingly eating it

    Both itself and Kosher should be banned .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Aren't cattle killed with a captive bolt, doesn't sound very humane.

    Maybe just ban meat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 157 ✭✭jwof2006


    The captive bolt is the stunning method and leads to immediate insensibility. It does not kill them. They are then killed by cutting their jugulars and being bled out.

    In Halal slaughter, their jugulars is cut without stunning meaning they feel their neck being cut and are conscious while they bleed out. It is meant to be horrific.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    The only difference between Halal and regular meat is that there is a muslim who says a prayer before cutting the throat of the animal.

    This 2014 BBC article:

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/uk-27324224.amp

    This article:

    https://hmacanada.org/what-is-halal/

    As long as the animal is only stunned and not dead, then stunning is absolutely allowed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 823 ✭✭✭Silverdream


    The Turk walked away owing lads a fair ball of money. I know one small dealer/trucker who got caught for a 100k



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 157 ✭✭jwof2006


    I guess when I say I am trying to avoid Halal slaughter I mean halal slaughter without stunning as is still practiced in certain slaughterhouses here- in the article it says "UK Food Standards Agency figures from 2011 suggest 84% of cattle, 81% of sheep and 88% of chickens slaughtered for halal meat were stunned before they died" I am talking about the 16% of cattle that are not stunned before halal slaughter.

    There seems to be certain halal slaughter which allows it but a good percentage which doesn't , where they are bled out without it. I think there should be more transparency on this so farmers know how their animals are being killed.

    Or why not insist that all halal slaughter involves pre-stunning. If the halal authorities are happy for certain halal meat to be stunned why not all of it. I think there seems to be a stricter version of Halal which does not facilitate pre-stunning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 157 ✭✭jwof2006


    That article from the HMA says stunning is not allowed? (Copied below)

    It says post-cut stunning can be done if approved, but for me this is not good enough I want to make sure my cattle have as little pain as possible at slaughter.

    1. "person conducting the slaughter cannot employ any method of stunning, such as the captive bolt stunning prior to slaughter. Post cut stunning may be applied where required upon the approval of the halal authority.
    2. Cattle will be slaughtered in a restraining box with their head placed in a head holder, which will raise the head at the time of slaughter to expose the throat. (See appendix C).
    3. The animal should face the prayer direction (qiblah) during the time of slaughter. Exceptions to this rule can be made at abattoirs where operations currently exist, provided infrastructural modifications cause undue hardship for the company.
    4. The person conducting the slaughter must recite Tasmiyah: “Bismillāhi wa Allāhu Akbar”, or at least “Bismillāh” upon every individual animal prior to slaughter without exception. (See Appendix A).
    5. The slaughterer will make the incision below the glottis and thus sever the esophagus, trachea and the two jugular veins without exception in a single swift cut. Sticking, poking, carrying out a vertical cut prior to the incision or doing a double cut during the slaughter will render the animal uncertified.
    6. The knife used by the slaughterer must by sharp, in good condition and larger than the area where the slaughterer will make the incision."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    It says the person conducting the slaughter is not allowed stun it. Not that the animal is not allowed to be stunned by someone/something else beforehand.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 157 ✭✭jwof2006


    I wouldn't take from that that someone else can stun. I think the fact that it then says "post-cut stunning can be applied", would suggest pre-cut stunning is not allowed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 157 ✭✭jwof2006


    I guess the point I am making is that I know for a fact that there a slaughterhouses that do not stun.

    And I feel it should be made clear, so that farmers know what their animals are being subjected to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 157 ✭✭jwof2006


    The wording of these things can be used to confuse the situation. It all comes back to what causes the least amount of suffering to the animal, and that has to allow for pre-stunning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    Once the animal has been blessed and cut it is supposed to bleed out uninterrupted. Thus to interfere after this stage they need permission (lol). Before then, stunning is allowed, just not by the person performing the slaughtering.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 157 ✭✭jwof2006


    Why is there Halal slaughter happening in Ireland without pre-stunning if stunning is permissible?

    And just to clarify by stunning I mean captive bolt stunning to ensure they are unconscious, not some form of stunning that is less effective and may or may not work.

    Again back to my main point. Number 1 priority has to be the animal at its time of death. If there is anything compromising or put over that, we as farmers should be fully informed.

    There are factories killing cattle without stunning or not fully stunned, and I don't think we or DAFM should stand for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 157 ✭✭jwof2006


    "penetrative captive bolt"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭GNWoodd


    What was the draw of that particular factory ? Were they paying over the odds ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    Its permissible, not mandatory. Thats where authorities should step in to make it mandatory, as that article shows other countries have done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,856 ✭✭✭standardg60


    If anyone thinks there are not elements of suffering whilst animals are being 'processed' no matter what the method used they are fooling themselves.

    We all watch wildlife programs featuring various methods of what we perceive to be tortuous deaths. I'd like to think that nature itself spares the victim due to the release of adrenalin.

    Is it not the case that most people who have survived severe throat injuries reported no memory of it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,921 ✭✭✭memorystick


    They’re savages if that’s part of their religion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 855 ✭✭✭chrisd2019


    Lots of references and articles online relating to payments and HR issued with the employees.

    Never a good sign when a company operates out of a building without a prominent sign identifying it.

    It's like it trying to hide in Shannon Industrial Estate.

    A large % of the fresh Halal meat in ethnic shops comes from them.

    Poor form to not pay the suppliers. Though given the publicity I would have though animal suppliers would be wanting payment on delivery.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,856 ✭✭✭standardg60


    Interesting concept, would farmers be happier sending their livestock to halal approved slaughter houses if they got an extra cut?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 855 ✭✭✭chrisd2019


    Most probability, like anyone extra income always welcome.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭dmakc




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 211 ✭✭Diddly Squat


    Obviously we all want the animals to have as minimal suffering as possible but its well documented that the waiting and noise beforehand along with a lot of animals knowing whats about to happen Is probably worse as the actual slaughter as they're sentient beings not without some sentiment of understanding as to what is about to happen.

    It takes seconds for an animal to lose consciousness after the jugular is cut but I do understand where you're coming from regards to stunning them but I'd argue the wait to run up the chute and the noises and stress involved in the whole process is as bad as not stunning them

    I grew up on a farm where we killed and butchered our own pigs and lambs up till a decade ago so I'm well aware as to what it involves, when you fry up the liver and kidneys of a pig you've reared by hand while they're still warm it gives an invaluable insight as to the importance of what an animal gives us when we rear it for food.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 157 ✭✭jwof2006


    Would it definitely be that quick Diddly Squat? Chat GPT says" Cattle: Most cattle collapse (an indicator of early unconsciousness) within 5 to 20 seconds, but this can range from 1 to over 90 seconds in some cases. Complete loss of brain function can take up to 40 seconds with a clean, effective cut" . Too long if you ask me, and not a nice way to die. What if the bleeding doesn't go to plan and they are conscious while a second cut is made? It leaves too much to chance. At least the stun means the animal is unconscious straight away and can bleed out, without being terrified and in pain for its final seconds/minute.

    I know what you mean regarding the lairge etc. being stressful for them, but I am not sure I agree that they know what is about to happen, sure they are in a noisy environment but some of the lairages I have been on are pretty well designed with cattle often chewing the cud etc. I am talking about cattle here, I understand that pigs may be different and that they may be more perceptive to what is going to happen.

    Look I know that the slaughter of animals and transport to factories is never going to be a totally stress and problem free undertaking. The point of the thread was to address one aspect of this, the final act of ending the animals life, and I don't think it should be hidden from farmers if a particular factory is killing an animal in a way that is contrary to accepted best welfare practice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    Loads of good questions. There is very little understanding of "Halal" and its history in Ireland.

    It was first in Ballaghadreen in the 1970s with foreign contracts for Egypt, Iran/Iraq, Saudi Arabia. Plenty of money and unlimited demand. Slowly but slowly some of the excess was dumped on the domestic market.

    Halal is not the method or confinded to meat. Halal is the system, where a tax called the Jizya is paid. Every product you buy in the supermarket is halal compliant. Now of course the local producers dont pay anything called the Jizya, they pay for a halal certificate of compliance. This approximately charged at 2% of gross production. It is charged at each stage (start counting). Who collects this money in Ireland? Shiek Halawa collects it for all of Europe, nice guy colourful history. A Halal product cannot be next to a non halal product. Pork can be Halal if the Jizya is paid. Yeah a lot of certification being issued.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,503 ✭✭✭Airyfairy12


    Good for you! Its awful and should be banned. Ive nothing else to add.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 211 ✭✭Diddly Squat


    Whilst the animal may have no comprehension of death it's aware what is happening is not good. Newer slaughterhouses are designed in such a way as to minimise the affect on the animals which is a good thing but I dont think you can ever really eliminate the stress involved. I agree with you in that all meat plants practicing halal should be made to declare it publicly and I agree stunning is a much preferred way for end of life processing. The paragraph below is what AI came up with

    Animals, especially more intelligent ones like pigs and cattle, show strong signs of fear, stress, and panic when approaching slaughter

    , indicating they perceive imminent danger, though whether they comprehend "death" as humans do is debated; their reactions stem from sensory cues (smell of blood, sounds) and "emotional contagion," suggesting awareness of a terrifying, final event, even if not the abstract concept of mortality. 

    T



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,781 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    It is curious that you should start this thread on the same day that RTE Livelines entire show today was taken over by the same subject.

    Chicken and egg situation.



Advertisement
Advertisement