Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1164516461648165016511852

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭longjohn200




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,079 ✭✭✭50HX


    After a solid yet unspectacular spell on piano last season Byrne didnt even make the summer tour just gone.

    He's played well enough this season & has been backed as the starting 10 away from home for Leinster as it looks like they are doubling down on the solidity of defense esp when away from home.

    Crowley is probably a better 10 on both defense & attacking with ball.Byrne is a better place & touchline kicker this season so far.

    I can't see any scenario outside of injury where Farrell bins Prendergast out of the 23 consistently from here on...17 games to RWC

    I suspect it'll be tried & trusted in Paris with minimal changes outside of injury enforced.

    The current 10's will be in sitiu imo with Crowley probably starting at 10 away from home & SP to pick up the starting spots at home



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,054 ✭✭✭johnh6767


    Andy Farrell is not erratic in his decision making and doesn’t take as much lead from the provincials as many would expect. He made a call to back Sam in the last 6N and despite the drop off in form / over exertion he will continue to with that backing I think. Byrne will be the 3rd option though and all 3 will get game time as it’s still quite a journey to RWC27 with multiple scenarios yet to play out in URC/ Europe for each of these players



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,433 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Indeed, I think he's looking at the current game plan of most teams, which has been forced on everyone by the rules changes, and picking the players based on that. SPs kicking game is clearly better (although he's also capable of some stinkers), and while his defensive frailties are there, Farrell definitely sees the positives more than the negatives.

    Pretty sure it'll be SP and Crowley interchanging.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭longjohn200


    The form of provincial weighs heavenly on selection. The best team in the league for the past decade has been leinster and that is reflected in selection to date.

    Farrell is in the game of winning - not loyalty. If Sam is not performing and ireland are not winning, he most certainly will be dropped.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,079 ✭✭✭50HX


    😁😁 tell that to Tom Farrell...the form centre in Ireland last season.

    Soroka is my form 6 this season...will be interesting to see if he gets a shot



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,755 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Clearly Farrell sees loyalty as an important component of building team spirit and its a big part of his management style. The retirement stuff with POM, Murray and Healy was a highly choreographed example of it, there are numerous others. It's not necessarily a bad thing and he must see the value in it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭longjohn200


    If ireland were putting in poor performances and losing games, It would be different. 100%



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭longjohn200


    Tom farrell deserved his shot no doubt. Similarly to mcclockey had to bide his time. Needs to keep performing, hasn't been exceptional over the last number of weeks though

    Any time I've seen soroka he was average. Not the quickest and was anonymous against ulster in he first half. Reminds me of Dominic Ryan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,755 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Ireland have been putting in mediocre performances and losing games since the WC.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭longjohn200


    80% win percentage in both six nations is not bad in fairness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,755 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Trend is going in the wrong direction, and beating France and England is what matters if we are serious about being a top team, SA and NZ similarly. Anyway, results are largely irrelevant to the management style of the coach. He either believes loyalty is important in team building or he has a more transactional approach where results are everything, Farrell is very much the former.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 367 ✭✭letsbefair


    Easy to knock from the ditch, he picked Ringrose over Farrell. I think he is entitled to do so on form. We have punched well above our weight with him as coach. Who would you make the coach if you are so unhappy with him ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,755 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I'm very happy with Farrell, Im just making the argument that he does prioritise loyalty more than some other coaches might. Again, thats not a bad thing. Punching above our weight, whatever. New Zealand punch above their weight too, but that plays no part in their mindset. Ireland is fortunate to have many advantages when it comes to pro rugby, in my view we aren't punching above our weight but making the most of our resources. And there will always be an asterisk beside the entry of any coach who can't get us past a 1/4 in the world cup. That's punching below our weight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,058 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Disagree. I think there's heavy bias towards the tried and trusted players over the form players. If Henshaw suddenly started playing as well as he currently plays, he wouldn't get within an ass' roar of the squad, let alone the team. But he's in the squad regardless of how well he's playing.

    I think Farrell only got called to the squad because of public opinion in the weeks preceeding it. He had one average performance and he'll settle onto the Nick Timony role of playing a game against a second tier team for a year or 2 and be phased out. Meanwhile Henshaw is continually included while putting in average performances.

    I think Farrell has been brilliant for Ireland. But now I think he's entered a phase where he's picking his favourites rather than picking the team to win games. I think he believes his favourites are most likely to win rather than the most in-form players.

    We'll see how it works out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭longjohn200


    Not my point. Form of the province as opposed individual form.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,593 ✭✭✭OldRio


    'And there will always be an asterisk beside the entry of any coach who can't get us past a 1/4 in the world cup'

    Who decided about this asterisk? Was it a committee meeting? A peer review? A fans poll? I must have missed this news can you enlighten me. Thanks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,805 ✭✭✭BoardsMember


    It'll be interesting to see the squad for 6Ns. By rights Henshaw shouldn't be involved. People saying his performances are average are being very kind. So its a bit of a litmus test, its hard to see what is to be gained by selecting him. It's time to move on. Whether Farrell sees it that way or not will be telling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,085 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    He either believes loyalty is important in team building or he has a more transactional approach where results are everything, Farrell is very much the former

    You have this backwards. He’s all about results and that manifests itself in a stable team that he believes can win, but this gets interpreted as excessive loyalty.

    The loyalty argument never stands up to scrutiny because it’s so selective. Farrell was loyal to James Ryan until McCarthy came along, to Murray until JGP came along. He’s loyal to everyone until there’s someone better.

    Everyone is bizarrely fixated on Henshaw which completely overlooks the point that McCloskey was picked ahead of both him and Aki in the recent AIs. Farrell was loyal to them until he wasn’t, but it’s completely ignored.

    We have a small playing pool and we’re one of the top rugby teams in the world. The harsh truth is that the vast majority of players at the provinces simply aren’t good enough for Ireland. The gap between the URC and top level tests is a chasm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,079 ✭✭✭50HX


    Yet Henshaw started v Japan & Australia.

    Stu got injured so where do you then...back to the tried & tested



  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,397 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    So who is the 12 that was hard done by that should have started who was not stu, henshaw or aki??

    Remember, we absolutely hockied Australia with Farrell's team selection so, pudding and eating comes to mind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,085 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    see above re fixation with Henshaw.

    McCloskey started against Australia too. It was Aki who got picked when he got injured.

    Hammer Farrell all you want but basic facts should be correct.

    At that point McCloskey, Henshaw and Osborne were all injured so I’d love to know who we should have picked at 12.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,079 ✭✭✭50HX


    Osbourne should have been selected at 12 v Japan go from there.

    He got injured & another window has passed & it looks like tbey don't fancy him at 12 tbh

    Yes they did a number on Aus & well done, don't see how thats relevant when you left out the 2 possession.

    I was originally responding to goin back to the tried & tested,not the who is hard done by



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,079 ✭✭✭50HX


    Remind me again why POM started in Rome last March & Cian Healy got 30mins off the bench in 3 6n's games plus a CC semi final start that fell on its arse.

    You are correct loyalty is v selective & we could be here for the day debating the above 2 players.

    I agree the standard of rugby player in ire has dipped & we could be heading into leaner years but there is also exciting talents out there that prob won't get a proper crack til post RWC regardless of being good enough or not as time waits for no man



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 603 ✭✭✭thamus doku


    no matter who is picked from 9 to 15 unless Ireland can fix the issues at set piece we are going no where.
    I don’t think it is fair to just blame certain players.

    For me it’s a coaching issue, across the board including Farrell.
    Farrell could do with some new coaches who will stand up to him and Tell him some home truths.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,085 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I’ve seen some odd criticisms of Farrell over the years but blaming him for Leinster’s CC selection policy is a new one, I have to say.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,917 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    This is a silly point in regards discussing "loyalty" though given Osborne was starting at 15. Farrell's preferred setup for the AIs was McCloskey at 12 and Osborne at 15.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,079 ✭✭✭50HX


    @Former Former Former you are a knowledgeable poster.

    My point on the CC semi final re Healy is a point on loyalty that was also evident in the test team...I would imagine you know that but not agree with



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,079 ✭✭✭50HX


    My preferred choice of seeing Osbourne at 12 was in reply to " who was the centre that should have started"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,085 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    or maybe, just maybe, both Leinster and Ireland thought that in March-May 2025, Healy was still a better prop than Boyle. They were probably right.

    The fundamental problem here is that posters always default to the negative about Ireland to the point where the most logical explanations don’t even occur to them.



Advertisement
Advertisement