Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1421422423424426

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 864 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    I wonder if Dart SW is being delayed because enough new trains won't be ready to serve the line?

    In absence of full electrification, could they still increase capacity using Maynooth commuter trains?

    Or is the 3 line section into Heuston at capacity?

    And can we please leave WRC out of this thread? I'm tempted to respond to some comments above, but it's just the same old arguments.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,584 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Mod: Can we keep this thread to Dart+. (Dart expansion).

    Off topic will be deleted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60 ✭✭spark23


    I would have thought the Dart+ SW project with four tracking, Kylemore, Heuston West and Cabra stations would have been the most beneficial to the whole Dublin and National system added ideally with Kilcock/Maynooth -Hazelhatch/Adamstown link(for hourly services Sligo line into Heuston), would make Dart + West possibly cheaper then later. Mainly i'm saying would be best use of funds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,406 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    DART+ West includes the new depot and the new station at Spencer Dock - they are vital to the whole scheme.

    The link between the Sligo line and the Cork line hasn’t even been planned yet - it is at the very least a decade away if not longer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,454 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    Any word on the Depot actually?

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here (use your boards.ie email!)

    👇️ 👇️



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭tnegun


    Nothing beyond rumours, I spoke to a couple of local councillors as I believed they should be getting behind it, considering the long-term opportunities/employment that it would bring to the area, which wouldn't depend on an MNC. Both seemed to believe it was going to be resubmitted soon with changes to address the issues in the original application but that was several months ago now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 178 ✭✭VeryOwl


    Will the DART+ West construction proceed without the Depot, or is the entire DART+ scheme going to be held hostage to it?

    Separately, why is the replenishment of stock being held up because of issues with the custom, IE, experimental battery trains? Surely the orders for the normal conventional electric units can proceed. We desperately need them.

    It's the lack of urgency to all of this that's most dispiriting.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,419 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,449 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Without a depot, where are they going to put the trains? Irish Rail already losing another yard for storing trains next year

    It's not as simple as just ordering "normal conventional electric units". Issues with the trains aren't just related to the batteries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 676 ✭✭✭Razor44


    What yard are they losing?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 178 ✭✭VeryOwl


    Fair point on the Depot, though many of those trains are to replace ageing DART units in any case. What's the situation there?

    What doesn't make sense is why the preparatory work DART+ SW has been tendered out if there's no intention to think about building it until "2030+". Probably an observation more appropriate to the NDP thread, but all in all the NDP is incoherent. Re-reading Darragh O'Brien's comments, they're just bizarre.

    The NDP is meant to give certainty to funding and timelines, yet we have O'Brien saying it's "flexible" and the DART+ project "could" begin "next year". It's meant to ensure a continuous stream of projects yet everything is backloaded, with shovel ready, quick win projects like Luas Finglas delayed and priority given to advancing road schemes which aren't near construction. All the hallmarks of an Irish Government, as usual, not committed to delivering any of it. His defeatist language on Metrolink gives the game away, though at least some of the media are covering how ridiculous the situation on all of this has become.

    Back on DART+, given how integral the Depot component is to the entire DART+ scheme, to the point where it seems nothing else can be realistically advanced without it, you would've thought IE would be racing to get it re-submitted. It's hard to believe, but we're nearly 17 months on from the planning refusal and still, nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,302 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    It's hard to believe, but we're nearly 17 months on from the planning refusal and still, nothing.

    It’s not really hard to believe. We’re nearly 17 months on from the vast majority of the RO being granted and still, nothing.

    If we see electric trains in west Dublin this side of 2030, it will be a miracle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,371 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    A tender for surveys on a site west of kilcock will be out in Q1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 98 ✭✭Woah


    https://www.thejournal.ie/dart-southwest-dublin-6890559-Dec2025/

    Pushback to the delays of dart SW seem to be building. Article says Irish rail going ahead with procurement despite delay maybe to put pressure on government?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,302 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    A tender for surveys in Q1 2026 means actual surveys complete maybe in Q1 2027, so maybe a planning application in 2028, so maybe construction starts in 2029. But probably later.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 102 ✭✭Crakepottle?


    What does procurement entail in this particular context ? Does it mean acquisition of ground required?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,371 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    I expect irish rail will use their framework or suppliers which is quicker than an open tender



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,302 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    So maybe, a month or two quicker?

    It's nearly a year and a half since the depot was rejected, and more than two years since the oral hearings at which serious reservations were raised about the location.

    It's just not good enough.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,759 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Relating to the SW, does it really make sense to speed it up if there will be no electric trains to run on it and nowhere to put them?

    I suppose it depends on what you mean by speed it up, if they mean speed it up so it opens around the same time as DART+ West and the depot, then of course fair enough, that would be great. But I’d worry if it opened years ahead with no trains to run on it, it could become the next children’s hospital in the public view and damage perception of public transport projects.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭Consonata


    I think its going to take longer than we think to quad track and make the necessary improvements than it will do to get rolling stock. The latter is also largely out of our hands, whereas the former isn't. It will also likely be cheaper to build west and south west as one project given the significant overlap in specialisation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,832 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    https://www.rte.ie/news/leinster/2025/1203/1546992-rosslare-europort-development-project/

    When Irish Rail really want to do things they can do it quickly it seems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,454 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    It is crazy to me that we are 18 months beyond the rejection of the Depot and site surveys ahead of a PP submission are only being tendered now??

    On D+SW being built ahead of stock coming, the same argument could be made for D+West? Without rolling stock, what you end up with for each project respectively is:

    D+ West: closure of some level crossings and resulting line speed improvements, and OHLE infrastructure unused until the stock arrives (still likely to be around the time it opens anyway)

    D+ SW: completion of 4 tracking from Heuston to Hazelhatch, new stations at Kylemore, Heuston West and Cabra (Assuming KM/Cabra pp goes through fine and they get effectively tacked into the build) and unused OHLE.

    These works, DART stock aside, will significantly simplify the approach to Heuston for commuter and intercity trains from day 1, leading to capacity for increased intercity and commuter services (as stock allows), potential for improved journey times and effectively no waiting for trains to pass you at "The Gullet" ever, which often results in fairly significant wait times either just after your train has left Heuston, or just as you're about to arrive into Dublin (when you've stood up to get off at Heuston and are most likely to notice a wait, as you check your watch to make sure you don't miss your bus/luas etc)

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here (use your boards.ie email!)

    👇️ 👇️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,064 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    If there is a delay to DART+ West, then the EMU trains that were ordered for it should not be deferred, but instead used to replace the original 8000-series DART trains - no additional depot space is needed to do this.

    I guess that’s what will be done, although the only type approval work done so far has been on the BEMU trains (90000 series?) not the new EMUs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,540 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    No trains have been ordered for DART+ West



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,064 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Oops, my mistake, I meant to say "were to be ordered".

    I wonder, though, with the delays on BEMU delivery, will IÉ swap some of their ordered BEMUs for EMUs while Alstom implement a new battery design? Probably not, I think, but it would do wonders for public confidence in this project if they could at least see new trains in the next 12 months.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,572 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I have said from the beginning that they should apply for some basic depot facilities (stabling, cleaning, etc. but not mechanical works) at Hazelhatch where they have space. Any maintenance, mechanical works, etc. could be done at Inchicore. That would allow D+ SW to proceed independent of W.

    The stabling space would be useful even after the depot opens as part of W (surely there will be a huge amount of unnecessary effort sending trains from Hazelhatch to Maynooth every night and back the next morning?)



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,759 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    On D+SW being built ahead of stock coming, the same argument could be made for D+West? Without rolling stock, what you end up with for each project respectively is

    I don’t believe they are the same thing! DART+ West includes the depot which is obviously needed for the new trains, that is why it has to come first.

    In an ideal world, you would probably start with the depot, ahead of others parts of D+W like Spencer Dock station, so that you could start taking delivery of the new trains and start testing them out. Obviously the ABP decision has made a mess of that.

    I like Pete’s idea above, one issue is that the electric trains could only operate into Heuston, they couldn’t operate along Drumcondra into Docklands/Spencer Dock as that section is all part of D+W, I suppose unless they used BEMU’s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,454 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    I was more referring to the situation as it stands, given that the government was aware the depot will not be part of D+ West when the decision was made to delay D+ SW

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here (use your boards.ie email!)

    👇️ 👇️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 276 ✭✭Bsharp


    For Dart+ SW, it's never too soon to provide capacity and resilience in a rail system. Build the tracks, stations, and enable for the fleet and electrification. The infrastructure deficit in the system is too wide to be waiting for the perfect synergy. Waiting costs money.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,302 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    And for Dart+ West, regardless of the depot or judicial reviews about Ashtown, they could and should have got going on the improvement works at Connolly and building Spencer Dock. The money is there, planning is there, get going FFS.

    Even if we never see electric trains in Maynooth, improving the mess in the north city would be a huge help.



Advertisement