Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Australia bans social media for under-16s.

  • 02-12-2025 11:18AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,370 ✭✭✭✭


    Australia has banned under 16s from accessing social media. Personally, I think this is a great idea and would love to see other countries following suit. These companies are actively radicalising people and poisoning their minds. It's past time they were reigned in. They've had two decades and all they've proven is that they only care about profits, not the safety of users.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cnv2z059745o

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,107 ✭✭✭Pauliedragon


    Two 15 year old kids are taking the Aussie government to court to fight it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,370 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The article mentions that. It'd be a farce if they succeed when the law's about to come into force.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,068 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    This is pointless, they will just download a vpn and bypass it. The UK tired this with porn and they found that people that didn’t use the vpns moved to dodgy porn sites that had malware on them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,474 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    What’s it radicalising people and poisoning their minds with though, I doubt there’s universal agreement on the answer.

    It’s a good idea on the face of it but I’ve a feeling this is just going to shove them into a different place, WhatsApp, Telegram etc don’t fall under this initial legislation. Then you’ve the whole virtual and digital world, it’s impossible to police, places like Roblox and Gorilla Tag.







  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,068 ✭✭✭Potatoeman




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,677 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    How does a VPN get around requiring age verification for a social media account?

    Edit - ah I get you, just pretend you're not Australia haha.

    Yeah it needs to somehow be a global ban on under 16s. Not really possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,591 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    To use an example for teenage boys, they were actively being pushed content from the likes of Andrew Tate for years....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,474 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    His answer to should you buy a bmw or a bitcoin the other day was spot on, most men would proably agree with him. You'll need to come up with a better reason to block boys from audio and video.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,591 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    If that's the kind of stuff that Tate was pushing, there wouldn't be a problem. Pushing abusive and misogynistic views etc are a serious problem. You clearly don't mind because for some reason you chose to point to his views on bitcoin. And unsurprisingly he has turned out to be of a trafficker.

    Also this is a well documented issue that I assume you know about. Platforms promoting individuals such as him is not positive.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/aug/06/andrew-tate-violent-misogynistic-world-of-tiktok-new-star



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,474 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    I was implying a broken clock can be right once a day. This ban will have no effect on someone who wants to listen to him being able to do so.

    If we were to follow on from that logic who else do we ban chaps from seeing and hearing until they’re 16? Fr Ted, POTUS etc.

    How about girls and their role models, Cardi B springs to mind.

    I think the problem is adults in kids spaces, back to Roblox, gorilla tag etc. Great fun but there’s nefarious actors amongst them.

    Shorts are also rotting their brains, there’s a generation out there with a 4 second attention span in their 20’s now.

    I nearly fell over when I noticed a new trend a few weeks ago, rawdogging in the bedroom and it’s the complete opposite of what springs to mind, this current generation is in big trouble.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,514 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    What will be done about the adults with fried brains from social media?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭Dazler97


    That's not gonna work under 16 is abit of a stretch maybe under 12 but can't see this being successful



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,412 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Another classic Aussie knee-jerk, unthought out response.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,370 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    They're too far gone.

    I'd love to see social media taxed at the user level though. The firms should have to charge each user a levy which is then passed on to the state. Would cull those bots nicely as well.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,665 ✭✭✭wonga77


    If social media platforms simply introduced a properly thought-out verification process then things would dramatically improve. If people had their true identities tied to an account, it would cut down on faceless nameless trolling and people might think twice about what they post.
    However thats too easy and none of them will do it because it would rule out multiple accounts and bots which is more traffic/clicks/revenue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 105 ✭✭DexterMorgansGhost


    What will be considered social media?

    Are online gaming platforms considered social media.

    Is Youtube comments section social media.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,346 ✭✭✭DoctorEdgeWild


    So you want people to turn copies of their ID documents over to a private company if they wish to use their service? Mandated by law? How about to post on a forum/bulletin board system like this one? That's social media. Boil that down a little to a real life bulletin board. ID to pin up a car for sale? What about a piece of paper? Am I OK to write on that or should I give my ID to Wernham Hogg.

    I'm obviously using the ridiculous example above to facetiously point out how the suggestion proposed is unworkable and wrong.

    That's ignoring the most obvious and clear answer that if all the countries that headquarter these companies somehow got together to agree to your solution, within a couple of hours, they would be gone to another country that sees things more reasonably. Or the user base would go to another platform where they didn't have to play 'Papers Please' with a social media company.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,602 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Is boards social media?

    some weird ideas being pushed on it, or so I'm told.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,591 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Realistically I think regulation on how algorithms are utilized is needed . That includes known issues like actively pushing addictive behaviors and platforming some resume harmful individuals. Anything less is only partially addressing the issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,346 ✭✭✭DoctorEdgeWild


    Who decides who is harmful? Because just look on this board, someone like JK Rowling is either an evil bigot or a crusading heroic author. Likewise Donald Trump, a sex offending idiot or a righteous political leader.

    At what point does personal responsibility (or parental/guardian responsibility) come into it?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,602 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    The ninny state.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 856 ✭✭✭littlefeet


    It's a great idea. I am 100% sure teens will try to find some way around it, that's not the point, though.

    It's similar to a country retaining the death penalty but choosing not to use the death penalty sentence and commuting the death penalty sentence to life in prison instead.

    What Australian society is signaling is that the use of social media by under-16s is a social ill; teens trying to get around it is irrelevant, what it signals is far more important.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,295 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Suppose it wouldn't be hard to send them some AI generated false ID. Does this mean every over 16 year old will have to verify themselves just to use bloody YouTube?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,107 ✭✭✭Pauliedragon


    Just look at their alcohol laws ffs.

    We often criticise governments for doing nothing about things. Maybe it's worth giving it a try. It might wake the SM crowd and they might put more of an effort to keep a better eye on whats on their platforms (unlikely I know)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,370 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Agreed. It's insane how much these companies have gotten away with.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭nolivesmatter


    But that's where laws banning children from social media play a role in forcing companies to do something about it. I understand people saying the kids will work around a ban by using VPNs etc, but if companies are held accountable for having underage people on their platforms it'll incentivize them to try harder to prevent them gaining access.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭nolivesmatter


    All problems for the social media companies to worry about and solve. We should just be focused on penalizing the ****.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,665 ✭✭✭wonga77


    Jesus seems I hit a nerve. I was suggesting someway that would stop people posting anonymously on the likes of Twitter etc.
    People have no issue verifying their ID to the likes of betting companies, dating sites etc.
    I wouldnt trust those sites any more than a social media site tbh



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,665 ✭✭✭wonga77


    Very true but most of these companies have a fairly wonky moral compass so they wont really give a dam if 3 year olds are using their platforms. But I take your point, in theory it should incentivise them



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,068 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    How about you parent your own children instead of expecting everyone else to give their personal data to more online companies.



Advertisement
Advertisement