Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Mod Note Added 02/09/25*

1399400401402403405»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,809 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    That's nuts, in South Korea a whole city cost 40 billion dollars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    Jesus.

    There are very, very few countries worldwide who do not allow people to gain citizenship. And the reason for that is there are great benefits to both the states and the applicants.

    I'd get into it with you, but as you invoked the very racist replacement theory I'm really not arsed.

    Do a little research though. It's literally never been easier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,413 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    We don't have to give citizenship to people so why should we.

    What benefit does it actually provide for Irish people, people can work and pay taxes without citizenship so it provides no benefits to Ireland as a country.I have no problem with some people being given citizenship but it;'s being handed out too easily in my opinion.

    The replacement theory is real whether you want to believe it or not, between 20% and 25% of the people living in Ireland today were not born in Ireland, that'll keep on increasing over the years and this demographic change has essentially happened in the last 30 years where prior to that we had barely anybody living in the country who were born overseas. There has been an even bigger demographic change in the UK in a similar period , entire parts of cities changing beyond recognition in a few decades.You can pretend it isnt happening if you want but it definitely is happening.

    Truth is you can't actually find any argument against people who point out that ethnic replacement is happening so you pretend it's purely a racist conspiracy theory and beneath you so you won't bother arguing, when in fact it's just basically observable reality.

    It is possible to have an emigration system which allows people to move to a country live here and yet still keep the numbers low enough so it doesn't stretch resources and stop people who are unlikely to benefit the country from being allowed to emigrate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,888 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    I don’t believe that there is some shadowy cabal orchestrating the replacement of white people - that idea probably does have its roots in racist conspiracy theories

    That being said, it is simply impossible to deny that the native populations of many European countries are gradually being replaced. Look at London, white British are now a minority there, in their own capital city. This pattern will presumably continue on its course.

    Some people might say “so what?” to that…but then these same people would go mad if the native population of Fiji or whatever was crowded out by big influxes of white Americans or Brits.
    But the same happening to the native people of our small island is something to be welcomed for some reason that is never explained.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney



    Can you not stick your question on citizenship into chatgpt and get a little informed before spouting a load of nonsense online?
    Of course there are major economic and social benefits to citizenship. That's why just about every country in the world does it. Is every country having their population replaced? How's that going to work?

    The replacement theory is not real. It's absolutely ridiculous.

    Truth is you can't actually find any argument against people who point out that ethnic replacement is happening so you pretend it's purely a racist conspiracy theory and beneath you so you won't bother arguing, when in fact it's just basically observable reality.

    I don't need to even look this up. The fertility rate in Ireland has fallen from a peak of about 4 kids per woman in the mid 60s to about 1.5 kids today. The ethnic Irish are in decline of their own accord.
    Added to that we have an attractive economy where we cannot fill the roles available with the native population, and you have a requirement for plenty of immigration just to keep things afloat.

    The origins of the replacement theory come from far-right racist lunatics. It's not happening. It requires a malevolent global elite who are orchestrating it all for some mad reason. It's just completely and utterly mad and stupid.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,413 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    So you agree it is happening, fewer Irish kid's being born and people being brought in from abroad to fill the gap. That is what replacement migration is, I don't happen to think it is a good idea though, much better to encourage an increase in the number of Irish kids being born by providing better benefits for families, this won't work in all cases but it will work in some, I know some of my friends who would have liked a 3rd child but couldn't afford one due to childcare and housing expenses and having the mother out of work for too long.

    There is no malevolent global elite orchestrating it, it's being orchestrated right in front of us by government and EU policies. It isn't a conspiracy theory it's observable reality.

    What are the major benefits to Ireland (not to the people getting citizenship) of giving out citizenship in such large numbers? Please answer the question, you are the one who is claiming it is beneficial so back up that claim. In my opinion there really are no real world benefits as they can work and contribute without being citizens.

    Again I didn't say nobody should be entitled I just said we should be more picky.

    You essentially are proposing Pyramid Scheme economics which means continuous population growth in order to prop up economies, I would argue such policies are incredibly detrimental to the world at large and far more effort should have been put into things by economists, policy makers , politicians etc to change this way of operating .At some point population growth will have to slow for the whole world, what do we do then when the solution for the economy is just increasing population, it's just kicking the can down the road to be dealt with it in 50/100 years time rather than addressing the problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 403 ✭✭sekiro


    So you admit the replacement itself is real but it is not being done intentionally?

    Pointing out that the demographics of Ireland are changing is fine.

    Suggesting that government policy is driving that demographic change is not just a far-right but also racist conspiracy theory.

    So the difference is that when the "ethnic Irish" (your words, not mine) are "in decline of their own accord" that's just the way the world is but if it's suggested that local government or EU policy is responsible for the decline then it crosses over to very racist replacement theory?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    1 + 1 = 2

    You take one Irish person, add another person from abroad, now you have 2 people. Nobody got replaced. Award that immigrant with citizenship eventually and you've got yourself 2 Irish people. Nobody has ceased to exist. Nobody has been replaced.
    I worked in tech for decades. We were filling roles with immigrant workers (many of whom are now citizens) because we couldn't fill those roles with Irish people. It had absolutely nothing to do with replacement. Nothing.

    We have a demographic crisis. It's the fault of many things, but not inward migration.
    Immigrants will form a part of the solution to the crisis. Well, if they're not all scared off by the replacement theorists.

    You essentially are proposing Pyramid Scheme economics which means continuous population growth in order to prop up economies, I would argue such policies are incredibly detrimental to the world at large and far more effort should have been put into things by economists, policy makers , politicians etc to change this way of operating .At some point population growth will have to slow for the whole world, what do we do then when the solution for the economy is just increasing population, it's just kicking the can down the road to be dealt with it in 50/100 years time rather than addressing the problem.

    Nope. I'm saying we're facing the bleak prospect of population decline. Immigration can obviously help a lot but cannot and will not be a panacea.
    I agree with you that much more should be done to make having children more attractive and affordable. But if you look at Scandinavian countries you'll see that this isn't a panacea either.

    Your ideal country sounds a lot like Japan. **** all citizenship. Very low numbers of immigrants generally.
    Their economy and society is not far off doomed, and a significant factor in that is their historic views on immigration.
    Now the elderly in Japan present a massive and growing burden on the young and working aged population.
    They've recently realised how stupid their policies have been, and have launched an array of schemes intended to encourage inward migration, but it's too little too late.

    As for the benefits of citizenship, here's what ChatGPT says and I broadly agree. I don't know why I have to do this for you though:

    Granting citizenship to immigrants is widely regarded as a significant positive for both the individuals and the host country, primarily by fostering full societal and economic integration. When immigrants naturalize, they gain permanent security and a greater sense of belonging, which allows them to make long-term plans for their careers, education, and homeownership without the constant fear of deportation. This stability is a key factor in improving their economic prospects; studies show that a naturalized citizen's individual earnings increase, which in turn boosts the national tax base and local spending power. Furthermore, citizenship allows immigrants to participate fully in the democratic process by voting and running for certain offices, giving them a voice in their communities and strengthening the country's overall democracy. Ultimately, a pathway to citizenship is seen as an investment that can increase the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), create jobs, and generate greater tax revenues for the nation.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,792 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    The cost of getting an Irish passport should be a lot more expensive than it is.

    A citizenship test should also be a requirement and people should have to provide evidence they have always been working and not getting any benefits.



Advertisement