Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1163316341636163816391844

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,740 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    I think what the coaches need to do is stop relying on Leinster players so much. Once upon a time they were undoubtedly the strongest team in the British and Irish Isles and many of those players deserved their places at the time. Times have changed and it's time to diversify the Irish team if we want to start winning again

    I'd imagine the thinking behind Tom Farrell is for the 2026 edition of the 6 Nations, I don't think he'll make the next world cup! I think somebody gave a statistic a few months back that finishing 3rd in the 6 nations is worth around the same as winning the world cup in financial terms so I'm glad to see evidence that they aren't trying to 'build towards the World Cup' at least



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,965 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I'll remind you of your claim. 

    on that day, the Bulls won multiple scrum penalties against Munster

    Munster’s scrum gave away at least two penalties early in that game, something covered in match recaps of the game.

    I’m asking you to provide the detail from the match recaps that you’re referencing here.

    Because my recollection is that Munster went very well at scrum time in that game. The stats, albeit over the full game, seem to bear that out: 

    • Munster retained 3 from 3 
    • Bulls only retained 6 from 8

    Even if they did give away at least 2 scrum penalties, the stats suggest they got more than parity at scrum time. That’s all part of the context. 

    But since I asked for that detail, you've reverted to quoting a single post from here and a single post from Munsterfans to back up your point, rather than anything from actual journalists. And even then, with regards this: 

    Those posts though were posted literally in the middle of the game in question, and no one challenged the view [that our front row just aren't at the level we need] put forward either.

    … literally isn't true. I rarely ever use munsterfans, but someone literally replied with the following: 

    Think the front row have been pretty solid. Pack is starting to get out muscled but I wouldn’t single them out.

    Here’s a broader point. If I started to back-up my arguments with posts from Munsterfans, how do you think that would be received here?

    With regards actual details from match recaps, here’s each mention of the scrum until Loughman went off, from RTE:

    • 13 mins: We restart with a Munster scrum in their own 22.
    • 14 mins: Lovely exit from the 22 for Munster. A solid scrum locks out, and Murray drops it back to Crowley who finds an excellent touchline, up at half-way. Textbook.
    • 23 mins: …so the Bulls will have a 5m scrum. The first two scrums today have been solid, but this is a pressure set-piece...
    • 24 mins: Bulls try to milk a penalty out of the scrum, but the referee decides to reset it...
    • 26 mins: It was a solid Munster scrum, but the Bulls recycle the ball to go into a series of phases, and Elrigh Louw powers over the line
    • 32 mins: Scrum Munster, just inside the Bulls 22.

    This suggests that, at a minimum, we were pretty solid. I'm not suggesting Loughman is some scrum titan here, I'm just calling for a bit of factual accuracy.

    With regards Porter, you know my thoughts on him. Overall, I think he's a pretty poor scrummager, even if he has some good days at scrum time like the URC final. He's incredibly prone to penalties in general, something you've defended him on in the past e.g. 6 penalties vs Wales being downplayed and "getting it slightly wrong". It's incredibly lenient.

    But what are your thoughts on Porter? Cos from your posts here it seems you're defending his scrum performance on Saturday, and pinning the blame on the ref, with Marx getting away with things.

    Which I don't think is anything close to what actually happened.

    But fwiw, you've refused to respond / acknowledge that a front-row getting subbed at 51 minutes is not indictative that they were "hauled ashore" or played poorly, at scrumtime or otherwise. Are you going to be consistent and suggest Venter and Thomas do Toit were "hauled ashore" on Saturday?

    Post edited by aloooof on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 601 ✭✭✭thamus doku


    for me using the 6 nations to build for the World Cup is not the correct thing to do. They should have used the last 4 games to build for this 6 nations.

    Also I have no problem on the team being mainly made up of Leinster team starters, but I do have a problem with them picking Leinster non starters for the Irish Squad even for development.

    For example The sight of Sheehan kelleher and Gus McCarthy in the squad is wrong. It sends the wrong signal to the players in the other provinces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,864 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    No pissing contest, just addressing the fact the Clegg seems to be opining this at every given opportunity recently as soon as there's any mention of Milne, and I disagree with him on it, it's usually all or nothing with him when it comes to player ability.

    He's entitled to his opinion of course. Milne has gone well for us in the scrum to my eye and looks to be a good signing… I'm not sure a few penalties called against him by his more experienced international colleagues is enough to convince me yet of "awful" scrummaging (plus I felt at the time a couple of them were marginal calls).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,891 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    I can make a very educated guess that Clegg, myself and many other Leinster fans on this site will have seen Michael Milne play exponentially more times than you have to make our own conclusions on him as a scrummager.

    It's not too late for him, not by any means. However, right now, he's a crap scrummager and that is the reality for him. It is what it is.

    For you to come in here and try to make it about criticism of him since he moved to Munster is trying to make this a provincial spat that it doesn't need to be.

    The reason why its worth pointing out that he's a crap scrummager is because we're talking about him as an option in the Ireland squad following a match where our scrum got absolutely annihilated, so it is a relevant point whether it hurts your feelings or not.

    If that's the line you want to go with, though, then I'll remember that next time you or anyone else brings up Sam Prendergast's defence.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,978 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    l saw Milne play a few times for Leinster, mostly off the bench. I liked him and I never noticed any problems for him in the scrum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,864 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    No feelings hurt here Pete, don't worry about that, I appreciate your concern though! I couldn't really care less how he played 3 years ago for ye, only how he's going recently, so maybe search inside that great big lovely heart of yours and give him another chance. If Stephen Archer can lock out scrums in big games in South Africa having spent his early and mid-20s being a deckchair maybe Milne can learn and improve too…

    You're entitled to your opinion, personally I'm seeing differently in his appearances for us… which is why I find it strange Clegg is constantly hammering the "crap/awful" scrummager line at every opportunity.

    Milne looks solid enough in the scrum to my untrained eye, solid enough to be Munster first choice already, he's very good in the loose. Made a bigger impression than Lee Barron for sure down this way.

    I wasn't talking about him in an international context btw, just on how he's 'awful' and 'crap' at scrummaging when I'm not seeing that. He's been in and around Ireland squads the last couple of years and played against Spain so he must have something going for him that the international coaches like. There's a plethora of props log-jammed behind Healy and Porter for almost the last decade so time will tell I guess on the Ireland front for Milne and others.

    If he turns out to be crap at scrummaging, I'll do similar to Sam in defence and I'll hold my hands up!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,060 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Milne is a grand player but was firmly behind Boyle at Leinster and would be behind McCarthy if he'd stayed.

    He's still young enough to improve his scrum technique with more game time, so hopefully that's what happens.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,370 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Your first post in response to mine opened on a provincial argument. I've linked you to posts, when Milne was still a Leinster player, highlighting my reservations about him as a scrummager. You'll also see other posters issues as well. My position on him has been the same for years now.

    You have ignored that and now gone on a different tangent. It's obvious what you're doing but whatever. You've worn down everyone with the usual nonsense. Have at it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,965 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Is there not an obvious difference between:

    • "have my reservations, sacrifices your scrum a bit, not a great scrummager, needs a lot of work on his scrummaging".

    and

    • "appalling scrummager, awful scrummager, bad scrummager and I'm not convinced he'll ever really improve"

    I don't think it's accurate to claim those positions are the same.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,370 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    I would have thought from those posts that it was obvious I felt Milne's scrummaging was bad. In the space of a year he again failed to kick on and instead moved from competing with Healy for 2nd choice to falling to 4th choice.

    These positions are in fact the same. And I'll ask you again, like I did in the Leinster thread before, to stop misrepresenting my positions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,965 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I'm sorry but there is no reasonable interpretation where these are in fact the same positions.

    It's fair to say they are both critical towards his scrummaging.

    But they are not equally critical. One set of them are way more critical.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,370 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    It's entirely reasonable to hold these are the same position. Because they are. You're now just arguing over language because you don't have a point of substance to make.

    It's pretty obvious from those posts that I thought his scrummaging was bad. It's a consistently held position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,965 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    The difference in language is the substantive point…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,740 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    For sure. If anything then financially speaking the World Cup should be used as a training session for the 6 Nations



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,370 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    From my posts it's clear what my stance on Michael Milne is; he can't scrummage. I think he's awful at it and hasn't improved on where he was a few years ago. You can even trace the progression of my thoughts on it from year to year in the posts linked.

    You're unhappy with the language of the post and that's fine. What it doesn't do is take away from a consistent position.

    What it also doesn't do is address starting another provincial shitfight for no reason. The poster was implying it was a newly held position because Milne had now joined Munster. It isn't and was shown not to be. It's incredibly tiring.

    Post edited by Clegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,437 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 372 ✭✭VayNiice


    You're wasting your time with that poster. It was the same when McCarthy was selected in the AI squad ahead of him - Jumping to Milne's defence.

    Funny they weren't calling for Milne's inclusion in the squad when he played for Leinster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,965 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    For the sake of accuracy here, the extent to which I "jumped to Milne's defence when McCarthy was selected in the AI squad ahead of him"was to post the following in the Munster thread:

    Coombes and Milne both unlucky to miss out. I think Ireland were held up over the line 5 times during the 6 Nations? You'd think those 2 would be handy additions to the squad…

    That was the entirety of my comment on both Milne and McCarthy after the squad announcement until you posted the following rubbish 2 days later.

    Interestingly I don't remember many calls outside leinster for Milne to be included before now… although I'm sure it would be the same for Mccarthy if it was him that had moved south

    Which clearly just reads as you wanting to have a swipe at Munster fans more than anything else….

    Post edited by aloooof on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 372 ✭✭VayNiice


    I'm sure in the time you spent going back through those discussions you could see that that wasn't the full extent of your comments



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,965 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Enlighten me to the full extent of my comments then?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,553 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Good job the disciplinary committee didn't review the game when checking Ryan's previous record



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,671 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,091 ✭✭✭Packrat


    The first jump in movement half attempting to use his knee isn't remotely ok.

    I also saw it and I think another one before that.

    I'd say he had lost his temper at the way the ToB decision went. If he had watched Carleys body language at all after that incident he would have seen the the ref (wrongly imo) was more put out about VDFs intervention after than he was about the actual tackle. It was obvious Ireland were getting the next card against them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭jimbob955


    But who would you drop? Which of the 3?

    Can’t drop Sheehan, no way

    Kelleher is a lion

    Gus Mac has been ear marked for a while now, has a few caps under his belt and has been in a few camps, where he gotten up to speed


    which hooker in Ireland could compare with the 3?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,308 ✭✭✭TRC10


    which hooker in Ireland could compare with the 3?

    You tell us



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 458 ✭✭Skyfloater


    For those who haven't seen it, James Tracy on the 42.ie has a good analysis of the Scrum issues against SA. It negates the overly simplistic notion that it's always Porters fault, and focuses instead on the hooker-tighthead bind as the problem. Maybe the height difference is an issue after all.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVUsKMAGOjE



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,553 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I saw a South African clip (I can't find it again to link it here) analysing Ireland running through scrum practice in the warm ups, they were highlighting the hookers hips being higher than his props, feet in the incorrect position, etc. It looked fairly basic errors considering how we folded to the SA scrum in the game.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,851 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Eh? He is jumping over the South African player on the ground. There is nothing wrong with that at all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,628 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Carley is a fairly abysmal ref. He's been in charge of so many games with highly controversial incidents



Advertisement
Advertisement