WFH is dead and buried. Right to WFH bill is pointless

A daily is tracking though no?

Yes, we are tracking the work being done as a team, any issues are better discovered in the daily.

i have the luxury to wfh which is great, i still get ppl to come in 2/3 days a week which i think is fair.

i deal with a wide variety of businesses and A LOT of companies seem to be pulling ppl back into the office full time from what i am hearing. its causing these ppl great upset etc, i get it, but im not sure what ppl can do to try keep the wfh scenario they currently have.

Off the top of my head.

Rear Window
1954 ‧ Alfred Hitchcock / John Michael Hayes,

Disturbia 2007, The Net (1995 film)

From memory, there are more scenes in peoples homes and houses than in the sewing factory.

What about Downtown Abbey.

Not sure what any of this has to do with actually real people wfh? Majority aren't sitting watching tv or soaps.

Someone made the point that some people that are working from home are watching the soaps, but the soaps feature drama that is far from WFH, the office and workplaces were worthy of that drama but WFH is not since nothing happens. They are watching soaps about drama that is far away from WFH while WFH, that's the point.

WFH is so much better and I still think it will be the future despite the current resistance from big companies that tend to have older senior management.

It’s absolutely unsustainable madness to have thousands and thousands of cars spending hours queuing to get into Dublin to do jobs that can easily be done remotely.

Younger generations are more and more tech savvy and know how to collaborate without needing to physically be together.

if your point is that in-office is better than WFH because there is less 'drama' and its less interesting working from home, so there is less material for TV shows……..then okay, thats good for you.

i think most of us would be happier with the workplace that would better allow their work to be completed sufficiently while keeping an acceptable work/life balance. for alot of, if not most, people that is working from home for the majority of the time

but it is based on real life, its an exagerrated and spiced up take on real life yes, but it has to have some basis on reality to be relevant , why are so many people addicted to soaps ? WFH is real yes, but its not spicy enough or interesting enough for soaps , therefore it doesn't feature whereas offices and workplaces are interesting and do feature in soaps and dramas .

Could be worse could be trying to get through to private company like Ticketmaster or Virgin Media.

Only Fools and Horses - set largely in the home and pub - no sign of a traditional office there.

Thats not an analogy for working from home, del boy was a self employed entrepreneur not an office worker, his work place was the market not his apartment. In any case his employees were grandad and Rodney who were always with him physically, that's where the humour came from . They weren't sitting at home in front of a desktop with headphones on with grandad in Dublin and Rodney in the market. That's what I mean when I say it's not material for drama, soaps or comedy

With "the office " even though they were basically sitting in front of desk tops too the drama came from the interaction between the different characters physically in the office and with the people not in the office all day but in the warehouse at the back. The reality of most office based workers is that they support a physical real world production

One poster is just obsessed with discussing tv shows because one show The Office was set in an office so that means that all tv shows are comparable to wfh for some reason.