Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1719720722724725859

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭badabing106


    Your analogy misses the central point: the goal isn’t to moralise about who the “good” or “bad” neighbour is,it’s to end the most devastating war since world war 2.. If Trump is the one who finally brings the war to an end, that outcome matters more than any idealistic perfections. Peace achieved pragmatically is still peace

    Biden had years to de-escalate this conflict but chose to avoid any direct talks. Sanctions and slogans and more weapons didn’t save 1,000,000 lives or end the bombing, they prolonged them. Trump, for all his flaws, understands that strength and negotiation often go hand in hand. That’s why he’s been able to get adversaries to the negotiating table

    It’s convenient to condemn Trump’s methods, but results speak louder than moral posturing. If he can actually bring peace where countless seasoned diplomats in Europe and bidens admin have failed, that deserves recognition, not ridicule.

    P.s....i thinkThe Nobel Prize is supposed to reward tangible progress toward peace ,not reward speeches that achieve nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭brickster69


    It's not going to get sorted in a week this thing. It's going to take months and months to finalise. Too much speculation and leaks from the press confusing everyone also.

    Sounds like the Russians reject any Europeans having a role in any negotiations like they said in the past and just dealing with the US and Ukraine now.

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,705 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    I don't think I agree really on US successfully dictating policy, despite their power/influence.

    I think the US doesn't know its own arse from its elbow at the moment, as regards strategy for ending the war or security in Europe (beyond pro Russian instinct and desires for personal profit of people in current US admin), and is flailing around here without achieving very much at all.

    The US is militarily and economically more powerful than any single European country - we all know that.

    The only way we can possibly stand up to the US (or indeed China) is to get ourselves organised, and speak and act in unison.

    Even standing up to Russia (far weaker than those 2) is much harder when every country has an independent position (as they often do) and there is a requirement to constantly to seek consensus to act collectively.

    Given I think from your posting record and politics I think you'd be a quite Eurosceptic type, with a very dim view of the EU project you seem to want to have your cake and eat it too as regards attacking "Europe" for impotency here?

    What are you expecting here - a Xi/Putin/Donald Trump leader for the EU who will issue decrees in our name or send some flunkies off to do secret "smoke filled room" type negotiations with Putin and his gang of scumbags on behalf of everyone in "Europe".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,322 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    The US is the world's biggest superpower, by a long shot. It has a singular president.

    Europe is over 40 countries that "work together". They aren't the same thing and the two situations aren't very comparable.

    I fully agree that Europe needs to grow teeth, gear up, etc, etc - but it's not easy. And dealing with Trump on top of that is not easy (for anyone).

    As for Kallas's comments - it's a very large game of 3D chess going on and game theory, all sides are asking for things they know they won't get to leverage other demands. Privately I would suspect a whole bunch of players know the Russians will reject all this - but are positioning so that the optics once again reflect on how unreasonable/irrational Putin's Russia is - all topped off in being forced to vie for Trump's random whims.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Ukraine media on the Pokrovsk situation. It seems some of the maps shown recently were a month out of date and the ones released on the day of the Geneva talks were not realistic also.

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,682 ✭✭✭Deub


    Ending a war by rewarding the agressor is a sure way to deter any other countries to have the same idea and least of all, China.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,657 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    It's a catch 22 if the aggressor is known for civilian massacres and for lying to civilians. You won't even discuss the issue of the genocide so your perspective isn't exactly reliable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,070 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    It is not true that theyve gone back to the original Trump plan. But the White House is saying more talks are needed with Russia and Ukraine. Bricksters posts on this conflict should be treated with a pinch of salt as they always give rose tinted accounts for Russia of whats going on on the battlefield.

    Visegrád 24 in the past has been accused of sharing false or unverified content. For instance, a claim that Leonardo DiCaprio donated $10 million to Ukraine was posted and later retracted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,657 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    By your logic, Neville Chamberlain was a wonderful peacemaker. The reality is Russia is a genocidal state and appeasing them runs the risk of consequences that will outlive Trump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,070 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Babading, would you not acknowledge that the progress to democracy in the world - including the West - was a violent process, punctuated by war, revolution, and protest not always peaceful? Would it have been better then to stick with absolute monarchy just to have military peace? I personally don't think so.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,496 ✭✭✭✭Jelle1880


    Interesting, because the maps you consistently show make it seem like all of Pokrovsk is under Russian control when in reality it's everything below the railway? Gotta make up your mind.

    FYI that's been the situation for a while now, around 2 weeks or so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,237 ✭✭✭wassie


    Bricksters posts on this conflict should be treated with a pinch of salt as they always give rose tinted accounts for Russia of whats going on on the battlefield.

    Or what ever BlyatGPT happens to be spitting out at the time…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,254 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Reward Russia with 25% of Ukraine you're just asking the likes of Israel to annex more of Palestine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,322 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    No.

    Biden and most European leaders didn't have options to "de-escalate" this conflict. It's an invasion of choice by Putin that was going ahead regardless. There are no legitimate validations for it. No legitimate grievances. It's to conquer territory and subjugate and redraw borders.

    These leaders have relatively normal values and principles

    Putin sycophants like Trump (Orban, etc) don't have those values - therefore, in an ironic way, Putin is more likely to do a deal with them.

    That's it. There's nothing more high level than that.

    I'll welcome any respectable peace - but if it's "achieved" through Trump it's only because of Trump's hideous faults and fondness for dictators - not anything of principle or value. If a used carpet salesman gets a deal with Putin - likewise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,070 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Biden was actually too slow and cautious. Hardly any Abrams tanks got there and stripped of their hi-tech features, though I understand they didnt want to risk them falling into Russian hands.

    I think he made a number of missteps before the war too, such as the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan. I'm.not saying he shouldn't have withdrawn, but the withdrawal was implemented incompetently. I think Putin was emboldened by that, assuming Zelensky would flee the country like Ashraf Ghani. Jake Sullivan should have resigned after that I think.

    By many accounts, Jake Sullivans caution during the war was a factor in slowing down deliveries. There was $6bn of Congressional mandated spending for Ukraine left unspent when Biden left office.

    Post edited by Ozymandius2011 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,218 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    In the end any deal has to be acceptable to the two countries at war. No amount of deal artistry or general jiggery-pokery can get around that awkward fact. We are also being told by our American friends that both sides will have to make compromises. Remind me what Russia is doing in that regard.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,864 ✭✭✭zv2


    If you believe Trump wants peace I have some magic beans to sell you. Trump wants Ukraine to surrender and he dresses up surrender as peace. He "wants to stop the killing" - if he really cared about human life so much why did he facilitate the slaughter of the Gazans? He is a divisive and very compromised individual. The Russians have him over a barrel.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,070 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    He is so eager to be in Putins good books its bizarre.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,322 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Oh I'd agree -with hindsight many leaders were too cautious.

    But hindsight goes both ways - if Trump had been President when Putin invaded, perhaps he would have supported the invasion and Ukraine would be in a much worse position now (he called Putin a genius for it) or conversely he could have sparked a nuclear conflict.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 517 ✭✭✭8mv


    Lavrov confirming that 'understandings' were reached in Alaska and that they will not accept any proposals that are in conflict with that. Trump not to be trusted under any circumstances.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/russia-says-amended-us-peace-plan-must-reflect-spirit-letter-trump-putin-summit-2025-11-25/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,496 ✭✭✭✭Jelle1880


    Who could have predicted that. Oh right, everyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,070 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Negotiations behind Ukraines back are not going to end this. In fact they are more likely to prolong the war. Peoples livelihoods and property in Ukraine are at stake. If you had spent your life building up.a business or saving for a house, or paying a mortgage, would you accept handing all that over to Putin? If you are a farmer, would you accept a deal handing it over to Putin? Because it's been reported a Russian oligarch called Tkachev seized 400,000 acres of farmland in occupied Ukraine.

    Meanwhile, reports a Russian Tapir Class warship has been hit by a Ukrainian drone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,231 ✭✭✭Field east


    Do you not see that the Kallas suggestions are very strategic. Have them on there as bargining chips . As a matter of fact more conditions to be met by Ru could be added eg Ru to give up being a member of the various alliances it is a member of



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,070 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Danish authorities spotted Russian military aboad vessels of the ghost fleet. Possible connection to drones over Denmark recently. Also the Dutch tried ground based weapons to shoot down drones. Oslo airport suspended traffic because of drones recently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,369 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Ukraine says 'understanding' reached with US on peace plan, as Trump says his envoy will meet Putin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,369 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Is it a bird, is it a plane, no it's Drone Guy

    All down to Drone Guy, it doesn't inspire confidence



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,158 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Putin doesn't want peace. He wants a 'forever war' to keep his hold on Russia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    I simply cannot see Ukraine agreeing to giving up land. So it’s already a non starter from the Russians bullshit point of view.

    The fact Ukraine is even entertaining this “plan” is applaudable



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,218 ✭✭✭wildgreen


    This has been led with the opposite drivers, Israel stealing land may have emboldened Russia.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,369 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Yep, we all know where did is going, Putin will refuse a deal, and Zelensky will get blame



Advertisement
Advertisement