Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1163016311633163516361640

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 geoff2204


    absolutely nuts that Gus McCarthy gets picked over someone like Tom Stewart or whoever is 1st choice at Connacht and Munster at the time. I'm not even trying to debate who is better. I just think it's bad for Irish rugby. The message to Gus Mccarthy should be if you want to play for Ireland you need to be playing week in week out for your province. This should also be the message for everyone in Ireland. without to much thinking Ditto the Connacht log jam at scrum Half or maybe even Ulster centres. (I just want to be sure I am not being perceived as anti Leinster) It will improve the players and it will improve the national team. It will also improve the provinces and make the interpros more of a probables vs possibles each time. It's a no brainer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    "First choice Ulster player Tom Stewart" - he started one game in the 24/25 season for Ulster in totality (a loss to Zebre). Had he been healthy when Gus McCarthy was called up in November '24 then he would have been selected, but he wasn't.

    There were plenty moaning about Paddy McCarthy's undeserved inclusion in the squad this November too, but we don't hear so much from them now that he's proven he's a viable option internationally there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,293 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    He is being ironic.

    We really need to stop with the ‘cohesion’ or ‘familiar with the system’ **ite

    No one ever, ever argues that we should pick players for cohesion and systems. It is only ever thrown out there - as in this case - to have a dig at the Ireland coaches and accuse them of Leinster bias, but people somehow think this is a clever way of doing it.

    Tiresome would be the kindest description of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Straight up question, FFF.

    Do you think there is a difference between claiming Leinster bias and the position that some selection decisions may go to way of the Leinster player because of cohesion / familiarity?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭exiledawaynothere


    Hold on. It was used by the coaches to justify selections - particularly during the Lancaster days. Less said by it now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 26,591 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I don't know was it used by the coaches but it was certainly used by posters here in their attempt to stymie discussions on selections.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,002 ✭✭✭hold my beer




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,002 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    MOD EDIT

    Poster warned

    Post edited by Lost Ormond on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,293 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Not really, no. Certainly not in the intent with which it gets claimed here.

    The current complaint is about Gus McCarthy over Tom Stewart so let's look at them as an example.

    Gus McCarthy made his Leinster debut in April 2024 and his first start in September 2024. He was playing for Emerging Ireland in October 2024 and made his test debut the following month. He had a few months and a handful of matches as a senior Leinster player - and only under the Nienaber regime - before leapfrogging Stewart for Ireland (as well as McKee and Barron at Leinster). What level of cohesion and familiarity could he possibly have achieved in such a short period?

    Tom Stewart played for Emerging Ireland in September 2022, called up to senior squad for the 2023 Six Nations and pre-RWC training, made his debut in the warm-ups and named again in the 2024 6N squad. Then he was supplanted by McCarthy, two years after his introduction to the Ireland set-up.

    The usual explanation we get is that Farrell just robbed Lancaster's playbook, but if McCarthy never played under Lancaster, how much does that apply here?

    Any reasonable observer would say that the guy with the two year head-start in the Ireland environment would be more familiar and cohesive. So no, I don't think there's a difference here.

    Maybe they just picked the player they thought was better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,011 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    There is, it's the Leinster guy whinging about the Munster guy whining.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Tom Stewart was injured anyway at the time when the November 2024 squad was selected. He didn't play for Ulster last season until late November.

    Gus wasn't even selected ahead of him, Gus was fast-tracked into the squad because at the time the squad was announced we had what several news headlines described as an "injury crisis" at hooker.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    You'll note that "the current complaint" isn't my current complaint tho, so lets make that distinction at the outset.

    The broader points are:

    • You've accused me of rolling out "Leinster bias" in the past when I've never done so. I think there's an obvious difference between claiming a decision has went with cohesion in mind, rather than it being bias on behalf of the coaches.
    • You often take umbrage as this being posters "having a dig at the Ireland coaches". But where does "a career of mediocrity" sit on the spectrum of "having a dig" at a player? The point being, you're more than happy, on occasion, to "have a dig" yourself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,293 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    You'll note that "the current complaint" isn't my current complaint tho, so lets make that distinction at the outset

    I didn't say it was, so distinction not required. It was the complaint being discussed in the thread before you chimed in.

    The broader points are:

    You've accused me of

    That's not the broader point at all, that's your beef with me. I doubt the wider board wants another episode of that particular saga.

    where does "a career of mediocrity" sit

    Again, completely unrelated to this topic and only airing out your grievances with me. If you believe that there are no mediocre players in Ireland, that's fine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Correct, my beef is that you accuse me of Leinster bias when I have never claimed as much.

    If you want to believe that there are no mediocre players, that's fine.

    Well, at least now you are admitting you did say "career of mediocrity". Progress.

    My point is, on the one hand you seem to take umbrage almost any time there's criticism of Farrell, but on the other you're happy to dish out fairly hefty criticism yourself when it suits.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 geoff2204


    ok fair enough. but, my point is that if we want the national team to improve we need our best players playing regularly in the most competitive games they can find. Not making the leinster 23 for europe should preclude you from selection for Ireland in my opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,048 ✭✭✭TRC10


    The message to Gus Mccarthy should be if you want to play for Ireland you need to be playing week in week out for your province. 

    Minutes played for their respective province last season

    Tom Stewart: 235

    Gus McCarthy: 583

    Look, I’m all for guys in form for their province playing for Ireland. But if you’re going to use that argument to fight a guys case. Then they have to be, you know, playing rugby.

    McCarthy got in because Stewart was injured. Sure, they could have selected Rob Herring or Niall Scannell, but that would have been a bit regressive IMO. If Tom Stewart keeps playing and stays injury free, I’ve no doubt he’ll be back in as the third hooker.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    We should pick the best players available, and avoid setting any other selection criteria on it.

    Of the current Ireland squad - the only players who arguably aren't in the Leinster 23 for Europe are Paddy McCarthy / Jack Boyle (one of them obviously will be this season), Gus McCarthy, and maybe Tom Clarkson.

    None of those players were problematic for Ireland this November - Paddy McCarthy was one of the few bright spots of the series, Gus McCarthy did well in his cameo v Japan, Jack Boyle didn't feature at all and Clarkson was pretty good both times he featured.

    The LHPs are where they are because there are no real viable alternatives to them. There's not much really between Boyle and Milne, but Milne equally doesn't have a lot of European experience. Denis Buckley has played 40+ games in Europe, but the notion he should be in the Ireland squad ahead of these guys is nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 82 ✭✭jimbob955


    I think one of P Mac or Boyle should not have been included. Obviously P Mac went very well. So now he should be #2 at Leinster for the rest of the season and by default #2 for Ireland. I have no issue with that, he looks very competent and promising. But now Boyle should not be picked for the 6Ns, he has very very little game time for Leinster and 0 minutes for Ireland this Autumn (which I think was an awful waste). So for the next 6Ns the #3 LHP has to come from a different province surely.

    Now if both Porter and P Mac gets injured the next few months. Boyle will be #1 LHP for Leinster, therefore guaranteeing him being #1 for Ireland

    There was an article in the Indo about calling for a couple of squad changes. At centre Hugh Cooney was mentioned. I see why he could get picked, he is familiar with Henshaw/Ringrose/Prend/Frawley/Osborne etc etc. He would bring more cohesion to an already cohesive unit. If AF took a chance and picked one of Kelly, Gavin, Forde, Posthletwaite, Hume it is very very risky, they would not bring the same level of cohesion and familiarity. Even though some of them have multiple more URC minutes played than Cooney. Perhaps at the last 6Ns training camp Cooney trained the Carton House down and pulled up aforementioned trees, I presume he did. Exciting times ahead



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 geoff2204


    i am not saying denis buckley should be in the squad. I am saying another prop, like boyle, should be getting games in Europe in his place. I would have thought having as many of our top props as possible playing highest level would be axiomatic? Honestly can't see why we would debate this. Kiwis/Saffas wouldn't let players do it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,018 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    I'm surprised that Andy didn't come out and blame Leinster for the set piece. He picks the entire Leinster pack and probably only trains the set piece in so far as it launches strike plays. I feel he depends on the Leinster cohesion for the basics.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,314 ✭✭✭50HX


    I will speak for myself here re Paddy Mc.

    I questioned his inclusion based on limited club minutes, went on a summer tour & wasn't selected.

    The same summer tour the head coach wasn't present at & then gets dropped in v NZ.

    All valid points imo at the time esp when we have Boyle there as well & thinking we could build on his test appearances to date.

    Delighted for Paddy & Farrell that a call like that paid off hugely.

    As ever there are a cohort of posters who will defend Farrell no matter what as is there a cohort who will bemoan their own provincial players not being selected....the sweet spot is somewhere in the middle.

    Whats apparent is the likes of both Mccarthys now look to be in the wider Irish 23's goin forward whilst at the same time briadly being 2nd & prob 3rd choice for their club when it comes to CC knockout games….that is not a good place to be in long term re international level.

    The question then is are they that much better than their counterparts at other provences or is it back to the cohesion/systems familiarity point



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,018 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    IMO if the replacement SA front row were available for selection, I'm not sure Andy would even pick them. He sees the set piece as an evil to be endured in order to launch attacks. He's playing League in Union. Somehow I think Andy would find these guys not mobile enough.

    Andy now, because of rule changes, finds himself back playing Union, but still has the personnel for his original league-based game plan. He's now trying to squeeze round pegs into square holes. If Andy wants to kick the leather off the ball, he'll faster wingers and a bigger pack.

    There's little doubt in my mind that Loughman and Jager are better in the scrum than Paddy McCarty and Bealham. I would put Paddy on par with Josh Wycherley, same size, but Josh is probably the better in the scrum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,293 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    whilst at the same time briadly being 2nd & prob 3rd choice for their club when it comes to CC knockout games…

    This might upset some people but… playing CC knockout games is exactly why squad players might want to stay at Leinster rather than be first choice elsewhere.

    (Now, that might be about to change this season, if things continue as they have been going…)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 82 ✭✭jimbob955


    I too was slightly critical of P Mac being picked. But he did very well, i stand corrected. But I don't think Boyle should be picked for the 6Ns, if he still #3 at Leinster.

    I disagree on the other players mentioned above. I don't think Josh is at the same level as P Mac. He has had a few years in the Munster set up and has struggled at times against the bigger URC teams. Also you lose familiarity and cohesion, and tree pulling ability if you pick Josh. I suppose on the other hand the thing about Loughmam, Jager, Josh is that they all played Leinster schools rugby, they have come through a strong pipeline so in theory should be able to step up quicker in Ireland camp ahead of say Wilson at Ulster, he would find it very hard to step up to the camp



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,314 ✭✭✭50HX


    Agree completely, if a player is happy to be in the wider leinster squad & getting scraps of minutes in the hope that a few injuries bump them up the pecking order then thats a reflection on them as well as the system.

    Likes of Barron & Milne moves will become more frequent i feel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,011 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Gus McCarthy needs to go on loan to another province for a year. If he has a great season, and I'm pretty confident he would, then he can talk with Leinster about his future and make a decision on whether it's better for him to stay there or move on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,018 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    I think Leinster need to concentrate on the URC BEFORE thinking about competing in the Champions Cup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭FtD v2




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,037 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    we will end the convo about Wycherly etc playing schools cup in Leinster and its relevance to Irish camp as it has nothing to do with his ability/chances in irish senior camp

    I dont think either wycherly is good enough to step up as theyre just not physically big enough.

    MOD. we will not continue this type of discussion here



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,236 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    When it comes to weighting starting for another Province Vs being 2nd/3rd choice at Leinster, I imagine there's always an element of comparative competition that factors in, rightly or wrongly. It's a harder task to be the first choice front row for Leinster than it is for Connacht.

    Complaining that guys who left Leinster aren't getting picked ahead of lads who were rated higher by the Leinster coaches. If Milne or Barron were so good, they would still be playing for Leinster.



Advertisement