Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Republic of Ireland General Discussion Thread 2026

1144145147149150256

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,563 ✭✭✭✭billyhead


    That Times article is paywalled.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,114 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    https://www.balls.ie/football/results-ireland-world-cup-play-off-draw-644558



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,693 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I was sk sure this is how it would go.

    Be 2-1 up and concede in the 96th minute and like always end in a draw.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,828 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Its simple assuming we jump Albania we are in Pot 2 currently.

    If Macedonia draw or beat Wales

    AND Austria draw or beat Bosnia

    we stay in Pot 2.

    If Wales OR Bosnia get a win we fall to Pot 3.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,571 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    That times article has bosnia 75th, why would a win put them into pot 2 ahead of us(62 in that times article)?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,828 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    A win makes Bosnia group winners and through automatically leaving the play-offs entirely.

    Austria would then fall into the play-offs and into Pot 1. Pushing Poland down to Pot 2 and us into Pot 3.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,406 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    Wouldn't mind Slovakia, watching this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,828 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,178 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Most people accept that SK's reign didn't work out.

    There are more now trying to rewrite history for Mick's reign, trying to make out that it wasn't that bad and that he would have won the playoff against Slovakia when there was zero evidence he would have done so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,145 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Really, for fairness sake, we should've been rolling things all the way back to MON for the playoff, since he's the one whose Nations League campaign actually earned it 😅

    We've had some tough times since 2016… great to finally have something a bit more tangibly positive happening. Can enjoy living with hope for the next ~5 months now at least. And from there, who knows.

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,114 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    Kenny’s Ireland scored one goal in his first 8 matches. Micks team hadnt that sort of a record. One more goal vs Denmark would have qualified them directly.

    And how in the name of Jesus could anyone argue Kenny’s reign did work out without resorting to strong drugs.


    why we even have to talk about it I don’t know



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,267 ✭✭✭Peter Flynt


    Yep we are still living with the aftershock of SK's reign as the ranking position got so bad we are now forced into an away SF tie in the draw on Thursday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,693 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Didn't we set some record for consecutive games without scoring ?

    That was the closest I ever came to total apathy for Ireland. At least when Stan was useless you knew there was a team there if he would fuk off and with Kenny I liked the kids coming through despite the results. But that weird team of journeyman had some lads I actively hated and seeing Jeff Hendrick and Cyrus Christie would almost have you cheering for the opposition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,114 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    Kenny’s team went 7 games without scoring a goal. Didn’t get the sack.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,267 ✭✭✭Peter Flynt


    We went 14 months (7 matches) without scoring a goal under SK - from his second to eight match. The signs were there early on. He would have been devastated at how it all turned out but football doesn't give much room for sentimentality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 127 ✭✭Ignacius


    Do yellow card accumulations cause bans for the play offs?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,114 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    the people trying to say it wasn’t that bad or wasn’t that worst than other regimes do him no favours as they just get responses that showed how much worst than every other regime we’ve ever had.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 127 ✭✭Ignacius


    sorry found the answer

    https://www.sportbible.com/football/football-news/fifa-world-cup/ireland-world-cup-hungary-players-banned-play-offs-196962-20251116



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,178 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    What the actual f*ck are you talking about?

    You're replying to my post which specifically says the SK reign didn't work out, trying to argue why it didn't work out as if I've said something different.

    I'm talking about people in this thread who are arguing that Mick would have done a better job. There is zero evidence to support that, because his second term was so sh*te and he achieved nothing, and he achieved it with a squad that needed to be gutted out quite frankly.

    It's impossible to talk to anybody here, because when there is a frank and honest conversation to be had about how sh*te Mick's second term was, it's just a bunch of people saying 'but but Kenny'. Talk to me about Mick, because that's the point I'm arguing.

    If you think the spell we had in the doldrums would have been different under any other manager, you're deluded. It's that simple. It's that entitled obnoxious arrogance I was talking about earlier that Ireland should be doing this, that and everything because we are Ireland, and nothing to do with the players available to us at the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 843 ✭✭✭RonanG86


    And if your granny had wheels, she'd be a wagon.

    Things under Mick were fairly poor. We didn't score from open play in 180 minutes against Georgia (Pre-Kvartskhelia and pre-Mamardashvili Georgia too) and racked up a staggering 3, including 1 OG and 1 last minute goal, in 180 minutes against the mighty Gibraltar.

    Basically, all we had was late hoofing to scam draws when Denmark and Switzerland didn't kill us off. Heimir's taken that approach and done better with it in terms of both performance and results in the past 5 days alone.

    What I would say in Mick's favour is he had a lot of pure muck in the team, even towards what Kenny had. He had Randolph, Coleman, John Egan, McGoldrick and the tail end of McClean being a good enough winger. Brady was constantly injured and the rest were very limited. Even Duffy was basically just a big obelisk that you'd hope wouldn't make a mistake at the back and could then stick up top for the last five minutes. And most of the players who came through later under Kenny were either too young when Mick was there or just weren't playing any football. He couldn't really call up anyone else.

    He recalled a 34 year old Glenn Whelan and he was one of our better players that campaign. Says a lot.

    Things are still a long way from being okay on the player front. I was thinking about it last night, and apart from the first XI last night (and there are question marks about some of them), there's only Knight, Bazunu, Brady, Johnston, Ferguson, and maybe Manning who've generally played okay for us. After that you're into guys who've never really done anything for us and taking a punt on someone like Andrew Moran. And if we do get to the World Cup we're talking about a 26 man squad. We have 17-18 who you could say deserve to be there.

    If Coleman gets injured we're in serious trouble, for example. Who the hell do we put at right wing back? Ebosele is a one trick pony who is stumped if he encounters an opponent that can deal with his pace and I never want to see Matt Doherty in an Ireland shirt again. What Sam Curtis doing at St. Johnstone?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,114 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    well no…you said “Most people accept that SK's reign didn't work out.” So I queried were those not in the “most people” group under the influence of drugs? I reacted to your own statement.


    If you want to discuss the Mick reign - it ended with a one one draw vs Denmark where one more goal and a win would have qualified us. So…pretty acceptable..then Kenny took over and we scored once in the next 8 games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,828 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Micks second term might have been shíte as you say but the evidence he might have done better is that he never reached the absolute levels of diarrhea Kenny did. Naturally you don't want to discuss that.

    Going from bad to worse isn't fcukin progress and trying to claim that the bad was somehow worse than the worse is just delusional.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,178 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    "One more goal and win would have qualified us."

    And yet we never even came close to it. We poxed a draw against Denmark and we were delighted with it. Let's also not forget those 4 goals in 4 games against Georgia and Gibraltar. Exhilarating stuff.

    At least now we're winning games and we're not looking like one-trick ponies while doing it.

    Mick never looked like winning a game against a team at our level. That is the fact of the matter here. How you can take those results and suggest we then would have beaten Slovakia is mindblowing mental gymnastics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,178 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    And pretending that Mick's reign wasn't that bad, as I have been arguing with people here, is also delusional.

    That's the whole f*cking point, yet you're all beside yourselves trying to act like Mick would have done a much better job than SK did.

    Mick wouldn't have brought through the players that needed to be brought through at the level SK did. He stuck with what he knew and never deviated, and there was no evidence he was ever going to deviate.

    You can accept that SK's reign was awful while also accepting that Ireland was in free-fall long before he ever got the job. However people are desparate to stick the knife in that they're going to pretend otherwise.

    Mick achieved nothing in his second spell and there was zero evidence that he was going to achieve anything if he had stayed on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,114 ✭✭✭Did you smash it



    I said we’d have beaten Slovakia did I? (I didn’t)

    Micks team usually scored. Kenny’s team didn’t for 7 of his first 8 matches. So micks team had a better shot of qualification imo.


    we understand each other. We don’t agree. Best of luck to you 👍



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,857 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    Mick had us get results in 3 of the four games against the higher seeds in the group and have us one goal short of automatic qualification in the final game.

    That's being competitive

    Screenshot_2025-11-17-23-45-40-58_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,828 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Yeah Mick definitely would have kept picking the retired Randolph/McGoldrick/Whelan etc. Thank god Kenny was such a visionary to pick from out of the blue Bazunu, O'Shea, Cullen, Ferguson etc. No other manager could possibly have envisioned picking players playing in the Premier League over retired players. Revolutionary.

    The desperate straws that are grabbed to try and retcon Kenny's reign are gas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,001 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    I’m glad we won. Imagine how bad the thread would be if we lost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,504 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    This thread proves humans will always find a way to argue about shite no matter the circumstances.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,986 ✭✭✭✭briany




Advertisement
Advertisement