Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

President Connolly

  • 12-11-2025 10:06AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,513 ✭✭✭✭


    With the campaign over and President Connolly having been inaugurated yesterday, thought it would be no harm to keep track on how she's getting on as president. A number of people in the campaign thread think she will be a dangerous president, a lot of people think she will be speaking far more openly than previous presidents, let's see.

    On her first full morning I heard she is going to a Gaelscoil and they had a bit on Morning Ireland about it - it really does feel like she is putting a focus on the Irish language which is no bad thing.

    I wonder though will the limitations of the office start to constrain her a little? Watching a small bit of the inauguration yesterday and there was a whole lot of pomp and ceremony, but it also meant a whole lot of being told where to go, where to stand, when to speak, stuff like that.

    Post edited by dulpit on


«13456733

Comments

  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 12,358 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    I couldn't see what watch she was wearing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,587 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    She's going to be the TG4 (subtitled) President.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,472 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


     but it also meant a whole lot of being told where to go, where to stand, when to speak, stuff like that.

    Is this for real?

    Do you genuinely believe she resents conforming to the requirements of a formal ceremony, or that it compromises her in some way?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,513 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    No I meant it's a formal role. Doesn't have the flexibility to do what you want, when you want. That could be something that grates after a period of time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,472 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    She has spent a lifetime working within the constraints of local authorities and the Dáil, I don't see it presenting an issue at all.
    When she speaks she will pick her time and ensure she will be heard.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,962 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Mother. Psychologist. Barrister. Councillor. Mayor. TD × 3 terms. Leas Ceann Comhairle. President.

    Not bad.

    She will work very very hard.

    Day 2: This morning she will visit Gaelscoil Inse Chór in Dublin, before travelling to Co Meath, where she will visit the Trim Resource Centre. Following that, the President is due to visit Merlin Park Community Nursing Unit 5 and 6 in her home county of Galway.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,012 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    I'm just waiting to hear her first few speeches in the role as president in whatever context she at an event and how far she will push the envelope and go off topic as to what she is attending to delve into the political realm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,445 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Is the President watch the 2025 version of the Michael Tea Higgins cosy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,201 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    It's definitely timely to open a Presidency thread and move on from the election campaign.

    I'm not sure about "Watch" part of the title though because maybe it suggests there'll be a lot to see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,811 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Despite not wanting her, I would also say the role isn't powerful enough for her to be dangerous.

    I mean like a danger to what? Or who?

    She can talk all she wants, but at the end of the day she's just howling at the moon out in the Park.

    She can refer as many Bills to the Supreme Court as she likes, but when it finds them constitutional, she has no choice but to sign them. And if she still resists, or is going against the Council of State regularly, we'll have her impeached, if she hasn't resigned in protest first.

    I was watching clips of supporters of hers gathering in Galway yesterday to watch the inauguration, you know, the LGBTQIAUTISTICARTSCHOOLDROPOUTCHAMPAGNESOCIALISTINSIXHUNDREDEUROARARANJUMPER brigade, talking about the achievement and the mandate and the changes it will bring about, and yet, no one can tell me what they want, what those changes are, what they think a mandate means in the presidential context, and how anything that they suggest is actually going to be enabled by the president?!

    So have a Catherine Connolly watch, by all means, I suspect all it will show is quiet frustration.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,961 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Didn't you say "inauguration of a dangerous socialist as president" just yesterday?

    Glad you're seeing that your stance is now hyperbolic.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 11,175 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    I don't know how she could be a dangerous president, she could in theory hold up or refuse to sign legislation, but that would be a very foolish move, unless the Supreme Court upheld her decision.

    Like wise she can give as many speaches as she likes, but if she was regularly to go against the Dail for anything other than a constitutional issue, the would be foolish.

    An Irish president has one job and one job only - defend the constitution, everything else is fluff. If she was to regularly go against the people as expressed in their representation in the Dail, then that would lay the grounds for impeachment. A president in Ireland as in many European countries is a guarantor of democracy not a leader.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,012 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    A guarantor of democracy, what exactly do you mean by that?

    She was elected as president and in her election campaign she made many anti European country speeches on defence policies, also against the US and UK. She was very critical of them all. These are our economic allies and our by far biggest markets for our success economically. Free speech is a big part of democracy, and as a President, elected with a huge majority of votes, if her speeches were to continue in that vein, she could well be dangerous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,962 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Please make more illogical predictions though!

    Impeached by end 2026? With Heather to win the subsequent election?

    Do you think Harris is damaged goods now or will he survive until Taoiseach time?

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,068 ✭✭✭crusd


    YThats a particularly niche type - school drop out champagne socialists with 600 euro jumpers. Of is it more likey you think you are being smart with a catch all label but have more spectacularly missed the goal than a Mayo corner forward



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 55,435 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,100 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    I think the Irish people were deprived of choice in this election and presented in the end with two poor candidates so most people didn't vote.

    I find her views to be embarrassing personally but as long as she doesn't make a complete show of us then that would be OK with me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,823 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Most people don't vote in every election - this was no different. But I do agree, the options available were limited.

    As I've said from day 1, she will be a grand president.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,811 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The constitution was followed to the letter, so the question of deprivation doesn't arise, it simply is what it is.

    If parties, or groups of independents, or civil society organisations want to nominate someone, I suggest they do better at general election time and get their ducks in a row quite a lot earlier than September.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,811 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    You've inadvertently hit the nail on the head, because it absolutely isn't a catch all label.

    Its a rag-tag bunch of fugitives and disparate ne'er-do-wells. This illusory pan-left cohesion will be blown apart at the first challenge, be that migration policy, or the Galway West by-election campaign.

    And even if it isn't, my guys are in control of both central and local government for the next four years at least, so there's not a whole lot the other side can do anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,211 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Good call Mr D …Far too often we have the left wingers who spring up with the answers to everything.

    Not specifically referring to PC here but Keir Starmer types and the the Mayor of NY guy…..promise everything and then sink below the horizon.

    Look at the bother Starmer is in now!

    Good idea to keep an eye on them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,472 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Aye, sure FF FG never promised anything and then whoosh disappeared. 😁😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,812 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    With the promises of brexit and Trump disappearing based on convenience, I think this is not a left/right issue. Just politicians in general.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,419 ✭✭✭corkie


    Except for her inauguration speech yesterday any future public addresses will require to be approved by whatever government is of the day. So the likely of her going off topic is unlikely. As other accounts mentioned, she is aware of how to and the need follow the rules and guidelines of her office. Yesterday was he only chance of speaking that wouldn't have been restricted.

    "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." ~ George Santayana
    "But that's balanced out by the fact that it's a mandate not to do very much." ~ Prof. Eoin O'Malley



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,532 ✭✭✭creedp


     And if she still resists, or is going against the Council of State regularly, we'll have her impeached, if she hasn't resigned in protest first.


    And even if it isn't, my guys are in control of both central and local government for the next four years at least, so there's not a whole lot the other side can do anyway.

    😂😂 TBH I don’t know whether to laugh or cry! A bit of counselling might help but I’d say it’s far too late



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,616 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    TBF hes somewhat moved onto acceptance after yesterdays comments so I'd say there'll be a full recovery.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,033 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Imagine comparing Starmer and Mamdani as one and the same.

    Zero grasp of reality there.

    Starmer always campaigned on just not being a Tory. Far from Tony Blair was he and the vote share is reflective of that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,611 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    So am I, my attitude is “Go on Catherine prove me wrong, “

    if she doesn’t it will show why I didn’t vote for her. I wanted a more apolitical President.

    There is a certain vibe to some of the more enthusiastic Connolly supporters some young lad with a red beard who was on during the campaign before. Jayus he was that excited you would swear Connolly was going to change the country like some evangelist.

    Another older gent who supported Connolly didn’t seem to care what Connolly says. Saying “if she goes over the line now and again so what?” The complete opposite what I think.

    If she tears around the place leading by example visiting places etc. But dials down the rhetoric - to hints at most I will be happy enough.

    Overall thoughts are Connolly is extremely lucky to get the Presidency as circumstance and happenstance left no real contenders to effectively compete against her.

    Nationally before her campaign few would have heard of her. She certainly seems to have energy and drive for the office, I will give her that. If she keeps up the pace of day 1 she will likely be Ireland’s most energetic President.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,447 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    I think the Irish people were deprived of choice in this election and presented in the end with two poor candidates

    I'm glad to have found something I can agree with you on. The Irish people were presented with two poor candidates.

    Gavin and Humphreys were two poor candidates - appalling candidates actually.

    Luckily we also had one excellent candidate. The electorate recognised this, voted for her in great numbers (more than any previous candidate) and in an extremely high percentage, and chose her over the two poor candidates.

    Big congratulations to Catherine Connolly.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,513 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    FYI I am a left winger, I voted for Connolly, I just created this thread because it seemed silly to be discussing her presidency in the election thread.



Advertisement
Advertisement