Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

1125712581260126212631308

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Yeah, I also think it will cost a bit much but then Semenyo is sooooo good he could be elite on either side at WB and if we have to move back to a 433 in the nearish future then he is also an elite option on the wing. His quality along with his versatility would make it justfiable, imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    we played 433 and 4231 under ETH.

    and we looked like we would concede on every attack.

    maybe its not just the system, maybe it is also the players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    Yes, but that was Ten Hag. I think we can all agree tactically, he wasn't the best, and that's being very generous.

    What I'm saying is, it's what suits the best for now. Work with what's best for now, focus on improving the basics (we really need to), and then adjust tactically form there once you make the signings/improve the players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    It is not too late for that? Like we are 12 months in.

    We are arguable 1 player away from being as set for this formation as we are for any other.

    I 100% think we should have reverted to 433 or similar back in March, and try to finish the season strong. but now? Why? I don't think it will be massively different, and just create more noise when we do move back and it doesn't immediately work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 576 ✭✭✭Seattle


    Personally I wouldn't be buying a specialist wingback. Amorim may not be here next season, so it wouldn't be right to flood the squad with specialist players for his system. Someone like Semenyo would be perfect because you could imagine him doing a great job at wingback similar to Amad. But if we ever change manager/system, he can easily slot into a winger role in a 4-3-3. This is exactly the type of player we should be targeting.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    I think it would suit the players more, and as I posted up earlier, give us options in different positions as well and one more body in the middle where we get do get over-run.

    You're right, it's probably late in the game to try it now that he's committed to his system, but I believe 4-3-3 would be a better fit for the team and the squad we have right now, and that it would improve the side.

    Cunha and Mbuemo look like proper players and both have great work ethic to them with is viatl for a front 3 with two out wide, and Sesko is good at holding up the ball and getting off a pass, so I could definitely see it working with them 3 up front with Bruno as an advanced midfielder.

    Certainly compared to the Ten Hag's preferred Antony/Hojlund/Rashford triumvirate of horror.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 576 ✭✭✭Seattle


    Amorim will have 1 year left on his contract in the Summer, so we'll have to decide whether to stick or twist.

    You would hope Amorim would have us on a clear trajectory towards becoming a league title winning side and will get an extension. And the bar for that imo isn't a top 4 finish. That's a bad way of thinking about it because Mourinho, Ole and Ten Hag all got top 3 finishes but none of them ever had us looking like we were on a trajectory to becoming an elite side.

    Similarly, you can have finishes outside the top 4 and be on that trajectory, ala Arteta. But the problem with the media is they tend to be very result/outcome orientated when judging these things..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,164 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    surely any player who can play WB can also do a decent job at FB. A lot of players will have very little experience of being a WB as it's not a common system, but they'll all have played plenty of 433 or 442.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    depends on what you are looking for.

    If Amad is the type of player he wants there, or Quenda if you look at Sporting then I don't think either are a fullback.

    Additionally, i think Frimpong is 100% a wingback, and will struggle as a more conventional fullback - and I think Kerkez is suffering for that too.

    And if you buy a fullback that is good at attacking, I don't think you will generally find the offernsive skills needed.

    Nuno Mendes and Alhonso Davies are two of the few players I think would be great at WB for us, but have also shown to be very good fullbacks in a 433 or similar.

    Personally I think United need to be looking at wingers who are good defensively. We have players like Mazraoui and Shaw who can be fullbacks. and I think Dorgu could play fullback far better than Amad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭Caustic


    I had a look back on the highlights last night and in the first half we played some lovely football was really good in parts except on the final bit, a little impatience or understanding between players, mis control by sesko etc.

    It did die off as it always seems to with us but was a decent period at the same time and certainly improving.

    I think Cuhna lost the head a bit (in terms of concentration) as the game went on he was constantly getting blocked and fouled and should have had a few yellows given against players he didn't get, he started great but did fade. But the ref was shocking that first half.

    In reality we didn't give up much in the way of chances but mistakes continue to cost us big.

    We lost our way for a good stretch in the 2nd half and couldn't even get the ball for any decent length as players tired and lost discipline and I again can't understand how so few subs were made, mainoo would have kept the ball better, ugarte would have closed down the ball better then cas, sesko confidence looked shot. I really can't understand it at all



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    i thought Sesko, Mbeumo and Cunha were all quite poor in Saturday. We got into decenet positions, but the final ball and touches were poor. But i would expect them all to do better and put it down to a bad day rather than a bad team/formation/plan etc.

    agree with your view on the game.

    especially in the second half - I felt we were always going to create chances if we calmed down a bit, but we were just a bit too hectic or panicy in both directions imo. Even after the equalizer, I felt we could go on to win it but we played too quickly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭johnnyryan89


    AFCON this year's starts 21st of Dec and the final is January 18th so still gives you some time to do business afterwards for say Mainoo if you can get a CM in and give him a loan for six months.

    Zirkzee another one. Should have came on for Sesko on Saturday. If he can't get a run out when Sesko is playing poor in a game we're losing then try and move him on. Could call him 4th or 5th choice CF at this stage. Cunha and Mount have played there ahead of him and Mbuemo would likely get the nod ahead of him too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭johnnyryan89


    Think no matter when you go for Anderson the quoted price is going to be 9 figures. Shocking that Newcastle left him go without even a sell on clause.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I think the main reason I would go for him in january, similar to Baleba in the summer, is to maybe get a jump on the competition. You won't save any money, but you might just not have to deal with as many other big clubs going for him.

    I think we will try to make a big move for him, Baleba, Wharton or Semenyo in january. may/probably will find all those clubs just unwilling to do any business - but i do reckon we ask the question



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 495 ✭✭GolfPar


    Jonny Evans on MNF.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,406 ✭✭✭caviardreams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 955 ✭✭✭ollkiller


    I know I'm in the minority but I'd love to see Shaw at LWB. He's light years ahead of Dorgu or Dalot in that position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭johnnyryan89


    If the rumours that they're high on Semenyo are true I think they need to get two of those CMs in. I assume he comes in at LWB with Amad on the other side. That's a very attacking WB line who'll almost play as wingers. We'll need to add some athleticism into midfield and maybe look at the CB line too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,263 ✭✭✭kowloonkev


    Semenyo doesn't make sense. Can't keep turning forward thinking players into defenders. Can'tafford any more African players at the moment.

    Simon Harris is monitoring the situation...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    disagree.

    1. its the key to making this work - can't keep doing a thing we have done… once. while really needing two options of that type in the squad, imo.
    2. AFCON 2027 is a summer tournement. So while AFCON 2029 would have the january issue it would be a problem I am more than willing to ignore for 4 years.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I think we need those two CMs no matter what we do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,263 ✭✭✭kowloonkev


    Bruno has also been moved backwards and expected to have defensive instincts he simply doesn't have.

    Shaw is now a permanent centre back despite his best attributes are generally going forward.

    I suppose it's different anyway. We'd want to have City levels of control of games to make Amad and Semenyo not massive weaknesses at wing back. It'd probably work to a point, but coming up against elite teams in really big games it's suicide.

    Simon Harris is monitoring the situation...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I think that should be the goal though, but the midfield balance will need to change, with two more capable and athletic CMs to help it work.

    You then have two wingers, a striker, and two attacking midfides - alongside 3 defenders and 2 defensive minded/capable midfielders. in terms of numbers…. is that wrong? In a 433 you would likely have two wingers, a striker and two attack minded midfielderds?

    And then yeah, vs the best sides you then maybe still need to adjust, dropping out one of the more attacking players for a more fullback coded 'wing back' - but that is basically what Amorim did at Sporting. Wingers at Wing Back when looking to be offensive, fullbacks at Wingback when he wanted to go defensive.

    As it is, right now, imo Amorim only has one attacking player for wing back - maybe Dorgu gets there (I think positionally he 'gets it' but lacks quality) but you aren't getting the offensive side out of Mazraoui or Dalot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 576 ✭✭✭Seattle


    I do think Shaw will most likely be used at LWB if Martinez gets back up to speed soon. 1 game week for 60 mins, you'd imagine he should be able for it.

    Imo he hasn't moved Shaw from LCB this season because he's the only player he trusts in there position right now. That'll change if Martinez comes back and is ok after his injury.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 576 ✭✭✭Seattle


    It's be interesting to hear whether Amorim thinks playing Shaw LWB significantly increases his risk of injury, or whether his previous injuries were as a result of different reasons. I don't think he's ever been asked that.

    I don't think Shaw would have the legs to allow him get up and down the line as well as he once could, but I do find it hard to imagine a more conservative version of him being worse there than Dalot or Dorgu.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭Caustic


    Shaw has been great the last two games at lcb, our best defender, really aggressive pressing when stepping out, won numerous balls doing so, has started plenty of attacks and also played some lovely line breaking passes,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,341 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    I don't understand the point/logic about not signing Semenyo because we will at times face top teams?

    That is why you have a squad of players…

    Despite what Slot says you are in fact allowed to change your team and adapt your team depending on the opposition i.e Amad and Semenyo don't need to be the starting wide players if we play City, Arsenal, Pool etc..

    We could go more attacking if needed and play both.
    Or play 1, or play none.
    Play more defensive more traditional full back there if worried about defending

    I don't see the issue tbh
    I just see the team having more high quality options that improve our options



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,173 ✭✭✭NITRO95


    But if we sign Semenyo we won't be able to sign Hakimi or switch to a 442 for the new manager that is definitely coming and changing the whole set up



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,899 ✭✭✭keeponhurling


    United started the same first 11 in the past two league games v Forest and Brighton.

    According to ChatGPT the last time this happened was in 2021 under Rangnick.

    This must be seen as a positive thing. Lack of stability has killed United in the last few years, especially in the defence. So Shaw will probably stay in the team as long as he's fit.

    In particular, it must be nice for the newer players to be coming into a stable team and playing in their best positions!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭Caustic


    I could be very wrong but seymendo very much looks like a guy who likes being a main player in the team and getting on the ball a lot, if and when he gets his move away from bouremouth I'd imagine it'll be to a team that wants him as an attacker, not sure he would fancy being a wing back at united and having to do all the running back required in a wing back role.

    I do think he is a sensational player and probably would have been on my list of summer signings but the more I watch of him he does seem to do a lot of his best work with space and counter attacking so probably wasn't suited as one of our 10s.

    So probably would be a great wing back and I know everyone on the bouremouth team works hard but I just don't see him wanting the role, but it would be a lot of fun if it happens for sure



Advertisement