Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1158815891591159315941853

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,702 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Respectfully, there was no comparison to the contributions between Prendergast and Crowley in attack. Prendergast was a key contributor to multiple attacks, Crowley just wasn't. Both tries after he came on, happened without his input. Things flowed through Prendergast in a way they haven't to date with Crowley. You can't claim he made significant contributions, when nothing he did lead to anything. Neither his passes,nor his break produced any extended attacking sequences. We saw him struggle again vs Italy when he was given the start, and yesterday.

    Whether it's a function of our poor attack, or something in himself, Crowley has struggled to lead the offense. For all his issues, Prendergast was better as a fulcrum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,758 ✭✭✭ersatz


    people talking about Ireland doing very well for 60 minutes and being ahead are tripping. We were defensively very good in the first half when NZ were shambolic. I dont think I’ve ever seen NZ crumble and make so many mistakes before, granted Ireland disrupted their game very well. 13 points from that is a very, very poor return. Yes, it’s the first game, and we missed Beirne enormously. But I couldn’t see what our strategy was to score, no out the back passes, brief periods of a short passing game (worked ok) and then a lot of incoherent, inaccurate and aimless kicking, box kicks, grubbers, chips, etc. so lots of tactics but it wasn’t clear to me that their was a gameplan that the team were playing to. A lot of poor decisions and execution flowed from that.
    mcCloskey was great but what is the point in bringing in. a 32 year old now? Problems all over the field Lineout shambles, scrum penalties go lór. Bad start and definitely going backwards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭darkened_scrum


    When the starting 10 was that poor it's hard not to talk about it TBF.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,881 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    Except he wasn't 'that poor'. He was average. Considering we had poor set piece with a malfunctioning lineout, scrum not in great shape, pedestrian backs and a 13 who passed once, average wasn't 'that poor' a performance all things considered.

    If he's 'that poor' with a decent platform then it's a whole other conversation, I'd agree.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭darkened_scrum


    Oh it's all Garry Ringrose's, a player who plays 2 positions outside Crowley, fault of course. You know how this works right? The 10 serves the players outside him, not the other way around. Maybe Ringrose didn't pass because of the garbage being served up to him?

    He was rubbish. His kicking from hand was straight up 0/10 and he created absolutely nothing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,598 ✭✭✭OldRio


    I salute you Sir for trying to move the conversation on. Alas..................



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 689 ✭✭✭CONSI


    Overall a poor performance, did well to manage the red card but losing Beirne was costly and having to bring in henderson earlier than planned didnt help. Set piece is becoming a joke now a days, teams are happy to give us lineouts and wait for us to balls it up or compete against us. A lot of the players looked underplayed, because they have been this season, appreciate the lions tour but other countries have had lions back playing for weeks now. 12 day jolly in the USA didnt prepare the team for this game. Personally I hate these "glamour" games away during the autumn series, both unions must have been well paid for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,003 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    I was surprised how much of a different impression I got of the Beirne incident between the two camera angles. In the side-on shot it looks as if Barrett just runs into him and I was thinking does Beirne actually have to get out of the way or what? But then in the other angle it looks as if Beirne steps into it enough to look as if he's at least deliberately blocking him. And it's direct to the head and his arm is in a braced position and there's enough force to see Barrett thrown to the ground.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    All of which overlooks the fact that, as a team, we kicked significantly more frequently when Crowley was on the pitch as it coincided with Marcus Smith moving to full back. You can ignore that if you want but that is all part of the context. And that tactic worked really well, fwiw.

    But ultimately this…

    Respectfully

    …is all I was asking for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,074 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Whatever about the rules, I admired Barrett saying he was gutted for Beirne and he didn't believe there was any intention to harm him. Also said he'd try to advocate for Beirne in the disciplinary hearing this week.

    That's my biggest problem with Kiwis. They're just so bloody sound, you can't even hate them. It's maddening!

    Post edited by El_Duderino 09 on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Post edited by Lost Ormond on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35 geoff2204


    think crowley wasn't that bad.

    Big limitation is personnel in the team. We were absolutely beasted at the breakdown and we don't have athletes in the backs to punish mistakes like NZ do. Player for player there is a big gulf and we are lying to ourselves if we can't see that. It's not a selection thing either. There are no glaring omissions that would instantly improve the team. I think this is just where we are now for the next few years. 3rd in northern hemisphere and 5th /6th in world. Adjust expectations please.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Moving on to next week; the McCloskey injury is really frustrating. I had hoped for four big weeks from him, and maybe he grabs that jersey.

    I think, frustratingly, he's going to keep a lot of the same players in the saddle for this one, but hope we'll see some changes.

    This is the 23 I'd like to see:

    (15-9,1-8):

    Jimmy O'Brien, Tommy O'Brien, Tom Farrell, Jamie Osborne, Jacob Stockdale, Jack Crowley, Craig Casey, Paddy McCarthy, Ronan Kelleher, Tom Clarkson, James Ryan, Tadhg Beirne (assuming no suspension), Ryan Baird, Nick Timoney, Caelan Doris

    Reps: Gus McCarthy, Jack Boyle, Finlay Bealham, Tom Ahern, Jack Conan, Caolin Blade, Sam Prendergast, Garry Ringrose

    Assuming McCloskey is injured

    With the following side facing Spain:

    Michael Lowry, Robert Baloucoune, Jude Postlethwaite, Dan Kelly, Shayne Bolton, Harry Byrne, Ben Murphy, Michael Milne, Tom Stewart, Tom O'Toole, Evan O'Connell, Darragh Murray, Alex Soroka, Ruadhan Quinn, David McCann

    Reps: Lee Barron, Alex Usanov, Scott Wilson, Diarmuid Mangan, Sean Jansen, Fintan Gunne, Jack Murphy, Zac Ward

    Assuming James Culhane is injured



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,687 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35 geoff2204


    I don't see how you you could have more Irish in a combined xv. Yes I think England are probably a better team now. They definitely have way more depth. That is borne out by the bookies odds too. I know its not what we want to hear but it's the truth objectively.

    I am not saying we can never beat these teams if we get things right and there always improvements to be made. We don't have the depth of talent of some of our closest competitors.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Gerry Thornley article from this morning says:

    Stuart McCloskey’s performance was a positive – “he was a handful, wasn’t he?” agreed Farrell – but the Ulster centre will probably be ruled out of next week’s game against Japan, and perhaps for even longer, with a groin injury. The trip home effectively makes it a six-day turnaround, which will probably lead to fresh legs being brought in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,087 ✭✭✭50HX


    Yeah rinse & repeat, it'll be sorted & collapse again this time nxt year or 6N 27 or more worryingly at rwc 27

    Honestly if POC was in any other international set up he'd be gone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    POC clearly isn't coaching them to do what they did on the first lineout for example, but we are in dire need of a change there. Just said it in the match thread, it's depriving us of a primary attacking platform for far too long now. Couple that with Goodman being known for his set-piece launch plays, which we just can't run off lineout now.

    Even when we are securing our own lineouts, it's not quality ball and that extra half-second makes all the difference. It seems to be in their heads at the moment too; I'm sure everyone watching was tentative going into the first lineout, and then that happens. POC has to be replaced at this point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 432 ✭✭Tommysocks11


    Not worried about lineout, its been brutal for 3 or 4 years now, we cough up 3 or 4 per game, and our scrum is always seems to be under pressure



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    In fairness, no one is scapegoating anyone - saying player X had a bad game is not the same as player X cost us the match. 80% of the team was so flat that there's plenty of blame to go around

    The 10 debate is going to keep going for a number of reasons, but primarily because it's such a pivotal position and we don't have a clear first choice or a proven test level player. Like, Dan Sheehan was pretty poor on Saturday but we know he's probably the best hooker in the game so we can hope it was a once-off. Ringrose was absolutely appalling but he's got years and years of quality performances behind him. We can't say anything remotely similar for any of our options at 10.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 432 ✭✭Tommysocks11


    Exactly we need new blood, nothing against ringrose but as u say all he seems to do is go for the big defensive hit, his creativity is poor, he is very bad to bring his wingers into play preferring to go himself usually, I'm not saying to discard him totally but give someone else a chance at outside center



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,087 ✭✭✭50HX


    Ah come on, Baird had a great end to last season, had a stop start season at the beginning last year but has put in excellent club performances since then.

    He warrants his position at present & is showing signs of becoming a leader on lineout calls.

    Its up to him to keep his standards up...i don't see another 6 who has shown anything of the consistency he is starting to show....Ahern needs to put a club run together before being considered imo but thats not a pre requisite of Farrell as shown by other selections...thats just my own opinion.

    The others you've mentioned have plenty of credit in the bank.

    There's alot of knee jerk reaction to Sat.

    If it was game 4 of the series & we were to play again I'd fancy us...NZ were there for the taking & a more cohesive team would have performed much better.

    Lets wait til all games are played



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭longjohn200


    Things are never as good as they seem, and never as bad. I expected ireland to lose that game. If you didn't, you are deluded..

    Imo, Jury is still out on TOB to take over the mantle on the right wing. Hard worker but maybe not international quality. I will be keen to see how Balacoune goes against Spain.

    Looking forward to seeing Farrell at 13, offers a real attacking treat in the 13 channel.

    Stockdale has rediscovered his confidence, so excited to see him go. He still looks as though he lost that edge of pace since he broke into the irish team. Injuries taking there toll I imagine.

    Shame for McCloskey and the injury. Looked dominant and dangerous on each carry. Haven't seen Mccloskey look as aggressive at the line in a long time.

    I think Harry bryne has to jump prendergast in the pecking order.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,002 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Baird was the best Irish forward on the pitch.

    Honestly, what game were you watching?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    We already know Crowley is a proven test player based on the 2024 6N and how he played in SA that summer.

    We really don't know that, and it's abundantly clear that Andy Farrell didn't either.

    We had 5 22 entries, same amount as NZL managed. Maybe the question needs to be rather than the 10 why are we only winning 69% of our lineouts despite having 6 test lions in our pack and then why is our ruck clear out and protection so poor…maybe instead of making excuses let’s actually fix these problems, you could bring Sexton back in at 10…it’s not going to help our test lions win their lineouts and it’s not going to help them clear out and secure ruck ball.

    That's literally what I said, so I've no idea what the 'making excuses' bit is about. I literally said that no one player cost us the match and that 80% of them were flat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    His kicking from hand is tragic 

    I mean, literally his previous game before this (Leinster), which went a long way towards forcing his selection for this game, his kicking from hand was excellent.

    It didn't go well for him here, but that doesn't mean his kicking from hand is "tragic".

    "Created absolutely nothing" isn't completely accurate either. In the lead up to our try, he did really well, going blindside and offloading to Sheehan for huge inroads, from which Ireland get a penalty, which he kicks to 5m, and we score our try off the resulting lineout.

    One of only 3 offloads all day fwiw. And the linebreak stat has been updated to 2 (vs NZ's 6, for example, off more carries).

    It's also way more difficult to manufacture a linebreak when your carriers aren't punching holes and commiting defenders as effectively as the opposition (Ireland's post-contact metres were less than half of NZ's 157, vs 320).

    That's all part of the context. It was definitely an issue but it can't all be pinned on Crowley.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 864 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    I am far more concerned with our backs than our pack. Despite the issues with lineout we had parity up front in terms of possession and territory, its how we used it that bothered me most.

    Up front I was happy to see Baird deliver a good performance and Paddy McCarthy looked promising. Agree with everyone that the lineout needs a big fix asap.

    Big issues at 10 and 13 and no obvious replacements for me. Farrell and Goodman will need some serious chats about what we are trying to do. Henshaw, Aki, McCloskey and Farrell all in the wrong age bracket regardless of form and we could do with blooding a couple of options but not very fair on guys to be bringing them into a tactical **** show.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,598 ✭✭✭OldRio




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,598 ✭✭✭OldRio


    I never mentioned the lineout. You said 'we don't need replacements in either position' So I will ask again. Are you happy with the present incumbent of the number 13 Jersey?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭darkened_scrum


    Is Hansen out for the whole series?



Advertisement
Advertisement