Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1158815891591159315941848

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,385 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    He was excellent in the URC Final.

    I don’t think he’s the finished article at all, and tbh, on current form if Leinster had a must win game tomorrow I’d prefer Harry Byrne starting, but Prendergast had lots of excellent performances last season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,562 ✭✭✭✭phog


    is his elite passing enough to ignore his defensive frailties and his tendency to throw an intercept pass



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,642 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    It may be. Is Crowley's inability to kick effectively, or manage a backline worth ignoring? I think of the two of them, Prendergast has more upside to his game, when he's playing well, and he's better at building an attack around. He gets more involved on the ball than Crowley does.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    I’m struggling to think of Crowley’s last big performance for Ireland. He already has 28 appearances for Ireland including (15 starts) so has a good bit of experience at this stage in his career so being dropped for 5 games last season seems like a weird excuse by some to explain his lack of quality performances for Ireland.

    I find it bizarre how some posters refuse to consider the fact that he wasn’t performing particularly well last year and was dropped as a result. He’s been very good for Munster this season and has got the last two meaningful starts against Italy in the 6N and deservedly against NZ but needs to start putting in performances in green otherwise Farrell will drop him again.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,865 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Maybe, maybe not. Clearly not for now and that is why he has been dropped



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    So where was this attack that was being run against Munster? A lineout maul and a consolation try is the attack? The main problem is, Andy is a defence coach coaching attack. I've no doubt that Crowley and the rest of the players were trying to run whatever scheme he told them to, but I didn't see anything to suggest the coach has a cohesive attacking plan.

    The Lions series win wasn't really all that big a deal considering how England smashed Australia yesterday. In fact you could say they probably under performed with the talent they had.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 889 ✭✭✭darkened_scrum


    Crowley was rubbish yesterday. His kicking from hand is tragic and as the main playmaker in the team, he created absolutely nothing (zero line breaks for the team in the entire game).

    I can pretty well remember the multi-month long meltdown from Munster supporters last season at his dropping, and then he goes and puts in a performance like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,280 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    I’d be willing to forgive defensive frailties at 10 if the rest was right. That’s not the main job there, in my ignorant opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 361 ✭✭big-al


    How did Prendergast perform

    When he was on.


    people need to accept that these are two fairly average 10’s and then we go from there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,990 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    He was really good off the bench against England. And good off the bench vs Australia.

    He was really good in the first half against Argentina.

    He was excellent in Marseille.

    I’m sure there are more (particularly in his first 6 Nations).

    In short, he has had quality performances for Ireland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,280 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    I must say I was impressed how we bottled NZ up and came through the Beirne card. We remain cohesive in defence and could still spring a surprise on a top team but we need a new star or two in the back line. Our lineout is a big worry. That should be something we can sort out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 597 ✭✭✭Piskin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,642 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    No arguments from me about the quality of Leinster and Ireland's attack. They're both substandard and players are suffering for it. Prendergast can take a share of the criticism for his performances this season for Leinster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,642 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Can we stop peddling the lie that he made any meaningful contributions Vs England. We can speak of his merits without making stuff up



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,990 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    People really need to learn the difference between "lie" and "difference of opinion"…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,000 ✭✭✭almostover


    I think the whole Jack vs. Sam thing is a natural reaction to the fact that neither are Sexton and both are very unlikely to ever be as good as him. That's fine too, if one or preferably both of them, can improve the weaknesses in their game and become an high standard international fly half then we'll be fine.

    There have been plenty of teams who've been successful without a superstar at 10. We have a weird obsession in Irish rugby with the fly half position.

    Dan Carter himself or prime Wilkinson could have played 10 for Ireland yesterday and we still would have lost. A shambles of a lineout and a weak scrum can't be overcome by the fly half alone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 889 ✭✭✭darkened_scrum


    Dan Sheehan had more impact at 10 than Crowley did. The most bizarre case of reflected glory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,642 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    If you're saying he made a meaningful contribution to the winning of that match, by all means, provide evidence. It's been done to death. He played no part in the tries after he came on, didn't make any significant number of passes. Saying he did otherwise, in the face of amply supplied proof to contrary, is pushing a false narrative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,990 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    All of which is predicated on the notion that unless a 10 has a direct involvement in a try, he can’t have played well…

    Plenty of pundits had him in their team of the week, from his cameo. Presumably they’re all in on the “lie” as well? It’s rubbish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭50HX


    Didnt take long for chatter to spin back around to the 10 debate....it'll never end until Harry Byrne takes the top spot😁



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,642 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    If he wasn't involved in creating the tries, what exactly did he do of significance then? He made one nice break down the left wing that came to nothing, from memory. I suppose he kicked the conversions. Back up your assertion with some evidence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    And you agree that Sam's attack scored zero points against the Stormers? And that some players from that team are capped? I feel like I need to use baby steps..

    What metric did Andy use to justify picking these guys?

    Their personalities?

    The Force?

    I think Andy needs to read this, it's nice and short with no big words.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Moved_My_Cheese%3F



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,642 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Did I miss where Prendergast started yesterday? He has been dropped because he's not playing well. I've not been happy that Farrell has picked lads out of form, perhaps you missed that in your wild leap to conclusions there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,280 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    After yesterday I’d have concerns way beyond 10. Even Sheehan has work to do (with the other forwards) to sort out the lineout immediately and JGP had a mediocre performance by his own lofty standards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,280 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    It’s like a stage of grief. Somewhere between denial and anger the provincial rivalries creep in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 904 ✭✭✭HanShotFirst


    I don’t think I am. But ok. I treat concussions seriously.
    I didn’t say you didn’t know of, or about concussion.
    I wish you and your wife well.

    Sincerely



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,990 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I did exactly all of this, in reply to yourself at the time, AT - see below - so I don't suppose another 9 months is gonna chance your opinion.

    Here's 2 broader points

    • Your "meaningful contribution / came to nothing" is such flawed logic. By way of example, say a world-class 13 puts in a world-class offload to put a winger away, but the winger fumbles it. By your logic, this came to nothing, so wasn't a meaningful contribution to the result, so therefore is largely irrelevant when assessing the individual performance of said 13. It's completely flawed.
    • But more importantly, I'm not "lying" any more than you are here. We just disagree. But you'll note I haven't accused you of lying.

    Post edited by aloooof on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,069 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I think the whole Jack vs. Sam thing is a natural reaction to the fact that neither are Sexton 

    I think this is right. We also went from Humphreys to ROG to Sexton so we had quality options at 10 for over 20 years and maybe subconsciously we assume that, well, we must have one now, and so if it’s not Prendergast it must be Crowley or vice versa. As of now, that doesn’t look a great bet

    We might be in for a lean few years if one of these guys can’t improve significantly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,477 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    In fairness we've already won a 6Ns title with Crowley at 10 and a Triple Crown with Prendergast at 10 so if that is what a few lean years look like then as someone who remembers the bad old days in the 90s only too well I'd suggest that isn't too bad at all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,069 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Fair point, and I don’t need reminding of the 90s, I lived every mediocre moment of it.

    I celebrated the Triple Crown of 2004 like it was the birth of my first child, but the 2025 version barely registered with me (like the birth of my last child). Our expectations have moved on massively and let’s be honest, the last 18 months haven’t blown us away. I’m not blaming either Crowley or Prendergast for that but if we want a ten who can drive a team on to victory, I’m not seeing it from either one yet. SP is still only 22 and JC only 25 so its not time to panic yet.



Advertisement
Advertisement