Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1158215831585158715881641

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,513 ✭✭✭Miley Byrne


    Balacoune is 28 now. I don't think there is any scenario where he finally manages to force his way into Farrell's plans at this stage of his career. He is decent, but I can't help feeling he has always been just missing something to make the leap to International Rugby.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    We were far from perfect come the Aus game, but the NZ was particularly notable for the sheer amount of errors; handling errors, penalty count, missed tackles, turnovers conceded, scrum and lineout issues. I'd go as far as saying it was our poorest performance in years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,245 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    I hope we can keep it close.

    Always watch the quids, Lilly. I don’t say they mean everything, but watch them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    NZ have named their side:

    (15-9,1-8):

    Will Jordan, Leroy Carter, Quinn Tupaea, Jordie Barrett, Caleb Clarke, Beauden Barrett, Cam Roigard, Ethan de Groot, Codie Taylor, Fletcher Newell, Scott Barrett, Fabian Holland, Simon Parker, Ardie Savea, Peter Lakai

    Reps: Samisoni Taukei'aho, Tamaiti Williams, Pasilio Tosi, Josh Lord, Wallace Sititi, Cortez Ratima, Leicester Fainga'anuku, Damian McKenzie



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭almostover


    That 23 is as good as we can put out at the moment. Worrying lack of pace in the outside backs, I feel we will have to monster their set piece and ruck to win this game. Big game for both number 10s, hopefully Jack will put us in pole position over the first 60mins and Sam can then come on and steer the ship home. However, I see NZ as strong favourites for this game.

    Only disappointment is Henderson on the bench. Need to move on from him. McCarthy is a loss in this regard but I'd rather the 4th choice lock wasn't Henderson. Need to get Izuchukwu and Tom Aherne up to speed so we can jettison Henderson. Another option that would have been available right now would have been to bring Gavin Coombes and have him bench. Baird could move to lock then and Coombes to back row. But I'm a broken record now on the Coombes thing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,056 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    If anything demonstrates the nonsense set up of the Champions Cup these days, it is this.

    By this point of the season, irrespective of Lion's Tours, Ireland Summer Tours, development tours or anything else, senior players would have played at least two rounds of pool stage Heineken Cup games by now, as well as at least one major derby.

    That the Ireland Men's squad are going into this game colder than a butcher's freezer has a lot to do with that.

    As a Leinster fan, even I wouldn't have picked that many of our players to start against New Zealand. As a squad and as individuals, we are in shocking order.

    If Joe Schmidt said to Rob Kearney 9 years ago 'you need a good one this week Robbie', I'd be saying the same thing tonight to Ryan Baird, Van der Flier, Gibson-Park, Ringrose, Furlong and a few others.

    These two week in the U.S. had better have been spent pulling up trees and looking some unpleasant truths square in the eye, because if they haven't, we're gonna get pasted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,571 ✭✭✭daithi7


    Thanks for sharing AT, I really enjoyed that 'preview/ IrlvNZ look back' video, all 52+minutes of it.

    Totally stoked now, can't wait for the game - Gwan Ireland!!



  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 9,204 ✭✭✭fitz


    Think we can get at that front row in the set piece, and that back row isn't vintage. Savea is still class but not as consistently standout as he was a couple of years ago.

    I think it all depends on whether we rock up with accuracy and intensity. If we do, I reckon we can exploit their defense. If we're fumbling things, it's gonna be a tough day.

    Edit: also, happy to see McCloskey start, he's been in good form for a year, despite Ulster's woes, and would be good to see him carry hard through contact and bring a bit more physicality than we've seen from Henshaw of late.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I was very impressed by Simon Parker as the Rugby Championship evolved - old school blindside, hits hard, carries hard. Peter Lakai is a bit more of a wildcard though, great athleticism but can drift in and out of games IMO.

    Cam Roigard is a huge difference maker for them - his running and kicking games are so good. Quinn Tupaea, especially if he brings his form from the end of the RC, is a good call over Billy Proctor too. He's extremely direct and physical.



  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 9,204 ✭✭✭fitz


    Agree on most of that, though I'd say Parker is in the solid but unremarkable category for me. Has some big moments, but I don't think he's a game-changer.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,772 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    In general yes, but TOB is properly rapid. Real difference making (if he can stay fit) in that way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,631 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    It's pretty close to our strongest side I think. Of the injured players (Tyrel Lomax, Tupou Vaa’i, Noah Hotham, Emoni Narawa, Ollie Norris, Ofa Tu’ungafasi, Asafo Aumua, Stephen Perofeta, Timoci Tavatavanawai, Patrick Tuipulotu) only Lomax and Vaa'i are probably First XV.

    Good luck to Irish fans - I watch more soccer than rugby these days, but will watch this game. Probably delayed coverage as there doesn't seem to be a lot of viewing options. I have no real idea about the Irish team form anymore, will see how the game unfolds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I'm pretty concerned about our ability in the air, tbh. Remembering back, Will Jordan was pretty imperious against us last year and that was when we had Keenan (and indeed Hansen) on the pitch, who'd rate ahead of our starters this time round.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,644 ✭✭✭Quitelife


    12 from Leinster starting - only 2 from Munster ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,316 ✭✭✭50HX




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 26,592 ✭✭✭✭phog




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,239 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I think he could still be excellent for Ireland if given the chance. He was very good Vs South Africa, in a game where we did absolutely nothing to put him in space with the ball. I know the criticism is that he should find work, but there should be blame shouldered by the coach that doesn't gameplan to maximise opportunities for his most dangerous attackers. Farrell was wrong to dump him, especially given he brought Stockdale into camp.

    If TOB can finally get his chance to show his quality, so could he.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 495 ✭✭HanShotFirst


    Completely agree on Baloucoune. Injuries have prevented him from showing Farrell how wrong he was.
    He has time yet.

    I would still pick Hansen myself and Lowe.

    What am I missing about Lowe? He seems to be getting a bit of grief from fans. Like there is no way Stockdale should be starting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,239 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I suppose the question with Lowe is whether his game will hold up for 2 years. He's never been particularly fast, so there's probably not going to be a massive drop off there, but is that going to be enough to have him be picked over a younger lad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,245 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    I thought our QF performance against NZ was first rate, albeit crushingly disappointing, but even then Lowe’s lack of pace against the very best was exposed and things haven’t improved since. In that regard it’s better to face NZ than SA first so we can assess how best to cope with our slow back line.

    Post edited by Ardillaun on

    Always watch the quids, Lilly. I don’t say they mean everything, but watch them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,239 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    We have some promising prospects available, but Farrell will have to be willing to potentially give up some of Lowe, and Hansen's, playmaking. He's still picking Aki, despite him looking like he's doing a Ross Byrne tribute trying to turn and chase in defense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 495 ✭✭HanShotFirst


    ok. Yes he’s not in the side for pace but fair question.
    2 years time is not a reason to drop him now in fairness. Not like he’s blocking an outstanding candidate.
    Maybe Hansen ends up there and it’s whoever is standing from O’Brien, Baloucone, Nash, Kilgallen, Larmour, Bolton …for 14 come the World Cup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭ersatz


    That's the real problem with moving on from those two on the wings, both come in field very comfortably and add another dimension to our game. It's not something that a lot of other wingers in the picture have and likely means we will change the way we play over the next few years.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,813 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    He has at least dropped the absolutely mediocre Henshaw.

    He's never going to jettison both Henshaw and Aki in one go in a game against NZ, and I think the right player has lost his spot here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,239 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I'd take Aki too, but I question the purpose of having him on the bench. McCloskey isn't a player who needs subbing off, and Aki is only good at 12. Not a fan of it at all.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,813 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I've always said Farrell's love of having a player who can only play centre at 23 is nonsensical but it is what it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,356 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Why? Stockdale has been playing very well lately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭almostover


    Not to mention a centre who really only plays at 12.

    Crowley to cover 15, Osborne 14 & 11, Aki for 13 & 12.

    The issue isn't Aki per se, its the fact that both other replacements in the backs also only cover 1 position.

    That can be the attraction of benching Crowley, he can play 10, 12 and 15. Allows Farrell to pick a centre then in 23 shirt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    For a long time I thought it was simply a feature of we didn't have a lot of high quality options in the back three, and he rated all three of Henshaw, Aki and Ringrose really highly so wanted them all in the 23, but increasingly it kind of baffles me too.

    To have two guys there, McCloskey and Aki, who both really only play 1 position is nonsensical to me. Any injury in the backs (except to McCloskey) will require a big rejig of positions in any scenario.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 55,813 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Yea but in all these scenarios, an injury to any back 3 player means we have to change our 10.

    This is nonsense IMO.

    And to be frank and not wanting to start an argument, it means bringing on a 10 who IMO is really not in a great place right now. I want to see Crowley at 10 for the overwhelming majority of this game.

    I don't think Aki has 13 in the tank any more to be honest either, but at least that change wouldn't require a lot of messing about.



Advertisement