Israel/Palestine Thread

These are the report's recommendations.

report

71. Recalling her previous recommendations, the Special Rapporteur reminds all States of their legal obligation not to participate in or be complicit with Israeli violations, and to instead prevent and address serious breaches of international law, particularly as set out in the UN Charter and Genocide Convention.

72. Given the enduring emergency unaddressed by current “peace” discussions and plans, the Special Rapporteur urges States to cause no further harm to the Palestinian people and to:

(a) Exert pressure for a complete and permanent ceasefire and full withdrawal of Israeli troops;

(b) Take immediate steps to end the siege in Gaza, including deploying naval and land convoys to ensure safe humanitarian access and mobile housing before winter;

(c) Support the re-opening of Gaza’s international airport and port to facilitate aid delivery.

73. Beyond the emergency, States must recognize Palestinian self-determination and justice as essential to lasting peace and security, and therefore:

(a) Suspend all military, trade and diplomatic relations with Israel;

(b) Investigate and prosecute all officials, corporates and individuals involved in or facilitating genocide, incitement, crimes against humanity and war crimes and other grave breaches of international humanitarian law;

(c) Secure reparations, including full reconstruction and return;

(d) Cooperate fully with the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice;

(e) Reaffirm and strengthen support to UNRWA and the UN system as a whole;

(f) Suspend Israel from the United Nations under Article 6 of the UN Charter;

(g) Act under “Uniting for Peace”, in line with General Assembly resolution 377(V), to ensure that Israel dismantles its occupation.

74. The Special Rapporteur also urges trade unions, lawyers, civil society and ordinary citizens to monitor States’ actions in response to these recommendations, and to continue to press institutions, governments and corporations for boycotts, divestments and sanctions, until the end of the Israeli illegal occupation and related crimes.

You’re the useful idiot or shill though!

You posted this piece of Hamas sponsored propaganda a while back.

Either you didn’t fact check, and eagerly rushed to regurgitate a piece Hamas disinformation, the very definition of a ’Useful Idiot’, or, you were aware that it was bunkum and chose to post it anyway, effectively shilling for Hamas.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-harvard-study-gaza-missing-palestinians-86b40dc1de388e860927495c00880d59

The tag claxon must have gone off.

When the ceasefire was announced, it was met with universal disapproval and outrage on here. NO WAY the Palestinians should be forced to accept it, yada, yada, yada.

Immediately after it was accepted, the same crowd were on claiming the exact same deal as a massive defeat for Israel.

BTW I see the more inventive of the online anti-semitics are now claiming that Israel is somehow responsible for the war in Sudan, so I guess that’ll be getting a bump on here soon from the ’I’m not anti-semitic, but here’s another BS news article portraying Israel in a bad light’ brigade.

Criticism of Israel/IDF is not criticism of all Jewish people, not sure how many times it needs to be said.

If you really believe that you can lump all Jewish people in as one and are exactly the same, it is you who is the antisemitic one.

Does that woman ever mention Hamas, and their contribution to the conflict?

Wait! Turns out she does have a bit to say about them alright!

Unfortunately, it’s all positive.

• In November 2022, Albanese told a Hamas conference: “You have a right to resist.”
• On October 7th, 2023, as the Hamas massacre was still unfolding, Albanese minimized the atrocities by posting: “Today’s violence must be put in context.”

An UN Ambassador shilling for a Jihadist terrorist organisation, egging them on, condoning Oct7th, and still has a job. Says it all really.

Are you saying he didnt post the article?

Disingenuous at best. Nobody was against stopping the indiscriminate bombing of a starving population. People voiced serious concerns that Israel could be trusted to uphold the ceasefire. Legitimate concerns as it turns out. But that wouldn’t suit your narrative.

A video from two years ago that did not foresee the scale of the genocide

Perhaps you’d prefer "The Real Housewifes of Hamas"

She was Massive!

It was absolutely a huge shock to everyone.

It shocked the world in fact!

As an era defining event it’s right up therewith 9/11, Pearl Harbour. A unique moment where the eyes of the world are all focused on one event.

It shocked people in the middle east more than anyone because the belief was that with the progress of the Abraham accords there was slow, steady diplomatic progress taking place between Israel and the Arab nations.

There’s only one kind of person claiming that Oct 7th was nothing to get yer knickers in a twist about.

There was only one bunch of people watching those murders unfolding live and declaring. "Lads, Lads, Lads, context please, context."

The fact that she’s still employed by the UN beggers belief.

You were one of them.

I even pointed out that you would all pivot, and ye did.

Everything, always, has to be framed in the context of Israel, and giving it a ’Black eye’.

That’s why you had posters claiming that the ceasefire was a strategic victory for Hamas, despite the fact that they have to surrender, disarm and go into exile.

"People keep calling out our dumb unsubstantiated bullsh*t, and our smears aren't stopping them.

Rescue us Sheepy with your marginally more eloquent dumb unsubstantiated bullsh*t. Bring your slander attack, its our only hope"